Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

Community is already so fractured into separate mailing lists, that adding yet another one seems wrong. My preference would be for the board to discuss some decisions in private, as is their right as a board, and use different means to ensure that members are kept informed. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On 25/09/17 07:12, Walter Bender wrote: > remedy the situation by creating a new email list, shadow-slobs, which > could be subscribed to by any community member who is interested in > these sorts of topics +1 Except the name of the list should be */sugar-discuss/* and so nothing Sugar-related

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

+1 from me. Please lets get his flight ASAP. Time is essential ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: > How many votes would it take to change the tagline of IAEP to “It’s An > Education Project (not a travel agency!)”? > I feel your pain. The volume of email relating to process issues of late has been

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Ryan Cunningham < levantamos.para.u...@gmail.com> wrote: > El sept 25, 2017, a las 00:01, Ryan Cunningham < > levantamos.para.u...@gmail.com> escribió: > > Correction: > > My opinion is that Sugar Labs shouldn't approve trips not having to do > with official

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

Martin Dengler, i am sorry to be bringing this sad news to iaep list. FYI, adam suggested it and put it himself not me. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Adam Holt wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Lionel Laské > wrote: > >> >> -1 for this

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

> El sept 25, 2017, a las 00:01, Ryan Cunningham > escribió: Correction: > My opinion is that Sugar Labs shouldn't approve trips not having to do with > official business of Sugar Labs; the Software Freedom Conservancy; One Laptop > per Child; an OLPC client

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

My opinion is that Sugar Labs shouldn't approve trips not having to do with official business of Sugar Labs; the Software Freedom Conservancy; One Laptop per Child; an OLPC client organization; Google Inc. (only for Sugar Labs' participation in the Google Code-In and Google Summer of Code); the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

How many votes would it take to change the tagline of IAEP to “It’s An Education Project (not a travel agency!)”? Martin (Not directed at Caryl personally - this whole thread comes off as pretty far from SL’s mission to this observer. It should be internal IMHO.) > On 24 Sep 2017, at 23:39,

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

Ed and I would love to host Samson in LA for a couple of days between Google and Boston. Kayak is showing the one way ticket at $111 at the time he can fly (evening). We will get that ticket for him if the rest of his trip is approved. Caryl Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2017, at 8:15 PM,

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Lionel Laské wrote: > > -1 for this motion. > > Participation to the GSoC Summit is already a privilege. It's fair that > Samson as a mentor could have opportunity to attend to it. > I don't see any advantage for SugarLabs on the Samson

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 04:55:25PM -0400, Adam Holt wrote: > Flights like KLM's https://goo.gl/flights/XwKR have very efficient layovers > (4h15m, 1h46m and 2h10m) and would save Sugar Labs $487.36 or $676.76 > according > to Samson's own arithmetic. I'm sure there are other factors I'm missing

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Adam Holt wrote: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Walter Bender > wrote: > >> From what I understand, from the flights that Samson identified, which >> are the ones with reasonable layovers -- a consideration that the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > From what I understand, from the flights that Samson identified, which are > the ones with reasonable layovers -- a consideration that the new SFC > travel guidelines allow him to take into account -- the difference

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

Please excuse the top post. >From what I understand, from the flights that Samson identified, which are the ones with reasonable layovers -- a consideration that the new SFC travel guidelines allow him to take into account -- the difference is a wash. However, if you think it is necessary to vote

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

-1 for this motion. Participation to the GSoC Summit is already a privilege. It's fair that Samson as a mentor could have opportunity to attend to it. I don't see any advantage for SugarLabs on the Samson side trip, so there is no reason for SugarLabs to pay for it. Lionel. 2017-09-24

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Sep 24, 2017 7:44 PM, "Adam Holt" wrote: On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > +1 from me. > > This is a timely matter, so please vote ASAP. > > regards. > > -walter > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Sameer Verma

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > +1 from me. > > This is a timely matter, so please vote ASAP. > > regards. > > -walter > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > >> Second. >> >> Sameer >> >> On Sep 22, 2017