On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien <b...@laptop.org> wrote: > Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98. > > Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of > reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that > Sugar is in its early alpha (which is clearly wrong IMHO.) >
The problem is that Sean is also saying a 1.0 would be hard to market (without html activities, which I don't think are going to be solid at the first iteration). So I don't really know how we should call this release. Maybe 1.0 and we just don't make noise about it. Feels a bit like a lost opportunity though.
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
