On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi Adam
>
> On 11 April 2016 at 15:21, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote:
>>>
You are thorough enough to consider the fiduciary/stewardship
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Are all the PRs in 2013/14/15/16 listed on that page?
>
Yes indeed. We considered doing one for the TripAdvisor grant, but decided
it was better to wait for results. There has been lessening press interest
in SL, parallel to OLPC, but th
Hi Sam!
Pinned to the top of https://socialhelp.sugarlabs.org is a thread, "Survey
- “How bad is Sugar (software)?”"
Are the results of this survey available anywhere? :)
If not, the survey contents is anonymous, so I don't see any reason to keep
the full results private, but perhaps I'm missing
Hi Sebastian!
In the "Seeking insights into Oversight_Board/Decisions" thread you said,
On 11 April 2016 at 14:57, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> El 11/04/16 a las 13:56, Walter Bender escribió:
>
>
>> Generally I think all mediawiki instances should be retired and replaced
>> with a static site gen
Hi Walter!
In the "Seeking insights into Oversight_Board/Decisions" thread you said,
On 11 April 2016 at 14:56, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You are thorough enough to consider the
Hi Adam
On 11 April 2016 at 15:21, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>>> You are thorough enough to consider the fiduciary/stewardship secretary
>>> role outlined below, and/or coaching/mentoring someon
Hi Sean!
On 11 April 2016 at 15:37, Sean DALY wrote:
> Prior to the pack, I was funding press releases on pay-as-you-go out of my
> pocket, and I wasn't able to continue that any more at over $200 a pop.
>
Thank you so much for that huge material contribution - there are so many
PRs in https://
Hi Sean!
On 11 April 2016 at 15:57, Sean DALY wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> Given the trademark fee was recently paid to renew the trademarks, I
>> guess the merits were accepted
>
>
> For an organization with the possibility of widespread recognition, own
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Given the trademark fee was recently paid to renew the trademarks, I guess
> the merits were accepted
For an organization with the possibility of widespread recognition, owning
your trademark is a vital step. It could be compared to owni
Hi Dave,
the $2390 sum is for the following marketing/promotion/PR expense:
eReleases CauseWire 10-pack Invoice #011413122
This was authorized by a SLOBs vote in late 2012.
Prior to the pack, I was funding press releases on pay-as-you-go out of my
pocket, and I wasn't able to continue that any m
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> You are thorough enough to consider the fiduciary/stewardship secretary
>> role outlined below, and/or coaching/mentoring someone younger to assist
>> you -- would you consider giving back i
El 11/04/16 a las 13:56, Walter Bender escribió:
>
>
> Generally I think all mediawiki instances should be retired and
> replaced with a static site generator backed by a distributed
> version control "pull request" model of collaboration.
>
> http://designwithfontforge.com has s
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>>
>> You are thorough enough to consider the fiduciary/stewardship secretary
>> role outlined below, and/or coaching/mentoring someone younger to assist
>> you -- would you consider giving b
On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote:
>
> You are thorough enough to consider the fiduciary/stewardship secretary
> role outlined below, and/or coaching/mentoring someone younger to assist
> you -- would you consider giving back in this way?
>
Sort of: I don't want to take on any responsib
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> SORRY
>
> I shot this off and didn't double check, I think I confused myself because
> (IIRC) Adam put together the finance wiki page summary and I got confused
> =)
>
> THANK YOU WALTER :D
>
Dave,
You are thorough enough to consider
SORRY
I shot this off and didn't double check, I think I confused myself because
(IIRC) Adam put together the finance wiki page summary and I got confused
=)
THANK YOU WALTER :D
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@list
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks to Adam for putting together
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions - is a great read
> :)
>
I put this collection together as a quick reference, not as a place to go
for the details...
>
> I have some q
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks to Adam for putting together
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions - is a great read
> :)
>
This is Walter Bender's very hard work, and a huge step forward in 2015.
Sugar Labs unfortunately lacks a secr
Hi
Thanks to Adam for putting together
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions - is a great read
:)
I have some questions about some of the motions, but some are a few years
old and perhaps it is no longer easy to answer them - no pressure :)
> selectricity
This sounds great! Wh
Hi all,
as much as I appreciate efforts to be completely transparent on those
issues, would you mind having the discussion on a single mailing list?
Receiving those emails twice is a bit stressful.
Thanks!
And a big hugs to all paid or unpaid Sugar/OLPC *volunteers* <3
--
Bastien
___
Hi Laura!
Thanks for the spreadsheet - this is great!
On 10 April 2016 at 23:57, Laura Vargas wrote:
> According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the
> information published by you) for the last 4 years, ~80% (USD$26,400) of
> expenses are related to promotional travel
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Laura Vargas
wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> Am not sure how the Conservancy can help us get better if we don't have
> our financial policies well defined.
>
> According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the
> information published by you) for the l
22 matches
Mail list logo