from Policy to PolicyCondition and subclasses.
>
>
>> SecurityTemplate
>>
>> This is a good idea!
>>
>> SecurityCapability, DescribedBySecurityCapabilityDetail, NSF
>>
>> I would change this design.
>>
>> An NSF MAY be described by
gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 02, 2018 10:11 AM
*To:* John Strassner <john.sc.strass...@huawei.com>
*Subject:* Fwd: [I2nsf] updates on the capability models
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Cataldo Basile* <cataldo.bas...@polito.it
<mailto:cataldo.bas...@polito.it&
.@huawei.com<mailto:john.sc.strass...@huawei.com>>;
John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com<mailto:straz...@gmail.com>>
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [I2nsf] updates on the capability models
Sorry for the delay in replying.
First, Aldo is correct – the d
taldo.bas...@polito.it>; John Strassner <john.sc.strass...@huawei.com>; John
Strassner <straz...@gmail.com>
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [I2nsf] updates on the capability models
Sorry for the delay in replying.
First, Aldo is correct – the decorator pattern is used to bot
pdates on the capability models
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cataldo Basile <cataldo.bas...@polito.it<mailto:cataldo.bas...@polito.it>>
Date: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] updates on the capability models
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei
Dear all, as Aldo shared I will do my best to contribute on the suggestions I
made at Singapore and perhaps go to Turin after Xmas to work with Aldo.
Right now I need to study all the background information to be at level first
and I can’t prioritize this work for painful reasons.
Dear Linda,
I may be wrong, but I remember that we discussed a change in the
capability model to avoid sub-classing as a way to obtain different
types of conditions, action, events, etc.
The new model, now under John's review, implements the decorator
pattern, thus avoid sub-classing as
Aldo,
Thank you very much for the update. By the way, the version on data tracker is
still 00, so your update should be 01.
During our side meeting in Singapore among IM/DM authors, you stated that you
don't like explicit listing of the needed attributes for capability, e.g. the
line by line
