[IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

2016-07-15 Thread Laura Vargas
As of today, July 15 please find saved Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes below. So far, the main strategy is to share, prioritize, fund and execute, a " curated participatory portafolio of projects and project ideas" related to the support and expansion of the Sugar

Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project

2016-07-15 Thread Adam Holt
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Thank you Adam for getting this done! It will be nice to share any > no-confidential documentation with the community so we can all learn from > the experience. > Samson's contract was fully executed (fully legal)

Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project

2016-07-15 Thread Samson Goddy
sure! From: la...@somosazucar.org Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:00:02 -0500 Subject: Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project To: samsongo...@hotmail.com CC: ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; h...@unleashkids.org Thank you Adam for getting this done! It

Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project

2016-07-15 Thread Laura Vargas
Thank you Adam for getting this done! It will be nice to share any no-confidential documentation with the community so we can all learn from the experience. Samson, Have you already started translating? have you set a confortable workflow with your translation partners? Please if possible share

Re: [IAEP] Priority languages to translate Sugar

2016-07-15 Thread Laura Vargas
Thanks Sora for the addition to the list. I hope more Deployments in need of translation get to share their need by adding their idea/proposal to the list. Caryl, The way I see it, Sugarizer like Sugar Network are already part of the Sugar Learning Platform. >From the translation POV, we will

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

2016-07-15 Thread Dave Crossland
On 15 July 2016 at 08:43, Tony Anderson wrote: > A lot of questions. I believe Sebastian Silva would be your best source. > Sure! My email is in reply to his, and I expect he will answer these questions on this list when he has time? :)

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

2016-07-15 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On 15 July 2016 at 04:29, Tony Anderson wrote: > This proposal needs some details. > I agree > ASLO supported many functions including the developer hub, authentication, > and so on. A simple static site that is functionally equivalent is > ambiguous. > Yes. Since

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

2016-07-15 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Dave A lot of questions. I believe Sebastian Silva would be your best source. Tony On 07/15/2016 02:37 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi! On 15 July 2016 at 00:14, Sebastian Silva > wrote: > I am proposing a simple static

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

2016-07-15 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi! On 15 July 2016 at 00:14, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > I am proposing a simple static site that hosts xo bundles, that is > > functionally equivalent to the php5 codebase. > > Aleksey had proposed this: > http://school-network.org/hub/?view=Catalog=activity=featured

Re: [IAEP] Priority languages to translate Sugar

2016-07-15 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On Jul 15, 2016 7:31 AM, "José Miguel García" wrote: > > Hola! > Estoy de acuerdo con Caryl de fortalecer Sugarizer. > Es importante avanzar en función de las disponibilidades de los despliegues, para poder fortalecer a Sugar > A modo de ejemplo, en Uruguay se están

Re: [IAEP] Priority languages to translate Sugar

2016-07-15 Thread José Miguel García
Hola! Estoy de acuerdo con Caryl de fortalecer Sugarizer. Es importante avanzar en función de las disponibilidades de los despliegues, para poder fortalecer a Sugar A modo de ejemplo, en Uruguay se están distribuyendo tablets para los niños más chicos. La única forma de comenzar desde temprana

Re: [IAEP] ASLO

2016-07-15 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi Dave This proposal needs some details. ASLO supported many functions including the developer hub, authentication, and so on. A simple static site that is functionally equivalent is ambiguous. Aleksey's proposal has been implemented and is on-line (sugar network). Is this what you are

Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project

2016-07-15 Thread Samson Goddy
Well according to tony from SFC statement "Adam hasn't yet signed on behalf of Sugar, but his signature is just an acknowledgment, since Sugar isn't a legal entity, let alone a party to the agreement. " so i guess Adam is still remaining! From: la...@somosazucar.org Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016

Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project

2016-07-15 Thread Samson Goddy
I just signed some documents but i haven't yet! I am still waiting for SFC Samson From: la...@somosazucar.org Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [IAEP] Status of Samson's project To: samsongo...@hotmail.com CC: ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org;