Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 7:22 AM
To: Roman Danyliw; Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
On 22/03/2022 10:54, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Sue!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Susan Hares
>> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2
On 22/03/2022 10:54, Roman Danyliw wrote:
Hi Sue!
-Original Message-
From: Susan Hares
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:35 PM
To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
Roman:
Security has created very few Yang modules.Therefore, you do not
usan Hares
Cc: Roman Danyliw; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
On Mar 23, 2022, at 13:47, Susan Hares wrote:
>
> Here's the difficulty. IP-SEC knowledge is key to the restructure.
> And so is Yang models. My personal experience in trying to get the
On Mar 23, 2022, at 13:47, Susan Hares wrote:
>
> Here's the difficulty. IP-SEC knowledge is key to the restructure. And so
> is Yang models. My personal experience in trying to get the IP-SEC model
> used by BGP model, is that there are differences between the implementation
> of IPSEC secur
9:51 AM
To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:27 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:27 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> The orchestration in the original charter was seen as "Yang mo
To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
Hi!
What's described below sounds like a great conversation to have. I don't
sufficiently understand the existing gaps of "IP-SEC model[s] us[ing] BGP"
to assess the volume or complexity of future work i
anyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> Good question! By mistake, I responded to just you.
>
> Here's the difficulty. IP-SEC knowledge is key to the restructure. And so
> is Yang
> models. My personal experience
[Again - I am grateful to Paul and Tom Petch]
Just giving you feedback from the trenches.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 6:54 AM
To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:35 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> Security has created very few Yang modules.Therefore, you do not
s at draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-13.txt.
-Original Message-
From: Roman Danyliw [mailto:r...@cert.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 5:03 PM
To: Susan Hares; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behal
lf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 3:12 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> May I ask a questions before answering your questions.
I don't have compr
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 3:12 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> May I ask a questions before answering yo
I2NSF.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:33 PM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
Hi!
It's nice to see I2NSF on the formal meeting agenda again. I see
discussio
Hi!
It's nice to see I2NSF on the formal meeting agenda again. I see discussions
on the mailing list to again revisit the WG charter [3] and it's on the agenda
for this week's IETF 113 meeting. I don't want my position at the meeting to
come as a surprise so I'll restate what I've previously
15 matches
Mail list logo
