I don't will reply about your interpretation of our communication, looks
like will not change with anything I can say.
We are trying to make something different this time, we started a survey
already sent to people responsible on deployments, to get more information,
and we are organizing a face
If the current governing documents don't allow mid-term replacements due to
someone resigning or shortages, that might be something worth amending them
to include.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
wrote:
We run elections at the end of each year. If we have
I'm really sorry I didn't understood well your intructions at that time...
Now, my name is on the list ;D
According to your logic, we should run elections when we have enough candidates.
How many additional candidates do we need?
2015-03-10 11:23 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard
Sebastian,
The election was discussed in public SLOB meetings. We made public
decisions with opportunity for public input. If you want to ask the
board to revisit its decisions, that is fine. Please try to be
concrete in your proposal.
regards.
-walter
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:31 PM,
Personally I would be more interested in why groups/organizations don't use
Sugar than what existing deployments are looking for to continue using it.
In order for Sugar to become more than a niche product it is going to have
to accommodate a wider population.
The XO/Sugar/Schoolserver
We run elections at the end of each year. If we have fewer candidates
than slots to fill, we don't run the election. We'll run another
election at the end of 2015.
Regards.
-walter
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Laura Vargas la...@somosazucar.org wrote:
I'm really sorry I didn't understood
Laura,
No election was held because no new candidates stepped forward. If you
were interested in a board seat, why did you not run a board position
when we solicited candidates?
We'll open up for candidates again at the end of 2015.
regards.
-walter
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Laura
Hi Sebastian,
In this specific case, we will keep the replies from the deployments
confidential
and release a general inform with conclusions without naming the deployment
involved.
There are a reason for that, and anybody involved in negotiation with
countries will understand.
Every time than a
Hi Gonzalo,
Regarding the Sugar Labs Board, if no elections are going to me be
made, how do you justify not to rotate the board members with long
time active volunteers? specially those who have shown interest, like
I have
Thanks and I really hope (for the sake of the kids) we can run a
I suppose a committee will be integrated by more than one member, we need
more volunteers.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote:
If Sebastian becomes the Elections Committee which is fine with me, how do
we avoid a more-than-Clintonesque conflict-of-interest with
Thanks Caryl !!
That is what we need, volunteers.
Gonzalo
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All
For heaven's sake! No wonder we are always stalled. If it will help, I'll
do the election. It can't be that much work. I have no conflicts of
Adam,
To your conflict of interest concern and with all the love to my
husband, I can only respond that I believe I have enough skills and
merit by myself.
Best wishes,
Laura V
2015-03-10 13:31 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org:
Well,
It's 2015 and we are all hackers here.
Hi All
For heaven's sake! No wonder we are always stalled. If it will help, I'll do
the election. It can't be that much work. I have no conflicts of interest. What
would I need to do?
Caryl
From: la...@somosazucar.org
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:54:09 -0500
To: sebast...@fuentelibre.org
CC:
Forgot to mention, we also need to get access to memb...@sugarlabs.org,
since I suspect new membership applications have gone stale for a long
time now. (see [1])
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Applying_for_membership
El 10/03/15 a las 15:05, Sebastian Silva escibió:
Hi
14 matches
Mail list logo
