Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Separate Emails
Why not just petition for a change to the mailing list policies? Most lists.debian.org lists don't require subscriptions, it just makes the spam issue greater. On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, 18:04 Samson Goddy,wrote: > Hello, > > I am requesting possible two email addresses for the social media > accounts. I am proposing if we could have email accounts like " > i...@sugarlabs.org" that could be connected with iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org > and "syst...@sugarlabs.org" for "sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org". > > Why? because most people don't really buy the idea about subscribing to > mailing-lists first, before asking some important questions. I had issues > when handling questions thrown the SL twitter account, Tymon also had some > similar issue on Facebook. > > > > BR > > Samson Goddy > ___ > Systems mailing list > syst...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems > -- -- Luke ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Sugar Labs Oversight Board 2014
Hello all, Since we only had three candidates for three slots, the three candidates will assume their roles on the board. That is, * Chris Leonard (cjl) 2013 Candidate Statement http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Cjl/Candidate_Statement * Walter Bender 2013 Candidate Statement http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Walter#Regarding_the_Sugar_Labs_Oversight_Board * Jose Miguel Garcia (Jmgarcia) 2013 Candidate Statement http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Jmgarcia are members of the Sugar Labs Oversight Board effective 1 January, 2014. -- __ (_ Luke Faraone, Web Infrastructure __)ugarLabs.org ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Election Details for 2013-2014
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:43:43PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: If you or somebody you know should be on the ballot, make sure to publish an announcement of candidacy to IAEP, and put your name on the list[2] before December 7. This should have read December 15. Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs Cheers, Luke signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Luke Luke Faraone Software Engineer at Humbug, Inc. Greater Boston Area Confirm that you know Luke Faraone: https://www.linkedin.com/e/wa89wc-hgdqdi8b-4e/isd/13023789898/N-srj03B/?hs=falsetok=2seUoxXrOST5I1 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/wa89wc-hgdqdi8b-4e/XWe-FAnnZj4QsxtUTS1QQmnnx-eQyg25JWwYSD/goo/iaep%40lists%2Esugarlabs%2Eorg/20061/I4312082162_1/?hs=falsetok=3k0TyrmP2ST5I1 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Luke Luke Faraone Software Engineer at Humbug, Inc. Greater Boston Area Confirm that you know Luke Faraone: https://www.linkedin.com/e/rrnv5l-hgdqgav8-1j/isd/13023859755/j1ZPHNo0/?hs=falsetok=0fGWhPi16UT5I1 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/rrnv5l-hgdqgav8-1j/nnMXHFQjsgS0E7lk26QVd-yERoMLkE82/goo/hosted%40sugarlabs%2Eorg/20061/I4312104346_1/?hs=falsetok=3oKCJ2DuCUT5I1 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] 2012-2013 Oversight Board Election results
Hi all, The results are in! Please provide congradolences to our new Sugar Labs Oversight Board members: - Adam Holt - Gonzalo Odiard - Claudia Urrea - S. Daniel Francis The full results are shown at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/w8/~andru/cgi-perl/civs/results.pl?id=E_7fe0e83eba6b35ff. Thank you to everyone for participating. -- __ (_ Luke Faraone, Web Infrastructure __)ugarLabs.org ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Oversight Board Election has begun
Hi all, We have 6 candidates[1] for the Oversight Board election. Four seats are open for election this term. The election will finish at December 27, 2012 at 23:59. The candidates are: * Adam Holt * Gonzalo Odiard * Claudia Urrea * Sebastian Silva * Yama Ploskonka * S. Daniel Francis I encourage each Member to review the candidates' platforms in preparation for the coming election. Ballots will have been mailed by the time this email is sent. Individuals interested participating in next year's election should apply for membership[2]. NOTE: This election is being conducted via the Condorcet Internet Voting Service[3], operated by an independant third party. This is different from what was done in previous elections, and a departure from what was mentioned in the election announcement[4] due to concerns about Selectricity's reliability. [1]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2012-2013-candidates [2]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Applying_for_membership [3]: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/w8/~andru/civs [4]: http://mid.gmane.org/20121109220022.ga10...@cobalt.mit.edu -- __ (_ Luke Faraone, Web Infrastructure __)ugarLabs.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Oversight Board candidacy
Sebastian Silva sebastian@... writes: Hi Walter, Luke, community, This is to confirm my candidacy for re-election to the Oversight Board. Regards, Sebastian--Sebastian Silvahttp://somosazucar.org/ Hi Sebastian and others, Please post a link to your name and platform to http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2012-2013-candidates. As a reminder, anybody can self-nominate to run for the Oversight Board by midnight tonight. Cheers, Luke Faraone ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Election Details for 2012-2013
Hi all, It's that time of year again: oversight board election season! Four (4) seats are to be selected over the coming months. The timeline[1] for the election is as follows: == Timeline == - 2012-11-23 23:59 EST: Deadline for applications for membership. - 2012-11-24 23:59 EST: All membership applications processed. - 2012-12-07 23:59 EST: Candidate list closed. - 2012-12-08 17:00 EST: Ballots sent by email, start of voting period. - 2012-12-15 17:00 EST: Voting period ends. I'll send out additional emails as we near each of the deadlines. == Membership == If you haven't yet applied for membership in Sugar Labs, please do so. If you're wondering whether you meet the requirements, if you're a teacher using Sugar in your classroom, regularly reading mailing lists, or have discussed Sugar in IRC, you probably do. Follow the instructions on the wiki[3] before the deadline to ensure your vote is counted! You can find a list of current members online[4]. == Candidacy == If you or somebody you know should be on the ballot, make sure to publish an announcement of candidacy to IAEP, and put your name on the list[2] before December 7. == Election processes == Our election will be hosted at Selectricity, a service of the MIT Media Lab. Ballots will be sent out via email, and votes will be anonymous. All members are eligible to vote. If you have any questions about the process, feel free to contact me. [1]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members [2]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2012-2013-candidates [3]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Applying_for_membership [4]: http://bit.ly/sugarlabs-member-list Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Sugar Labs Board Election 2011-2012 Results
Hi all, Please welcome your recently (re)elected SLOBs: Walter Bender, Chris Leonard, and Gerald Ardito The remaining candidates (in order according to the Schulze method[1]): 4. Sridhar Dhanapalan and Laura Victoria Vargas (TIE) 5. Nick Doiron 6. David Farning [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method == Additional election result details == Out of 246 registered members, 64 individuals voted. In contrast, last year's elections saw 79 voters, and 63 votes were cast in the 2009 election. A graph of the Borda Count[2] (which assigns points to each ranking) is available at http://selectricity.org/graph/borda_bar/1969/graph.png, and the percentage of first-place voting is available at http://selectricity.org/graph/plurality_pie/1969/graph.png. Fortunately there was no tie in the top three spots. However, policy on resolving such a tie should be established before the next election season begins. [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda_count Sugar Labs would like to thank Mel Chua and Bernie Innocenti for their service on the Board. Congratulations to the new and returning SLOBs! -- Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Ballot information for 2011-2012 Sugar Labs election
meetings, including the SLOBS meetings and I have advocated for attention to the needs of our language communities in those forums as well as encouraging collaborative effort among Sugar Labs teams and upstream outreach to the wider FOSS community. I've gained a wide angle view of Sugar Lab's work, as well as having delved into excruciating detail in a number of areas. I've had the opportunity to work with a broad variety of stakeholders and I hope to use this perspective to help Sugar Labs grow it's community and reach it goals. === Laura Vargas === Currently working on Sugar Camp Lima 2011. Starting the century [2000] I graduated as an industrial engineer from the Colombian School of Engineering, the same year I began to specialize in international business, banking and finance at the University of Rosario. In 2005 moved to California to study film production [thanks to the Ministry of Culture and the Fulbright Commission Colombia] leading on my return the local production team of the film Love in the Time of Cholera. In Bogotá I became part of a select team, designing user experience for multiple commercial and educational web projects, until Free Software crossed my path in 2009 and first came the idea of getting involved with the group which was also dedicated software design aimed at children of primary school. I was accepted as a research associate at Escuelab and from there and hand to hand with Sebastian Silva, we incubated the research project somosazucar.org / sugarlab Peru with the aim of encouraging the use and development of free software SUGAR. My vision and reason for filing this application, is to align the system's efforts towards creating a secure, open and free Sugar Users Network where end users can interact with designers and developers. To achieve this goal I propose first to strengthen the network of local laboratories, procuring their sustainability and the sharing of their experiences and results. -- Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] REMINDER: Candidates list for 2011-2012 elections closes this Tuesday (Nov 15)
On 08/10/11 17:12, Luke Faraone wrote: - 2011-11-15 23:59 EST: Candidate list closed. We currently have 6 candidates for 3 board seats. The deadline for announcing your candidacy is Tuesday, November 15; ballots will be sent out the next day. If you are on the fence about running, please decide one way or another soon :) then follow the procedure below: == Candidacy == If you or somebody you know should be on the ballot, make sure to publish an announcement of candidacy to IAEP, and put your name on the list[2] before the end of October. [2]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2011-2012-candidates Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] REMINDER: Member list for 2011-2012 elections close this Saturday
On 08/10/11 17:12, Luke Faraone wrote: - 2011-11-07 23:59 EST: Deadline for applications for membership. As stated previously, the deadline for membership application is this Saturday. If you aren't listed here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List then please do apply as described below. If you haven't yet applied for membership in Sugar Labs, please do so. If you're wondering whether you meet the requirements, if you're a teacher using Sugar in your classroom, regularly reading mailing lists, or have discussed Sugar in IRC, you probably do. Follow the instructions on the wiki[3] before the deadline to ensure your vote is counted! You can find a list of current members online[4]. If you have any questions about the process, feel free to contact me. My SL email appears to be blackholing currently, so use my personal @faraone.cc address. [3]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Applying_for_membership Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Election Details for 2011-2012
Hi all, It's that time of year again: oversight board election season! Three (3) seats are to be selected over the coming months. The timeline[1] for the election is as follows: == Timeline == - 2011-11-07 23:59 EST: Deadline for applications for membership. - 2011-11-12 23:59 EST: All membership applications processed. - 2011-11-15 23:59 EST: Candidate list closed. - 2011-11-16 17:00 EST: Ballots sent by email, start of voting period. - 2011-11-30 17:00 EST: Voting period ends. I'll send out additional emails as we near each of the deadlines. == Membership == If you haven't yet applied for membership in Sugar Labs, please do so. If you're wondering whether you meet the requirements, if you're a teacher using Sugar in your classroom, regularly reading mailing lists, or have discussed Sugar in IRC, you probably do. Follow the instructions on the wiki[3] before the deadline to ensure your vote is counted! You can find a list of current members online[4]. == Candidacy == If you or somebody you know should be on the ballot, make sure to publish an announcement of candidacy to IAEP, and put your name on the list[2] before the end of October. == Election processes == Our election will be hosted at Selectricity, a service of the MIT Media Lab. Ballots will be sent out via email, and votes will be anonymous. All members are eligible to vote. If you have any questions about the process, feel free to contact me. My SL email appears to be blackholing currently, so use my personal @faraone.cc address. [1]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Timeline_for_2011-2012_Season [2]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2011-2012-candidates [3]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Applying_for_membership [4]: http://bit.ly/sugarlabs-member-list Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote: I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit, but thought it worth mentioning. Odd. Did you at least get the mail from Selectricity? -- Luke Faraone Sugar Labs, Systems ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum (non-binding) results
On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote: This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases of Sugar. This poll will run from right now until Wed Jun 29 2011 at midnight UTC-4. Sorry for the late update; the reporting mechanism for our voting software temporarily broke. Summary: the winner was **GNU GPL version 3, or any later version**. ## Results Details ## 55 out of 217 eligible members voted, or a little more than ¼. The full results of this election ranked the candidates in order of preference (from most preferred to least preferred): 1. GNU GPL version 3, or any later version 2. GNU GPL version 2, or any later version 3. Don't know or don't care Each number in the table below shows how many times the candidate on the left beat the matching candidate on the top. The winner is on the top of the left column. v3 v2 DC v3 -- 34 37 v2 21 -- 42 DC 18 13 -- Based on a sheer count of 1st place votes, v3 received 49% of the vote, v2 received 29% of the vote, and the apathetic position received the remaining 22% of the vote. Full details (and alternative election method calculations) are visible at the Selectricity page linked in the original voting ticket email. Thanks, Luke Faraone Sugar Labs, Systems ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Questions Re: Skype on XO
I'm not sure this is an apt question for IAEP. On 03/01/2011 09:24 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote: I need to be able to do a 2-way video chat. I would like to know... 1) How much memory does Skype take up? Disk space: the RPM page is 18.7MiB, so I'd imagine it takes up a little bit more than that on disk. RAM: depends. 2) Do the instructions on the wiki at apply to 860? I have not tested them, but they look like they should work. 3) What is the difference in performance between the XO-1 and the XO-1.5? 4) What is the reason for the difference, memory or speed or both? Probably proportional to the processors of each. Memory would only matter if Skype tried to use more than available. 5) Will I need to delete Activities before installing Skype? You need to have sufficient disk space. 6) Does it run just in Terminal in Sugar, or is there a way to use it in Gnome? It should be accessible from the Applications menu. 7) Can it run a video chat along with the text chat window for sending links etc? That's consistent with my experience of Skype on Linux, I'd imagine it would work similarly on the XO. 8 Do I have to have a PC to set it up? I am a Mac person. The instructions provided are run on your XO. 10) What is gstfakevideo? Do I need it? Do I want it? Hah, it has been ages since I wrote the video instructions. Those are *definitely* out of date, and I would be very surprised if they worked. -- \___/ |___| Luke Faraone, Web Infrastructure Intern \___\ One Laptop Per Child - http://laptop.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] election results
On 11/29/2010 09:27 AM, Walter Bender wrote: I am happy to report that Chirs Ball, Adam Holt, Aleksey Lim, and Sebastian Silva will be joining Bernie Innocente, Mel Chua, and me as new and returning members of the Sugar Oversight Board. The full results list, from most to least preferred, is as follows: 1. Chris Ball 2. Adam Holt 3. Aleksey Lim 4. Sebastian Silva 5. Rosamel Norma Ramirez Mendez 6. Claudia Urrea 7. Gerald Ardito 8. Pacita Peña 9. Steven Parrish Thank you all for running, and for those who voted. The full election data, including a breakdown of the results tables, can be viewed by accessing the link originally provided to you by Selectricity, the voting software used in the election. Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [Election] Membership and candidate lists finalized
Hi all, The membership and candidate lists are now frozen. We have 9 candidates[1] for the Oversight Board election: * Adam Holt * Steven Parrish * Chris Ball * Rosamel Norma Ramirez Mendez * Gerald Ardito * Sebastian Silva * Aleksey Lim * Claudia Urrea * Pacita Peña I encourage each Member to review the candidates' platforms in preparation for the coming election. Ballots will be emailed on Sunday. In 2010, Sugar Labs gained 42 members, bringing the total number of members[2] to 228. Please welcome Frits Hoff, Peter Robinson, I. T. Daniher, Anish Mangal, Gonzalo Odiard, Andrés Ambrois, Martin Abente Lahaye, Lionel Laske, Raul Gutierrez Segales, Daniel Castelo, Esteban Arias, Kandarp Kaushik, Tabitha Roder, Stephen Jacobs, Laura Victoria Vargas, Claudia Urrea, Pacita Peña, Aleksey Lim, Jeff Elkner, Antonio Carlos, Gustavo Ibarra, Jhan Carlo Perez Ramirez, Enrique Mayorga González, Gabriel Eirea, Jorge Luis Contreras, Javier Rodolfo Del Carpio López, Marcos Orfila, Pablo Baqués, Sebastián Codas Salinas, Cecilia Rodríguez Alcalá, Luis Patricio Acevedo Jimenez, Kevin Gordon, Yamile Susana Galvis Rizo, Alfredo Gutiérrez, Juan Camilo Lema, Johna Rupire, Antje Breitkopf, Ana Cichero Mildwurf, Rita Freudenberg, Rosamel Ramirez, George Hunt, Raul Hugo, and Tim McNamara to Sugar Labs. [1]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2010-2011-candidates [2]: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [Election] Membership registration deadline in two days
Hi all, This is an informational mail; nothing has changed since my previous date announcement last month. By Wednesday, 2010-11-10 23:59 EST, all applications for membership must be submitted if they are to be considered valid for the upcoming election. On the 13th, all applications submitted before this deadline will be processed, and ballots will go out the next day. The voting period ends two weeks later, on the 28th. Please see http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members#Applying_for_membership for information on how to apply. If you're not listed on http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List, we don't know to send you a ballot! In addition, some people have no email address on file, noted by a red NO next to their name. If you are this person, or you know how we can contact them, let me know and I'll fix it in the database. Thanks, Luke Faraone Membership and Elections Committee Sugar Labs ✉: l...@sugarlabs.org I: lfaraone on irc.freenode.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs potentially a trade mark infringer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/30/2010 01:09 AM, Tim McNamara wrote: Compare Breakout[1] with Break Out[2] I haven't checked the USPTO's database, but I'm fairly certain that Atari would have registered it. They have: Atari, Breakout, computer game programs and video game cartridges http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serialentry=76062330 - -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxS2cwACgkQtrC51grHAgaZpwCffIptr56vBPomrRme+8rIWyOi l9YAoJQFpUYrNfrq1qqUczNvWVibhdlb =5Qmj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Systems] [Sugar-devel] Mailing list administrators
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/22/2010 10:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: El Thu, 22-07-2010 a las 19:06 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió: the role of administrator for iaep@ and sugar-devel@ has been vacant for some time, so I've been filling in. This is incorrect: Luke Faraone has been the administrator of iaep@ for some time. I thought I had deleted this first draft before posting it... I try to run listadmin every week or so, which I set to check iaep, sugar-devel, systems, and soas. I've been partially on VAC, and have fallen behind in my checking, so apologies if mails have been getting stuck in the queue. - -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxI/zsACgkQtrC51grHAgZlBgCfdIbN+CE9GXSJYnDJXby06TPA i8gAoIcbb5Q5OQDNyLgtIWChoAUuzBAu =oBKJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Problems with Best OS Image Ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2010 10:26 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote: But, holding down the Escape key doesn't have any effect. It just does a regular boot. The XO is running Sugar 0.82.1. I have a developer key installed. Hold down the ? (check) key while pressing the power button, releasing it when prompted. What messages appear on-screen before boot? (at which point the display turns black, etc) - -lwf -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwez8kACgkQtrC51grHAgb56wCgj4zluTNNmXckug2mtPWL5iMn K/EAn0iJJSh9JNxrx6vITAJ4QCJpeRLs =TXnT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Soliciting SoaS v.4 Codename Colour Suggestions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/04/2010 11:19 AM, Anish Mangal wrote: Alphonso | saffron - red http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphonso_(mango) Alphonso is arguably the best available variety of Mango, which is one of the most awaited summertime fruits in India. Besides there are so many mango varieties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mango), it is only fair that one of them gets to be selected as a SoaS codename :-) It's also a proper name, shared by a number of people, including https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Alphonse_Capone. - -1. - -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwJHvAACgkQtrC51grHAgZapQCgpgbkKsyjRCJKSrIO19LBDTEX L5QAoJDLZKTSoSWW+e46Fu3mFagTkHOo =LYCP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [SPAM]Re: [SPAM]An intelligent sneakernet for the XO.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/13/2010 08:16 PM, William Schaub wrote: I would be interested in getting this integrated in sugar but right now its way too much of a mess for that. I wish they would just distribute perl with sugar and be done with it but that will likely never happen. I'm sure I could re-write the glue in python or even C if I needed to. but I figure Perl is probably Ok to stick with for the early stages of the project. Perl is part of every LSB-compliant Linux distribution (IIRC), and I believe it is shipped on the XO. We would like to guide you away from Perl since most of the developers have experience with Python, and thus we will be best able to help you with problems you encounter in that language. Furthermore, we feel that we can better maintain and review code written in a common language. - -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvFDlAACgkQtrC51grHAgaXUQCggcZcQCuPzstYVE0QR9j+5p0c WyQAn1iGkjBKt0ao+hJUXn3pZXOcABgR =AZf7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] is Soas safe?
[please drop iaep in followup emails, this is a technical discussion] On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 19:31, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote: I guess that harddrive-less units are totally OK, but what happens in normal, hard-drive based machines if somehow a stick gets infected? when booting from a USB stick, is it like when booting from a CD or for those old enough to remember, like booting from a floppy? I mean, that was THE way to get infected before Word macros started being the star, since such infection basically bypass all anti-malware protection, except when set at the BIOS level, and how many people knew about it in my younger days? How can we ensure this is not an issue made worse by Soas users? Opinions and knowledge, anyone? The operating system running on the SoaS stick has unrestricted access to the computer. It can mount internal disks, repartition, etc; anything one could do if you were root on the running computer. So far, the only security vulnerability experienced in conjunction with USB sticks has been Windows viruses. Since the SoaS stick does not contain WINE, it cannot run any Windows executables, and unless a virus is specially crafted to work on Linux and handle the specific way that LiveUSB sticks are constructed, it is unlikely to pose any threat. There is no way to mitigate this threat other than to verify the integrity of a SoaS stick from a trusted (ideally sole-role) computer designed for that purpose, or have the BIOS check the kernel signature (a la the XO), and have the kernel verify the userland. This is overkill for 99% of situations. In summary: There are much more probable threats to be worried about, and as of today, SoaS does not have the level of popularity where one would have to consider such solutions. If we want to protect against rouge activities, there are existing technologies that can easily be put into place with a configuration change (`touch /etc/olpc-security`) and some testing. This is a good thing to work on short-term in my opinion. Thanks, Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] SoaS change of direction: heads-up on convos in other lists
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 13:40, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote: OK. Let's focus a bit here. In the spirit of IAEP, I wonder who this version of SoaS will be for... educators and students or developers? It seems like the discussion is favoring the latter. That would be a big disappointment to those of us who are waiting to have a good stable version to share with the education community. Sounds to me like it's for deployers, people looking to make derivatives of SoaS. As Silbe said, there are tools for building new images with more activities. On the other hand, it would be useful to have an all inclusive version of SoaS for instant-on usage of the system. Or, better, to have it be incredibly easy to download from ASLO activities that have been tested and QAd, and to have these activities widely promoted on the page. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] non-free activities on ASLO
The Opera activity, for example. Thanks, Luke Faraone Sent from my mobile device. On Mar 18, 2010, at 13:55, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity, what is an example of a non-free Sugar activity?? ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Anki - open source memorization tool.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 21:38, Caroline Meeks wrote: An open source memorization tool. Looks simple and cool and already runs on Linux, might be a good addition to Sugar. In fact, it's even written in Python, so supporting it in Sugar should be straightforward. Do we have a page on the Wiki where we can put such activity ideas? - -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10) iEYEARECAAYFAkuYWdEACgkQtrC51grHAgbmeQCgseBCDIvPaIft1t15Ao/sXgwa dfcAoLwmVoTedVWtxdQlzSIuqT7Ha/dv =ZRyD -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOBs] Scenarios for licensing our trademarks
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:05 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: Or the guy who claims he sent in an e-mail and never did, uses the marks and tells the press we never answer our e-mail? We could setup a bot on automatic-tradema...@sugarlabs.org that replies to applications with an ID number; if you don't get one, you definitely don't have a trademark license yet. I'd be happy to work on that. Would RT with an autoresponse a la help at laptop dot org be a suitable system for this? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] dealing with mailing lists
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:14, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 01/12/2010 08:55 PM, Marten Vijn wrote: - I got cc'ed halfway a thread - some mail are 4-5 times (cc'ing / crossposting) Your mail client doesn't collate mails with similiar content and identical Message-IDs? Maybe Gmail has me spoiled, but I'm sure there are ways in other clients... Hmm, some people do cc people to highlight specific persons some do remove cc and only post to the list to keep traffic low. We should at least have a guideline about it, otherwise you can not rely on a constant income-stream. I for one like it when people use Cc:. If I'm CC'd to an email that is relevant to me, I'm more likely to see it and respond to it. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Why #sugar should be logged - a plug for transparency and ease of use.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 17:54, Jeff Elkner j...@elkner.net wrote: Is there a good reason why we don't auto log the channel? We've talked this subject practically to death. See http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg06656.html. (hint: the thread you want is herehttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-February/thread.html#3828 ) Consensus has been no for a variety of reasons, which would be redundant to enumerate here once again. We already log meetings http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/ in #sugar-meeting, but the policy for #sugar is against it. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Why #sugar should be logged - a plug for transparency and ease of use.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 21:25, Jeff Elkner j...@elkner.net wrote: Can I just use #sugar-meeting, then, instead of #sugar? That would work for me. #sugar-meeting is for just that, meetings. Things outside of meetings are not recorded. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [DESIGN] Ideas and questions on SL.o
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 19:52, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: It would probably make a better first impression than the Wiki as it now stands. Further, we might take some of the better content on the Wiki (Sugar Almanac, for instance) and think about converting it into Floss Manuals. I agree. While I'd be reluctant to make it the front page, it would seem a sensible choice for the getting help with sugar link on the mainpage. On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 05:23, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote: Programmers and other geek types will mostly fend for themselves ;-) Put a link somewhere for developers and we'll find it. Heh. I think we want to first convert our users to the idea that Sugar is something worth using/deploying, and then to lure them in to community participation. We have to keeep in mind we're serving a variety of audiences; most [citation needed] people in school administration don't have the time / bandwidth to join a mailing list to find out more. Rather the implementation people in IT and teachers in the classroom are those who would provide the most value to the community, and they will probably (subject to verification, see below) still be able to find their way. On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:22, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: What about making a list of the audience profiles and evaluate how well each of them can find what they want? Teachers, school administrators, hackers, parents, journalists, etc? Seems sensible. We can even conduct some budget usability testinghttp://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030602.htmlonce we get to the later stages. There are plenty of people who fit in those groups around my school :) -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] [DESIGN] Ideas and questions on SL.o
Recently, I attended a presentation along with Walter, Bernie, and Dogi in which students from Babson College discussed the deployability challenges faced by Sugar and SugarLabs in the United States. One of the things mentioned was the distributed nature of our project. We have a extensive wiki, a variety of high-traffic mailing lists, and doezens of blogs. For a teacher or administrator looking into the viability of Sugar, it can be quite a daunting task to process and synthesize all these disparate sources into a cohesive message. They specifically mentioned the front page of our community, www.SugarLabs.org, as an example of our failure to communicate. While the design is visually appealing and graphically stunning, it suffers from being *too* simplistic in my opinion. In terms of conveying actionable information, it performs poorly. Most people come to an organization's front page with specific goals in mind, and it should be our goal to make it as easy as possible for people to accomplish those goals. As Bernie commented during the meeting, one of the first things as developers we jump for is the link to the wiki. But this link dumps the user to a large, disorganized mass of content in which one can easily get lost. Wiki-gardening is definately a full-time job, probably for more than one person, but as it is, what we have isn't working. Therefore, my proposal is simple: redesign www.SugarLabs.org. As a strawman, lets say we were to offer, on the main page, jumping off points to the rest of our community. This would include things like: - Download Sugar (Sends them off to the [[Try Sugar]] wikipage) - Explore teaching resources (needs authoring) - Solve a problem ([[Sugar help]]) - Get involved Of course, we'd need to have these all link to supporting pages, either on the wiki or elsewhere, but deciding *how* to organize something is a large part of actually producing *usable* content. We can also find a place to put the current SL.o explanation text, but I don't think it should be the sole, central focus of the page. Comments, criticism, and alternative proposals welcome. Thanks, Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] AP: Schools shun Kindle, saying blind can't use it
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 13:35, Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com wrote: So, no text-to-speech on Kindle? Very silly. The blind will have to wait for the mp3 versions of books, then. The Kindle has text to speech, but they allow it to be disabledhttp://news.cnet.com/amazon-retreats-on-kindles-text-to-speech-issue/on a book-by-book basis by the publisher. Most publishers opt for this, in the hope of boosting audiobook / playaway sales. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] (Please read) Re: Proposed Trac - Launchpad migration
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 22:36, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: * Existing bug data will be imported, but the bug numbers won't be the same. So the git commit messages referencing trac bug tickets will be future information garbage, oh joy. As stated, there will be both a conversion table and a redirect service available for the considerable future. We already have fragmentation between SL bugs and OLPC bugs. Launchpad will allow us to keep our old bug numbers Is there anything else that would make this work better for everyone? An example of the redirection scheme: https://launchpad.net/sugar/+bug/slbugs1534 points to a page titled Bug #460049 (slbugs1534). We can change the nickname prefix to whatever we'd like. * It will be hosted by Canonical externally, rather than by SL as Trac currently is. If any of these are not to your liking, the time to speak up is now, before it all happens. :) Not to my liking, but if some really smart/committed folks are willing to do the work, have it well tested, say this is really worth the pain, and don't mind some folks ignoring the move for a few months... Though, I would first really love to see a clear explanation of why this is a good idea, and how the move benefits us. To quote Bernie, our system administrator and current manager of Sugar Labs' Trac instance: bernie: my #1 reason for switching is that our trac instance is a wreck and nobody wants to maintain it. bernie: me less than anyone else. it's an awful application to maintain... especially now that it is riddled by spammers Switching to Launchpad would free up admin time to work on improving other services, such as ASLO http://activities.sugarlabs.org and the wiki. Launchpad is already many times faster than the current Sugar Labs bug tracker, and Canonical has committed to add capacity as the service grows. In addition, Launchpad allows developers to manipulate bugs by email (a la bugs.debian.org), permitting developers to choose their own workflow. Launchpad also is better suited for multi-project collaboration, both within Sugarlabs and with other distributionshttps://edge.launchpad.net/+tour/bugs. We can easily track the status of bugs that affect both upstream Sugar and the Sugar packages in, say, Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, and Gentoo, all from the same page. We've been testing https://launchpad.net/soas Launchpad with the Sugar on a Stick project for a few months now, and it's been working pretty well. Finally, we would be able to migrate away from Launchpad at any time. Thanks, Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] (Please read) Re: Proposed Trac - Launchpad migration
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 09:19, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: I have no experience with Launchpad, but am often frustrated by the performance of SL Trac. At my office we switched from Trac to Redmine for internal project development, since Trac's development seems to have slowed to a crawl. Provided a high priority is placed on migrating bug numbers and keeping links to dev.sugarlabs.org working, I'm not opposed. I'll probably take Gary's approach and let the dust settle though. Now that 0.86 is out it's probably the best time to do this. I've just confirmed with our contacts at Canonical that bug aliases will be created for all the old bugs, of the form sugarlabs- or sl-. Any chance OLPC would consider moving over too, so we could have true connections between OLPC and SL bugs? I don't think it's been discussed, but I'll forward it to the OLPC VIG. It is certainly more likely if the Sugar Labs migration works well. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Please read) Re: Proposed Trac - Launchpad migration
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:19, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote: * bugs.sugarlabs.org is moving from Trac to Launchpad. * Existing bug data will be imported, but the bug numbers won't be the same. what happens to bug numbers (i.e., referring to other bugs in the current database) that are embedded in the text commentary? i assume they get converted, but it's worth asking. Good question. There are two ways we can do this: 1. Ask for a list of the new bug numbers, and do some apache mod_redirect magic to convert them to the new method. 2. During the import, give each imported bug an alias, like 'sl1234' which identify their numbers on the old bug tracker. Then we just have to redirect from http://dev.sugarlabs.org/bugs/1234 to https://launchpad.net/bugs/sl1234, and LP will handle the rest. I'll have to ask for confirmation on whether option 2 can be automagically done during the import We'd have to implement the redirect to ( launchpad.net/bugs/sl + BUG_NUMBER) ourselves, but that's trivial. Worst case, we can do 1. I'll follow up and see what's doable and report back to the list. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Please read) Re: Proposed Trac - Launchpad migration
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 19:06, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote: so, if i understand this, the text of the bugs will still contain lots of bug numbers that link correctly, but read incorrectly. Well, Launchpad will redirect to the proper number. I guess there's no way to simply edit the bug text during the import, so as to make the references correct w/o redirection tricks? I'm not really sure what you mean. Are you referring to the references to other bugs inside the bugs themselves? Possibly, although it would be easy to mess up. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] thin clients
2009/10/24 Rubén Rodríguez Pérez ru...@gnu.org My question is I found this site and wondered if I can use Sugar as an application on my thin clients. You should be able to install Sugar on SuSe using this howto: http://en.opensuse.org/Sugar There's a tutorial for Ubuntu Intrepid at http://www.nubae.com/sugar-on-ltsp-ubuntu-intrepid-ibex, but it probably needs updating. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Ideas for Sugar
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 16:50, Deborah Boatwright boatwrig...@newmarket.k12.nh.us wrote: Can you use a projector and a smartboard with the sugar on a stick? SMARTBoards http://smarttech.com/, sadly, use proprietary drivers and we cannot legally redistribute them. You can however install the SMART Notebook software on Linux; see http://www2.smarttech.com/st/en-US/Support/Downloads/SBS/NBS10Linux.htm for more information. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Announcing the creation of a SoaS Decision Panel [organization process started]
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 14:05, Sean McGrath s...@manybits.net wrote: Bill Bogstad wrote: We will conduct any public discussions in the s...@lists.sugarlabs.org mailing list with a subject line tagged with [DP]. Suggestion: As a favor to the mailing list archive searcher of the future, consider a tag [in addition to,instead of] DP. The DP process may be repeated for different issues in the future. Maybe [DP-1] or [SDP-1]? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Election status update
Hi all, The Sugar Labs Oversight Boardhttp://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board 2009-2010 Election http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2009-2010-candidatesis scheduled to run from *October 1, 2009* to *October 14, 2009*. All 7 board seats are up for election. The Sugar Labs Members list is currently frozen. If you're still not in the members list http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List, email the membership committee memb...@sugarlabs.org to be put on the list for next year. Our election will be hosted at Selectricity http://selectricity.org, a service of the MIT Media Lab http://media.mit.edu. For transparency, David Farning http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Dfarning will administer the election, as a current Oversight Board Member who is not running for reelection. Ballots will be sent out via email to all Sugar Labs Members. Voting will be run via the Schulze methodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method. The top four candidates will be elected for two years, and the next three for one year. In case of a dispute over the election a decision will be deferred to David Farning. The current candidate listhttp://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2009-2010-candidatesis as follows: (in order by date of announcement) - Walter Bender http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Walter - Caroline Meeks http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:CarolineM - RafaelOrtiz http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:RafaelOrtiz - Sean Daly http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:SeanDaly - Edward Mokurai Cherlin http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Mokurai, Earth Treasury http://www.earthtreasury.org/worknet - Sebastian Dziallas http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Sdz - Mel Chua http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Mchua - Tomeu Vizoso http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Tomeu - Bastien Guerry http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Bzg - Bernie Innocenti http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Bernie (SLOB platformhttp://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Bernie#Oversight_Board_Platform) - Daniel Drakehttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-August/017765.html - Luke Faraone http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:LFaraone (SLOB platform http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:LFaraone#Oversight_Platform) - Yamandú Ploskonka http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Yamaplos ( on QE4A, and platform/proposal http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Yamaplos) - Chris Ball http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Cjb Thanks, Luke Faraone Sugar Labs Membership/Elections Committee ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] SoaS: Searching for Decision Panel volunteers.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 16:27, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: This mail is to ask for volunteers for the Decision Panel. Volunteers can be anyone with an interest in the outcome, *raises hand*. I'm fairly interested in the future of SoaS, and would like to be on the Panel. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Colors in the rim (Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.))
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 18:35, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: I also wish that the range of rim colors available for the XO choice in F1 Neighborhood would distinguish what Distribution they are based on... I'm just curious, but how is this relevant to the end user? Most students probably wouldn't care about what distro their friends are using. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] SLOBs Position on SoaS
On 2009-09-16, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com: I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary LiveUSB distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS). I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so there would be no primary distro. But users/deployments may prefer one or the other based on quality/performance/stability/ But there is a utility, from a usability standpoint, to tell new Sugar users here's an easy way to try out sugar, like GNOME does at http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/2.26/#rninstallation -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [SoaS] The Future of Sugar on a Stick (was [Sugar-Devel] The Future of Sugar on a Stick)
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:56, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote: To Martin's point, how about the routine use of a filterable tag, [SoaS] , in the Subject to messages appropriately routed to either IAEP or Devel or both? I just created a Sugar on a Stick topic on Sugar-Devel's mailman, which matches the pattern [SoaS] in the subject of a message. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] The Future of Sugar on a Stick (was [Sugar-Devel] The Future of Sugar on a Stick)
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 16:05, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: I would prefer to filter messages client side rather than having something enforced on me. Er, it's not *enforced*, as if you don't specify any topic you'll get all mail sent to the list. Please see the help text Kevin posted earlier in the thread. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Where should we put Lesson Plans? Currwiki?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:27, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.comwrote: curriki != moodle courses, format is quite different. So unless you create seperate instances of the courses one will have to choose either curriki format or moodle format. Hm, that doesn't sound right: wouldn't Curriki benefit by making their content easily convertible to a variety of formats? CC'ing an acquaintance of mine at Curriki to get the full story. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:32, David Van Asschedvanass...@gmail.com wrote: Well, this is really what moodle was created for. Especially considering its the main tool used in all XS server implmentations and is in use in at least 40% of British schools. I'm not sure about the American numbers, but pretty sure it must be highly used there too. Creating courses in moodle is not only easy, but extremely powerful, and can be easily shared with other teachers. There are existing general moodle implementations, though none have enough content, including the sugarlabs one (schools.sugarlabs.org) I'm focusing my own efforts on linux-for-education.org, where little by little we're growing the site. The latter has 5 sugar based courses I created and several ubuntu and opensuse courses. Apart from the courses, the glossaries and database modules link straight into the course content, allowing students to easily look up terms used in courses that might be confusing. But I guess you can deploy Curriki content in Moodle instances? I think the main point of Curriki is working together with an existing community, not so much about what is used to deploy the content. Regards, Tomeu kind regards, David Van Assche On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote: From: Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.com Subject: [IAEP] Where should we put Lesson Plans? Currwiki? To: iaep iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org, Kellie Doty kmd...@mail.harvard.edu Message-ID: b74fba2b0909091618s103ddaa0oe4e2767f2aa02...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I'd like to introduce Kellie Doty, she is a fellow student in the Technology, Education and Innovation program at Harvard Grad School for Education and she is in Intern at Sugar Labs this fall working on the GPA project. Kellyie's role will be to help us develop curriculum, test it at GPA and publish it in a format that will be easy to adopt by other teachers. One of her first tasks will be to take the lessons we did over the summer and try to write them up. One question is where should we put lesson plans? My first thought was wiki.sugarlabs.org our wonderful maze of twisty pages all different. But Kellie pointed out that teachers need to be able to find things through various paths such as subject, grade level and activities used. My second thought was Moodle as it probably has a module for that. +1 for curriki. It has an existing community of teachers to work w/ and it is a good tool, geared to their needs -- Bryan W. Berry Technology Director OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep -- Ted Turner - Sports is like a war without the killing. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning -- Marie von Ebner-Eschenbachhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/marie_von_ebnereschenbac.html - Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Where should we put Lesson Plans? Currwiki?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 19:18, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote: But Kellie pointed out that teachers need to be able to find things through various paths such as subject, grade level and activities used. We could make use of Semantic MediaWikihttp://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki, an extention that lets you tag pages with metadata and which is used extensively on wiki.laptop.org. See for example http://wiki.laptop.org/go/8.2.1 or http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Writeaction=formedit http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Writeaction=formeditI can then do http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Property:Activity_genre, or refine my search down to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Special:SearchByProperty/Activity-20genre/Math-20and-20Science http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Special:SearchByProperty/Activity-20genre/Math-20and-20ScienceIt's a bit difficult to set up, but it allows for a very well organized and usable wiki directory. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] REMINDER: Sugar Labs Membership deadline Sept. 6
Hi all, The deadline for applying for Sugar Labs http://sugarlabs.org membershiphttp://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members (for 2009-2010) has been extended to tomorrow, Sept. 6. Please send email to *members at sugarlabs dot org* with a brief description of what you do with Sugar Labs if you're not already on the Members Listhttp://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List . If you're worried about whether you qualify; if you're subscribed to one of the mailing lists receiving this email, you probably should be on the SL Members List. As a Sugar Labs member, you will get the oppertunity to vote in elections determining the project's governance, such as the upcoming Oversight Boardhttp://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board 2009-2001 Election http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2009-2010-candidates . Thanks, Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc Sugar Labs MembCom http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] Following My Own Advice
Caryl, You sent your email to iaep-request, which isn't the actual IAEP mailing list, so I'm quoting your mail entirely in my reply: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:12, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi... Well, I followed my own advice and ordered a fresh copy of Strunk and White's The Elements of Style. The price has gone up since my first copy many years ago (about $1.25). Now it lists for $9.95, but is worth every penny. It arrived by FedEx 2 day from Amazon this afternoon. All this brings me to the controversy that really bothered me for the book sprint last summer, punctuation with quotation marks. I was raised on the American style and had to use it when writing for publication in newspapers and magazines. There is a wikipedia article about this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Punctuation Last summer, we followed more of the British style discussed in the above article. I really had to grit my teeth for that, but did it anyway. This summer, it really doesn't matter to me which style we use, just so we all use the same one, which seems to be the British style (unless someone changes it). As a technical publication, I personally prefer that we use Logical Quotations, to avoid any ambiguity in meaning. Strings are First Class Objects, and shouldn't be tainted with superfluous punctuation, IMHO. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Proposed Trac - Launchpad migration
Hi all, So far, the experiment with SoaS has been a success. Sebastian Dziallasreports satisfaction with Launchpad's bug and blueprint functionality, as well as inter-tool integration. == Overview == Launchpad has a number of strengths that differentiate it from other tools we have explored, the most important is the integration of the following components into a cohesive whole: - Questions/Answers - Bugs - Blueprints - Translations - Code hosting (bzr) Moreover, if Sugar Labs decides not to make use of all of these components, we can disable them from within the Launchpad UI. Finally, Launchpad is not a PITA to manage. Rather than requiring Bernie (the only person other than Ivan who has access to dev.sl.o AFAICT) to constantly wrangle with system updates, scalability issues, and general maintenance, Launchpad is externally hosted by Canonical. == Comparisons == Compared to Trac: - Project-level optional access control on priority, milestone targeting, etc - intergreted spesification/blueprint functionality, with support for milestone targeting, etc. - differentiation between support requests and bugs - the ability to link bugs as affecting multiple projects, and to pull in status updates from other projects, even if they use different bug trackers - hosted gratis, and supported by a team of competent Canonical system administrators - support for translating projects using POT files - a cleaner user interface (opinion) - group support Compared to GetSatisfaction: - free and open source software, written in Zope - acts as both a bug tracker, a question/answers site, and everything described above == Migration == If Sugar Labs does decide to migrate, the process is fairly straightforward. All bugs can be exported from Trac using a well-documented and supported tool, and be imported into Launchpad projects. Users who have Trac accounts will have corresponding Launchpad accounts pregenerated, but they will not be active until the user generates a password. Users who already have Launchpad accounts will be able to merge them, or (if they used the same email address) automagically have bugs reported at SL associated with their extant accounts. (we can opt to not go this route and have all imported data owned by ~launchpad-janitor) All Sugar Labs projects would be associated with the sugarlabs super-project, and would be seen from http://launchpad.net/sugarlabs. We still get the benefit of having a single page to point people who are reporting bugs https://launchpad.net/sugarlabs/+filebug or asking questions https://answers.launchpad.net/sugarlabs/+addquestion. Since Launchpad does not support native bzr hosting, we have three options: - convert to bzr (not probable) - use bzr git imports with Launchpad - integrate Gitorious with Launchpad via OpenID, write a script for project mirroring - don't integrate Gitorious at all, and just have slight duplication of effort on the developer's part. (even light-weight LP-OID is easy to do) Based on the above, we'd like to propose that Sugar Labs migrate to Launchpad, at least for Blueprints, Answers, and Bugs, within a release cycle. -- This email was jointly constructed by Sebastian Dziallas and Luke Faraone. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] new technical list in spanish
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 07:15, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Please join if you would like to participate in discussions about Sugar development in Spanish. Won't this have the side effect of a segmented development community? On which list would consensus be authoritative? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] FSF attitude to xo and sugar
On 28/ago/2009, at 11.48, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: It's tragic how they undermine their allies' efforts in their blind zealousness. Worse than that, it's complete FUD. This is something you'd expect from MSFT, but not the FSF. The number of XOs shipped with Windows is still 0. -lf ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Feedback on Launchpad
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:17, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote: Cause its close. Really what I think I'm asking for is a comment and vote functionality on Blueprints. I will forward this request to him and let you know. I asked around on IRC, and came across this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/blueprint/+bug/49698 From what I can tell, work is underway on such support. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Systems] Feedback on Launchpad
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:18, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote: Personally I'd like to choose Launch Pad. Its open source where Get Satisfaction is only free to us. However here is today's problem with LaunchPad I want to discuss a features in the roadmap/blueprint. Well, assuming we make all features have a wikipage, you can discuss it on that wikipage. (we can later unify login between launchpad and Wiki/Gitorious so this isn't an issue, as LP is an openID provider) Launchpad supports setting the full URL for a spec, which can be any web page. Is that satisfactory? I worked around by using the Whiteboard. Maybe this is good enough? Possibly. There seems to be no way to vote for a feature/spec. Given our current focus on trying to be responsive to the needs of our users this seems like a really important feature. Hm. I guess we could submit a request to LP asking them to add said feature, or make it one of our tasks. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] What to report where - Was Re: Sugar on a Stick switches to a new Bug Tracker
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 17:38, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote: One question I have is how do I get alerted about Question and bug activity? I didn't see anywhere to set my email alerts. Well, you can subscribe to individual bugs and questions. For questions, we can set an answer contact (a group or individiual, usually the former) who will get mails about all new questions. For bugs, you can visit https://bugs.launchpad.net/soas/+subscribe (that's linked from the main soas bugs page as subscribe). For answers, you can visit https://answers.launchpad.net/soas/+answer-contact (that's linked from the main soas bug page as set answer contact) Re answers, I actually had to ask in #launchpad to find out, and the developers acknowledged that's completely unobvious and an awful name for such an option. They'll fix that and unify those options in 3.0. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] What to report where - Was Re: Sugar on a Stick switches to a new Bug Tracker
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 05:11, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero dir...@gmail.com wrote: and if lauchpad is better for that purpose we can translate all our bug infrastructure there.. IMHO we shouldn't split bug trackers between sugar and it's projects. Understood. SoaS is currently our guinea pig for Launchpad. After a few weeks (?) we/IAEP/the-sysadmin-team will evaluate it taking in feedback from teachers and end users, and we will consider a full migration. (other than code, as LP only hosts bzr repositories) -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Sugar Labs Membership proposal
Hi, There was a recent discussion on IAEP with regards to the management of the upcoming election. Here is the proposed policy for this cycle: Before *September 1st, 2009*, new member requests can be sent to members at sugarlabs dot org if they are not listed on [[Sugar_Labs/Initial_Members_List]]http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Initial_Members_Listalready. It should contain the following: - Wiki/dev/irc username - Explanation of their contribution I am currently on vacation, and as such will probably not tend to existing requests until the above date. I (along with Sebastian, who has also agreed to volunteer) should have a current-election-cycle list out by September 12, 2009. (if either of the dates above should be adjusted, that's fine with me, later is better) Does this seem sensible? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Membership proposal
Bernie, On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 17:23, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: * We need to state clearly what the criteria for selection is. Our current membership policy [1] is located in an obscure place. It could be moved to a separate page and linked from relevant pages (members list, etc) Good idea. I'll see if I can get to that tomorrow. * Can we state that anyone who writes to memb...@sugarlabs.org will receive an answer within X days? I'm concerned that potential members might be frustrated by silence. Does two days seem reasonable? * Since two people (you and Sebastian) are volunteering for membership screening, how are they going to coordinate to avoid answering twice (or not at all)? Something like an RT queue would seem useful, but installing an RT instancy only for this purpose seems overkill. We've set up a collaborative worksheet, and are CCing each other on all replies we make. By the way, if anybody else wants to help out, feel free to raise your hand on/off list :) * I'm looking at last year's membership list and I'm seeing a lot of people who disappeared a long time ago. How are we going to clear old memberships? Wouldn't it be better if we asked people to confirm their membership every year? (asking for a small amount of money for membership would make the latter step more natural, but I'm not sure we want to do that at this time) I was planning on sending an initial hiya folks, you still around and interested? email on Sept 3th or 4th. If we don't get a reply in 7 days, we'll send another email. If we *still* don't get a yay/nay, we'll put them on a grey area list and remove them for next year if we don't get a reply by next time around. * Is our wiki good enough as a membership management tool? Shouldn't we look at some specific application? I could ask the FSF what they're using to manage their members. Well, assuming we eventually migrate to Launchpad, we can use that. (that's used to manage Ubuntu Members, among other things, and would be intergrated with everything else) In the interim, the IML page should be sufficient. * We're only giving one week of advance notice to potential contributors in a period when people are generally on vacation Why couldn't we extend the deadline for submission closer to Sep 12? Sure. Those were just dates I thought would be reasonable. When should they be changed to? Disclaimer: Sebastian and I are both running for SLOB slots in the upcoming election. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] election workflow
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 14:20, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The basic premise is that _anyone_ who signs a signed copy of the Code of Conduct http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Legal/Code_of_Conduct becomes a voting member and receives a @sugarlabs.org alias. Hm. Sounds like it'd be trivial to ballot-stuff undetectably. I'd still prefer manual approval, myself, a la Ubuntu's Community Council. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] election workflow
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 14:42, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Can we assume that you are assuming responsibility for setting up and maintaining the community council and membership records mechanism? Community_council == slobs current, and one week/month/whatever before election we freeze the membership list (hosted on-wiki as it is currently), then the SLOBs glance through the list making sure that everybody's qualified to be on the list. Low-tech, and better yet, already implemented. (sans the freezing) -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] election workflow
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 14:58, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Community_council == slobs current, and one week/month/whatever before election we freeze the membership list (hosted on-wiki as it is currently), then the SLOBs glance through the list making sure that everybody's qualified to be on the list. Who is qualified to be on the list? Current policy: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance#Sugar_Labs_Membership I don't know who is staffing members at sugarlabs dot org, but we already have a process and criteria for membership. Not sure how that's run currently, however. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] election workflow
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 15:14, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Will you serve on the membership committee and verify that the list is created and forwarded to slob by a freeze date? What would be a reasonable date by which to have this list ready? How about this: Before *September 1st, 2009*, new member requests can be sent to members at sugarlabs dot org if they are not listed on [[Sugar_Labs/Initial_Members_List]]http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Initial_Members_Listalready. It should contain the following: - Wiki/dev/irc username - Explanation of their contribution (links preferred) Walter, do you have a list of the email addresses of all people on the current IML? I am currently on vacation, and as such will probably not tend to existing requests until the above date. I should have a current-election-cycle list out by Sept. 12, 2009. (if either of the dates above should be adjusted, that's fine with me, later is better) Anybody else want to join the committee? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Systems] sunjammer: VM relocated back to old host
On Aug 15, 2009, at 12:42, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: I enabled mod_mem_cache in the hope it will save some computation, but if it's not effective we might have to reduce the number of Apache processes and start returning 500 server busy errors. Maybe pipe downloads through the CoralCDN? It tends to be slow, but it'll save us bandwidth... -lf ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Systems] sunjammer: VM relocated back to old host
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:00, Daniel Clark dcl...@pobox.com wrote: I haven't used it in a while, but a year or two ago http://codeen.cs.princeton.edu/ was pretty sweet for large file transfers. Can we use it without any changes on the users' end? From what I saw on the site, it seems to require proxy configuration in-browser. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Get Satisfaction
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 19:44, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote: But I would keep meticulously away from setting things up for any specific service. It is up to every school to decide what to do. I think it would be useful to expose a (optionally disableable by the school) option within the UI to report a problem, which (after gaining the consent of the user/school/teacher) would send debugging information akin to what is sent in Ubuntu's apport functionality. It would not be difficult to do this in both a vendor-neutral way (letting the SL server take care of the details) and in a way that protects a user's privacy. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] eBook reading advice
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 09:15, Jim Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote: The plain text version on the website will not work with Read Etexts, because that Activity is designed to work with Gutenberg etexts which don't require word-wrapping. However it is possible that the Gutenberg site itself will have a version in the correct format, because I believe they have Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom as a PG file. No such luck: http://www.gutenberg.org/browse/authors/d#a3826 Maybe since LB is CC_BY_NC_SA, it isn't legally hostable by Project Gutenberg... -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Fwd: Follow-Up on: looking for two groups of volunteers]
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 13:55, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Is there anybody else interested in joining this committee? Sure, *raises hand for both*. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] eBook reading advice
On Aug 8, 2009, at 16:26, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.com wrote: http://craphound.com/littlebrother/download/ Its available in a wide variety of formats. Which one will work best in Sugar? When it first came out, I converted it into an XOL file for use in Sugar. Not sure if that file is still hosted there, or if it'll work in .84, but that was essentially a packaged version of the HTML copy of his book, viewable in the Library of Browse. -lf ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] My videos are on Sugar Labs video site
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:30, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: What is not working for you? Would you mind working with me to turn it into a bug report for our infrastructure team? The videos can only be viewed by those with a @sugarlabs.org account, which is a small group :) -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] A security vs. functionality question
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 14:28, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Is sharing an activity a sufficient indication of intent from the user to execute a potentially dangerous action, such as sharing Terminal on a public collaboration server? To activate a remote VNC client in Gnome, users must fill out this settings panel: http://www.bani.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/vino-p-g.png . Unlike an Activity, though, once those settings are made, the desktop is permanently shared. An Activity can easily be stopped by a single click at any time. A malicious attacker can type at speeds which would allow malicious commands to be injected without the user noticing until it is too late. Also, there is no method for limited sharing. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] A security vs. functionality question
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:02, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: I merely mean that users are less likely to leave such a shared activity always on. Good point, unless they forget about it (as they often do in pilots :) Also, there is no method for limited sharing. Perhaps you are not aware of the Invitations mechanism? I can invite people to an activity, and only those whom I have invited are aware of its existence. Invitations were admittedly not very reliable in older software versions; I haven't tried them recently. No, I wasn't. How secure is that? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Cloning USB sticks (was: Re: Could a KS file be used in the Fedora11 net install to customize the clone process?)
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 03:03, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-i...@silbe.org wrote: [copying USB stick via dd] Sucessfully copies the USB stick! this is an exact copy and boot and runs well. Just a word of caution: Because it's an exact copy, it will duplicate your identity as well if you've ever logged in to Sugar and entered your name before on the source USB stick. You will need to remove some files in ~/.sugar in order for collaboration to work properly in that case. Also, per http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_to_Damage_a_FLASH_Storage_Device , you may get better milage out of your USB disk if you don't use DD, but rather just copy over the files. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Is again Community Influence - Re: Lets Get Satisfaction (was: Community Influence)
Oops, sent too soon. On Aug 1, 2009, at 10:16, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote: On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:45, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I think OLPC also had this problem and decided to use rt for user support and trac for tracking development issues. May be worth asking Adam Holt about it? Tomeu, As someone who worked with the RT system, I can say that it works very well as a CRM for traditional organizations, but it suffers from it's clear separation between employees and users. The strongpoint of using a tool such as GetSatisfaction or UserVoice is that it scales well, by allowing people to ... Assist one another and provide a public archive of past problems and encounters. It lets anyone join in, and provides for a richer community experience. -- Luke Faraone ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Lets Get Satisfaction (was: Community Influence)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:35, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.comwrote: So while looking around and at various issue tracking systems, I discovered GetSatisfaction. I had seen that before already, but wasn't sure of its current state. There you go: http://getsatisfaction.com/ We had actually bounced a few ideas around on this same topic on syst...@lists.sl.o a week ago, and had looked at GS, but were leaning towards an alternative: http://uservoice.com/. UserVoice has nice plans for FOSS http://uservoice.com/for/opensource, and is a bit more digg-like in terms of tracking. I'm not sure what (if any) limits GS puts on their gratis plan. I've created both a UserVoice and GS site for IAEP readers to play with, you can find them at http://sugarlabs.uservoice.com/pages/25031-general, and http://getsatisfaction.com/sugarlabs. My employee status at GS hasn't been confirmed yet, and won't be for a couple of days, but when it is, I'll make anybody who needs to an employee on the site as well. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Elections at SPI
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:19, Benjamin M. Schwartz bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote: Last year we used http://selectricity.org/ , largely without incident. Do you have a reason to do otherwise this year? This reason: On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 17:51, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: there was some concern that Selectricity had some flaws and security holes Also having a 3rd party allows for greater accountability and transparency. Also, the Schulze method can only be used to elect a single winner. It does not describe any mechanism for multi-winner elections such as this one. Ok, then. What would you recommend? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Sugar Labs Elections at SPI
Hi, Sugar Labs is a non-profit under the Software Freedom Conservancy which develops and maintains the Sugar Learning Platform, the GNU/Linux Graphical User Interface used on the OLPC XO-1 and elsewhere. The majority of the software we release is under the GPL (some under MIT/new-BSD). We also actively work to foster pilots of GNU/Linux-based learning systems in both the third and first world. We were planning to have our second annual board election, and were wondering if SPI would be willing to hold/host it as a neutral third party. We would be able to provide SPI with a list of member email addresses, as well as a list of candidates, and would ideally like a randomized ballot which was tallied under the Schulze_methodhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method. We are attempting to fill 7 seats on the board. We would have our 2010 membership list finalized towards the end of August, and, if convenient, would like to hold the election around that time. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] Ivan's Sugar post Slashdotted
Hi all, If you haven't seen it already, Ivan Krstić's notebook posthttp://radian.org/notebook/nonsense-omeletreplying to (somewhat misquoted) comments made by Nicholas Negroponte in ZDNet about Sugar's role in OLPC's success. (or lack, thereof) You can check out the story, with associated comments, at http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/26/2340234/Ivan-Krsti263-Says-Negropontes-Wrong-About-Sugar-and-OLPC . -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Board elections (was Re: Sugar Digest 2009-07-22)
On Jul 24, 2009, at 17:51, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Well, there is making sure that the membership list is up to date; there was some concern that Selectricity had some flaws and security holes; not too much else. Could we ask Software in the Public Interest, the group behind Debian and other FLOSS projects, to hold the election as a neutral 3rd party? They have held the Wikimedia elections in the past, and would probably be happy to help. -lf ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugar as desktop os
2009/7/10 Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com In addition it seems that they all require a sugar- emulator and it's not clear to me what is being emulated. It's just the name of the program that starts everything. It is in a sense emulating an XO within a separate X session. But it isn't the fake version of some original that we're hiding from you. :) To be clear, no software is being emulated; sugar-emulator simply lets sugar run inside a self-contained window so as to not mess up the display of your normal desktop. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Ncomputing
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 15:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: One thing we spoke about here locally was getting some thin client device that was really certified to work with Sugar and whatever distro... It would be a necessary requirement for country level deployments... Sounds good, what's the work that needs to be done in order to reach there? Sorry to revive an ancient thread, but I recently met with some of the folks from NComputing at a recent conference. They seemed very interested in getting Sugar verified as working with their thin-client-like hardware, so that they can offer it as a supported (by them) option to their deployments. I'm currently in the process of getting it to work with the most recent releases of Fedora and Ubuntu, and will report back with my progress. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] SoasS-strawberry torrent
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:41, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I don't know anything about torrents or trackers. I just asked Sameer to do what he did with the olpc photos last week. If anyone has better ideas they would be appriaciated. It should be trivial to modify the torrent to be multi-tracker; it doens't hurt to be in many different places as once. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Wired article on OLPC
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 14:29, Seth Woodworth s...@isforinsects.com wrote: This is really weird, a good friend of mine works at geekdad and I heard nothing about this before hand. The end of the article says: Check back next week for Part 2: the XO-1 Hardware Platform Maybe I can convince them of a ...Part 3: Sugar I emailed the author about the work we're doing at SL etc, and pointed him towards our PR pages and marketing list. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Subscribing to planet
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 20:44, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: At the risk of revealing my low level of web foo Is it possible to subscribe to planet.sugarlabs.org. I forget to check it and end up missing the older posts. Yes, see http://planet.sugarlabs.org/atom.xml -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Getting data about the upgrading older machines and SoaS responsiveness.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 18:43, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: It sound like another great, low impact (I am trying to think of a term like 'carbon foot print' to properly reflect the impact) way of bringing LTSP into the class room. polite or gentle perhaps? or non-invasive? Emphasizing what is avoided: invading - potentially taking over, accidentally or on purpose, the computers Granted, you would *need* to check with your local systems administrator before implementing LTSP. (as opposed to a lower-risk USB-local-booting solution) At my school, for example, netbooting a workstation starts the recloning process of loading a new Windows XP image; setting up LTSP without asking would cause major problems with their work. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-06-01
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 07:51, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Bruce Byfield wrote an article for Activities and the move to context-oriented desktops for LWN.net for which he interviewed Gary Martin. The article is subscriber-only, so I have extract a few quotes. Here's a link that would allow you to view the article in question: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/334911/bcde5a60dda0c375/ -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Request for Artwork: Boot Screen
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:58, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: I would not recommend customizing the splash/progress from within Sugar... boot time is often a tense moment fraught with impatience (especially after a freeze/crash) and predictability in how Sugar usually loads is I think desirable I don't think it would be a problem, as long as the customization calls on a regeneration of *static* images to display, rather than creating the images at boot time based on configuration files. This way, there would be no performance penalty. (wrt customization, we should limit it to things like distro logos and the name of the school/lab) Not to clutter it up, but it also might be useful to as well as a visual indicator of the boot mechanism (SoaS vs. local booting vs. helper CD) so as to assist in debugging etc. On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 13:07, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote: For Sugar, the new Hello World tutorial could be its boot Activities for Learners: Each development tool (Pippy, Turtle Art, Etoys, others, even Forth) should provide an Activity to build the start-up sequence. Learners could play with the tools to build an endless variety of start-up spots, modify and preview from a library of saved sequences, learn all sorts of things about the system, the different tools, and of course, designate one sequence to display on the next boot. The work space is both sufficiently small and necessarily limited, so that robustness could be provided, while at the same time, the content of the sequences is limited only by the imagination. Learners will be able to take pride in a working sequence based on their modifications! I imagine that simple cartoons with embedded, single point or short point lessons, messages, and humor would become popular. Brief jingles would develop a currency like ring tones. And so on, *ad infinitum*! This would be difficult to do in a multi-user system, and even more so to coordinate with implementing a bitfrost security model. Rebooting shouldn't happen that often that the user has to care about customizing it. Ideally, we should get the boot-time down to be short enough that you won't even notice such things, let alone using the time for notifications or board messages! -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
[IAEP] GHOP for Sugar Labs
In the past, Google has held a program similar to GSoC known as GHOPhttp://code.google.com/opensource/ghop/2007-8/, or the Google Highly Open Participation contest. Unlike GSoC, it is more limited in the projects that can enter, but projects are not limited in number of slots, as things are broken down into tasks, which can usually be completed quickly. It is also open to high school students. Can we ask our GSoC contacts if we would be able to enter the 2009-10 programhttp://groups.google.com/group/ghop-discuss/browse_thread/thread/6fd119e7eb8280a1 ? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] zareason offering ubuntu on a strick
2009/5/28 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org ZaReason is an ubuntu shop. Ubuntu is not well regarded for pushing improvements back upstream. On the other hand, every linux on usb user drives the product forward. That's a bit unfounded: Canonical submits a large number of patches in proportion to the number of people under their employ. I'm sure an argument can be made that often patches made to packages in * universe* don't always get back to Debian or the orginal vendor, but most of the time it's due to politics or simply lack of time. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Important Schedule Changes - Please Read!
2009/5/26 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 18:38, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote: What we call beta - can't be announced as is working out of the box. I completely agree... nor can what we call v1 be announced as working out of the box if it can't :-( On the upside, little non-trivial software can be said to work out of the box for the general public. Regards, Tomeu We should be able to say with confidence that SoaS works everywhere that the Fedora LiveUSB works. No more, no less. And tell a story around that. I'm hoping to do a little bit more: by formatting flash drives in a special way we can gain compatability with a large number of BIOSes which are only compatable with USB_ZIP, an older system which is very particular about what it expects from a disk. There's very little potential for regression, and this alternate formatting is (imho) easier to deal with. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [support-gang] can OLPC be applied to receiving information from the user population?
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 17:17, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote: Was reading 'Don't! (The secret of self-control)' (by Jonah Lehrer) in the May 18 issue of 'The New Yorker'. In that article, a psychology experiment (developed I believe by a team headed by John Jonides at the University of Michigan) is described: Subjects are shown a list of four random words, two in red text and two in blue text. After reading the words, they are told to forget the blue words and remember the red words. Later, the subjects are shown a stream of words, and for each are asked if it was a word they were told to remember. [The scientists are counting how often incorrect (blue) words are remembered by individual subjects.] Seems to me homework consists of a teacher handing out work - the pupil returns the result - the teacher evaluates what was returned. Here we have a very similar situation - a scientist hands out work - the subject returns the result - the scientist evaluates what was returned. Sort of like a tiny built-in Activity-aware Sugar email client? -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] SoaS on a MacBook?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi... I've been trying to get the SugarLabs usb stick, Walter so kindly sent, to boot on my MacBook. I can get it to recognize the stick but when I try to boot from it, following the instructions from Apple Tech Support, it goes instead into OSX. The stick shows as a third drive on my desktop and I can open it and see that the files are there. The read me file comes up blank. When you reboot, did you hold down C? (while the screen is off before the apple logo) -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Recommend boot-helper CD as the first experience with Sugar on a Stick rather then setting the BIOS
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 12:33 -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote: In my opinion, the simpler the feedback, the wider the cross-section of users will be from a technically-adept point of view. By that I mean we will garner feedback (valuable I think) from non computer whizzes. I'm more worried about them. Simplicity of use is I think vital to SoaS success. I fear that many users will encounter difficulties 1) loading a USB stick, 2) setting BIOS to boot from it. As for #2, I've tried to rearrange the instructions so that a naive user is encouraged to create a boot-helper CD and use that and the USB for the first experience as I think that will have a much better first time success rate. It would be great if people looked over what I've done and improve on it. We could also leverage the Smart Boot Loader, which we can install on the local machine to put it as an entry in the boot menu. When clicked, it would load up the kernel from the USB key and doesn't require a CD. I'll write up instructions/make the binary in a bit. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Help Wanted: Keeper of the Hardware List
We can also make use of Semantic Media Wiki to create forms that lead into a table. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Kathy Pusztavari ka...@kathyandcalvin.comwrote: Yep, the wiki would be great. Just need to set up a table -Original Message- From: iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Marten Vijn Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 10:58 AM To: Caroline Meeks Cc: IAEP SugarLabs Subject: Re: [IAEP] Help Wanted: Keeper of the Hardware List On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 12:09 -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote: People are starting to use SoaS! which means they are starting to report which wireless cards, video cards and computers its not working on. We could really use someone to keep up a list of what we know works and doesn't on which dates, and what tickets have been filed. Either using a wiki or Google docs and the cool looking Forms feature. Aye! Let's use a wiki for this, I 've got 10-15 pieces of hardware I could test every now and then. It would be nice of a list what to test. Kind regards, Marten Thanks! Caroline -- Caroline Meeks Solution Grove carol...@solutiongrove.com 617-500-3488 - Office 505-213-3268 - Fax ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep -- http://martenvijn.nl Marten Vijn http://martenvijn.nl/trac/wiki/soas Sugar on a Stick http://bsd.wifisoft.org/nek/ The Network Event Kit http://har2009.org 13th-16th August http://opencommunitycamp.org 26th Jul - 2nd August ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Options for having Flash work in Browse on SoaS and on Demo Sticks?
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote: Hi, As I understand the law, if Solution Grove was creating USB sticks for a specific school we could load the adobe flash plugin onto every stick prior to giving them to the students. I think this is the same basic case as a company IT department distributing flash plugins to all the computers in the company. On the other hand, Sugar Labs can not install the flash plugin into the SoaS we offer for download on the sugarlabs.org website. My first question is about the grey area. If we are burning sticks and giving them out at a conference (such as FOSSVT) can we have the flash plugin pre-installed? IANAL, and this is something that SG might want to see one about, but per http://www.adobe.com/products/players/fpsh_distribution1.html : Licensee is permitted to distribute Adobe Web Players to multiple end-users by including the Player installers on CDs, DVDs or other physical media. Meaning you can include the installers, but cannot preinstall them. What are our different options for improving the user experience when a user browses to a YouTube video on Browse on a SoaS image? 1. Do nothing and let the user fend for herself. This is the current option. 2. Partner with them as David suggested. 3. Bring up a window explaining the various alternatives and letting the user choose whether to install free/nonfree plugins. We also would need to give a management console so the user could reverse/undo their choices. 4. Do the same as 2 but only offer Adobe's version. We can make this so that it's literally a yes, please download and install it and a accept this EULA (which ironically is not binding on our subjects) button. 5. Finally, we could ship the sticks with a script which downloads or installs Adobe's plugin the first time it is connected to the internet without any user intervention. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] Opening Page for Browse
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Caroline Meeks carol...@solutiongrove.comwrote: How hard is it to change this page? I think any deployment of any size would want to customize it. It's a single HTML file that you can have your deployment script run a search-replace on. It should be trivial to modify to your needs. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Re: [IAEP] [Marketing] Do not open a new window for menu link on sugarlabs.org
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote: Also, are the forums used? It would seem that if we really do our work via the lists, we should make the list archives prominent on the site and forget forums. Wha? We have forums? As far as I know, the only remotely forum-esque thing we have is Nabble http://n2.nabble.com/SugarLabs-f1511649.html forum-like setup which is synced with the ML. -- Luke Faraone http://luke.faraone.cc ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep