Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-24 Thread Rafa Marin-Lopez
Hi Paul: Sorry for the delayed answer. Our answer took us more time than expected preparing. Thank you very much again. Please see our comments inline: > El 22 abr 2019, a las 18:19, Paul Wouters escribió: > > Linda Dunbar wrote: > >> This email starts a four weeks Working Group Last Call

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-24 Thread Rafa Marin Lopez
a.org/form/protocol-assignment >> <https://www.iana.org/form/protocol-assignment> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Linda >> >>   <> >> From: Rafa Marin Lopez [mailto:r...@um.es <mailto:r...@um.es>] >> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 4

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-24 Thread Rafa Marin-Lopez
Hi Linda: > El 21 may 2019, a las 23:02, Linda Dunbar escribió: > > Gabriel and Rofa, > > Just to clarify: the purpose of asking you changing from "container.." to > "grouping.." is for "i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm" to the "ikev2" and > "ietf-ipsec" structure defined in

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-21 Thread Linda Dunbar
example, use “Identity ...” to specify the > value). > > By the way, if you do want to register to IANA, you can send the following > request which can be easily done. > > https://www.iana.org/form/protocol-assignment > > > Cheers, > > Linda > > > *From:* Rafa

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-21 Thread Linda Dunbar
Gabriel and Rofa, Just to clarify: the purpose of asking you changing from "container.." to "grouping.." is for "i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm" to the "ikev2" and "ietf-ipsec" structure defined in draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection. Not other way around, i.e. not asking

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-21 Thread Rafa Marin-Lopez
.@gmail.com>>; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org > <mailto:i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org>; Gabriel Lopez <mailto:gab...@um.es>>; fernando.perenig...@cud.upct.es > <mailto:fernando.perenig...@cud.upct.es> > Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-i

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-20 Thread Gabriel Lopez
..@gmail.com>] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 9:02 AM > To: r...@um.es <mailto:r...@um.es>; Gabriel Lopez <mailto:gab...@um.es>>; fernando.perenig...@cud.upct.es > <mailto:fernando.perenig...@cud.upct.es> > Cc: Linda Dunbar mailto:linda.dun...@huawei.com>>;

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-17 Thread Linda Dunbar
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04 Hi Authors: Rafa, Gabriel, and Fernando, I have a request to let your authors revise i2nsf ipsec draft (draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04) in order to conform to our i2nsf interface data models

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-17 Thread Linda Dunbar
afa Marin Lopez ; Yoav Nir ; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org; Gabriel Lopez ; fernando.perenig...@cud.upct.es Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04 Dear Linda, Yoav: Sorry for the delay in our answer (very busy weeks) The update is taking longer as expec

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-11 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Hi Gabriel, Yes, I think the current ipsec-ietf-ike and ipsec-ietf-ikeless without change will be fine to our I2NSF interfaces after I discuss with my student, Jinyong. Our Registration Interface with capability data model will register into Security Controller whether an NSF can support ipsec or

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-10 Thread Gabriel Lopez
Hi Paul. The ipsec-ietf-ike and ipsec-ietf-ikeless modules are standalone modules that can be used in the facing interface. We do not understand why do you need to include them in the nsf-facing interface data model. The idea of having a data model with all the security services a nfs can

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-09 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Hi Gabriel, we need to make ipsec-ike and ipsec-ikeless be grouping type so that your ipsec module can be imported by our data modules for two ipsec cases. The container type cannot be imported by other data modules. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul 2019년 5월 10일 (금) 오전 1:43, Gabriel Lopez 님이 작성: >

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-09 Thread Gabriel Lopez
Hi Paul. Could you explain what is the purpose of this change? Best regards, Gabi. > El 9 may 2019, a las 16:02, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong > escribió: > > Hi Authors: Rafa, Gabriel, and Fernando, > > I have a request to let your authors revise i2nsf ipsec draft >

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-05-09 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Hi Authors: Rafa, Gabriel, and Fernando, I have a request to let your authors revise i2nsf ipsec draft (draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04) in order to conform to our i2nsf interface data models. For your YANG data module to be used in our NSF-Facing Interface data model through

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-04-22 Thread Paul Wouters
Linda Dunbar wrote: This email starts a four weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04.  This poll runs until May 15, 2019.  If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-04-18 Thread Fernando Pereñíguez García
Dear all: As one of the authors of this document, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Regards, Fernando. El mié., 17 abr. 2019 a las 16:54, Linda Dunbar () escribió: > Hello Working Group, > > > > This email starts a four weeks Working Group Last Call on >

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-04-18 Thread Gabriel Lopez
Dear all. As one of the authors of this document, I am not aware of any IPRs related with it. Regards, Gabi. > El 17 abr 2019, a las 16:54, Linda Dunbar escribió: > > Hello Working Group, > > This email starts a four weeks Working Group Last Call on >

Re: [I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-04-18 Thread Rafa Marin-Lopez
Dear all: As one of the authors of this document, I am not aware of any IPRs related with it. Best Regards. > El 17 abr 2019, a las 16:54, Linda Dunbar escribió: > > Hello Working Group, > > This email starts a four weeks Working Group Last Call on >

[I2nsf] WGLC and IPR poll for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04

2019-04-17 Thread Linda Dunbar
Hello Working Group, This email starts a four weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04. This poll runs until May 15, 2019. Authors: please update the draft per the comments and suggestions from YANG Doctors. We are also polling for knowledge of any