El Fri, 18-09-2009 a las 16:27 -0400, Chris Ball escribió:
Please volunteer by replying to this mail if you're interested, and
please do so by Thursday September 24th so that we can run the vote
at the Friday September 25th SLOBs meeting.
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things (SL
should promote SoaS, SL should treat distributors equally).
The
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:47, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 03:24:23AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
2. manually sync /debian from git.debian.org to git.gnewsense.org
3. do final work in git.gnewsense.org
Is Alioth such a cruel place to work together? Is it me -
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a Stick a particular
release of a particular
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:24:42
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
Right, that's why the longer names such as Debian Sugar on a Stick
would refer to
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I
El Sun, 20-09-2009 a las 09:33 -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka escribió:
Because of my ignorant ways in interpreting things, which I trust is
also the way of the populace :-), I think the wisest thing is to keep
the SOaS moniker as a basic SLs thing, of course, of course
recognizing Sebastian. I
In some of the other threads we have been seeing an interest in the
Sugar Labs Community improving the Sugar experience on the XO. As
such, I would like to create a XO SIG within Sugar Labs. I have filed
an initial draft application with the OLPC Contributors program for 5
loaner machines for
I have set up a week site that has some preliminary research findings.
You can visit it here:
http://web.me.com/geraldar/The_Shape_of_Disruption/Welcome.html
I would appreciate any questions or feedback.
Gerald
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed,
Hi Gerald,
Very interested in your project and research.
Did you manage to gather any baseline data on the students as independent
learners before the project started?
Also interested to know if the school authorities and the teachers understood
the disruptive nature of the project and
Ian,
I am just starting, and will be collecting baseline data.
And my principal and superintendent and the teachers are on board for the
kind of disruption, which is great.
More as it happens.
Gerald
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Ian Thomson i...@spc.int wrote:
Hi Gerald,
Very
Gerald,
I am curious about your choice to evaluate a middleschool as opposed
to an elementary school. Sugar and the OLPC XO were designed for
elementary-school-aged children.
regards.
-walter
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Gerald Ardito gerald.ard...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian,
I am just
Walter,
It just happens that in my district the 5th graders are in the middle
school.
I consider them elementary students and they are still taught in an
elementary school fashion.
Does that make sense?
Gerald
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Gerald Ardito gerald.ard...@gmail.com wrote:
Walter,
It just happens that in my district the 5th graders are in the middle
school.
I consider them elementary students and they are still taught in an
elementary school fashion.
Does that make sense?
Sure.
Philippe Clérié wrote:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I sympathize since I'm also a
I really like that phrase, Sugar sweet-spot.
I completely agree.
Gerald
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Gerald Ardito gerald.ard...@gmail.com
wrote:
Walter,
It just happens that in my district the 5th graders
Gerald Ardito wrote:
Walter,
It just happens that in my district the 5th graders are in the middle
school.
I consider them elementary students and they are still taught in an
elementary school fashion.
Does that make sense?
Gerald
No, not at all. Shame on you! :-)
It's so funny,
Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
It's so funny, this thing about Sugar and the XO being for elementary
children, and then we go around serependitiously messing things up.
In Bolivia Primary goes up to 8th grade... So it's OK to use them for
8th grade there and not elsewhere?
Around OLPC, we
Hi David,
Very interested. Keep us posted please
Ian Thomson
RICS and OLPC Coordinator
Noumea
SPC
Phone +687 26 01 44
-Original Message-
From: iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org
[mailto:iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of David Farning
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 6:50 AM
2009/9/21 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org:
My idea is to start by getting a working version of the current
versions of Sugar and Fedora running on an XO. The SIG might lose
some of the specific hardware benefits and mass deployment features on
the first couple of iterations. But, it can
Anyway, as a muggle or someone with little information (a.k.a. the
public) I actually thought, could say was sure, eve, that Sugarlabs was
pushing SOaS as their flagship product, maybe SugarLive was there around
somewhere, or course (?!?!) Sugar for the XO, whose status seems so
unclear...
24 matches
Mail list logo