Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Uruguayan XOs Revival

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I would suggest reaching out to someone at Ceibal.
Fiorella Haim might be a great contact point: fh...@ceibal.edu.uy
I reached out to her a year ago and she mentioned that there are no more
XO's that are in good condition to be used.
I already gave all the ones I had to my friends, even made some tiktoks
videos that went viral (heh).

HMU if you want to do more stuff with the XO's beside unlocking them.
If it's just unlocking them by the "Lista negra" as Ceibal calls them, just
create a zip file with no content on the USB Drive.

Greetings

El vie, 30 jun 2023 a la(s) 13:59, Walter Bender (walter.ben...@gmail.com)
escribió:

> Maybe someone at OLPC can get you the codes. But Ceibal should also have
> them. I cannot imagine that they would be unwilling to share them at this
> time.
>
> regards.
>
> walter
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:35 PM Luis Michelena 
> wrote:
>
>> It's anybody there?
>> Cheers from Uruguay, long time no see, How are you all? Some folks
>> from Uruguay Butiá/CeibalJam and I, are trying to unlock XOs from
>> Ceibal(to revisit Butiá, and ,maybe, it's possible uses in
>> accesibility)
>> Do some of you could give us some advice about how unlock them?
>> It would be preferable if it could be posible to maintain the fs contents.
>> It's there still a chance to get developer keys for the XOs?
>> Because Ceibal decided to end support, declare them obsolete, and
>> begin to recycle !! but also turn the switch off for the rest of
>> the kicking ones...
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Luis Michelena
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> https://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Announcement] Sugarizer v1.5 is available for your device

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hello there Lionel, awesome work as usual :)

I'm testing it on an iphone and a friend is testing on a android phone!

We are trying to use Calligra app but the touch responsiveness is really
bad.
Is this something from our side?

Thanks
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] motion regarding GSoC mentor travel

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Okay.

Looking forward to see some pictures of your experience.

+1.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, 5:18 PM Walter Bender  wrote:

> Carly and maybe me. I don't know any other details.
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:05 PM Ignacio Rodríguez 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>> I'm not trying to be mean or something, but wondering who is he meeting
>> from SugarLabs?
>>
>> > (to visit some Sugar Labs people and his cousin in DC.)
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Ignacio.-
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:20 PM Samson Goddy 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Seconded,
>>>
>>> I believe that members should  use opportunities like Gsoc to Meetup
>>> fellow members.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, 8:17 PM Walter Bender 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Background: Google has provided SL with $3000 towards mentor travel to
>>>> the October summit. ($3300 - the SFC 10%) although we have yet to receive
>>>> $1100 of the funds. We have also received $5400 in mentor "stipends" ($6000
>>>> - the SFC 10%). As you may recall, we are sending three people, Devin,
>>>> Jaskirat, and Shrivank. Only Jaskirat is traveling internationally, so the
>>>> best estimate is that the travel will come in on budget. As we did last
>>>> year, we could apply some of the mentor stipend $$ to cover any overruns.
>>>> (Note we have already approved a previous motion to approve a travel
>>>> advance for Jaskirat to attend the Google Summer of Code mentor summit in
>>>> October 2018. [1])
>>>>
>>>> The SFC estimates a cost increase in Jaskirat's ticket of $400-$500 due
>>>> to his intention to travel some while in the States (to visit some Sugar
>>>> Labs people and his cousin in DC.) Jaskirat is paying for his domestic
>>>> travel, but the round trip in and out of SF is apparently less expensive,
>>>> hence the need for SLOB approval. IMHO, we should be extending
>>>> opportunities for community members whenever possible.
>>>>
>>>> Motion: To approve the additional cost associated with Jaskirat's
>>>> ticket to and from the GSoC summit as calculated by the SFC. If for some
>>>> reason the total budget for GSoC summit travel exceeds $3000, we can apply
>>>> Jaskirat's and my share of the GSoC mentor stipend to cover the overrun.
>>>>
>>>> This is somewhat timely as tickets need to be purchased.
>>>>
>>>> regards.
>>>>
>>>> -walter
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2018-August/055603.html
>>>>
>>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>>> From: Brett Smith via RT 
>>>> Date: Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:58 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [sfconservancy.org #1845] Additional US flight
>>>> expenditures for Jaskirat Singh
>>>> To: 
>>>> Cc: 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/18/2018 12:46 PM, Adam Holt via RT wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Brett Smith via RT <
>>>> approv...@tix.sfconservancy.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Adam and team,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jaskirat Singh is planning additional travel in the US after the GSoC
>>>>> mentor summit. Some of it is personal,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Brett,
>>>>
>>>> Travel funds for the GSoC mentor summit do not include personal side
>>>> trips.
>>>>
>>>> Adam,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, to be clear, our travel policy states: “Travelers may seek
>>>> approval to book travel itineraries that include extra days for personal
>>>> reasons, *so long as the cost of the flight meets the other
>>>> requirements of this Policy*.” Additional expense *just* for personal
>>>> reasons isn’t permitted, and if that was the case here, I would’ve declined
>>>> without even asking you. The planned meetings with other collaborators
>>>> meant it was at least potentially project-related, so that’s why I checked.
>>>>
>>>> I’ll work with him to see what he wants to do but I won’t book
>>>> additional travel with him unless/until you tell me otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your prompt response,
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Smith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Walter Bender
>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>>> ___
>>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>> ___
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] GCI 2018

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I'll second.
I'll have more time this year to mentor and be admin if required.

Greetings,
Ignacio.-

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 5:42 PM Walter Bender  wrote:

> We seem to have sufficient interest from the community to apply to Google
> Code-in again this year. Lots of returning mentors and some students who
> have morphed into mentors as well. But I will not apply w/o SLOB approval.
>
> Motion: Sugar Labs will apply to participate in Google Code-in 2018.
> Walter will be the primary administrator.
>
> Time in of the essence as the schedule this year has applications starting
> this week, so please respond ASAP.
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [sfconservancy.org #1322] For Approval: Jaskirat Singh funding and advance for travel to GSoC mentor summit

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Samson Goddy  wrote:

> Seconded
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018, 1:32 AM Walter Bender 
> wrote:
>
>> A bit of context:
>>
>> We are assigned 3 slots for GSoC mentors to attend the mentor summit. I
>> am hoping that Devin and Jaskirat will be able to attend, along with one
>> TBD. We will get $3300 from Google to cover all of the expenses, which
>> should easily cover Devin (domestic travel)  and Jaskirat (international)
>> and one more domestic traveler. (Google will also be covering the local
>> hotel and meal expenses.)
>>
>> Motion: To approve a travel advance for Jaskirat to attend the Google
>> Summer of Code mentor summit in October 2018.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:15 PM Brett Smith via RT <
>> approv...@tix.sfconservancy.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi SLOBs,
>>>
>>> Jaskirat Singh is traveling to the GSoC mentor summit.  Because he's
>>> coming from India, he's asked us to prepay a number of expenses, which
>>> we're happy to do as long as you approve.
>>>
>>> First, he has requested an advance of 43,700.00 INR (about $625) to
>>> cover expenses related to getting his visa and ground transportation in
>>> India.  He provided this budget:
>>>
>>> VISA Fees - 11200 INR
>>> Travelling agent and Consultant charges - 7000 INR
>>> As i have to travel for the VISA Documentation and Interview to other
>>> states so for that i have 2 dates consecutively ( VISA appointment letter
>>> attached), So for that Hotel Charge for 1 night and 2 days - 7000 INR
>>> Meals for this purpose ( 2 days ) - 2000 INR (approx.)
>>> Taxi fare from my location to the US Embassy - 4000 INR + toll and taxes
>>> ( approx ).
>>> As per the rules VISA Documentation and Interview takes place at
>>> different place and VISA Collection gets issued from the different location
>>> which is the part of another state, so for that Taxi Fare - 2500 INR
>>> Taxi fare from Home to Airport - 5000 INR + toll and taxes ( approx )
>>> Taxi fare from airport to back Home - 5000 INR + toll and taxes ( approx
>>> )
>>>
>>> Please let us know whether or not you approve sending him money for
>>> these expenses ahead of time.  We'll still ask him to provide receipts
>>> after the fact as required for all travel under our policies.
>>>
>>> Note that, between this advance and the flight he's asking us to book,
>>> Jaskirat's travel is likely to exceed $1,000, meaning some of it will be
>>> paid out of Sugar's general fund and not covered by the money coming from
>>> Google for GSoC.  Please let us know what total travel budget you're
>>> willing to set for Jaskirat.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brett Smith
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> 
>>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] Action required: Devin Ulibarri travel/stipend

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] GSoC 2018

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018, 7:28 AM Lionel Laské  wrote:

> +1
>
> 2018-01-06 7:22 GMT+01:00 Claudia Urrea :
>
>> + 1
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Sameer Verma  wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Sameer
>>>
>>> On Jan 5, 2018 6:46 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>>>
 I made a motion at today's meeting regarding Sugar Labs participation
 in Google Summer of Code 2018. As I mentioned, Google has pushed up the
 application process: we need to get our application in by January 23. I
 think GSoC is well worth the effort and I hope we can agree to participate
 again this year.

 Motion: Sugar Labs will apply for Google Summer of Code 2018

 The motion was seconded by Adam. Samson, Adam, and I voted in favor of
 participating, but we have yet to hear from the rest of you. Please respond
 at your earliest convenience as we don't have much time to prepare our
 application.

 regards.

 -walter

 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org
 

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


>>> ___
>>> SLOBs mailing list
>>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> SLOBs mailing list
>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>
>>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] email motion 2017-19

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1 from me, Claudia seems to be a potential candidate :)

El vie., 1 de dic. de 2017 6:17 PM, Samson Goddy 
escribió:

> Sorry guys, I ran into some internet issue. +1 for me
>
> On Dec 1, 2017 9:47 PM, "Lionel Laské"  wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry I was online one hour too late. Stupid error on DST.
>>
>> +1 for me for this motion.
>>
>>Lionel.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-12-01 20:35 GMT+01:00 Walter Bender :
>>
>>> Motion: To appoint Claudia Urrea to the oversight-board seat that opened
>>> due to the resignation of Laura Vargas. This temporary appointment would
>>> last until the next oversight board election in 2018.
>>>
>>> This was discussed at today's oversight-board meeting [1], but since we
>>> lacked a quorum we could not take a vote. Hence this email. Please respond
>>> ASAP.
>>>
>>> The gist of the discussion was:
>>>
>>>  #topic replacing Laura on the board
>>>  Laura Vargas has resigned her seat on the board. I think
>>> we should fill the vacancy with a temporary appointment.
>>>  Her seat was up in fall 2018.
>>>  So it would be a 9-10 month appointment.
>>>  I propose Claudia Urrea
>>>  for several reasons:
>>>  (1) she got the most votes in the last election (missing
>>> a seat on the board by just one vote)
>>>  (2) she is very experienced with Sugar and our target
>>> audience
>>>  (3) she brings academic and education experience to the
>>> mix
>>>  (4) she is a thoughtful, long-term contributor to the
>>> community
>>>  (5) and she is a very respectful colleague
>>>
>>> Her state of objects from the last election can be found at [2].
>>>
>>> regards.
>>>
>>> -walter
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-12-01T19:05:26
>>> [2]
>>> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2017-2019-candidates#Claudia_Urrea
>>>
>>> --
>>> Walter Bender
>>> Sugar Labs
>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SLOBs mailing list
>>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
> ___
> SLOBs mailing list
> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1 from me.

Please lets get his flight ASAP.
Time is essential
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] motion to approve travel advance

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Same here.
+1

Please enjoy and make us proud :)



‌

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Sameer Verma  wrote:

> I'll second the motion.
>
> Sameer
>
> On Sep 19, 2017 7:01 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>
>> Alas, we have made no headway on my email regarding our travel advance
>> policy [1], but we have an important decision to make as soon as possible
>> [2].
>>
>> As you know, we are hoping to send three representatives from Sugar Labs
>> to the Google Summer of Code summit. Google has in fact allocated $3300
>> towards travel for this purpose (See [3] below). The plan of record was to
>> send Cristina Del Puerto, who will be traveling from San Francisco,
>> essentially at no cost, Samson Goddy, who will be traveling from Nigeria,
>> and Michaël Ohayon, who will be traveling from France.
>>
>> Samson has requested that the SFC prepurchase a ticket for him, as
>> detailed in [2]. He has also accrued several hundred US dollars in expenses
>> in obtaining his visa, which was money lent to him by community members
>> when the SLOB denied his request for a travel advance. He is also asking
>> for a cash advance of US $550 to cover local transportation needs in
>> Nigeria and the States [4]. It is likely that the total cost of his and
>> Michaël's travel will exceed the Google budget by some hundreds of
>> dollars. That said, I think it is a worthwhile investment in two dedicated
>> community members. So...
>>
>> Motion: Approve a travel advance for US $2550 (US $2000 SFC prepurchase
>> of an airline ticket and $550 towards local transport) for Samson Goddy's
>> travel to the Google Summer of Code mentor's summit.
>>
>> Your timely response to this motion much appreciated.
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>>
>> [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020168.html
>>
>> [2] SLOBs,
>>
>> As you probably know, Google provides a donation of $2,700 which they
>> suggest
>> projects use for travel for mentors and students, ideally for the Mentor
>> Summit.
>>
>> Samson has asked us to book his flight.  It seems it will probably cost
>> around $1,800, but I'm sorting out details with Samson now based on his
>> email
>> in a private thread.
>>
>> I ask that Adam Holt, as Representative to Conservancy from SLOBs, please
>> communicate immediate approval for up to $2,000 for booking Samson's
>> flight
>> (prices may change by the time you send that approve, so extra budget room
>> is a good idea).
>>
>> Note that the budget constraint by Conservancy's travel policy in this
>> case
>> is US$2,748.54 for this particular travel, but the Google funding means we
>> do need to get approval from you, since likely the combined travel for
>> GSoC
>> -- which includes Samson Goddy, Michaël Ohayon, and Cristina Del Puerto --
>> will likely, in combination, go above the $2,700 donation for this purpose
>> from Google.  Others have not sent their travel details so we don't know
>> their travel costs -- if you want to set capped budgets for them as well,
>> please do that immediately too.
>>
>> I recommend approval for all this travel -- provided that it follows
>> Conservancy's main travel policy -- given the large amount of funds Sugar
>> Labs has at its disposal already, but it's of course your decision.
>>
>> Martin Michlmayr
>>
>> [3] Hi GSoC Org Admins --
>> As a thank you for your participation in GCI this year we want to give
>> you 3 slots for mentors to send to the GSoC Mentor Summit (instead of the
>> normal 2).
>>
>> We will add an additional $1100 to your GSoC mentor travel stipend
>> payment (for a total of $3300 for the mentor travel stipends). Feel free to
>> have the third person sign up for the Mentor Summit registration before
>> September 5th, the sooner the better so we can get more folks off of the
>> wait list early.
>>
>> We will of course pay for the 3rd person's room for Friday and Saturday
>> nights as well so be sure they sign up for their hotel room at either the
>> Sunnyvale Sheraton Hotel  or Aloft Santa Clara Hotel before September 5th.
>>
>> It would be great if you sent a mentor that was a mentor for both
>> programs as your third person. The person does need to be at least 18 years
>> old.
>>
>> If you have any questions please let us know.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Stephanie and Mary
>>
>> [4] Sure and $550 for travel advance I will be in Lagos for almost 7
>> hours and London for 6 hrs, transportation and taxes in Both airport in
>> Nigeria and America. I wanted to fly from Port Harcourt direct to SFO but
>> it will cost additional $1500 to the flight money which i think people in
>> the board might argue on.. So i decided to use Lagos instead of Port
>> Harcourt to save $1.5k, though more stressful but less money spent
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> 

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1 from me.
I know people tend to relate Sugar to OLPC, in fact I still do sometimes
(it's easier to explain someone that "Sugar" is the thing that runs in the
XO's).

But the icon should stay as it was.
If you want to change the icon for your deployments just change it (wasn't
that what you guys were trying to say?)

Thx


On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:00 PM Sameer Verma  wrote:

> +1
>
> Sameer
>
> On Sep 15, 2017 7:15 AM, "Samson Goddy"  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 15, 2017 3:12 PM, "Walter Bender"  wrote:
>>
>> The discussion regarding the status of the xo-computer icon seems to be
>> going around  in circles. In my opinion, this makes it even more imperative
>> that the Sugar Labs oversight board respond to Tony's questions so that
>> Tony can proceed with his investigation in to our options.
>>
>> To state the obvious, this discussion is not about whether or not we can
>> change the xo-computer icon -- we can do that at any time in consultation
>> with our design team. The discussion is about whether or not we make that
>> decision on our own terms or be forced into a change.
>>
>> Motion: To answer the questions posed by the SFC regarding the
>> xo-computer icon as follows:
>> (Q1) Why is the XO logo included in the sugar-artwork repo now -- and
>> does the SLOBs want to keep it there?
>> (A1) The xo-computer icon has been part of Sugar since we first designed
>> and built Sugar (beginning in 2006) and we would like to keep it there
>> until such time as the design team decides there is a reason to change it.
>> (Q2) Assuming the SLOBs want to keep the XO logo in sugar-artwork: what
>> outcome would the SLOBs *prefer* to see happen?  E.g.,
>> - Does Sugar want downstream users to be able to redistribute and modify
>> Sugar's codebase with or without the XO trademark file included in the
>> program?
>> - Does the SLOBs want downstream users to be able to modify and
>> redistribute the XO trademark image itself, or is that less important to
>> Sugar?
>> (A2) Sugar Artwork, including the xo-computer icon, is currently licensed
>> under the GPL and we would like our downstream users to be able to use all
>> of our artwork under the terms of that license. As far as the use of any
>> trademark image outside of the context of Sugar, we have no opinion.
>>
>> I'd appreciate if someone would second this motion and, if it passes, the
>> results be reported to Tony by Adam, our SFC liaison. Of course, if the
>> motion does not pass, we will need to continue the discussion.
>>
>> I second the motion.
>>
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Walter Bender 
>> Date: Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:48 PM
>> Subject: [SLOB] xo-computer icon
>> To: SLOBs 
>> Cc: Sugar-dev Devel 
>>
>>
>> As probably most of you are aware, yesterday one of our community members
>> unilaterally changed the xo-computer icon in sugar-artwork. The ensuing
>> discussion about the change is in the github pull request, "Urgent fix
>> logos", [1]
>>
>> The gist of his concern is that OLPC has a trademark on the XO artwork
>> [2] and there was concern that we were infringing and consequently
>> downstream users would also be infringing.
>>
>> As Sean Daly points out, this is not the first time that the topic has
>> come up [3, 4]. "In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo
>> logo in Sugar, but asked we not use it in marketing materials without a
>> formal co-branding licensing agreement."
>>
>> Personally, I think that OLPC was explicit in making the Sugar artwork
>> available under a GPL licence and that this is hence moot. But I am not
>> qualified to make that assessment. Consequently, I asked Adam Holt, our SFC
>> liaison, to raise the issue with the legal team. Tony asked us to consider
>> the following questions:
>>
>> 1) Why is the XO logo included in the sugar-artwork repo now -- and does
>> the SLOBs want to keep it there?
>> 2) Assuming the SLOBs want to keep the XO logo in sugar-artwork:  what
>> outcome would the SLOBs *prefer* to see happen?  E.g.,
>> - Does Sugar want downstream users to be able to redistribute and modify
>> Sugar's codebase with or without the XO trademark file included in the
>> program?
>> - Does the SLOBs want downstream users to be able to modify and
>> redistribute the XO trademark image itself, or is that less important to
>> Sugar?
>>
>> The answer to the first part of Tony's first question is that the XO logo
>> was part of Sugar from the very beginning -- before Sugar Labs was split
>> from OLPC. We've never changed it.
>>
>> Regarding the second part: does the SLOBs want to keep it there?  is
>> something we  need to discuss. Personally, I think it serves its purpose
>> well -- a childcentric interface and it is "iconic" of Sugar. I see no
>> reason to change it.
>>
>> Regarding Tony's second question, I would 

Re: [IAEP] Membership and Elections Committee - Elections 2017-2019 Update

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I'm just wondering, how did you guys got the Hrishi email?
I only have the one he sent days ago, and one requesting for a sunjammer
account.


‌

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Laura Vargas  wrote:

>
>
> 2017-09-13 13:35 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho :
>
>> "Looking on the archives seems Hrishi requested membership on December
>> 18, 2017. I was not in the Membership Committee at the time" .
>>
>>
>> The above date is 3 months in the future! 
>>
>
> Ups!  I meant December 18, 2016.
>
> Thank you Caryl for the correction.
>
> Sebastian had announce his Membership and Election's Committee on December
> 2, 2016
>  but
> he looked it up and found Hirish's first application made on December 18,
> 2016.
>
> Samson can you please check in your records?
>
> Any reason why you did not add Hirish back on December 2016?
>
> Regards
>
> Laura
>
> *From:* IAEP  on behalf of Samson Goddy
>> 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 13, 2017 6:49:25 AM
>> *To:* Laura Vargas
>> *Cc:* Frederick Grose; sugar labs; pericherla seetaramaraju; SLOBs; Dave
>> Crossland; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; Ibiam Chihurumnaya; iaep
>> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] Membership and Elections Committee - Elections
>> 2017-2019 <2017%202019> Update
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2017 1:15 PM, "Laura Vargas"  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-13 0:33 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2017 2:01 AM, "Laura Vargas"  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2017 4:51 PM, "Laura Vargas"  wrote:


 Hello Committee and Community members,


 *Topics for discussion*

 01 Ignacio,

 Your resignation
 to
 the board has a direct impact to current elections as *it would open a
 fifth seat for the Sugar Labs Oversight Board 2017-2019 <2017%202019>
 period.  As long as you don't make a formal declination of your board seat,
 the Membership and Elections Committee will not consider the seat available
 for the 2017-2019 <2017%202019> elections.*



>>> Samson,
>>>
>>> Can you please share your opinion in this issue as well?
>>>
>>> Sorry for replying late, i think Ignacio have not originally declared
>>> himself out yet. So the seat isn't available until the next election.
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks for your imput. Given the relevance for current elections, l think
>> we should doable-check with the Boar to be sure.
>>
>>
>>> Secondly laura, as you requested Hrishi actually applied for membership,
>>> he has not gotten any reply or added today the list. I am still in Abuja
>>> for my visa (Which i got) so i am away from my computer.
>>>
>>>
>> Looking on the archives seems Hrishi requested membership on December 18,
>> 2017. I was not in the Membership Committee at the time,
>>
>> Can you confirm why you didn't approve the request at the time?
>>
>> I did see his mail last week.
>>
>> But he mailed the membership applying for membership September 11th.
>>
>> Hrishi Patel
>> IRC name : hrishi
>> GitHub : hrishi1999
>>
>> I've been contributing to SL since 2014. I've been part of GCI
>> 2014,15,16. I was a mentor for 3 projects in GSoC 2017 and has helped for
>> docs and other projects.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please look into it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> --
>>> Laura V.
>>> *I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>>
>>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
>>> ~ L. Victoria
>>>
>>> Happy Learning!
>>> #LearningByDoing
>>> #Projects4good
>>> #IDesignATSugarLabs
>>> #WeCanDoBetter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Laura V.
>> *I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>>
>> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
>> ~ L. Victoria
>>
>> Happy Learning!
>> #LearningByDoing
>> #Projects4good
>> #IDesignATSugarLabs
>> #WeCanDoBetter
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Laura V.
> * I SomosAZUCAR.Org*
>
> “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
> ~ L. Victoria
>
> Happy Learning!
> #LearningByDoing
> #Projects4good
> #IDesignATSugarLabs
> #WeCanDoBetter
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2017-09-12

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

>
7. One of the first decisions the new board will be making is whether
or not Sugar Labs should apply for GCI 2017. I am hopeful that the
board will see the merits of the program and give a green light to
apply again this year. If we do apply, I will be looking for mentors,
project ideas, and a co-administrator. Please contact me if you are
interested.


Count me in as a co-administrator this year ;)

On 9/12/17, Walter Bender  wrote:
> It has been a long time since I last wrote a Sugar Labs community new blog.
> I got tied up with my day jobs: starting a new design college from scratch
> and launching a new research center at MIT. (And, frankly, I was a bit
> depressed following the deaths of Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert.) I have
> a breather on both fronts and given all of the Sugar activity of late, I am
> inspired to do some writing.
>
> 1. A footnote from Google Code-in 2015. Ezequiel Pereira, one of the
> grand-prize recipients from Sugar Labs was recently acknowledged by Google
> for discovering a security bug. He got some nice press, e.g., [1, 2]. In
> one article [3], he was quoted as saying: "Homework is boring. Looking for
> bugs is fun.” Ezequiel is one of a generation of children in Uruguay who
> grew up with Sugar. It is nice to hear the occasional word about their
> accomplishments.
>
> 2. We just wrapped up Google Code-in and Outreachy 2017. We had 9 interns
> supported by Google and 1 Outreachy intern. You can read about their
> accomplishments in their blogs [4] and in the meeting logs [5] (every
> Monday from May through August). Highlights from the summer include a new,
> easy-to-maintain activity portal and a new www.sugarlabs.org, both going
> live soon. Also of note: a new Sugar image for Raspberry Pi, some new apps,
> GTK3 ports, a Sugarizer dashboard, and a major overhaul of Music Blocks.
>
> Tip of the hat to our mentors: Abhijit Patel, Cristina Del Puerto, Devin
> Ulibarri, Hrishi Patel, Ignacio Rodriguez, José Argüello, Lionel Laské,
> Matias Baez, Michaël Ohayon, Samson Goddy, Samuel Cantero, and Tony
> Anderson. Lionel help me adminsister the program again this year. It is
> nice to note that many of the mentors are fomer GCI participants.
>
> Cristina, Michaël, and Samson will be representing Sugar Labs at the annual
> mentor summit at Google in October. (For those of you who have been
> following the saga of Samson's visa, I am happy to say that he was
> approved!)
>
> 3. I was invited to represent Sugar Labs at the Plan Ceibal 10th
> anniversary in Montevideo a few months ago. It was great to see children
> still using Sugar 10  years after the first deployment in a small school in
> the Florida Department. It was also an opportunity to catch up with many
> old friends and Sugar contributors, including Ignacio, Andres, Alan, Jose
> Miguel, Guzman, etc. I am not sure if my talk is on line, but I wrote a
> paper based on the talk which is available for download [6].
>
> 4. Lionel just announced a new release of Sugarizer (v0.9). See [7] for all
> of the details.
>
> 5. James Cameron is working towards the release of Sugar 0.111, our first
> new release in nearly one year. It is mostly planned as a maintenance
> release.
>
> 6. There are only a few more days left (15 Sept.) to register as a
> candidate for the Sugar Labs oversight board. Please consider joining the
> board as we need some fresh voices and perspectives. See [8] for details.
> You also have until 27 Sept. to register as a member in order to be given a
> vote in the election. See [9] for details.
>
> 7. One of the first decisions the new board will be making is whether or
> not Sugar Labs should apply for GCI 2017. I am hopeful that the board will
> see the merits of the program and give a green light to apply again this
> year. If we do apply, I will be looking for mentors, project ideas, and a
> co-administrator. Please contact me if you are interested.
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> 
>
> [1]
> https://thenextweb.com/google/2017/08/10/highschool-security-research-google-data/#.tnw_5BETRGWT
> [2]
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/10/schoolboy_google_bug_bounty_http_host/
> [3]
> http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/google-awards-uruguay-high-school-student-10k-finding/story?id=49249604
> [4] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code
> [5] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings
> [6] http://www.um.es/ead/red/54/bender.pdf
> [7] http://sugarizer.org
> [8] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2017-2019-candidates
> [9] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Urgent Motion: To add three contributors into the membership/election committee

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

It's +1 from me.

But I will leave SLOBs once this happen, I honestly don't have time, and I
no longer feel motivated to be part of the SLOBs.
I will remain as a Sugar Labs, and will mantain some systems if required.

Thanks.

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Adam Holt  wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks all for updating https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/
> Sugar_Labs/Governance/Committees#Membership_and_Elections_Committee if
> this is approved -- with personal background on all Membership/Elections
> Committee members -- so we can better avoid conflict-of-interest
> accusations/patterns of late, moving on to far more positive+uplifting
> efforts soon!
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Walter Bender 
> wrote:
>
>> I would think membership on the committee would be a unilateral decision
>> by the committee itself. In any case, +1 from me.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Samson Goddy 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am requesting to SLOB. To add Pericherla Seetaramaraju  (Google
>>> Summer of Code Intern), Hirish Patel (Contributor and Google Summer of Code
>>> Mentor)
>>> and Ibiam Chihurumnaya (Member of Sugar Labs). I mentioned at the
>>> meeting that we need more members in the Membership/Election committee.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will appreciate if someone second this motion for voting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Samson Goddy
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SLOBs mailing list
>>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> SLOBs mailing list
>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @ http://unleashkids.org !
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sur] URGENT action needed

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

It's +1 from me. Let's hope SFC provide some money in advance this time.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 6:42 PM rosamel norma ramirez mendez <
rosano...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Aprobado!
> Saludos Cordiales
> Rosamel Ramírez
> Uruguay
>
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
> El 10 ago. 2017, a las 17:44, Walter Bender 
> escribió:
>
> I presume we need a motion and a vote on this. Time is of the essence, so
> please respond ASAP.
>
> Motion: Samson Goddy has been selected as a Sugar Labs representative to
> the Google Summer of Code mentor summit. He has requested a travel advance
> to cover the costs of his visa application. The advance, including wire
> fees comes to $US 627.05. This motion is to approve the travel advance. (As
> additional background, Google will be covering up to $2200 in travel
> expenses for two representatives to attend the summit. Since our other
> representative is local to the SF area, the bulk of that money would be
> available to cover Samson's travel, so the net impact on SL funds will be
> negligible.
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Accounting at Software Freedom Conservancy <
> account...@sfconservancy.org>
> Date: Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:16 PM
> Subject: URGENT request for Sugar Labs to approve of US$627.05 advance for
> Goddy for GSoC Mentor Summit (was: Is Goddy actually requesting $160 ?)
> To: su...@sfconservancy.org
> Cc: Martin Michlmayr , Samson Goddy <
> samsongo...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Sugar Labs PLC,  please urgently page down to the all caps section below.
>
> Samson,
>
> Samson Goddy wrote at 08:52 (EDT) on Wednesday:
> > it has been 5 days, i already made request to su...@sfconservancy.org
> for
> > funding. Since it takes up to 15 working days(3 weeks) for the embassy to
> > accept appointment for interview.
> >
> > I haven't heard anything from both parties.
>
> Unfortunately, We are waiting for someone from Sugar Labs to reply to
> approve the expense.  I don't know why they haven't replied.
>
> SUGAR LABS PLC: By my calculation, Samson is asking for this:
>
>   FOR TRAVEL TO GET A VISA, AND FOR THE VISA FEES ITSELF, SAMSON GODDY ASKS
>   FOR A CASH ADVANCE OF TRAVEL EXPENSES (TO COME TO GSOC MENTOR SUMMIT
>   2017).  The totals are as follows:
>
>   If we use western union, N202,350 = $570 (rate set by WU)
>
>   If we use wire, he's asking for 561+(561*.05)+13+25 = US$627.05 to be
> wired.
>wire fees
>
> If Sugar Labs PLC replies with approval before Sunday night US/Eastern, we
> can likely process a payment by wire on Monday.
>
>
> We don't typically use Western Union, and it would be substantial effort
> for
> us to do that, so we'd like Sugar to approve the additional wire fees as
> it will make payment more rapid for Samson and easier for Conservancy.
>
> Samson, your request was a bit ramble-y, so if I gleaned the wrong totals
> above, please correct them.
>
> Samson, in preparation for Sugar Labs PLC hopefully approving this request,
> could you let me know if the wire instructions I used for you before are
> still correct, and if not, send me new ones?
>
> --
> Bradley M. Kuhn
> Distinguished Technologist of Software Freedom Conservancy
>  |--> & also, de-facto Bookkeeper for the moment
> Pls support Conservancy!: https://sfconservancy.org/supporter/
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
> ___
> Lista olpc-Sur
> olpc-...@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
>
> ___
> SLOBs mailing list
> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion 2017-08-10: Sugar Labs Financial Manager to have a monthly compensation

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

> Motion: *Sugar Labs Financial Manager will have a monthly compensation of
US$ TBD* in exchange for:
1 complete financial report per quarter and it's publication on the Sugar
Labs Finance Wiki page maximum 30 calendar days after the end of the
period. The format to be used should be compatible with the International
Financial Reporting Standards* or it's equivalent in the U.S..

I don't think this is that much needed.
Does Sugar Labs make a lot of transactions per month?

I don't think that paying for this task is something we need, maybe if Adam
could just provide the data we could make it look "pretty" (some charts or
images I guess)

Sorry but it's -1 from me.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Walter Bender 
wrote:

> I disagree. While the quality of the reporting left much to be desired,
> the relative importance of this issue to our organization seems to be
> pretty minor. That said, if there was some assurance that a FM could
> somehow light a fire under the SFC regarding responsiveness to financial
> inquiries, e.g., Samson's request for a travel advance to procure his visa,
> then I would be all for it. But that seems to be a structural issue within
> the SFC, not within Sugar Labs.
>
> -walter
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Samson Goddy 
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah i totally agree...
>>
>> +1 Laura
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Laura Vargas 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi SLOB's and members all,
>>>
>>> I think we should learn from experience and start compensating doing all
>>> this work for Sugar Lab's Organization [keeping track of communications and
>>> transactions with the Software Freedom Conservancy].
>>>
>>>
>>> Motion: *Sugar Labs Financial Manager will have a monthly compensation
>>> of US$ TBD* in exchange for:
>>> 1 complete financial report per quarter and it's publication on the
>>> Sugar Labs Finance Wiki page maximum 30 calendar days after the end of the
>>> period. The format to be used should be compatible with the
>>> International Financial Reporting Standards* or it's equivalent in the
>>> U.S..
>>>
>>> *see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Financial_Report
>>> ing_Standards
>>>
>>>
>>> To approve the proposed motion simplifies the July, 2016 SLOB's
>>> motion/decision
>>> ,  assigns a
>>> monthly compensation for the Financial Manager and above all, *assures
>>> community has timely access to reports*.
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope another SLOB can second the motion in order to start voting.
>>> Suggestions to define the value are also welcome from all, specially from
>>> Adam :D
>>>
>>> Below I pasted some extracts from background emailing about the subject
>>> in case anyone interested in reading.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards and blessings,
>>>
>>> Laura V
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-08-05 19:31 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho :
>>>
 Hi All...


 There was (and still seems to be) a lot of confusion regarding the
 topic of a treasurer's report. I think the main problem is that most of you
 are thinking of the SugarLabs "Books" (a big ledger will all the personal
 identifying information Adam was referring to) instead of a simple
 "Treasurers  Report" which just includes the pertinent information without
 all the identifying details. The former, the "books," should be available
 to the SLOBs on request on a view only basis as mentioned elsewhere in this
 thread. The latter, the Treasurer's Report, should be available to all
 Sugar Labs members and other interested parties as appropriate.


 Maybe it is all the years I have spent in many types of organizations
 (4H, Girl Scouts, homeowner's organizations, teacher's orgs, Sierra Club
 groups, etc.) that make this seem very familiar, simple, and
 straightforward. Hopefully the information below can help make it work well
 for Sugar Labs as well.


 A quick Google search turns up this list of criteria for a simple
 monthly treasurer's report. It says it should include:

1. the name of the organization.
2. the period which the report covers.
3. the cash balance at the beginning of the period.
4. the income received during the period (with sources)
5. the expenses paid during the period (with what it was for and
who was paid ... name only, no PII).
6. the cash balance at the end of the period.
7. the signature of the treasurer.

 Another easy to follow resource is this description of how to put such
 a report together: https://www.energizeinc.com/art/treasurers-report

 (Note: the sample they refer to in this is missing... you have to buy
 the book to see it!).


 Yesterday's financial report was very confusing and seeing Adam's email
 just seemed to make it worse. Maybe going forward we can 

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

The email was sent to rosano...@hotmail.com \\ is that her email address?
We have that one at the moment


On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Again
>
>
> Rosamel Ramirez Méndez also did not receive the email either one. She
> definitely wants to remain a member. Perhaps you have the wrong email
> address for her.
>
>
> I notice you are also missing all the folks from SugarLabs in Argentina
> and those in Chile as well.
>
>
> Caryl
> --
> *From:* IAEP <iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org> on behalf of James
> Simmons <nices...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2017 7:51:16 AM
> *To:* Ignacio Rodríguez
> *Cc:* iaep; sugar labs
> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list
>
> Ignacio,
>
> I did get a confirmation email this time, but it was sent to my work
> address:
>
> jim.simm...@walgreens.com
>
> and it would have been better to send it to my personal email:
>
> nices...@gmail.com.
>
> The email did not go into my Spam folder at work, so it is reasonable to
> assume that it had not been sent to my work email before this, as I
> definitely would have seen it there.
>
> James Simmons
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez <igna...@sugarlabs.org>
> wrote:
>
>> All verification emails have been re-sent.
>> Please check Spam folder :)
>>
>> If we keep having problems maybe we should check postfix/mail logs as I
>> suggested.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ignacio.-
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *B *
>>> cjl
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all, Hola a todos,
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to share the current Sugar Lab's member's list. After first
>>>> round of email verification was made,
>>>> we are a preliminary total of 98 members:
>>>>
>>>> 1 Aaron Borden
>>>> 2 Adam Holt
>>>> 3 Alejandro Gonzalez Barrera
>>>> 4 Alexander Dupuy
>>>> 5 Ana Cichero Mildwurf
>>>> 6 Andreas Gros
>>>> 7 Aneesh Dogra
>>>> 8 Anish Mangal
>>>> 9 Antonio Carlos
>>>> 10 Asaf Paris Mandoki
>>>> 11 Avni Khatri
>>>> 12 Benjamin Berg
>>>> 13 Benjamin Mako Hill
>>>> 14 Bernie Innocenti
>>>> 15 Bert Freudenberg
>>>> 16 Bill Bogstad
>>>> 17 Bob Stepno
>>>> 18 Carla Gomez Monroy
>>>> 19 Carol Lerche
>>>> 20 Carol Ruth Silver
>>>> 21 Chris Leonard
>>>> 22 Christoph Derndorfer
>>>> 23 Cristian Peñaranda Rojas
>>>> 24 Daksh Shah
>>>> 25 Dan Williams
>>>> 26 Dan Winship
>>>> 27 David Van Assche
>>>> 28 David Wallace
>>>> 29 Edward Cherlin
>>>> 30 Eli Heuer
>>>> 31 Frederick Grose
>>>> 32 Gary Martin
>>>> 33 George Hunt
>>>> 34 Gerald Ardito
>>>> 35 Greg DeKoenigsberg
>>>> 36 Greg Smith
>>>> 37 Guillaume Desmottes
>>>> 38 Harriet Vidyasagar
>>>> 39 Hernan Pachas
>>>> 40 I. T. Daniher
>>>> 41 Ian Bicking
>>>> 42 Ibiam Chihurumnaya
>>>> 43 Ifeanyi Mattew
>>>> 44 Ignacio Rodríguez
>>>> 45 Irma Couretot
>>>> 46 James F. Carroll
>>>> 47 Jean Piché
>>>> 48 Jecel Assumpcao
>>>> 49 Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez
>>>> 50 Jim Gettys
>>>> 51 John Watlington
>>>> 52 Jose Antonio Rocha
>>>> 53 Jose Miguel Garcia
>>>> 54 Kaif Khan
>>>> 55 Kevin Cole
>>>> 56 Kim Rose
>>>> 57 Laura Victoria Vargas
>>>> 58 Lionel Laske
>>>> 59 Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez
>>>> 60 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>>>> 61 Manusheel Gupta
>>>> 62 Marc Maurer
>>>> 63 Marco Pesenti Gritti
>>>> 64 Martin Dengler
>>>> 65 Michael Stone
>>>> 66 Nathanael Lécaudé
>>>> 67 Noah Kantrowitz
>>>> 68 Pablo Baqués
>>>> 69 Pablo Flores
>>>> 70 Paulo Drummond
>>>> 71 Phil Bordelon
>>>> 72 Rabi Karmacharya
>>>> 73 Rafael Cordano
>>>> 74 Rafael Ortiz
>>>> 75 Raul Hugo
>>>> 76 Rita Freudenberg

Re: [IAEP] IAEP Digest, Vol 110, Issue 54

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Can you both check again?

Thanks,
Ignacio.-

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Valerie Taylor  wrote:

> B
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:37 AM,  
> wrote:
> > Send IAEP mailing list submissions to
> > iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > iaep-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > iaep-ow...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of IAEP digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >1. [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list (Laura Vargas)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 00:36:48 -0500
> > From: Laura Vargas 
> > To: iaep , memb...@sugarlabs.org
> > Subject: [IAEP] [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list
> > Message-ID:
> > 

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I will re send all emails today. Let's hope all of them arrive

On 30 May 2017 16:15, "James Simmons" <nices...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Laura,
>
> I haven't been very active on the project lately, but I probably should be
> on this list. I never got the email.
>
> James Simmons
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all, Hola a todos,
>>
>> I'm happy to share the current Sugar Lab's member's list. After first
>> round of email verification was made,
>> we are a preliminary total of 98 members:
>>
>> 1 Aaron Borden
>> 2 Adam Holt
>> 3 Alejandro Gonzalez Barrera
>> 4 Alexander Dupuy
>> 5 Ana Cichero Mildwurf
>> 6 Andreas Gros
>> 7 Aneesh Dogra
>> 8 Anish Mangal
>> 9 Antonio Carlos
>> 10 Asaf Paris Mandoki
>> 11 Avni Khatri
>> 12 Benjamin Berg
>> 13 Benjamin Mako Hill
>> 14 Bernie Innocenti
>> 15 Bert Freudenberg
>> 16 Bill Bogstad
>> 17 Bob Stepno
>> 18 Carla Gomez Monroy
>> 19 Carol Lerche
>> 20 Carol Ruth Silver
>> 21 Chris Leonard
>> 22 Christoph Derndorfer
>> 23 Cristian Peñaranda Rojas
>> 24 Daksh Shah
>> 25 Dan Williams
>> 26 Dan Winship
>> 27 David Van Assche
>> 28 David Wallace
>> 29 Edward Cherlin
>> 30 Eli Heuer
>> 31 Frederick Grose
>> 32 Gary Martin
>> 33 George Hunt
>> 34 Gerald Ardito
>> 35 Greg DeKoenigsberg
>> 36 Greg Smith
>> 37 Guillaume Desmottes
>> 38 Harriet Vidyasagar
>> 39 Hernan Pachas
>> 40 I. T. Daniher
>> 41 Ian Bicking
>> 42 Ibiam Chihurumnaya
>> 43 Ifeanyi Mattew
>> 44 Ignacio Rodríguez
>> 45 Irma Couretot
>> 46 James F. Carroll
>> 47 Jean Piché
>> 48 Jecel Assumpcao
>> 49 Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez
>> 50 Jim Gettys
>> 51 John Watlington
>> 52 Jose Antonio Rocha
>> 53 Jose Miguel Garcia
>> 54 Kaif Khan
>> 55 Kevin Cole
>> 56 Kim Rose
>> 57 Laura Victoria Vargas
>> 58 Lionel Laske
>> 59 Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez
>> 60 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> 61 Manusheel Gupta
>> 62 Marc Maurer
>> 63 Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> 64 Martin Dengler
>> 65 Michael Stone
>> 66 Nathanael Lécaudé
>> 67 Noah Kantrowitz
>> 68 Pablo Baqués
>> 69 Pablo Flores
>> 70 Paulo Drummond
>> 71 Phil Bordelon
>> 72 Rabi Karmacharya
>> 73 Rafael Cordano
>> 74 Rafael Ortiz
>> 75 Raul Hugo
>> 76 Rita Freudenberg
>> 77 S. Daniel Francis
>> 78 Sam P.
>> 79 Sameer Verma
>> 80 Samuel (SJ) Klein
>> 81 Sean DALY
>> 82 Sebastian Silva
>> 83 Sora Edwards
>> 84 Stefan Unterhauser
>> 85 Tabitha Roder
>> 86 Tariq Badsha
>> 87 Thomas C. Gilliard
>> 88 Tim McNamara
>> 89 Tim Moody
>> 90 Tomeu Vizoso
>> 91 Tony Anderson
>> 92 Tony Forster
>> 93 Torello Querci
>> 94 Tymon Radzik
>> 95 Wade Brainerd
>> 96 Yamile Susana Galvis Rizo
>> 97 Yannick Warnier
>> 98 Yoshiki Ohshima
>>
>> If your name is not on the list and it should be, please reply ASAP (keep
>> copy to IAEP and membersATsugarlabs.org) and please specify if:
>>
>> A- You are a new member and wish to be added, or
>>
>> B- You didn't get the verification email that was sent on April 10, 2017,
>> or
>>
>> C- You did get the verification email that was sent on April 10, 2017 and
>> you did click on the verification link provided.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you everyone at Systems for the support and specially Ignacio for
>> leading the implementation.
>>
>> Blessings and regards,
>>
>>
>> Laura
>>
>> -- Membership and Election's Committe
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar Labs] Verified Sugar Labs member's list

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Is it possible to check postfix/mail log on sunjammer for april 10?
Emails were sent from Sunjammer


On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Samuel Cantero <scante...@gmail.com> wrote:

> B
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> B
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all, Hola a todos,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to share the current Sugar Lab's member's list. After first
>>> round of email verification was made,
>>> we are a preliminary total of 98 members:
>>>
>>> 1 Aaron Borden
>>> 2 Adam Holt
>>> 3 Alejandro Gonzalez Barrera
>>> 4 Alexander Dupuy
>>> 5 Ana Cichero Mildwurf
>>> 6 Andreas Gros
>>> 7 Aneesh Dogra
>>> 8 Anish Mangal
>>> 9 Antonio Carlos
>>> 10 Asaf Paris Mandoki
>>> 11 Avni Khatri
>>> 12 Benjamin Berg
>>> 13 Benjamin Mako Hill
>>> 14 Bernie Innocenti
>>> 15 Bert Freudenberg
>>> 16 Bill Bogstad
>>> 17 Bob Stepno
>>> 18 Carla Gomez Monroy
>>> 19 Carol Lerche
>>> 20 Carol Ruth Silver
>>> 21 Chris Leonard
>>> 22 Christoph Derndorfer
>>> 23 Cristian Peñaranda Rojas
>>> 24 Daksh Shah
>>> 25 Dan Williams
>>> 26 Dan Winship
>>> 27 David Van Assche
>>> 28 David Wallace
>>> 29 Edward Cherlin
>>> 30 Eli Heuer
>>> 31 Frederick Grose
>>> 32 Gary Martin
>>> 33 George Hunt
>>> 34 Gerald Ardito
>>> 35 Greg DeKoenigsberg
>>> 36 Greg Smith
>>> 37 Guillaume Desmottes
>>> 38 Harriet Vidyasagar
>>> 39 Hernan Pachas
>>> 40 I. T. Daniher
>>> 41 Ian Bicking
>>> 42 Ibiam Chihurumnaya
>>> 43 Ifeanyi Mattew
>>> 44 Ignacio Rodríguez
>>> 45 Irma Couretot
>>> 46 James F. Carroll
>>> 47 Jean Piché
>>> 48 Jecel Assumpcao
>>> 49 Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez
>>> 50 Jim Gettys
>>> 51 John Watlington
>>> 52 Jose Antonio Rocha
>>> 53 Jose Miguel Garcia
>>> 54 Kaif Khan
>>> 55 Kevin Cole
>>> 56 Kim Rose
>>> 57 Laura Victoria Vargas
>>> 58 Lionel Laske
>>> 59 Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez
>>> 60 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>>> 61 Manusheel Gupta
>>> 62 Marc Maurer
>>> 63 Marco Pesenti Gritti
>>> 64 Martin Dengler
>>> 65 Michael Stone
>>> 66 Nathanael Lécaudé
>>> 67 Noah Kantrowitz
>>> 68 Pablo Baqués
>>> 69 Pablo Flores
>>> 70 Paulo Drummond
>>> 71 Phil Bordelon
>>> 72 Rabi Karmacharya
>>> 73 Rafael Cordano
>>> 74 Rafael Ortiz
>>> 75 Raul Hugo
>>> 76 Rita Freudenberg
>>> 77 S. Daniel Francis
>>> 78 Sam P.
>>> 79 Sameer Verma
>>> 80 Samuel (SJ) Klein
>>> 81 Sean DALY
>>> 82 Sebastian Silva
>>> 83 Sora Edwards
>>> 84 Stefan Unterhauser
>>> 85 Tabitha Roder
>>> 86 Tariq Badsha
>>> 87 Thomas C. Gilliard
>>> 88 Tim McNamara
>>> 89 Tim Moody
>>> 90 Tomeu Vizoso
>>> 91 Tony Anderson
>>> 92 Tony Forster
>>> 93 Torello Querci
>>> 94 Tymon Radzik
>>> 95 Wade Brainerd
>>> 96 Yamile Susana Galvis Rizo
>>> 97 Yannick Warnier
>>> 98 Yoshiki Ohshima
>>>
>>> If your name is not on the list and it should be, please reply ASAP
>>> (keep copy to IAEP and membersATsugarlabs.org) and please specify if:
>>>
>>> A- You are a new member and wish to be added, or
>>>
>>> B- You didn't get the verification email that was sent on April 10,
>>> 2017, or
>>>
>>> C- You did get the verification email that was sent on April 10, 2017
>>> and you did click on the verification link provided.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you everyone at Systems for the support and specially Ignacio for
>>> leading the implementation.
>>>
>>> Blessings and regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Laura
>>>
>>> -- Membership and Election's Committe
>>>
>>> ___
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] email motion re Scratch Conference

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I still don't know the difference of "seconded" or +1 to be honest :P

But as I already said, its +1 from me

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:01 PM Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Sameer Verma <sve...@sfsu.edu> wrote:
>
>> I second.
>>
>> Sameer
>>
>> On May 19, 2017 5:50 AM, "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps someone can second the motion so we can begin voting?
>>
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Samson Goddy <samsongo...@sugarlabs.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you all for the positive comments. But i am little sad that since
>>> wednesday, only one vote has been made. Where we have 7 SLOBs member in
>>> this community. I am pleading to other SLOBs member to come and vote, so
>>> that i and Ibiam can have idea what to do next if this motion passes or
>>> not. Because if this motion pass, we will have to wait for SFC 30 days
>>> policy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Samson Goddy
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez <
>>> igna...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone
>>>>
>>>> It's +1 from me :)
>>>> I've seen some pictures on Facebok and I love what you both are doing,
>>>> awesome work, Samson and Ibiam.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ignacio.-
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Avni Khatri <a...@kidsoncomputers.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Same. Not a member of SLOB but agree it's a well written proposal. +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 17, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a well thought out proposal for a worthy project. I am not a
>>>>> member of the SLOB so I can't vote. But I do hope it is approved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Caryl
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 17, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Samson and Ibiam are seeking funds to cover part of the cost to attend
>>>>> the Scratch Conference in Bordeaux France in July to promote Sugar. The
>>>>> detailed proposal is here [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Motion: Sugar Labs agrees to cover up to US$2800 for expenses related
>>>>> to traveling to the Scratch2017BDX, 17th to 22nd of July, 2017 for Samson
>>>>> Goddy and Ibiam Chihurumnaya.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/152VDfUcdcGOHOFBLT3lG15sUFpzBeuBCGiNAGCSOLj4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> -walter
>>>>> --
>>>>> Walter Bender
>>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SLOBs mailing list
>>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] email motion re Scratch Conference

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hi everyone

It's +1 from me :)
I've seen some pictures on Facebok and I love what you both are doing,
awesome work, Samson and Ibiam.

Thanks,
Ignacio.-

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Avni Khatri 
wrote:

> Same. Not a member of SLOB but agree it's a well written proposal. +1
>
> On May 17, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Caryl Bigenho  wrote:
>
> This is a well thought out proposal for a worthy project. I am not a
> member of the SLOB so I can't vote. But I do hope it is approved.
>
> Caryl
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 17, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Walter Bender 
> wrote:
>
> Samson and Ibiam are seeking funds to cover part of the cost to attend the
> Scratch Conference in Bordeaux France in July to promote Sugar. The
> detailed proposal is here [1].
>
> Motion: Sugar Labs agrees to cover up to US$2800 for expenses related to
> traveling to the Scratch2017BDX, 17th to 22nd of July, 2017 for Samson
> Goddy and Ibiam Chihurumnaya.
>
> [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/152VDfUcdcGOHOFBLT3lG15sUFpzBe
> uBCGiNAGCSOLj4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Well as I said +1.

Lets hope everything gets resolved ASAP

On 4/17/17, Walter Bender  wrote:
> -1 from me. It seems an arbitrary and unscalable request.
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Laura Vargas 
> wrote:
>
>> Ignacio, I believe you'll need to state your vote again :D
>>
>> Since I am the requesting party, my vote will be "abstain".
>>
>> For all other slobs that haven't vote yet: Adam, Sameer and Walter,
>> please
>> keep in mind motions need to be voted on via email within 7 days of
>> posting.
>>
>> In case any of you slobs require additional information please do ask on
>> time.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Laura V
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-04-13 9:07 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
>>
>>> +1 for me.
>>>
>>> On Apr 13, 2017 11:25 AM, "Lionel Laské"  wrote:
>>>
 Motion: Urgent maintenance budget of 500$ for fixing spam attacks on
 Sugar Network. Detail of the tasks to do are described in the Technical
 Service Request provided by Laura. It's an one shot motion to avoid
 interruption of service for Sugar Network users. Further investments on
 Sugar Network will be correlated to discussion about long-term support
 of
 the platform.

 Please second this motion to start the vote.

 Best regards.

  Lionel.

 2017-04-12 14:22 GMT+02:00 Laura Vargas :

> Thank you Lionel, Samson and Ignacio!
>
> The formal procedure requires a SLOB to propose "A motion" and then
> another SLOB to second it. In this way all other SLOBs will understand
> they
> are called to vote.
>
> I would appreciate if you guys can do this.
>
> Blessings and regards
> Laura V
>
>
> 2017-04-09 11:36 GMT-05:00 Lionel Laské :
>
>> I'm agree with the idea to think to the long-term but I think we
>> can't
>> leave loyal Sugar user without their tools.
>>
>> So +1 to process this TSR considering we can't process other requests
>> without thinking to the long term support of Sugar Network.
>>
>> Lionel.
>>
>>
>> 2017-04-08 16:39 GMT+02:00 Laura Vargas :
>>
>>> Once we solve the urgent need to neutralize Spam attacks, I would
>>> love to open the discussion for long-term support.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> 2017-04-08 9:34 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
>>>


 On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Laura Vargas
  wrote:

> We have supported Sugar Network on a voluntary basis without
> retribution since it's deployment on 2014. Unfortunately we ran out
> of
> resources and can't afford to dedicate the required time.
>

 This begs the question, what is next? How will the next issue be
 resolved? It seems a long-term solution should be discussed as
 opposed to a
 one-time patch.

>
> Regards
>
> Laura
>
>
>
> 2017-04-08 9:24 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
>
>> This document helps clarify what work needs to be done. What is
>> not clear to me is why this is work that needs to be funded as
>> opposed to
>> being done by volunteers.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Laura Vargas <
>> la...@somosazucar.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> As per SLOB's request in yesterday's meeting, I'm attaching the
>>> Sugar Network urgent maintenance project proposal.
>>>
>>> I hope this documents covers all the information required by
>>> SLOB's to make a decision.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards from the Peruvian Amazon forest,
>>>
>>> Laura
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-04-02 23:58 GMT-05:00 Laura Vargas :
>>>
 Dear Community members, Oversight Board Members and Free
 Software Conservancy Staff,


 I would like to add the following request to the upcoming
 April's Sugar Labs Oversight Board meeting:



 Our dear *Sugar Network is in #urgent need of maintenance*.

 Due the the recurrent *spam attacks *we have had during
 previous months, and due to the fact that we are serving a large
 group of
 active users during the local school year, I'm hereby requesting
 funds to
 perform the following technical services:


 -  The addition of a "Captcha" identifier for the 3 main 

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

It's +1 from me as well.

I've seen what this guys have done in past, and by keeping the support of
Sugar Network, we indirectly increase our users (not sugarlabs directly,
but sugar itself).

So I think it benefits all :)

Sorry for my bad English,
Ignacio
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] ping

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

+1 from me, It's a great opportunity to mentor volunteers / get new
members / advertisement.

About funding more than one project, we can try to first fund one, and
see how it goes.

Greetings


On 2/17/17, Samson Goddy <samsongo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am cool with the idea of the Outreachy, i also believe if we can fund
> more than one project. Then we should do it. That's a +1 for me.
>
> Samson
>
> On 16 Feb 2017 3:21 a.m., "Walter Bender" <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have anything to say regarding my Outreachy motion?
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Services provided by Sugarlabs - Inventory - Maintainers

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

> kuckuck
I'm almost the only user, I use it for "random" subjects, like testing
scripts or services, or hosting bots as gcibot. AFAIK it only uses 1gb
of ram and 20gb of space, so if it doesn't bother anyone I would like
to keep it running. Thanks

On 2/18/17, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Samuel,
>
> I wanted to make a few comments on just a few parts of this list.
>
>> Justice:
>>
>> 1. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS,
>> 2. Maintainers: Bernie Innocenti, Sebastian Silva and Samuel Cantero.
>> 3. Services (VMs running inside this node):
>
> Thanks to you, Sebastian and Bernie for maintaining this core server
> (justice), it is indispensable to our mission, and I don't think you
> guys can ever be thanked enough for the work you do to keep this
> running and providing the many services it hosts.
>
>> amnesia:
>>
>> OS: Fedora 18. This OS has reached End of Life.
>> Maintainer: X.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> Apparently it's used by Paraguay Educa. It's running an HTTP server,
>> MySQL, etc.
>> Are we still using this?
>
> Let me (and maybe Walter) reach out to ParaguayEduca about amnesia.
> Walter presented in Paraguay not too long ago and he and I are also
> working on some great stuff in terms of Guaraní (Paraguay)
> localization that will be the subject of some upcoming posts to this
> list and hopefully discussion by the SLOB.
>
>> aslo:
>>
>> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.5. EOL: April 2019.
>> Maintainer: Samuel Cantero.
>> Codebase maintainer: X. it would be nice to have someone behind it.
>> Aleksey have been helping so far.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> activities.sugarlabs.org
>
> Obviously a critical piece of infrastructure for getting our code out
> there.  I only wish more of the activities posted there were set up
> for i18n so that we could localize them on Pootle.
>
> I've got a partial (and certainly outdated) inventory of the
> activities on ASLO (see attached file).  I'd love to work with someone
> on updating and completing it, particularly with an eye toward trying
> to identify additional high-priority targets of i18n/L10n or migration
> to our main  github repository.
>
>> pootle:
>>
>> OS: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS.
>> Maintainer: Chris Leonard.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> translate.sugarlabs.org
>
>
> That OS is getting long-in-the-tooth.  We are going to want to upgrade
> to Version 2.8 of Pootle in the near future, it could be released any
> day now.  It will bring back some nice features like repository
> integration (via the Pootle FS) that will make the back and forth of
> POT files and PO files in the repos much easier.
>
> http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/pootle/en/latest/releases/2.8.0.html
>
> We will obviously want to do that in a new VM (with  a current OS)
> when we do it, but eventually the new instance will completely replace
> the old instance (after a proper migration).  I'd be thrilled to begin
> working on a migration project with one of the sysadmins, but I know
> it won't be Bernie, because he won't touch Django (ask him what he
> really thinks about Django sometime).
>
>> Jita:
>>
>> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
>> Maintainer: X.
>> Services provided:
>>
>> git.sugarlabs.org (gitorious). Someone should move all repos inside
>> git.sl.o to GitHub.
>
> As I think was demonstrated today, there is still some great code that
> hasn't made it to github yet.  I'd like to approach a Gitorious
> de-commission methodically so we don't lose anything worthwhile, I
> only called out those repos that already were hosted on Pootle.  I'm
> sure there is more good stuff left behind and we might want to start
> by de-duplicating old Gitorius from current Github repos.  Who would
> like to form the Gitorious De-commisioning Committee with me to
> inventory old git and start trimming away things that have a new home?
>  I can guarantee that there will be things that need community input
> from this list (e.g. which slider puzzle version is worth carrying
> forwardf?).
>
>
> cjl
>


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Stopwatch activity maintainer needed.

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hello, I'll take care of it asap.
Will move it to github.com/sugarlabs and report back

On 2/18/17, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can one of our activity maintainers please rescue StopWatch from our
> old git repository and migrate it to github?
>
> https://git.sugarlabs.org/stopwatch
>
> We got lots of localization for this, but it need to be migrated so I
> can land the new strings.
>
> cjl
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] Google Summer of Code 2017

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Count me in as a mentor.

As I suggested in #sugar, we should focus on FIXING/OPTIMIZING code
instead of creating new one this year.. (I know it's students choice,
but we can put some ideas in the wiki)

On 1/22/17, Lionel Laské <lionel.la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SugarLabs participation in GSoC is very important. Previous GSoC give me
> lot of opportunities to improve Sugarizer activities/features in a very
> impressive way. I don't have Sugarizer projects proposal for GSoC 2017 for
> the moment but I will certainly have projects to submit.
>
> BTW I think that we must be very cautious on:
> - Project selection: one project is one token, i.e. one student working for
> us during months. We can't lost a token opportunity for a project with few
> interest or with few chance to go to its end. We should have an objective
> view on project from last years: how many projects are really integrated
> into Sugar/Sugarizer today ?
> - Mentor selection: a mentor should be someone with experience on its
> subject. He must perfectly know the project, the project goal and must have
> a very good technical knowledge of its subject. So, sorry to say that not
> everyone could be a mentor.
>
> May be it could be interesting to imagine a sort of selection process for
> projects, then for mentors.
>
> Best regards for France.
>
> Lionel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-01-22 16:06 GMT+01:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Charles <cco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Walter,
>>>
>>> I'm new to Sugar but have recently started working on contributions so
>>> Sugarizer and also to Sugar.  I would like to be involved in Sugar's
>>> GSOC
>>> this year as a mentor, or other.  I have the experience with Python and
>>> JavaScript, just not with Sugar all this time until now.  What is
>>> involved
>>> in being an administrator?
>>>
>>
>> The admin role (we need two) is more about managing the logistics:
>> ensuring we are fulfilling all of our obligations as a participating
>> organization in terms of mentoring, reporting, etc.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Charles Cosse
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are still wrapping up GCI and already Google has announced that the
>>>> application window for Google Summer of Code [1] is open. Before I
>>>> pursue
>>>> the possibility of Sugar Labs participating, I wanted to get a sense of
>>>> the
>>>> opinion of the Sugar Labs community and the Sugar Labs oversight board.
>>>> Should I apply on behalf of Sugar Labs? Anyone interested in either
>>>> being a
>>>> mentor or an administrator?
>>>>
>>>> regards.
>>>>
>>>> -walter
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Walter Bender
>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>>> [1] https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-cosse> | E-Learning
>>> <http://www.asymptopia.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>
>> ___
>> SLOBs mailing list
>> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>
>>
>


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [UKids] [Announcement] Sugarizer v0.8 is available for your device

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

 around the world. With Sugarizer, you could discover the Sugar Learning
> Platform on any Windows device. Sugarizer include a bunch of educative
> activities coming from the Sugar Learning Platform. A collection of tools
> that learners use to explore, discover, create, and reflect. Sugarizer is an
> open source software under Apache 2 licence, source code is available on
> Github.
>
>
>
> [2] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.olpc_france.sugarizer
>
> [3] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NKK7PZA
>
> [4] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sugarizer/id978495303
>
> [5]
> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/sugarizer/omfgclgehghdlloggibhgicnlldjiboo
>
> [6] https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdid=org.olpc_france.sugarizer
>
> [7] http://sugarizer.org/sugarizeros-beta.apk
>
> [8] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugarizer
>
>
>
> --
> Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @ http://unleashkids.org !
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Unleash Kids" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to
> unleashkids+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:unleashkids+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hi!

If it's possible, I would like to apply to be part of SLOBs this year :)

2016-12-01 19:45 GMT-03:00, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>:
> Samson,
>
> Seems like you will be leading this year!
>
> Another option I see to save time would be to directly name the last 3
> candidates from last year's election. Not sure if this has ever been done
> before.
>
>
> Regards and let's hope this Christmas brings joy to everyone :D
>
>
> 2016-12-01 17:29 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy <samsongo...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I guess so
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Dave:
>>>
>>> http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_dd38dc6aa11d1a98 says
>>> "The top four candidates will serve 2 year terms and the next three will
>>> serve 1 year terms" and here's the ordered list:
>>>
>>> 1. Walter Bender
>>> 2. Lionel Laské
>>> 3. Adam Holt
>>> 4. Sameer Verma
>>> 5. Claudia Urrea
>>> 6. Tony Anderson
>>> 7. Jose Miguel Garcia
>>>
>>> Therefore Tony, Jose Miguel, and Claudia's seats will be elected this
>>> year.
>>>
>>> I guess it only makes sense to have an election if there are more
>>> candidates than seats. Right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Laura
>>>
>>> 2016-12-01 16:06 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> This year I am not on the election committee because I am very involved
>>>> in setting up an OSSIE track for SCaLE. I don't know who is on the
>>>> committee this time or what their time table is. It probably should be
>>>> finalized at tomorrow's meeting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Caryl
>>>> --
>>>> *From:* Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM
>>>> *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland
>>>> *Cc:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson
>>>> goddy; Tony Anderson
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs
>>>>
>>>> Caryl,
>>>>
>>>> I Agree with you, we should be patient. The academia certification
>>>> system consumes a lot of time from people :P
>>>>
>>>> You lead last year election time table, Any news this year?
>>>>
>>>> Dave,
>>>>
>>>> I recall you also joined the Elections Committee early this year, I
>>>> hope
>>>> you still have time :D
>>>>
>>>> Regards and blessings,
>>>>
>>>> Laura Victoria
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-12-01 14:47 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree with Dave, we should wait for Sameer's guidance in this
>>>>> process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Caryl
>>>>> --
>>>>> *From:* IAEP <iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org> on behalf of Laura
>>>>> Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:13:55 AM
>>>>> *To:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> *Cc:* Tony Anderson; Dave Crossland
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>
>>>>> I am really interested in continue helping the community to shape it's
>>>>> vision for the following 10-15 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe society in general, needs urgently to rescue respect for the
>>>>> voice of women and young girls, specially in
>>>>> free/libre-culture/software
>>>>> projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> That said I have found that helping out is easier when your voice also
>>>>> has a vote attached.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's why I present my candidacy for the commingling board elections.
>>>>> Sebastian has shared with me he has no time to be part of this years
>>>>> election (is it 3 seats? is it for 2017-2019?) committee, so I ask all
>>>>> the
>>>>> other members to please set the time line in tomorrow's meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you all for the time!
>>>>>
>>>>> 

Re: [IAEP] GCI possible task

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Task name: Port PLE activity to Sugarizer
Description: Using sugar-web and sugarizer structure, port PLE (Peru
Learns English) to sugarizer (~convert it to a web activity)
  Useful links:
   - https://github.com/icarito/peru-learns-english/
   - https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer
   - https://developer.sugarlabs.org/web-activity.md.html

Instance count: 1
Time to complete (in days): 4
Categories: Code, Outreach / Research

Mentors:
 - Ignacio Rodríguez
 - anyone else can mentor (add yourself if you want)

Is this "template" ok? (If it is I will add the task)
--

Can you remind me which activities where the "transformando" ones?
(My idea is kinda to use that template for each activity)



2016-11-24 12:54 GMT-03:00, Laura Victoria Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>:
> Thank you Igancio!
>
> I guess porting all the "transformando" activities migh be a worthy and
> interesting challenge...
>
> Also, I been thinking it might be easier for participants to engage if
> we get to divide the task into many sub-tasks... not sure but it is an
> idea!
>
> Regards, blessings and happy thanksgiving!!!
>
> Laura Victoria
>
> El mié, 23 de nov 2016 a las 4:10 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez
> <igna...@sugarlabs.org> escribió:
>> I'll add it -if no other mentor has yet- and will let you know!
>>
>> Thanks for the idea :D
>>
>> 2016-11-23 12:08 GMT-03:00, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>:
>>>  Hi All!
>>>
>>>  I'm exploring the interest of upcoming GCI participants in the
>>> following
>>>  task:
>>>
>>>  - Porting PLE to Sugarizer
>>> https://github.com/icarito/peru-learns-english/
>>>
>>>  Please ping if interested.
>>>
>>>  Thank you in advance!
>>>  --
>>>  Laura V.
>>>  I SomosAZUCAR.Org
>>>  IRC kaametza
>>>
>>>  Happy Learning!
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ignacio Rodríguez
>


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] GCI possible task

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I'll add it -if no other mentor has yet- and will let you know!

Thanks for the idea :D

2016-11-23 12:08 GMT-03:00, Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org>:
> Hi All!
>
> I'm exploring the interest of upcoming GCI participants in the following
> task:
>
> - Porting PLE to Sugarizer https://github.com/icarito/peru-learns-english/
>
> Please ping if interested.
>
> Thank you in advance!
> --
> Laura V.
> I SomosAZUCAR.Org
> IRC kaametza
>
> Happy Learning!
>


-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Google Code In 2016

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Yay :D

I would like to be a mentor.
I'm kinda busy ATM (final week of school), so sorry if I don't do anything
D:


Greetings




2016-11-07 19:10 GMT-03:00 Utkarsh Tiwari :

> Hi,
>  Congratulations! I would like to volunteer for SugarLabs as mentor in
> GCI 2016. I have already added my name on SL GCI wiki page but I could not
> find any registration links for mentors on GCI official page.
>
> Regards,
> Utkarsh Tiwari
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Avni Khatri 
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations, very exciting!
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Walter Bender 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Great news. Sugar Labs was once again accepted as one of the
>> organizations participating in Google Code In.
>>
>> We have a few weeks to prepare. If you are interested in being a mentor,
>> please contact me and also please sign up at https://codein.withgoogle.c
>> om
>>
>> If you have project/task ideas, please send them my way or add them to
>> the wiki page at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/
>> go/Google_Code_In_2016#This_is_a_stub_for_25.2B_example_task
>> s_new_for_GCI_2016.
>>
>> As always, I am very much looking forward to GCI.
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ütkarsh Tiwari
>
>
>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] GCI 2016 meeting

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

So that's it.

Meeting is today at 6pm UTC in #sugar-meeting = 2pm EST

We can change it if anyone wants.

Greetings,
Ignacio


2016-10-25 5:03 GMT-03:00 Ignacio Rodríguez <igna...@sugarlabs.org>:

> 12:00UTC is too "early" for me :/
>
> 6pm UTC its ok for me (I will be at school, but I will have a free moment
> for sure)
>
> Anyone else can answer?
>
> I will try to send the logs once the meeting is over.
>
>
>
>
> 2016-10-24 18:07 GMT-03:00 Manash Raja <mpdman...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I too would like to volunteer for GCI'16 mentorship. 12:00UTC is fine for
>> me.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Manash Pratim Das
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Ütkarsh Tiwari <
>> iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>  I would like to volunteer for the GCI'16
>>> mentorship. We could schedule tomorrow's meeting at our usual time that is
>>> 12:00UTC on #sugar-meeting. What do others suggest?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez <
>>> igna...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone!
>>>>
>>>> GCI 2016 is near, and this year, like previous years it will be awesome
>>>> if we apply. But for this we need mentors and a list of tasks (the students
>>>> will come, thats for sure :)).
>>>>
>>>> So, I would like to have a meeting to discuss this topic.
>>>>
>>>> When? Tomorrow (25/10)
>>>> At what time? Well, I don't know. I would like to get replies in this
>>>> email about what time is good for you, if nobody replies I may have to
>>>> chose a time.
>>>> Where? irc (freenode) #sugar-meeting
>>>>
>>>> You can join us using chat.sugarlabs.org :)
>>>>
>>>> Count me in as mentor.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Ignacio
>>>>
>>>> -- as usual, sorry for my bad English :P --
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Ütkarsh Tiwari
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] GCI 2016 meeting

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

12:00UTC is too "early" for me :/

6pm UTC its ok for me (I will be at school, but I will have a free moment
for sure)

Anyone else can answer?

I will try to send the logs once the meeting is over.




2016-10-24 18:07 GMT-03:00 Manash Raja <mpdman...@gmail.com>:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I too would like to volunteer for GCI'16 mentorship. 12:00UTC is fine for
> me.
>
> Regards,
> Manash Pratim Das
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Ütkarsh Tiwari <
> iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>  I would like to volunteer for the GCI'16
>> mentorship. We could schedule tomorrow's meeting at our usual time that is
>> 12:00UTC on #sugar-meeting. What do others suggest?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez <igna...@sugarlabs.org
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone!
>>>
>>> GCI 2016 is near, and this year, like previous years it will be awesome
>>> if we apply. But for this we need mentors and a list of tasks (the students
>>> will come, thats for sure :)).
>>>
>>> So, I would like to have a meeting to discuss this topic.
>>>
>>> When? Tomorrow (25/10)
>>> At what time? Well, I don't know. I would like to get replies in this
>>> email about what time is good for you, if nobody replies I may have to
>>> chose a time.
>>> Where? irc (freenode) #sugar-meeting
>>>
>>> You can join us using chat.sugarlabs.org :)
>>>
>>> Count me in as mentor.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Ignacio
>>>
>>> -- as usual, sorry for my bad English :P --
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ütkarsh Tiwari
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] GCI 2016 meeting

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hi everyone!

GCI 2016 is near, and this year, like previous years it will be awesome if
we apply. But for this we need mentors and a list of tasks (the students
will come, thats for sure :)).

So, I would like to have a meeting to discuss this topic.

When? Tomorrow (25/10)
At what time? Well, I don't know. I would like to get replies in this email
about what time is good for you, if nobody replies I may have to chose a
time.
Where? irc (freenode) #sugar-meeting

You can join us using chat.sugarlabs.org :)

Count me in as mentor.

Greetings,
Ignacio

-- as usual, sorry for my bad English :P --
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Github Student Developer Pack

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I got that package like a year ago, and its really cool! :D

Is not that easy to get it (you need to be a student), it took me few
months.

But was worth the wait

2016-05-15 10:32 GMT-03:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com>:

> Seems like a good idea for Sugar Labs!!! Wonder what sort of packaging
> they require?
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> https://education.github.com/pack
>>
>> Nice deal
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Dave
>>
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
> _______
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>



-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Membership deadline.

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hey Dan, don't worry about there are not 7 in the list.

I'm postulating myself, but I had no time to write my postulation.

Greetings

Ignacio Rodríguez
SugarLabs at Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/SugarLabs/187845102582>

2015-11-30 16:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Tenason <dan.tena...@mail.ru>:

>
> It looks like another deadline for the the membership drive has come and
> gone with four new members added to the spreadsheet at
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List .
>
> As a gauge of interest it would be helpful for membership committee to
> publish the aggregate statistics for how many people responded that they be
> interesting in participating in the election scheduled for December.
>
> Secondly there are six candidates for seven open positions on the
> oversight board. In a quick search, I could not find any participation by
> at least one of the candidates on any of the SugarLabs communication
> channels since 2013. This opens a few options: Postpone the filing deadline
> and subsequent election. Appoint the the current candidate list leaving one
> slot open. Reduce the size of the board to fire members and hold the
> election as scheduled.
>
> Or, one might seek to understand why interest in Sugar and Sugarlabs
> continues to decline.
>
> --
> Dan Tenason
>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Is Mr. Bender compensated by OLPC or any other organization?

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Sorry, I don't want to discuss this..

But who cares?

Lets be honest, without Walter, probably Sugar Labs would be different..

Anyway..
I don't care, but, just this is what I think..

Ignacio Rodríguez
SugarLabs at Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/SugarLabs/187845102582

2015-03-28 12:59 GMT-03:00 Dan Tenason dan.tena...@mail.ru:

 How much Mr. Bender is being compensated by OLPC for his work on Sugar or
 OLPC related matters? On the OLPC web site he is listed as a contractor.
 Mr. Cameron is also listed as a contractor. He is paid to provide support
 to regional projects. Has Mr. Bender been paid or provided travel expenses
 to promote either Sugar or OLPC since he publicly quite during his feud
 with Dr. Negroponte?


 --
 Dan Tenason

 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2015-01-21

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

 Finally, a few projects worth mentioning:

Also I want to add few more things :)
* The Sugar Labs promo video [1]
* The new feature in Speak, the user can load a Image and create her own
face [2]
* The new Dropbox webservice [3]
* The new help pages [4]

I want to say 'thanks' to the mentors, we have done a lot of work, they
should be very exhausted! :)
as GCI 2013 student [and also 2014 student], this year was better, we got
new students, now some of these are 'friends'.
This year, like last, we tried to help new students :)

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVRReDdoW9gfeature=youtu.be
[2]
https://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2014/5140598474407936
[3] https://github.com/ignaciouy/dropbox-webservice
[4] https://github.com/godiard/help-activity/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed

Also, my english is still poor :)


Ignacio Rodríguez
SugarLabs at Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/SugarLabs/187845102582

2015-01-21 22:18 GMT-02:00 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:

 == Sugar Digest ==

 In schools, all hardware and software bestow agency on one of three
 parties: the system, the teacher, or the learner. Typically, two of
 these actors lose their power as the technology benefits the
 third. Ask a group of colleagues to create a three-column table and
 brainstorm the hardware or software in your school and who is granted
 agency by each. Management software, school-wide grade-book programs,
 integrated learning systems, school-to-home communication packages,
 massive open online courses (MOOCs), and other cost-cutting
 technologies grant maximum benefit to the system. Interactive
 whiteboards, worksheet generators, projectors, whole-class
 simulations, plagiarism software, and so on, benefit the
 teacher. Personal laptops, programming languages, creativity software,
 cameras, MIDI keyboards, microcontrollers, fabrication equipment, and
 personal web space primarily benefit (bestow agency to) the
 learner. -- Gary Stager

 1. Google Code-In. Wow. Finally a chance to catch my breath. Seven
 intense weeks: 60 students completed more than 300 tasks for Sugar
 Labs. The impact on Sugar Labs was even greater this year than in the
 previous years we have participated: more diversity among the
 participants, the mentors, the tasks, and a spirit of collaboration
 while striving for excellence prevailed throughout the contest. Thanks
 to Google and Stephanie Taylor for giving us this opportunity, to the
 contestants who not only did great work but taught me a thing or two
 along the way, and the mentors and community members who manned the
 IRC channel 24/7.

 I want to acknowledge the Top Ten+ from whom we will be selecting our
 finalists this week (results announce in early February):

 Ignacio Rodríguez, Daksh, samdroid, cristian99garcia, Ezequiel
 Pereira, svineet, Gtrinidad, Jas Park, Rafael Cordano, Richar, Sergio
 Britos, Aishmita Kakkar, Gabriel Lee, et al.

 Also, some mentors (and community members) deserve special
 recognition: Andrés Aguirre, Daniel Francis, Gary Servin, Gonzalo
 Odiard, James Cameron, Jorge Ramirez, Mariah Villarreal, Rajul,
 Rodrigo Parra, and Martin Abente Lahaye.

 Finally, a few projects worth mentioning:

 * Turtle Blocks JS plugins (Ignacio, samDroid, Daksh) [1]
 * Turtle Blocks guides (Jas Park) [2]
 * Activity reviews (Gabriel Lee) [3]
 * Dasher app (Cristian Garcia) [4]
 * Enhancements to Physics (Svineet) [5]
 * Sugar bugs squashed (Ezequiel) [6]
 * Butia Measure (Gtrinidad) [7]
 * Simple scrolling interface for Sugar (Rafael) [8]
 and much much more.

 2. As mentioned above, we have a number of new Turtle Blocks plugins
 (for both the Python and Javascript versions) as a result of Google
 Code-in. One of the more interesting inspirations for plugins comes
 from mashape.com, a repository of APIs for everything from translation
 services to a bicycle theft alert system. As Sugar becomes more
 web-friendly, we can take advantage of web services and also
 facilitate our users to craft their own tools and services. It is fun
 and empowering.

 === In the community ===

 3. The Free Software Foundation has put together a nice video on the
 core ideas behind Free Software. See [9]

 === Tech Talk ===

 4. Xevents [10] is a TurtleBlocks plugin that makes it easy to design
 different types of accessibility interfaces through a variery of
 physical sensors types. It is being developed at FING by Andrés
 Aguirre and Alan Aguiar and was the focus of some of the Google
 Code-in work of Rafael Cordano.

 5. For you OLPC XO 4 users, James Cameron has been working on enabling
 the second processor. He reports about 38% improvement. For CPU tasks
 like rendering, alt/tab, kernel compiles, the improvement is somewhat
 more than 38%. For single threaded tasks that rely on memory
 bandwidth, performance is lower because the memory controller is
 shared between two cores. When asked how it impacts Sugar, he said
 it feels faster and more responsive.

 6. Martin has announced

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Sur] Google Code In wiki page

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Let's sort tasks by difficulty, this year GCI has a beginner task
 system. Tasks can be marked as beginner tasks.

Where you get the beginner task info?

Ignacio Rodríguez
nachoe...@gmail.com
SugarLabs at Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/SugarLabs/187845102582

2014-10-12 15:41 GMT-02:00 Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com:

 Let's sort tasks by difficulty, this year GCI has a beginner task
 system. Tasks can be marked as beginner tasks.

 On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Yes. Did it land? If so, please close the ticket with a link to your
  patch. Also, please remove it from the wiki page.
 
  -walter
 
  On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hey, sorry
 
 
 https://git.sugarlabs.org/~ignacio/stopwatch/irodriguez-gci2013-stopwatch/commit/d6dd98b04dea43bb58ca44e212f0e082237bce41
 
  I think I fixed that last year
 
  Use XO Game Keys For Stopwatch
 
  Ignacio Rodríguez
  nachoe...@gmail.com
  SugarLabs at Facebook
 
  2014-10-10 16:18 GMT-02:00 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
 
  Please help us edit http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Google_Code_In_2014
 
  Tip-o-hat to SAMDroid who has already contributed some tasks.
 
  -walter
 
  --
  Walter Bender
  Sugar Labs
  http://www.sugarlabs.org
  ___
  Lista olpc-Sur
  olpc-...@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
 
 
 
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 
 
 
  --
  Walter Bender
  Sugar Labs
  http://www.sugarlabs.org
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [Sur] Google Code In wiki page

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

(iii) you cannot complete more than 2 tasks labelled as beginner tasks.

Ignacio Rodríguez
nachoe...@gmail.com
SugarLabs at Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/SugarLabs/187845102582

2014-10-12 15:53 GMT-02:00 Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com:


 http://www.google-melange.com/gci/document/show/gci_program/google/gci2014/terms_and_conditions

 It's buried in there somewhere.

 On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Let's sort tasks by difficulty, this year GCI has a beginner task
  system. Tasks can be marked as beginner tasks.
 
  Where you get the beginner task info?
 
  Ignacio Rodríguez
  nachoe...@gmail.com
  SugarLabs at Facebook
 
  2014-10-12 15:41 GMT-02:00 Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com:
 
  Let's sort tasks by difficulty, this year GCI has a beginner task
  system. Tasks can be marked as beginner tasks.
 
  On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
 
  wrote:
   Yes. Did it land? If so, please close the ticket with a link to your
   patch. Also, please remove it from the wiki page.
  
   -walter
  
   On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez 
 nachoe...@gmail.com
   wrote:
   Hey, sorry
  
  
  
 https://git.sugarlabs.org/~ignacio/stopwatch/irodriguez-gci2013-stopwatch/commit/d6dd98b04dea43bb58ca44e212f0e082237bce41
  
   I think I fixed that last year
  
   Use XO Game Keys For Stopwatch
  
   Ignacio Rodríguez
   nachoe...@gmail.com
   SugarLabs at Facebook
  
   2014-10-10 16:18 GMT-02:00 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
  
   Please help us edit
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Google_Code_In_2014
  
   Tip-o-hat to SAMDroid who has already contributed some tasks.
  
   -walter
  
   --
   Walter Bender
   Sugar Labs
   http://www.sugarlabs.org
   ___
   Lista olpc-Sur
   olpc-...@lists.laptop.org
   http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur
  
  
  
   ___
   Sugar-devel mailing list
   sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
   http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
  
  
  
  
   --
   Walter Bender
   Sugar Labs
   http://www.sugarlabs.org
   ___
   Sugar-devel mailing list
   sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
   http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] New Finance Request: Attend to Sugar Camp on Colombia

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Please see: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4775

Regards,
Ignacio Rodríguez
fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY
@NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos
nachoe...@gmail.com
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Background contest site error fixed

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Now works perfect

Ignacio Rodríguez
fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY
@NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com


2014-05-05 11:31 GMT-03:00 Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org:

 Hi folks,
 Martin Abente found a error in the server code of our Background Contest
 site [1].
 If you had problems uploading your images, please try again.
 Please report if the error continue
 Regards,

 --
 Gonzalo Odiard

 SugarLabs - Software for children learning

 [1] http://contest.sugarlabs.org/

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Last day in Google Code In - San Francisco

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Hi all :)

As Gonzalo says that was a good trip, a lot of fun in San Francisco
(¡Without English! - thanks Gonzalo for be my translator and guide on all
SF :))!

We have a lot of Google Talks! And a lot of surprises here (Like Nexus 5 :o)
We went to the California Academy of Sciences [1] and we go to the aquarium
(random picture: [2])

So, That was a good prize!!

The hotel are the best thing here!

Stephanie and Google team do everything possible for have a very good travel

So... thanks Gonzalo and all Sugar Labs community!

Ah! Today we went to the CA university!! This is the best photo of all
travel! [3] :)

Oh! Just an anecdote! With Gonzalo, we lost the Google Bus, haha, we went
to the planetarium and we split up the group :P
But by the way, planetarium are beautiful! I'll recommend it if you go to
SF!

Well..  That was a unique opportunity, if you come here, please learn
english, haha :) If not, you need a translator like Gonzalo! :)

[1] http://www.calacademy.org/
[2] https://www.dropbox.com/s/hen8untlbblm2e2/2014-04-15%2015.56.24.jpg
[3] https://www.dropbox.com/s/6kcgnwrcadfhgdo/2014-04-16%2019.25.14.jpg

Ignacio Rodríguez
fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY
@NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com


2014-04-16 22:25 GMT-07:00 Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com:

 :O
 On Apr 17, 2014 10:48 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:

 As some of you may know, this week was the Google Code In winners
 ceremony,
 where Ignacio Rodriguez from Uruguay and Jorge Gómez López from El
 Salvador, our finalists,
 their parents and I on behalf of SugarLabs,
 came to San Francisco. This is brief report,
 to share the experiece with the community.
 The event was perfectly organized,
 with a excelent work from Stephanie Taylor,
 and her team. They shown not only profesionalism,
 but love by the project.
 We participated with other 9 projects.
 The event started the last Sunday at the night,
 with a presentation of all the winners, and food.
 Googlers gave us food, a lot of food, all the time :)
 The Monday we had a visit to the Google campus,
 with the official prizes ceremony,
 and a talk from Chris DiBona, Director of Open Source at Google.
 Later some Googlers gave us talks about the projects where they work, and
 about their career.
 All the talks were different, some more technical,
 some more human, but all had good advices for the kids.
 The Tuesday was a day to know the city,
 we could choice between go to Alcatraz Island,
 or to do a tour in Segway for the city.
 The Segway are fun devices, and we had a little
 training before doing the tour. Ignacio said the
 Alcatraz excursion was very fun too.
 Later we went to the Academy of Sciences,
 (is like a giant museum but alive, have collections,
 a beautifull aquarium, a planetarium, and so.
 We had a Behind the Scenes Tour, with a guide,
 and the possibility of see places not opened to the public,
 like the places where the researchers work.
 Today was the last day, we went to Google offices in SF
 and we had the possibility of present every one of our projects.
 Later we went to San Francisco State University,
 to meet Sameer Verma, who did a interview to
 Jorge and Ignacio.
 All the week was a very nice experience, we could talk face to face
 with our students, students from other projects,
 and other mentors. We interchanged experiences,
 about how they manage GCI and GSoC contest,
 and I tried to start contacts with other projects
 related to us. In fact tomorrow I will visit the
 Wikimedia offices (is amazing how many internet
 companies and groups are in the SF area)
 I will upload photos when return home,
 just need do a selection, SF is a incredible place,
 I took 1000 photos!
 Sameer already shared photos from the OLPC SF
 meeting the last Saturday, from my part,
 I enjoyed participate in the meeting.
 I talked about the features in Sugar 0.100
 and 0.102, the webactivities,
 and other trends in Sugar development.
 They shared the project they have, as the work in Pathagar and statistics
 visualization.
 I hope we can work more connected in the future,
 SugarLabs and OLPC SF.
 Regards,

 --
 Gonzalo Odiard

 SugarLabs - Software for children learning

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Last day in Google Code In - San Francisco

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Ah! And dont forget to vote Gonzalo as next Google CEO haha [1]

[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/m83b8ier8reijnb/2014-04-16%2009.49.50.jpg

Ignacio Rodríguez
fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY
@NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com


2014-04-16 23:11 GMT-07:00 Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com:

 Hi all :)

 As Gonzalo says that was a good trip, a lot of fun in San Francisco
 (¡Without English! - thanks Gonzalo for be my translator and guide on all
 SF :))!

 We have a lot of Google Talks! And a lot of surprises here (Like Nexus 5
 :o)
 We went to the California Academy of Sciences [1] and we go to the
 aquarium (random picture: [2])

 So, That was a good prize!!

 The hotel are the best thing here!

 Stephanie and Google team do everything possible for have a very good
 travel

 So... thanks Gonzalo and all Sugar Labs community!

 Ah! Today we went to the CA university!! This is the best photo of all
 travel! [3] :)

 Oh! Just an anecdote! With Gonzalo, we lost the Google Bus, haha, we went
 to the planetarium and we split up the group :P
 But by the way, planetarium are beautiful! I'll recommend it if you go to
 SF!

 Well..  That was a unique opportunity, if you come here, please learn
 english, haha :) If not, you need a translator like Gonzalo! :)

 [1] http://www.calacademy.org/
 [2] https://www.dropbox.com/s/hen8untlbblm2e2/2014-04-15%2015.56.24.jpg
 [3] https://www.dropbox.com/s/6kcgnwrcadfhgdo/2014-04-16%2019.25.14.jpg

 Ignacio Rodríguez
 fb.com/Ignacio.Rodriguez.UY
 @NachoDeTodos https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos
 +598 91 686 835
 nachoe...@gmail.com


 2014-04-16 22:25 GMT-07:00 Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com:

 :O
 On Apr 17, 2014 10:48 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:

 As some of you may know, this week was the Google Code In winners
 ceremony,
 where Ignacio Rodriguez from Uruguay and Jorge Gómez López from El
 Salvador, our finalists,
 their parents and I on behalf of SugarLabs,
 came to San Francisco. This is brief report,
 to share the experiece with the community.
 The event was perfectly organized,
 with a excelent work from Stephanie Taylor,
 and her team. They shown not only profesionalism,
 but love by the project.
 We participated with other 9 projects.
 The event started the last Sunday at the night,
 with a presentation of all the winners, and food.
 Googlers gave us food, a lot of food, all the time :)
 The Monday we had a visit to the Google campus,
 with the official prizes ceremony,
 and a talk from Chris DiBona, Director of Open Source at Google.
 Later some Googlers gave us talks about the projects where they work,
 and about their career.
 All the talks were different, some more technical,
 some more human, but all had good advices for the kids.
 The Tuesday was a day to know the city,
 we could choice between go to Alcatraz Island,
 or to do a tour in Segway for the city.
 The Segway are fun devices, and we had a little
 training before doing the tour. Ignacio said the
 Alcatraz excursion was very fun too.
 Later we went to the Academy of Sciences,
 (is like a giant museum but alive, have collections,
 a beautifull aquarium, a planetarium, and so.
 We had a Behind the Scenes Tour, with a guide,
 and the possibility of see places not opened to the public,
 like the places where the researchers work.
 Today was the last day, we went to Google offices in SF
 and we had the possibility of present every one of our projects.
 Later we went to San Francisco State University,
 to meet Sameer Verma, who did a interview to
 Jorge and Ignacio.
 All the week was a very nice experience, we could talk face to face
 with our students, students from other projects,
 and other mentors. We interchanged experiences,
 about how they manage GCI and GSoC contest,
 and I tried to start contacts with other projects
 related to us. In fact tomorrow I will visit the
 Wikimedia offices (is amazing how many internet
 companies and groups are in the SF area)
 I will upload photos when return home,
 just need do a selection, SF is a incredible place,
 I took 1000 photos!
 Sameer already shared photos from the OLPC SF
 meeting the last Saturday, from my part,
 I enjoyed participate in the meeting.
 I talked about the features in Sugar 0.100
 and 0.102, the webactivities,
 and other trends in Sugar development.
 They shared the project they have, as the work in Pathagar and
 statistics visualization.
 I hope we can work more connected in the future,
 SugarLabs and OLPC SF.
 Regards,

 --
 Gonzalo Odiard

 SugarLabs - Software for children learning

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep



___
IAEP -- It's

Re: [IAEP] [somos-azucar] Les comparto...

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Era hacer eso? Yo no entendia muy bien la tarea..

Osea la idea era buscar una forma de unir la red Azucar a través de Redes
Sociales / Chat, etc? :P

Que tonto fui !

Saludos.
Ignacio Rodríguez


El 23 de noviembre de 2013 02:50, Laura Vargas la...@somosazucar.orgescribió:

 Gracias a la oportunidad que nos dá participar este año en el Google Code
 In, podemos extender nuestros retos a estudiantes entre 13 y 17 años que
 quieran aportar con el proyecto Sugar Labs y la Red Azúcar.

 Les comparto la primera propuesta de uso de la 
 Georeferenciaciónhttp://network.sugarlabs.org/context/artifacts/9b45b9ea4e5611e399ed525400e4dcb5?page=1hecha
  por un estudiante ;O)

 Gracias Austin!


 --
 Laura V.
 ID SomosAZUCAR.Org
 Sugar Labs Perú - Sugar Labs Colombia
 Identi.ca/Skype acaire
 IRC kaametza

 Happy Learning!




 ___
 somosazucar mailing list
 somosazu...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/somosazucar


___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] looking for more activity reviewers

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I'm ready for this..

User: ignaciorodrig...@sugarlabs.org


2013/7/26 Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com




 On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Walter Bender 
 walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:

 I need to disappear for an hour or so, but will look for you later.


 I am also off to bed. Will follow you may be tomorrow on irc or if you can
 drop an mail with guidance, that would too be fine.


 You have an account set up already?


 At activities.sugarlabs.org? Yes



 -walter

 On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
  On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Walter Bender 
 walter.ben...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  We have a bit of a log jam forming on activities.sugarlabs.org so I am
  reaching out to community members who would be interested in joining
  the activity team to provide peer reviews.
 
  It doesn't require programming skills, just some familiarity with
  Sugar. The idea is to review new activity submissions for content and
  quality before they are set to non-experimental in the Sugar App
  Store.
 
 
  I would like to contribute in reviewing.
 
 
 
  I am happy to walk any interested parties through the process. Please
  contact me.
 
 
  Yes it is better to have a proper guidence.
 
 
  regards.
 
  -walter
 
  --
  Walter Bender
  Sugar Labs
  http://www.sugarlabs.org
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 
 
 
  --
  Best Regards,
 
  Kalpa Welivitigoda
  Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
  Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering
  University of Moratuwa
  Sri Lanka
  http://about.me/callkalpa



 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org




 --
 Best Regards,

 Kalpa Welivitigoda
 Junior Treasurer | Electrical Engineering Society
 Undergraduate | Department of Electrical Engineering
 University of Moratuwa
 Sri Lanka
 http://about.me/callkalpa

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
Ignacio Rodríguez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Local Labs Wikis was: Re: wiki.sugarlabs.org ongoing maintenance

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

I'm leaning to think the best option is to copy the pages that are good
from all {ar, co, cl, pe} wikis
into one single Sugar Labs / Laboratorios Azúcar América Latina instance.

+1 for the idea.
Maybe integrate Uruguay in SL pages {uy.sl.org?} ! [?]




2013/4/20 Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org

  Hi,
 When I did maintenance and upgrade of co.sugarlabs.org the only
 difference with the other local labs wikis,
 was that it had some extensions related to vandalism prevention:

 from LocalSettings.php:

 #dirakx para los vandalos
 # icarito - File Not Found
 #require_once( $IP/extensions/TitleBlacklist/TitleBlacklist.php );
 require_once( extensions/CheckUser/CheckUser.php );
 #require_once( includes/DatabaseFunctions.php );
 require_once( $IP/extensions/bad-behavior/bad-behavior-mediawiki.php );

 I had to disable the TitleBlacklist extension because I coudn't find it
 and did not have the time to go
 fishing for it.

 Perhaps this is a good opportunity to study what countermeasures / options
 we have to fix this issue,
 which is particularly grave for local labs wikis.

 I'm cc'ing Rafael (dirakx) who originally configured these countermeasures
 for co.sl.org.

 I'm leaning to think the best option is to copy the pages that are good
 from all {ar, co, cl, pe} wikis
 into one single Sugar Labs / Laboratorios Azúcar América Latina instance.

 This would reduce the maintenance burden and maybe revitalize /
 consolidate our spanish speaking
 community a bit more?

 Regards,
 Sebastian

 El 19/04/13 23:41, Stefan Unterhauser escribió:

 found one link ...
 http://co.sugarlabs.org/go/Eigene_Mail-Adresse_kostenfrei

  /me knows german :)

  by the way wonder why there is no sugarlabs favicon :(

  cu
 dogi

  PS: there are much more here http://co.sugarlabs.org/go/Especial:Todas

  Wonder if somebody is actively watching all
 http://co.sugarlabs.org/go/Especial:Seguimiento


 On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:

 Cristian Paul detected a surge of spam on co.sugarlabs.org... can
 someone please check? I'll be on a bus to NYC this afternoon.

 On 04/18/2013 02:27 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
 
  El 16/04/13 00:03, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
  Our wiki has grown quite large and the upgrade from Mediawiki 1.19 to
  1.20 required several slow steps, so unfortunately I had to leave
 before
  fixing up the local wikis.
 
 
  I ran maintenance/update scripts for:
  pe.sugarlabs.org
  cl.sugarlabs.org
  ar.sugarlabs.org
  co.sugarlabs.org
 
  They are back up, spammy as they are.
 
  Regards,
  Sebastian


  --
 Bernie Innocenti
 Sugar Labs Infrastructure Team
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Infrastructure_Team
 ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


330.gif___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] meeting reminder

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Uruguay:  21:00HS
Argentina: 20:00 HS

2013/2/24, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
 We have a Sugar Labs oversight board meeting scheduled for Monday, 25
 Feb. at 6PM EST (23UTC). Please join us at irc.freenode.net
 #sugar-meeting

 regards.

 -walter

 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] More new stuff in Make Your Own Sugar Activities1

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Link to book: http://en.flossmanuals.net/make-your-own-sugar-activities


2013/1/7 James Simmons nices...@gmail.com

 I just re-published the FLOSS Manual *Make Your Own Sugar Activities!*
 Several people did updates this weekend.  Lionel Laské wrote a new Guest
 Chapter on* Developing Sugar Activities Using HTML5.*  Daniel Francis put
 the finishing touches on ***Making contributions to Sugar.  *I even did
 some revisions to* Setting Up a Sugar Development Environment.*  And there
 is more good stuff to come.  We should have a chapter on using WebKit in
 your Activities, and possibly one on using the accelerometer that newer
 XO's have in your Activities.  And of course I will bring all the chapters
 I wrote up to date.

 All of this Activity has come from the Google Code-In (in Lionel's case
 it was indirect, as he offered to help someone in GCI finish his chapter).
 However, the book can use new content from authors of all ages.  If you
 have an idea for a Guest Chapter why not share it, or better still write
 the chapter yourself?

 Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the manual.

 James Simmons


 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
Saludos
Juan Ignacio Rodríguez
*CeibalJAM!*
*Somos Azucar*
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sur] Sugar Labs participation in Google Code-in

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

Oh! Parece que habra que participar! :)


2012/11/13 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com

 I am please to be able to announce that Sugar Labs has been selected as
 one of ten organizations to participate in Google Code-in 2012 [1]. The
 contest will start on November 26 at 17:00 UTC. I'll be sending out more
 details about how to participate, both as a mentor and as a contestant in
 the next few days. But in the meantime, please visit [2].

 Thanks very much to Chris Leonard and Bradley Kuhn for their help in
 putting together a successful application. This will be both fun and
 productive. I look forward to your participation.

 ---

 Estoy a favor de poder anunciar que Sugar Labs ha sido seleccionada como una
 de las diez organizaciones a participar en Google Code en 2012 [1]. El
 concurso comenzará el 26 de noviembre a las 17:00 UTC. Voy a enviar más
 detalles sobre cómo participar, tanto como mentor y como concursante en
 los próximos días. Pero, mientras tanto, por favor visite [2].

 Muchas gracias a Chris Leonard y Bradley Kuhn, por su ayuda en la
 elaboración de una aplicación exitosa. Esto será divertido y productivo.
 Espero contar con su participación.


 regards.

 -walter

 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org

 [1]
 http://www.google-melange.com/gci/document/show/gci_program/google/gci2012/help_page
 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Google_Code-In_2012

 ___
 Lista olpc-Sur
 olpc-...@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-sur




-- 
Juan Ignacio Rodríguez
CeibalJAM!
Activity Central
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2012-10-27

[Ignacio Rodríguez]

 is the
 message”, how do you think technology will evolve in the coming years?
 All forms of communication and information will be the material itself
 rather than a separate physical device.: McLuhan was wrong. The
 message is the message. We use different media to deliver it, more or
 less intact.

 2. Sugar Labs is applying to Google Code-in (GCI), a contest for
 pre-university students (e.g., high school and secondary school
 students) with the goal of encouraging young people to participate in
 open source.

 Why we are applying? Sugar is written and maintained by volunteers,
 who range from seasoned professionals to children as young as 12-years
 of age. Children who have grown up with Sugar have transitioned from
 Sugar users to Sugar App developers to Sugar maintainers. They hang
 out on IRC with the global Sugar developer community and are
 full-fledged members of the Sugar development team. It is this latter
 group of children we hope will participate in and benefit from Google
 Code-in. Specifically we want to re-enforce the message that Sugar
 belongs to its users and that they have both ownership and the
 responsibility that ownership implies. Just as learning is not
 something done to you, but something you do, learning with Sugar
 ultimately means participating in the Sugar development process. At
 Sugar Labs, we are trying to bring the culture of Free Software into
 the culture of school. So the Code-in is not just an opportunity for
 us to get some tasks accomplished, it is quintessential to our overall
 mission.

 Learn more about GCI [1] and the Sugar Labs GCI effort [2].

 3. Agustin Zubiaga Sanchez noted that last week we passed the
 threshold of more than eight million activities downloaded from the
 Sugar Labs activity portal [3]. I echo his sentiment that I'm very
 glad to be a sugarlabs developer. Congratulations to all the team :)

 === In the community ===

 4. Last weekend was the OLPC SF summit [4] in San Francisco, which was
 followed by a three-day Sugar Camp. Although I missed opening day, Day
 Two was quite interesting in that there was a lot of good discussion
 about how to sustain and grow the various volunteer-run OLPC/Sugar
 deployments. At Sugar Camp, although not much code was written, there
 was an opportunity to get tangible and actionable feedback from the
 likes of Mark Bradley (we pushed hard on Turtle Art as a multimedia
 toolkit). I also had the opportunity to catch up with Raul Gutierrez
 Segales, Ivan Krstić, and others.

 === Tech Talk ===

 5. The little coding I did do in San Francisco was in support of
 migrating more activities to touch. Specifically, I worked on
 integrating the on-screen keyboard into several of my activities:
 Portfolio and Turtle Blocks. The challenge was that I was using
 key-press events directly, rather than accessing them through a GTK
 widget such as a Entry or TextView. With help from Raul, I managed to
 get things working pretty well: basically, I just drop a TextView
 widget under the cursor where I expect keyboard input. The details are
 outlined here [5]. I'm generally pleased with the results, but there
 is a bit of fine-tuning of the interaction, e.g, you need to defocus
 the TextView in order to dismiss it: not such a burden, but at times,
 somewhat awkward.

 6. Ignacio Rodriguez has been on a tear, helping me to migrate
 activities to GTK 3. Over the past week, we converted: Card Sort,
 Cookie Search, Color Deducto, Deducto, Flip, Fraction Bounce, Loco
 Sugar, Napier's Bones, Nutrition, Paths, Pukllananpac, Recall,
 Reflection, GNUChess, Sliderule, Story, Yupana, and XO Editor. I also
 worked with Agustin Zubiaga on Portfolio, Flavio Denesse on Ruler, and
 Daniel Francis on Turtle Blocks. Whew.

 === Sugar Labs ===

 Visit our planet [6] for more updates about Sugar and Sugar deployments.

 -walter

 [1]
 http://www.google-melange.com/gci/document/show/gci_program/google/gci2012/help_page
 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Google_Code-In_2012
 [3] http://activities.sugarlabs.org
 [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp_SF_2012
 [5] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Touch/Programming_Tips
 [6] http://planet.sugarlabs.org


 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
Juan Ignacio Rodríguez
CeibalJAM!
Activity Central
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep