-devel
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
I tried to do a migration using trac2github. Here is what it looks like
https://github.com/dnarvaez/test/issues/258
It's missing the reporter and it's not filtering by component but these
should be easy to add (it's php sigh, but still...).
On 19 April 2014 01:03, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
By the way, if we decide to do it I think we should do it *before* the
meeting, so that we triage using github already and we don't risk to lose
information (or to have a really hard time fixing the script to preserve
it).
On 19 April 2014 02:03, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Yes! I agree.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's
...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's hard to get right without
spending a lot of time really but maybe helpful
the tickets we _need_ fix, the tickets we _want_ fix,
and the tickets _would_be_nice_ fix.
We have almost 250 tickets, if we can solve 50 tickets in these 2 months,
is important know what are the best candidates.
Gonzalo
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote
volunteers some times more, some times less.
Just my two cents ...of pesos :)
Gonzalo
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
What I'm saying is that the would be nice to fix will never be fixed,
they will keep accumulating and we will waste triage time
On 10 April 2014 21:18, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
What I'm saying is that the would be nice to fix will never be
fixed, they will keep accumulating and we will waste triage time on
them over and over. Better
On 10 April 2014 22:08, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 April 2014 21:18, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
What I'm saying is that the would be nice to fix will never be
fixed, they will keep accumulating
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
This is an interesting blog post with a paragraph about GNOME triaging
http
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 April 2014, Gonzalo Odiard
godi...@sugarlabs.orgjavascript:_e(%7B%7D
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
sense to set one when confirming bugs, it's hard to get right without
spending a lot of time really but maybe helpful for contributors even if
not very accurate.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
Finally, something I think is important is to set enhancement vs defect. It
doesn't take much effort and it's very useful when we are feature frozen.
On Thursday, 10 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Something else to consider is what to do with priorities. It might make
.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.101.0.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.101.1.tar.xz
These are now built for Fedora 21/rawhide.
Peter
--
Daniel Narvaez
-0.101.0.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.101.1.tar.xz
A lot of people contributed to this release. Thanks to everyone!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project
,
Luke
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
http://pockey.dao2.com/2013/11/education-freedom-day-celebrations-18-january-2014/
Sad that Sugar is not even mentioned.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
progress and it's being a lot of fun. I'm mostly giving
you chance to tackle some of the issues before the students fix them all :)
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
I wonder if we should try to use bountysource.com to fund a few things we
consider strategic for Sugar Labs.
Just an idea.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
:
First, we need to decide what are those strategic things.
-walter
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
I wonder if we should try to use bountysource.com to fund a few things
we
consider strategic for Sugar Labs.
Just an idea
decision point will be which version of
Sugar to use for the 14.04 release due in the second quarter of 2014.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Cool stuff.
As for Fedora it would be great to have builds with the latest sugar
(stable
Yes with dependencies I also meant the version of them (for API
incompatible versions at least).
I'm all for getting concrete :)
On Thursday, 7 November 2013, David Farning wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Re library versions
should help with hardware
support.
As you might have noticed there is no Sugar on Android, other than for
drivers support and web activities running in a web browser. I don't think
going beyhond those gives us any real advantage.
Just my $0.02
--
Daniel Narvaez
On 6 November 2013 16:12, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
* Wait and see what happens with the XO. Support existing deployments by
producing images with the most recent Sugar release. Stick to a Fedora 18
base system, the work to upgrade is highly non trivial. Provide custom
rpms
On 6 November 2013 16:20, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Classmates are basically just x86 netbooks, I've not tried it as I
don't have HW but I don't see any reason they shouldn't work OOTB.
Yep. Sugar is running in classmates out of the box. In Uruguay for
example.
You mean
On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
Please elaborate :)
I think developing web activities on two very different platforms
(WebKit1
and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and
Gstreamer 0.10 is part of what I'm calling gtk2 toolkit, it's not
completely accurate but we have been using than terminology. So it seems we
are going to run into the issue of gtk2 toolkit pieces disappearing earlier
then I expected.
I think you can move to gst 1.0 only if you already ported to
1.0. Once I
get that working, Turtle Art will follow (that is why I still haven't
released the GTK 3 version of Turtle Art).
-walter
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Peter Robinson
pbrobin...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Narvaez
of timelines and objectives.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6 November 2013 16:20, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Classmates are basically just x86 netbooks, I've not tried it as I
don't have HW but I don't see any reason they shouldn't
:
On 11/4/2013 4:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson
pbrobin...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'pbrobin...@gmail.com');
wrote:
Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible
? Will deployments be able to
work with something like that? It even requires to ctrl-d on every boot...
I sort of wish the ARM vendors started to use secure uefi, and that's
saying it all :/
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv
Thanks a lot for the feedback Peter. I will check these out.
For the record, I was thinking about Sugar on Linux on Raspberry, not
Android.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 4
Do you know what's the status of graphics with the BeagleBone Black?
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson
pbrobin...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote
devices (WandBard, Utilite,
CuBox-i etc) should have accelerated graphics in the F-21 time frame.
Peter
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson
that the gi conversion is over we can avoid that.
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Walter Bender
walter.ben...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 4 November
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Going a bit off topic, but a pretty major issue I see in our workflow
with
Fedora is that we don't have a good way to develop unstable Sugar on a
stable Fedora. Rawhide is, or at least
and html5, is a very grave mistake,
probably the last.
But hey, I'm just a teacher, probably the only one in this list.
2013/11/5 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
Oh, awesome, COPR seems to be exactly what we need.
On Tuesday, 5
I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
log?
On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if you could launch
it with sugar-launch -d and post the backtrace., possibly after having
installed debug packages.
On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll open a bug + patch.
On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
open a bug + patch.
Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch
:)
On 5 November 2013 00:23, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
I poked my abiword friends, expect the commit shortly.
cjl
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon
On 5 November 2013 00:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
On 4 November 2013 22:53, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's not clear to me where we are going.
I'm afraid you are not the only one feeling that way. It's much easier said
than done, but we need to figure out where we are going and to communicate
it clearly inside the community.
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible as it would be
essentially unusable and have a terrible experience.
Can you elaborate on why you think
not clear to me
that any of these devices is open enough to be viable for deployments or
ordinary users.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.100.0.tar.xz
Thanks to everyone that contributed with code, translations and testing!
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
for you and if they need
to be fixed ;-)
Cheers,
Christophe
On 6 October 2013 01:59, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently switched to Arch Linux and I put together a couple of things
that others might find useful.
* A trivial script to build minimal images
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On 7 October 2013 05:14, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
El 05/10/13 18:59, Daniel Narvaez escribió:
* AUR -git packages for the Sugar core and the browse activity. They
makes it pretty easy to install the very latest sugar. (I tested them on my
laptop, not on the XO yet
Hello,
I setup a buildbot instance to build the packages daily, using the XO as a
build slave for arm
http://sugarlabs.org:8011/waterfall
https://github.com/dnarvaez/archbot
You can pull them by adding this to your /etc/pacman.conf
[sugar]
SigLevel = Never
Server =
On 6 October 2013 01:59, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently switched to Arch Linux and I put together a couple of things
that others might find useful.
* A trivial script to build minimal images for the XO. It builds a kernel
from the OLPC git repository and put
. They makes
it pretty easy to install the very latest sugar. (I tested them on my
laptop, not on the XO yet).
All of these are very much a work in progress. I'm posting them mostly
because they might be of interest for Arch Linux users. Patches and bug
reports both appreciated!
--
Daniel Narvaez
On 13 September 2013 18:56, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Just to clarify:
1. OLPC-A's intention is to create a HTML5+JS framework for creating
Sugar Activities.
A small correction: activities using web technologies has been
discussed for a while in the Sugar community, and is
@lists.sugarlabs.orgjavascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org');
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.99.1.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.99.1.tar.xz
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-runner/sugar-runner-0.99.3.tar.xz
--
Daniel Narvaez
to share their perspectives and
experiences to take the project further. Please head to hack.olpcdel.orgto
find out more. We can also be reached at
olpcde...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'olpcde...@gmail.com');.
--
OLPC Delhi
--
Daniel Narvaez
Same thing, they also have system api.
On 22 May 2013 21:23, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 May 2013 23:32, Sameer Verma sve...@sfsu.edu wrote:
Speaking of activities in the Sugar sense, I
On 20 May 2013 12:19, Bastien b...@laptop.org wrote:
Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com writes:
I feel that 0.100 is even more unmarketable than 0.98.
Agreed. Mathematically, it reads like a regression. Instead of
reaching some definite level of maturity, it gives the signal that
Sugar is in
of view we are not ready.
Otherwise we could delay it at least another cycle.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
Thanks so much for the well thought feedback, Sean.
On 17 May 2013 18:04, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
We can't go with 1.0 unless we change the numbering system.
The current system means it will take another decade to get to v3.0. I and
perhaps others will have far more grey hair by
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On 13 April 2013 03:21, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
I would like to see all these questions discussed further. I would like
the technical implementation discussions to be more contextualised in terms
of user experience.
Hi Tony,
let me try contextualize, for what I know so far.
I think
On 13 April 2013 06:11, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
Android]
Answering myself:
On 13 April 2013 06:11, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Martin Dengler wrote:
I bet someone (cscott?) has already investigated [porting Sugar to
Android]
Answering myself:
On 13 April 2013 15:37, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
1 Android kernel + Ported linux libraries + Sugar
2 Android kernel + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar rewritten
in
HTML
3 Full Android + Datastore/Collaboration replacement + Sugar activities
rewritten in HTML
4 Full
On 12 April 2013 23:40, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to, instead of trying to port all of Sugar to
Android, start with a few key Activities?
I think that's the idea. Porting the whole Sugar to Android would involve
porting a lot of system components and then
On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
The initial work seems very encouraging, yet it seems Sugar Labs doesn't
currently have the resources to make an Android offer available anytime
soon. But: now is the time. I believe fundraising is vital to achieve this
goal, at the
and research efforts concerning sugar's future.
Best,
Anish
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 April 2013 22:52, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
The initial work seems very encouraging, yet it seems Sugar Labs doesn't
currently have
On 13 April 2013 01:36, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Anish,
that's interesting.
First impressions from a quick look. There isn't really much documentation
so I won't promise this is fully accurate :)
Ubuntu is running in a chroot on the top of a modified android kernel
in all I think we made great progress planning the next release. But
we will need everyone help to execute and make it a really good one.
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
On 21 February 2013 09:35, Ron Feigenblatt doc...@gmail.com wrote:
The big news is that OLPC reports potential buyers have expressed
interest in Android, so it has a plan to move the XO-4 that way by
YE2013. This poses an implicit challenge to Sugar Labs, namely, could
Sugar sit on top of
Perhaps a good opportunity to get Sugar in the hands of more kids
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jan/29/google-raspberry-pi-s
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
:
It already works fine on the Fedora releases for Sugar.
Peter
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Perhaps a good opportunity to get Sugar in the hands of more kids
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jan/29/google-raspberry
On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500
Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
3. Daniel Narvaez has made a number of improvements to sugar-build
[5], which has by-and-large replaced sugar-jhbuild as the preferred
On 26 November 2012 15:58, Samy Boutayeb s.bouta...@free.fr wrote:
Le lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 15:36 +0100, Daniel Narvaez a écrit :
On 26 November 2012 02:34, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:43:35 -0500
Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
3
78 matches
Mail list logo
