On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Yama Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote:
is it Nell replacing Sugar? :-p
Just to be clear, I had nothing to do with the XO Learning software, and it
is not Nell.
(But I don't think an Android-based educational tablet is a bad idea.)
--scott
--
(
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
In the latest *Make Your Own Sugar Activities!* we'll have chapters on
making Activities using HTML 5. You can put HTML 5 inside a simple Python
Activity wrapper using WebKit. You could take the same HTML 5 and create
an
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
Lionel Laske wrote what was supposed to be the second chapter, where he
talks about HTML 5 and making JavaScript interface with Python. That
chapter is finished and published:
These questions deserve a complete response, but I don't have all the
answers myself. (I'm OLPC Foundation, not OLPC Association.)
The short version of the story is that OLPC-A has licensed out the XO name
to two groups, in an effort to increase the penetration of the OLPC ideas.
One group
Slides and links from the Literacy Project long-talk are now at:
http://cananian.livejournal.com/67703.html
--scott
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Live stream at 11:30 am and 1:45 pm Pacific time today!
I've done a little work on sugar-android pathways, including a (still
incomplete) port of gtk3 to android. The primary tasks would be: 1)
gtk/python container to run gtk3/py-gobject activities unmodified in
Android; 2) reimplementation of Journal as Android service (using intents);
3)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote:
Can you think about explaining this in person in San Francisco anytime Oct
19-24 during our 2 OLPC/Sugar events there?
http://olpcSF.org/summit EARLY DRAFT SCHEDULE POSTED (Oct 19-21)
Call for papers for this year is closed (of course). It would be
interesting to submit a paper for next year's conference. I'd be
interested in attending, but it has the same
conflict-with-impending-childbirth issue for me as OLPC-SF does.
--scott
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Christoph
I have about 20 XO Sticks and XOrduinos to give away to developers. Details at:
http://cananian.livejournal.com/66654.html
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net )
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
The many papers from this work greatly influenced the thinking about
personal computing at Xerox PARC in the 70s. Here are a couple:
-- O. K. Moore, Autotelic Responsive Environments and Exceptional
Children, Experience,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.comwrote:
If you're going to base it on Javascript, at least make it
Coffeescript-like. I also agree that some basic parallelism primitives
would be great; it is probably possible to build these into a
Coffeescript-like
I read the following today:
A healthy [project] is, confusingly, one at odds with itself. There is a
healthy part which is attempting to normalize and to create predictability,
and there needs to be another part that is tasked with building something
new that is going to disrupt and eventually
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Christoph Derndorfer
e0425...@student.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
thanks to Twitter I stumbled across a very interesting blog post called
Is there a new geek anti-intellectualism?
(http://larrysanger.org/2011/06/is-there-a-new-geek-anti-intellectualism/).
Particularly
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:11 PM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
Don Hopkins worked on a PostScript-based window system (HyperLook)
that would let you flip over an object on the screen to see behind
it a control panel with the guts of its implementation visible. You
could modify those, then
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
Smalltalk actually got started by thinking about a way to make a child's
Logo-like language with objects and pattern matching that could express its
own operating system and environment.
It is very tricky to retain/maintain
I'm familiar with the processors designed for specific high-level
languages. There was another generation of them built for Java
(microblaze, picoblaze, etc) and some of those are even still
commercially significant (they run Java subsets on smart cards).
I'm not terribly interested in those
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is nice!
Smalltalk actually got started by thinking about a way to make a child's
Logo-like language with objects and pattern matching that could express its
own operating system and environment.
It is very tricky to
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:28 PM, John Gilmore g...@toad.com wrote:
separation. This is why they never learn to modify the real programs
that hide behind the fluffy interfaces on their real XO computers.
I hope to show you a system where the real program *is* the fluffy
interface (and vice
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fsfe.org/projects/gplv3/europe-gplv3-conference.en.html
http://fsfe.org/projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript.en.html
see question 6b from this QA from the 3rd International GPLv3
Conference (Barcelona, June 22-23,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
By updating to the GPLv3, we make a clear political statement that
commercial usage is ok, but our software must always remain free for
users to use, study, share *and* modify.
1) I'm not interested in using Sugar
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
- What's the upside?
- At what point do we say hey, this has scant upside, and negative
controversy around it, let's spend our time in productive things
instead?
This is the crux of my objection as well. I
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
Really? By moving to GPLv3 your removing the ability to use GPLv2
which is by definition a re-license
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Gary Martin
garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Not that I'm aware of, but C. Scott Ananian might have some guidance on the
matter once he is through his The next four weeks plan – he must be just
hitting week three if still on track:
http
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Q: Do we need to ask the permission of all copyright holders?
A: No, we'll take advantage of the or any later version clause in the
current license. We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
This isn't
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Isn't this exactly what I wrote?
No, you wrote:
Q: How is the actual license change done?
A: We need to replace the COPYING file in the source code and update the
headers of all source files. This operation can easily
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
(Ironically, moving to GPLv3 is taking freedoms *away* from users of
Sugar).
Which freedoms are being taken away from the users of Sugar?
You are taking away the right to distribute Sugar under the GPLv2.
--scott
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
On 04/17/2011 01:29 AM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
exactly what language should I check out? What is being used to develop
Sugar?
Sugar and its Activities are mostly written in Python. They run in the
standard
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima yosh...@vpri.org wrote:
Yup. A lesson we learned is that locking ourselves into one
particular processor or OS is not a good idea, and trying to predict
the particularity of future platforms is not going to work. Make
things truly portable
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com wrote:
Almost. NaCl is not quite there with regard to writing really-really fast
code and having it run safely everywhere -- for example, doing your own
graphics, doing a really fast particle system, etc.
We are hoping they will do
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
I've posted a four week plan for XO-3 software exploration at
http://cananian.livejournal.com/62667.html
Briefly:
April 4-8: Android
Report on first week's work now at: http://cananian.livejournal.com/62756.html
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
PCs and Linux machines yes. But... there still lots of issues with Macs and
so far it does not work with the older G4 Power PC Macs (EToys
I've posted a four week plan for XO-3 software exploration at
http://cananian.livejournal.com/62667.html
Briefly:
April 4-8: Android
April 11-15: Chrome/ChromeOS/NativeClient
April 18-22: Get down dirty with mesh
April 25-29: Pulling legacy Sugar codebase into the
GTK3/g-o-i/touch-interface
That is, indeed, a fascinating shower!
--scott
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
These might make a great free textbook, if someone wants to write up
the pedagogy. I learned to program from typing the examples in from
the paper manual.
--Scott
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/pippy-examples
http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/cscott/pippy-examples/tree/ has a set
of pippy examples in both English and Spanish, based on the example
code in the Commodore 64 user's manual (which taught me how to
program, once upon a time). I've used this to teach programming with
pippy in Peru.
It's best
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 16 Feb 2011, at 20:35, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Christian Bryant
christianabry...@linux.com
christianabry...@linux.com wrote:
I'm curious
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:32 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net
wrote:
This seems to me to be a red herring. What does connectivity have to do
with your choice of OS?
While technically possible to write
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Nicholas Doiron ndoi...@andrew.cmu.eduwrote:
This is a tremendously interesting but increasingly technical discussion.
It's difficult to weigh pros and cons of an entire OS in an e-mail
discussion.
I'd actually like to avoid the technical parts as much as
(Changed subject line to separate technical discussion from other discussion
on original thread.)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 17 Feb 2011, at 14:46, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Gary Martin
Hi folks. I wish to make a radical proposal:
Sugar's days on OLPC hardware are numbered. Sugar as presently written is
not developing quickly enough, and hasn't made significant progress towards
supporting the new touchscreen devices coming down the pike.
This isn't a problem: it's an
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
Sugar is starting to move forward again. We could focus or we could
Get Distracted!
Well, you can pretend that the current course is not heading into a brick
wall, or you can choose one or two new ideas and make
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Christian Bryant
christianabry...@linux.com wrote:
I'm curious, is there a comprehensive requirements and/or design
document for Sugar against which the recommendation is measured? I'd
be curious to see a gap analysis that supports the argument to not
use
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Thanks for the proposal, lots of combustible material here. :)
I was hoping ask interesting questions, as Martin says.
I wouldn't be very excited about just porting Sugar activities to a
stock Android base. I think our
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Martin Sevior msev...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that the minimum requirement for this idea to have the
remotest chance of reusing all the work that has gone into sugar so
far is for Gtk to have android graphics backend. Gtk-3.0 can
apparently now draw
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I look back at when OLPC started, and some things have changed in the
world _we_ live in. But the kids we want to help with... their world
hasn't changed much. They still haven't got internet for starters.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
Stepping back for a moment, the key question is: how can we get
Sugar out of the window manager and network manager and activity
update and UI toolkit business, where it's just not keeping up
(and wasting our
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is something I find irresistible is spoof of scientific papers, I
am a big fan of the Journal Of Ireproducible Results (though find the
[...]
Alas, I have been unable to find an actual copy of the original
I'm not 100% certain we've pulled in members of the OLSR mailing lists
on this thread yet.
But they've actually got a number of very impressive *real world*
demonstrations of OLSRd in the wild. You'll have to search the devel@
archives for 'olsr' to find the emails I sent years ago with all the
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Kevin Cole kjc...@dc.sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:09, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz
wrote:
Compare Breakout[1] with Break Out[2]
Yes. So we need to
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:18 PM, John Watlington w...@laptop.org wrote:
Its amazing how cheap you can make a laptop if you
leave out the RAM, battery, display, keyboard, networking,
processor, and plastic case.
It is a much less developed version of AMD's 50x15
terminal.
That said, I do not
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Reuben K. Caron reu...@laptop.org wrote:
deployments that would like to install content bundles. They package
these files into .xol packages and these packages get installed into
the Library, which is contained on the left hand side of the Browse
activity. Yes,
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr.
je...@merlintec.com wrote:
C. Scott Ananian wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:25:55 -0400
I suspect the inventors added up some prices and reduced by some
arbitrary factor to include volume. My guesstimate says $20 for the
electronics BOM alone
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nz wrote:
* Encourage new people to join our project
I am an educator.
[...]
I have come to the conclusion it is perception of olpc and Sugar being for
technical people. The reason I am now seeing a shift and getting more
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Kevin Cole dc.l...@gmail.com wrote:
http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/index/~3/fgfvtXF_2a8/google-demos-codeless-android-development-tool-for-students.ars
Google has announced a new browser-based visual development tool called App
Inventor that allows
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
raf...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I don't know if it's a crazy idea but i guess TA can be used also to
construct activities,
Defining specific general blocks for general sugar specifics, like
graphics toolkit and prescence.
The key
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Mon, 12-07-2010 a las 22:13 -0400, C. Scott Ananian escribió:
Bernie, thanks for responding. I hope you understand that my message
wasn't meant as a flame on SugarLabs or y'all's work, just as
constructive criticism
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:04 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
I think an honest assessment would indicate that OLPC has done some
initial work on supporting touchscreen devices, but that SugarLabs has
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
I think it's highly inappropriate to say that eating your own dogfood means
that software developers, or even teachers, should use Sugar. Sugar is an
I (personally) view this as an important part of Sugar's
Again, just to defuse any hostility here, I want to say how cool it is
to see the SugarLabs' goal statement for 2010, and Bernie's mid-year
evaluation of the goals. I think it's a great way to keep us all
focused. By commenting on his evaluation I'm not suggesting that
SugarLabs is in some way
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
* Explore Sugar in the context of mobile devices and web-based
services
I'm not aware of any work in this direction. I can understand the need
to integrate with web-based services (aka online communities).
If
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Cole kjc...@dc.sugarlabs.org wrote:
I doubt I'm the first to ask...
Any thoughts about accessibility and touch screens? Voice
recognition? External keyboard / mouse (perhaps wireless)?
Or just offer alternative inexpensive computers, SoaS, etc.,
I strongly encourage the Sugar team to consider rethinking the Sugar
UI from the ground up for touch. The simple port is likely to yield
a very unsatisfactory experience; fat fingers are just not precise
pointing devices, and a lot of gestures which seem intuitive for a
mouse don't really work
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:49 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
the interviewed social Darwinist is Robert Wright, the author of Nonzero
http://www.nonzero.org/
The filmmaker is Righteous Pictures
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://vimeo.com/8709616
Fantastic. Like I always dreamed of the XO-1+wikipedia being used --
kids who read through the encyclopedia to find out about their world,
like I did as a kid.
--scott
ps. the older man says he's
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 14:48 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
For a future release cycle, we may want to re-evaluate yum-updatesd as
an alternative to olpc-updates which provides different trade-offs in
terms of
FWIW, at litl we are switching from a xulrunner-based brower to a
chromium-based browser. We are seeing a big performance improvement,
plus it's making it easier for us to implement plugin isolation and
better memory management (unloading pages which are not foregrounded,
etc).
YMMV, and it's
I've always thought that we should involve the camera activity, to
make it easier for kids to turn their stories into films. Write the
script, film you and your friends performing it, and then edit it down
and share it.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:51 PM, John Rigdon jrig...@researchonline.net wrote:
I have not seen the XO, but I think we should be rather thinking about these
new cheap netbooks for these other tasks and use the XO for what it is
designed. I am now evaluating a netbook I bought on Ebay for $79 and
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
A budding brand like ours needs protection to grow, but also needs
exposure to grow. Approving trademark licensing applications on the
basis of a functioning e-mail address will not assure our brand's
protection - we need to
Yes, a PackageKit backend that handles .xo files could be written. I
believe I've suggested this before.
--Scott
On Tuesday, September 22, 2009, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 00:54,
Seems reasonable: Design review in addition to code review for new
patches. Like code review, make a reasonable effort to have an
experienced designer or someone who knows the design for the
particular area, but if the patch stalls, any designer or developer's
review will do. If you care about
Quick comment: you should probably be thinking about running
activities *in place from their ZIP file* rather than storing the
unpacked form in the Journal. This will lead to a much simpler
implementation in the short term, since activities still have a single
identity.
There are a number of
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:38 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I am still looking into that issue.
An a related issue there is a question in the publish on demand
industry of how to define a 'new edition' which requires a new ISBN.
If the content changes, it's a new edition and
what the hell? i don't think it's productive to separate olpc and
sugarlabs in this fashion. the whole point of this was *joint*
discussion/planning!
and i also resent the implication that this was closed-door planning.
i posted a *proposed* schedule. we're discussing it here *in public*.
i
-1.
sugarlabs and olpc have the same mission. i think it's entirely
appropriate to have one day devoted to technical issues, with the
participation of olpc employees (who are also sugarlabs members --
even board members). we have monday, tuesday, friday, saturday, and
sunday reserved for
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 20:39, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sugarlabs and olpc have the same mission.
Yes, but you have to substitute the word 'education' for 'laptop' -
I can't remember which way round
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday and Friday, we have a second, smaller room besides the
large one.
We were planning to have the first face-to-face meeting of the Sugar
Labs oversight board there.
Please reserve the 3pm-5pm Thursday time
In the interest of trying to make room for the unexpected around the
Nov 17 G1G1 launch, I've tried to compress most of the technical talks
into a single day, Wed. Nov 19. There will be plenty of flex time
during the rest of the week to get to topics not covered, delve in
depth, or try to hack
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
pencilled in for talks?) If you are going to be in town, made a 9.1
proposal (or forgot to), and aren't listed above, let me know.
I should have also
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:18 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like Bernie start a on-line schedule at
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugarcamp
Yes, Bernie and I are working together on this. I just thought I'd
post a proposal to the list in general to find out if I'm totally
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4pm: Internationalization (Marco, C. Scott, possibly Saymindu by
phone and/or cjb on language learning)
I'm not giving talks about i18n
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope there are gobby sessions for all events, and that they are more
brainstorming and writing than presentation and recording video.
No. Wednesday talks are well-structured, compressed data, idea, open
question and
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
pencilled in for talks?) If you are going to be in town, made a 9.1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if (a) I understand how Bernie's schedule (Talk:Sugarcamp)
works; but (b) Friday morning at 9am is the only time that works for
Evangelina, who is able to jooin us for the Portfolio discussion. I
don't think we'll
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
15. XOCamp: Marco has written three proposals for the November XOCamp.
(I am working on one for the Portfolio as well.) There are many more
being posted on the Sugar and Devel lists.
We're trying to raise money to send
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:16 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have:
* A livecd for Fedora 10 devel (rawhide) that allows a Sugar 0.82 boot
option via GDM. We're missing activites, but as those make
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a strong feeling about where the image itself should be
hosted. Maybe on sugarlabs.org for now and the final F10 livecd in
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a first pass on the planning pages for 0.84:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84#Goals
We are going to have quick, informal meetings in #sugar-meeting at 9am
UTC every morning, to keep
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Carol Lerche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to introduce you to the revolutionary idea of a website. It is
so much more functional than this wiki thing olpc is so enamoured of. On
a website there is a homepage with important links to things like
help and
89 matches
Mail list logo
