Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-24 Thread James Simmons
>> iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; support-g...@lists.laptop.org >> Subject: Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism? >> >> In the United States teaching History is very political. A little >> less than half the country believes that our civil war had nothin

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-24 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
cmu.edu; gonz...@laptop.org; yamap...@gmail.com; > iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; support-g...@lists.laptop.org > Subject: Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism? > > In the United States teaching History is very political. A little > less than half the country

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-24 Thread James Simmons
In the United States teaching History is very political. A little less than half the country believes that our civil war had nothing to do with slavery, that our founding fathers were deeply religious and wanted to create a Christian nation, and many other things that are not true. School boards

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-24 Thread Sameer Verma
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote: > It is a nagging feeling I have that in the lack of understanding of cause > and effect lies a lot of what is wrong everywhere, especially in countries > that do not seem to be able ever to get out of the "subdesarrollo" > (underdevelopmen

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-24 Thread Yamandu Ploskonka
It is a nagging feeling I have that in the lack of understanding of cause and effect lies a lot of what is wrong everywhere, especially in countries that do not seem to be able ever to get out of the "subdesarrollo" (underdevelopment) - and also help us to avoid debt ... I see History and Scie

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-20 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicholas Doiron > wrote: > > This interview in the Wall Street Journal discusses history education and > > a couple of interesting, interactive lessons which could be programmed. > We > > don't have many hist

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-20 Thread Sameer Verma
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicholas Doiron wrote: > This interview in the Wall Street Journal discusses history education and > a couple of interesting, interactive lessons which could be programmed. We > don't have many history activities in Sugar > > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-20 Thread James Simmons
Actually our reading a book-getting Activities could greatly enhance history teaching. The nice thing about History is that there are a lot of good original sources in the public domain, free to download. The students can read the writings of Thomas Paine, Ben Franklin, etc. They are not limited

Re: [IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Good reading, thanks. Gonzalo On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Nicholas Doiron wrote: > This interview in the Wall Street Journal discusses history education and > a couple of interesting, interactive lessons which could be programmed. We > don't have many history activities in Sugar > > > http:

[IAEP] Historian David McCullough endorses constructionism?

2011-06-19 Thread Nicholas Doiron
This interview in the Wall Street Journal discusses history education and a couple of interesting, interactive lessons which could be programmed. We don't have many history activities in Sugar http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304432304576369421525987128.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opini