On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my opinion we should use a customized trac for project management, i
> don't like to have too many resources to take into
> count, we already have the necessary ones (Trac, mediawiki..moodle)
>
+1
Same
In my opinion we should use a customized trac for project management, i
don't like to have too many resources to take into
count, we already have the necessary ones (Trac, mediawiki..moodle)
The Gantt plugin it's a good solution there.
Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Sameer Verm
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sameer Verma wrote:
>> dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) and Project.net
>> (http://www.project.net/) are good candidates. They are both FOSS,
>> although I haven't had much luck locating Project.net's FOSS licens
There is also alfresco, which seems quite suited to larger projects:
www.alfresco.com and is GPL.
Kind Regards,
David Van Assche
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sameer Verma wrote:
>> dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) and Project.net
>> (http:/
Sameer Verma wrote:
> dotProject (http://www.dotproject.net/) and Project.net
> (http://www.project.net/) are good candidates. They are both FOSS,
> although I haven't had much luck locating Project.net's FOSS license.
> Their Bus. Dev. guy tells me that the next release will be GPLv3.
dotProject
I think that we are going to find that by the fall 2009 we will see a
release team spontaneously form and take a lead role in the project.
For the first release, Fall 2008, our effort was centered around the
organization of Sugar Labs.
For the second release, Spring 2009, organizational we are fo
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Caroline Meeks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> In our case, it's harder, but might still make sense. If we go
>> this route, let's make sure we support projects involving multiple
>> teams. For example, "Sugar on a Stick" would touch Development,
>> Infrastr
I have to express the contrary view here, based on 15 years of consulting
experience.
If the teams are involved in delivery, there needs to be roles involved in
keeping things
on track, especially in a meritocracy like an open source effort.
Infrastructure is needed, but there need to be about 3 '
Caroline Meeks wrote:
> I am going to be setting up LiquidPlanner, a free for nonprofits, Web
> 2.0 Microsoft Project like program.
>
> I've used it some for projects. Its pretty heavy weight for agile open
> source development. I want to use it for planning for Gardner's Sugar on
> a Stick deploy
>
>
> In our case, it's harder, but might still make sense. If we go
> this route, let's make sure we support projects involving multiple
> teams. For example, "Sugar on a Stick" would touch Development,
> Infrastructure, Marketing...
I am going to be setting up LiquidPlanner, a free for nonpro
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
> projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure.
>
> Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy.
>
> Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and
> mile
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Walter Bender wrote:
> I think the idea of a roadmap (with project schedules) within each
> team would address much of this need.
Agreed.
Project management is a pain in the ass, and we don't always have the
resources to have dedicated and "proper" project management -- wh
I think the idea of a roadmap (with project schedules) within each
team would address much of this need.
-walter
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
> projects inside SugarLabs' o
Hi,
was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of
projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure.
Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy.
Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and
milestones would be an important
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Bernie Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>
>> http://sugarlabs.org/go/InfrastructureTeam
>>> --
>>> Lots of good stuff here. Looks like Bernie is the man here... right,
>>> Bernie?
>>> Love th
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> http://sugarlabs.org/go/InfrastructureTeam
>> --
>> Lots of good stuff here. Looks like Bernie is the man here... right, Bernie?
>> Love the links to all supported infrastructure, even though some of them are
>> busted. The TO
I'll own Design. I promise I'll get back to regular meetings and
thorough minutes!
- Eben
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As long as we are putting our time where our t
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Farning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As long as we are putting our time where our talk is
> I'll serve as the WikiTeam coach.
>
> I have scheduled a meeting on the Sugar Labs community calendar at
> http://www.sugarlabs.org/go/Community .
I can take Devel
As long as we are putting our time where our talk is
I'll serve as the WikiTeam coach.
I have scheduled a meeting on the Sugar Labs community calendar at
http://www.sugarlabs.org/go/Community .
Thanks
david
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, David Farning wrote:
>
> Greg,
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to put together the well though out list of
>> concrete improvement that we can make to the wiki.
>>
>
> Thanks David. But to be
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, David Farning wrote:
Greg,
Thanks for taking the time to put together the well though out list of
concrete improvement that we can make to the wiki.
Thanks David. But to be clear here: I'm not fundamentally concerned with
wiki improvements, per se. I'm talking about te
Greg,
Thanks for taking the time to put together the well though out list of
concrete improvement that we can make to the wiki.
First the credit. I idea of teams came from SJ while we were discussing the
relationship between the SL and OLPC wikis. I was talking about the _best_
place to host dif
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a way to see all the pages under the DeploymentTeam namespace?
>>
>
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/Category:Deployment
>
> All the deployment-related pages should have the
> [[Category:Deployment]] tag. (Some mistakenly
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've seen several things written in the wiki under
>>> DeploymentTeam which didn't quite seem to fit to me.
>>
>> Can you please elaborate?
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've seen several things written in the wiki under
>> DeploymentTeam which didn't quite seem to fit to me.
>
> Can you please elaborate?
Is there a way to see all the pages under the DeploymentTeam namespace?
Anyway I thi
> I've seen several things written in the wiki under
> DeploymentTeam which didn't quite seem to fit to me.
Can you please elaborate?
thanks.
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a lap
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:
>
> * Having every team work mostly the same way is *really* useful. It allows
> volunteers to move comfortably from team to team. Seems like the common
> structure indicates that folks kinda get
Rafael Ortiz
Hi greg
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I love the idea of teams. Teams working together are awesome. Teams
> share a common goal. Teams hold one another accountable. Go Team!
>
> So we've got a list of teams on the left navbar
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/WikiTeam
>
> Who's the owner... cjl? The TODO list looks good... names attached?
>
> No, not the owener, just a contributor. By volume of work, I'd say
dfar
I love the idea of teams. Teams working together are awesome. Teams
share a common goal. Teams hold one another accountable. Go Team!
So we've got a list of teams on the left navbar of the Sugar wiki (and one
or two elsewhere). I figured I'd check them all out and give my
unsolicited feed
30 matches
Mail list logo
