Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Linda: I’m going to submit a -version 3 as soon as the IETF draft open again. I will send a version 3 out to the list (in text form) so that people can provide me additional comments. I will ask for any other comments on the list on Monday am? At the meeting, It would be good to go to WG

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Paul: I look forward to getting the SDN use case draft. I’ll add it to the general use case draft as a reference. Did you want to suggest an additional section for the use case drafts. As to my health, I am doing much better. This note comes to you from my airplane as it heads to

Re: [I2nsf] Comyou earlier on this topic: ments/questions about draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases

Gabriel: I believe responded to you before on this topic, but I am resending the information – in case I forgot. Please let me know if the resolution of these comments is ok for you. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel Lopez Sent: Thursday, October

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Linda, Adrian and I2NSF people: It appears I missed Paul’s and Daniels comments for the problem statement/use case. I’ll send my comment resolution to the list today. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:40 PM To:

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Susan, I prefer to add my draft for SDN into the problem statement and use cases draft. I will prepare the text for the additional section before this Saturday's hackathon to discuss with you. Thanks. Paul 2016. 11. 10. 오후 12:12에 "Susan Hares" 님이 작성: > Paul: > > > > I look

Re: [I2nsf] Comments/questions about draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases

Daniel: I believe the 3rd revision will fix most of these problems. I’ve included comments below. I will send the 3rd revision out once I reach the hotel in Seoul Tonight. Please see my comments below. I will await your confirmation on the comments prior to adding new text into