Re: [IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion

[Tony Anderson]

Hi, Sam

This was in response to Dave Crossland's concern that the Board is 
acting in secret. The motion passed with 6 votes in favor and one 
abstention.


Tony

On 07/01/2016 11:55 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote:



On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson  
wrote:

Hi, Dave

This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.

_At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the 
motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from 
GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity 
developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they 
prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to 
you in an email vote._


Didn't the motion pass?  I already merged the change of licence into 
the sugar repo, as per the approval.


Also, will we migrate sugar-toolkit-gtk3 to LGPLv3+?  What about 
sugar-datastore?



_
__
__Approve.__

__Tony Anderson__
__
_

_Approve._

__

_Sameer__
_

_Approve._

_
_
_BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so 
Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence. _

_I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?_


These web people and their non copyleft liscenses.  I'm defiantly not 
a copyright holder for sugar-web, but aren't they worried about people 
stealing their work and rolling it into nonfree software?


Thanks,
Sam


_
_
_  Lionel._
_
_
_+1 para GPLv3 motion_
_
_
_
___
__Lic. José Miguel García__
__Montevideo - Uruguay_
_
__Approved!_
_
_
_Claudia_

Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 
13 @ 8:04PM ET)


So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention.

Tony



___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion

[Sam Parkinson]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Tony Anderson  
wrote:

Hi, Dave

This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.

At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the 
motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from 
GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity 
developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they 
prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to 
you in an email vote.


Didn't the motion pass?  I already merged the change of licence into 
the sugar repo, as per the approval.


Also, will we migrate sugar-toolkit-gtk3 to LGPLv3+?  What about 
sugar-datastore?





Approve.

Tony Anderson

Approve.

Sameer

Approve.


BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so 
Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence.

I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?


These web people and their non copyleft liscenses.  I'm defiantly not a 
copyright holder for sugar-web, but aren't they worried about people 
stealing their work and rolling it into nonfree software?


Thanks,
Sam



  Lionel.

+1 para GPLv3 motion


___
Lic. José Miguel García
Montevideo - Uruguay

Approved!

Claudia

Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 
13 @ 8:04PM ET)


So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention.

Tony

___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] Voting on GPLv3 motion

[Dave Crossland]

On 1 July 2016 at 01:32, Tony Anderson  wrote:
> This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion.

AWESOME! Thanks for posting these - I will update the Decision page
with links to your emails and these results soon :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep