Ashley Pittman, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 22:16:16 +, a écrit :
> I suspect the right thing to do is to from my perspective is to report the
> affinity rather than the cpuset then or rather whichever of the two is most
> restrictive which will be the affinity if it's set and the cpuset if it's
> no
On 15 Feb 2010, at 22:02, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ashley Pittman, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 21:52:29 +, a écrit :
>> On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:46, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I say the commit r1726 which closed #21 and am working on testing this
now, it certainly appears to be what I requested.
>
Ashley Pittman, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 21:52:29 +, a écrit :
> On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:46, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> I say the commit r1726 which closed #21 and am working on testing this
> >> now, it certainly appears to be what I requested.
> >
> > Maybe, depending on whether you want to discov
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:46, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> I'm not sure I follow ticket #12 but I suspect it's the same thing as #21.
>
> No, it's not, really :)
>
> #21 was never meant to limit the discovery to the current binding
> (understand sched_setaffinity) of some process, it was just meant
> t
Ashley Pittman, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 21:39:29 +, a écrit :
> On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:29, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Brice Goglin, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 22:19:33 +0100, a écrit :
> >> hwloc wrote:
> >>> - Add a configuration flag to limit the discovery to the current binding
> >>> of the process
> >
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:29, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Brice Goglin, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 22:19:33 +0100, a écrit :
>> hwloc wrote:
>>> - Add a configuration flag to limit the discovery to the current binding
>>> of the process
>>> Do we still want this for 1.0?
>>
>> I think Ashley wanted the first i
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 22:29:55 +0100, a écrit :
> Brice Goglin, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 22:19:33 +0100, a écrit :
> > hwloc wrote:
> > > - Add a configuration flag to limit the discovery to the current binding
> > > of the process
> > > Do we still want this for 1.0?
> >
> > I think As
Brice Goglin, le Mon 15 Feb 2010 22:19:33 +0100, a écrit :
> hwloc wrote:
> > - Add a configuration flag to limit the discovery to the current binding
> > of the process
> > Do we still want this for 1.0?
>
> I think Ashley wanted the first item when he requested lstopo --pid
> but I may be wr
hwloc wrote:
> The get_cpubind function is already in.
> There are several ways I can see
>
> - Add a configuration flag to limit the discovery to the current binding
> of the process
> - Add a configuration function to limit the discovery to a given cpuset.
> To get the current binding of th
