Hi, Dave
On 06/20/2016 05:20 AM, iaep-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org wrote:
Adam asked me to diligently maintain the list of SLOB decisions going
forwards, that Walter had put together from archives, at
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions
I have reviewed this page. You have num
On 19 June 2016 at 13:20, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is not my vision of Sugar Labs or Sugar. I see Sugar
> as an educational opportunity provided to users of the OLPC XO
> and others. Naturally, it takes software engineers to develop and maintain
> this software, but the vision m
On 19 June 2016 at 13:50, Sean DALY wrote:
> If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the
> previously stated reasons.
That motion failed 9 days ago, since email voting is only open for 7 days.
Sorry I hadn't updated the
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Deci
Hi Claudia!
On 19 June 2016 at 13:38, Claudia Urrea wrote:
>
> I think we need someone to admin the motions. We have too many (pass,
> pending votes and pending endorsement for vote, etc.), they become depend
> on each other and we get stuck not being able to move forward.
>
Adam asked me to di
Hi Caryl!
Sorry to hear about the Montana trouble :( Perhaps you can 'hotspot' your
phone to get online with wifi and a real keyboard before then :)
On June 7 I made extensive suggestions to the document to address the
objection that Adam raised at the last SLOB monthly meeting. I hope you'll
be
On 16 June 2016 at 09:00, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Do we want these or not? :)
>
I guess not!
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Caryl Bigenho
> Date: June 19, 2016 at 5:33:52 PM MDT
> To: IAEP , sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org,
> walter.ben...@gmail.com, Adam Holt ,
> tony_ander...@usa.net, Lionel Laske , José Miguel
> García , Claudia Urrea , sameer
> verma
> Subject
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions
This page is very useful.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Claudia Urrea wrote:
> Dave and all,
>
> I think we need someone to admin the motions. We have too many (pass,
> pending votes and pending endorsement for vote, etc.), they become
If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the
previously stated reasons. The key activity of SL is developing software
designed to help children learn, not providing a friendly environment to
learn programming of software for children.
Sean.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:06 PM
Hi, Laura
Unfortunately, this is not my vision of Sugar Labs or Sugar. I see Sugar
as an educational opportunity provided to users of the OLPC XO
and others. Naturally, it takes software engineers to develop and
maintain this software, but the vision must be about the result - Sugar
and the
b
On 4 June 2016 at 00:07, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 3 June 2016 at 14:38, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 May 2016 at 07:59, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> > Motion: to reimburse Edgar Quispe for expenses incurred representing
>>> Sugar
>>>
Hi
I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of
SLOB.
On 3 June 2016 at 14:25, Laura Vargas wrote:
> I hereby propose the motion to update current SL vision statement:
>
> "About Sugar Labs(R): Sugar Labs(R) is a volunteer-driven member project
> of Software Freedom
Hi
I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of
SLOB.
On 3 June 2016 at 02:46, Laura Vargas wrote:
> I propose to adopt the following statement as the vision statement:
>
> Sugar Labs is a global community where you can learn how to design,
> develop and deploy high-
Hi
I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of
SLOB.
On 4 June 2016 at 11:38, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> If I was a SLOB I would support this motion. The passivity of the SLOBs is
> disappointing. It is better to vote and fail, than to linger.
>
> El 03/06/16 a las 16
Hi
I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of
SLOB.
On 3 June 2016 at 23:42, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> On 3 June 2016 at 17:10, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 3 June 2016 at 17:04, Walter Bend
Hi
I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of
SLOB.
On 7 June 2016 at 10:00, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Motion: to consider email votes on motions only valid if they are sent
> to both the SLOBs and IAEP mailing lists.
>
--
Cheers
Dave
16 matches
Mail list logo
