On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:58:48PM -0700, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is a FYI... Carlos Rebassa, a Rap Ceibal volunteer many of us met in
Uruguay has come up with a surprisingly critical complaint about Sugar. He
included a link to an English version, but did not send it to IAEP or
Am 15.06.2011 11:28, schrieb Kevin Mark:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:58:48PM -0700, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is a FYI... Carlos Rebassa, a Rap Ceibal volunteer many of us met in
Uruguay has come up with a surprisingly critical complaint about Sugar. He
included a link to an
As per our discussion at the last SLOBs meeting, I took a crack at
rewriting the Licensing page in the wiki. Please take a look and
comment/edit so that we can formally adopt new language at the next
meeting.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Licensing
regards.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar
/Kevin Mark wrote:
He also talks about using OO4kids with uses a non-sugar dialog box.
That should be fixed with a technological solution.
---
/
Hi, Kevin:
The problem that I was Talking about on the other
i see an apple guy trying to down FLOSS in it's truest form. the olpc is a
key human access to experiencing ingenuity at it's finest...it starts with
self
where apple starts with i and thinks it;s a pod business to make money
with good products that they are now making more affordable accessible
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Kenneth Wyrick k...@caltek.net wrote:
i see an apple guy trying to down FLOSS in it's truest form. the olpc is a
key human access to experiencing ingenuity at it's finest...it starts with
self
Don't shoot the messenger. Carlos is a prolific contributor to our
I Am talking about the problem about the incompatibility between the
Sugarized programs vs the normal linux programs , like the games that
the children wants. There are thousands of programs in Linux that
don't uses the Journal, so there are useless.
This seems to be the common thread between
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
I Am talking about the problem about the incompatibility between the
Sugarized programs vs the normal linux programs , like the games that
the children wants. There are thousands of programs in Linux that
don't uses the
As a new independent learner, there is no question that it is
difficult to learn Sugar but why would someone want to? I want to
because OLPC is on the right track toward the education that should
have been researched, implemented and supported for the last 20 years.
What is amazing is that those
/Walter Bender wrote:
The eventual transition to GNOME 3.0 and PYGI will make a big
difference in our ability to support more interoperability as well.
-/
This is a very good news, Thanks, Walter!
The concerns are much more technical that I was imagining.
I'm really out there on the fringe. I took the liberty of going
through the Sugar manual and leaving out anything that was too
technical for a general overview. There is still a lot of useful and
interesting information about Sugar,
You are showing one of the more commons problems when we talk about the
Journal.
Many times, bugs in activities are perceived like bugs in the Journal.
If one activity is not well sugarized, is a problem in the activity and must
solved.
And from a long time, the default way wen you open one
I'm glad to see all the entries which tells me what they clicked on and if
they didn't create anything then I'm curious to know why. maybe for long
term use there could be a way to sort entries based on size of the entries
or something like that which would put the files with no content near the
Oh! Ok I get that, now. Also, view my comments as a gut level response as
a newbie to this project who is looking for specific constructive dialog
instead of generalities that are easily thrown around.
Maybe it's just me but I replied how I felt as I read what was written.
So, I still want to
There are a option to sort by size, by creation date and by modification
date.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Kenneth Wyrick k...@caltek.net wrote:
I'm glad to see all the entries which tells me what they clicked on and if
they didn't create anything then I'm curious to know why.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Kenneth Wyrick k...@caltek.net wrote:
Oh! Ok I get that, now. Also, view my comments as a gut level response as
a newbie to this project who is looking for specific constructive dialog
instead of generalities that are easily thrown around.
Maybe it's just me
Chris,
Since this seems to be something you have sincere passion about, would you
be willing to simply list/summarize specific points that you see that
Carlos made so we can talk about them point by point to hopefully arrive
at a more succinct overall intention of his communication?
On Wed, Jun
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 15 2011, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Maybe it's just me but I replied how I felt as I read what was written.
So, I still want to know what his purpose is for spending time with the
olpc? Based on what I read, he sees the apple as our competitor. I could
have done without the apple
On 15.06.2011, at 14:03, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 15 2011, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Maybe it's just me but I replied how I felt as I read what was written.
So, I still want to know what his purpose is for spending time with the
olpc? Based on what I read, he sees the apple as our
When the majority of classes are using the
Browse activity (did we hear something like 70-80% ? ) it sounds like it
would be wise to discuss ChromeOS and browser-based applications, possibly
using a modern browser such a Webkit.
I seem to have heard that the current Browse Activity does not
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Kenneth Wyrick k...@caltek.net wrote:
Chris,
Since this seems to be something you have sincere passion about, would you
be willing to simply list/summarize specific points that you see that
Carlos made so we can talk about them point by point to hopefully
1. I believe Carlos raises valid points
2. We need specifics so we can prioritize and address them, So:
1. Let's stop talking in generalities and about volunteer vs
corporate, we are what we are, so let's make the best of it
2. We should work with Carlos (who I find
On Wed, June 15, 2011 7:45 pm, Steve Thomas wrote:
1. I believe Carlos raises valid points
Definitely.
2. We need specifics so we can prioritize and address them,
I asked Carlos to check over our existing documentation and tell us, and
in particular me, what is lacking. I await his
23 matches
Mail list logo
