Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com writes:
I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
Sugar is in its early alpha (which is clearly wrong IMHO.)
--
On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien b...@laptop.org wrote:
Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com writes:
I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
Sugar is in
seems to be down :P
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
Is anybody working on this? I don't have access to have a look.
Regards,
Sebastian
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
Was down, did an Apache restart, back up now. Thanks for the heads up.
cjl
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
seems to be down :P
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
Is anybody working on this? I