On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 09:55, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
No, not nitpicking!
Let's be clear what the version number is.
I have seen both 0.84 and 8.4 and 8.4.0 and 8.4.1, and for the
nontechnical user the build number can be confusing.
Which is it?
0.84.0. It's a release of
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:14, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
ok? I guess this will be contreversial but it must be said and acted
upon (much more importantly)
Im gonna try and make this easy:
SoaS - the latest fedora core based
I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:22, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:22AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
you know what the irony is with all this... all we need to do to get
those packs working is type ./configure
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 14:19, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 13:11, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
So... to log or not to log, that is the question ?
What if everybody that has ever posted in a sugar mailing list and is
against publishing logs
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 15:50, Bernie Innocenti ber...@laptop.org wrote:
- in no case ask people to sing NDAs or copyright attributions;
And anything we do have to sing, should be playable with free codecs.
:)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 14:10, Ties Stuij cjst...@gmail.com wrote:
I would really appreciate some logging of the #sugar channel, as my
connection to the #sugar irc channel is killed quite often, my
timezone doesn't converge very well with a number of you, and it's of
course a practical service
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 14:31, Marco Pesenti Gritti
marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I have tickets assigned to me in trac. Who should I reassign them to?
http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/100
At some point we should also make a separate soas-ubuntu component in trac.
That's Simon Peter's sbuntu in
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 08:48, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
[cc += i...@]
It occurred to me that we're not giving enough official recognition to
our sponsors and partners.
For infrastructure, I have a clear idea of who these are. To thank
them, I'd like to put up a page with
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:17, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please join us for the first Sugar Labs ActivityTeam IRC meeting this
Friday, 3PM EST in #sugar-meeting on FreeNode.
http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Meetings
All are encouraged to attend. I will be
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 19:49, Luke Faraone l...@faraone.cc wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 18:43 +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
is there a way to subscribe to the planet to receive the posts?
Yep, there should be a RSS Feed Icon somewhere on your browser's
chrome where it's autodiscovered.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 22:06, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
[cc += i...@]
Here's a revised version integrating some feedback from marketing@:
-8--8--8--8--8--8-
Does the world know that Sugar Labs is still 100% committed to
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 07:11, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey David,
Correction: Flash can absolutely do collaboration. Check out online
games like Corpse Craft for examples. A SWF-based collaborative
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:55, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hi,
we agreed in the QA-Meeting to rename the TestingTeam to Bugsquad [1].
Can someone with wiki powers move TestingTeam/* to BugSquad/*?
Thanks in advance,
Simon
PS: I know BugSquad does not fit in the Team
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 07:20, Nate Ridderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a place specifically for reporting SoaS bugs?
I noticed there is a SoaS component on dev.sugarlabs.org. I'm not sure if
this is for a
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 15:34, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Eben#Tasks:
Add Fedora logo to Sugar
We've agreed to include the Fedora logo in our Sugar distributions.
(Is this an OLPC agreement, or something SugarLabs should be doing in
general?)
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 19:15, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 08:36:42AM -0800, C.W. Holeman II wrote:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Application_Stack:
* Library Collections (e.g., for the Browse Activity)
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 03:17, Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as you might know or not, Debian lenny is frozen atm and new upstream versions
are normally not allowed anymore to propagate from unstable (sid) to testing
(lenny), which will become stable soon.
Sadly, only sugar
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 15:58, Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Faraone wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:48, Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
Please DON'T introduce more sugarisms like BEET, especially for
novices.
How are they supposed to
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:04, Stanley Sokolow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a similar invisibility problem, but involving an XO and a
different laptop. I just received my G1G1 XO. Wanting to emulate
another XO, I installed Sugar LiveCD on a Toshiba. The XO and Toshiba
each can see and
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 15:30, Luke Faraone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 23:35, victor rajewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First up, sorry if this isn't the place for this discussion, but I
understand that specialised discussion lists are still evolving...
I've been
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 20:09, C.W. Holeman II
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some comments on the Sugar Camp Brainstorm session.
Sugarcamp (http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp_proposal) had a link to:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/User:Mchua/proposals#Sugarcamp_brainstorm
SugarLabs the easiest
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:49, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 20:03, C.W. Holeman II
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does this go in the sugarlabs.org web site?
Or is it already there?
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy assigns names to some of the things
on your diagram, but your diagram is probably worth putting on a
separate page.
converted to USB keys.
Someone reported earlier on this list that collaboration did work from
USB keys on a Ubuntu network
from morgan collett: Link local presence should just work, but I've
never used the LiveCD images.
At any rate Morgan asked us for some files and after they were sent
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 05:24, Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just asked Ivan to setup a bug tracker for us on solarsail.
This is intended for filing Sugar bugs unrelated to any particular
platform, and for code reviews.
At the moment, the system has no registered
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:36, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 02:38, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.11.2008, at 13:55, David Farning wrote:
.One sticking point was the availability of squeak on Ubuntu. If I
remember this issue was beaten
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 02:38, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.11.2008, at 13:55, David Farning wrote:
.One sticking point was the availability of squeak on Ubuntu. If I
remember this issue was beaten to death before I got involved with SL.
I only remember discussion of
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 21:21, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are correct, its only for Intrepid... but its cool and easy never
the less :-) and intrepid is out now, so now's a good a time as any to
upgrade...
David
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 20:54, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:16 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have still have a way to go before Sugar is available on all desktops.
Our next step in the packaging phase is to work on the server side
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:09, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 20:54, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:16 PM
Just when I was going to build custom ejabberd packages, Jonas
Smedegaard pointed out that Debian ships the required patches for
enabling the shared roster, and they are therefore also in Ubuntu
Intrepid (due to release in 6 days).
I've written up the much simpler process of getting ejabberd up
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 21:54, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29.09.2008 um 11:51 schrieb Morgan Collett:
http://www.iht.com/articles
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 16:16, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 25, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
Hello All,
Bill Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, Sugar's collaboration software layer is not being detected
Any suggestions on how to fix this problem?
With
33 matches
Mail list logo
