On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:57, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, IMO the *only* stable Sugar OS is OLPC XO Software 8.2.0
running on XO or emulator. As far as I know, none of the other
Hi Mike,
Is it ok if I blog about this on schoolkey.net? Do you have a blog post
about it I can link to? I can easily embed your slideshow from Flickr and
it gives cusiouslee credit automatically.
Thanks!
Caroline
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Mike Lee curious...@gmail.com wrote:
By the
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 18:53, Mike Lee curious...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I just got SoaS running on an Intel Classmate 3. It was easy to
do. But as others have said, there's more work to do to beef up the
activities. I'm excited! I will be presenting this at next Saturday's OLPC
By the way, I just got SoaS running on an Intel Classmate 3. It was easy to
do. But as others have said, there's more work to do to beef up the
activities. I'm excited! I will be presenting this at next Saturday's OLPC
Learning Club DC meeting at Gallaudet University.
Photos here:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:14 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
ok? I guess this will be contreversial but it must be said and acted
upon (much more importantly)
Im gonna try and make this easy:
SoaS - the latest fedora core based
I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister...
It is absolutely vital that SoaS boot/install work in a reliable way.
Any nongeek user who can't use it will not bother reporting precise
bug information, and moreover will lose motivation to try it again. In
the case of branded USB sticks boot/install failures will make Sugar
Labs appear as a
hey there sean essentially there is no difference between SoaS and
cd the problem comes from the distro specific intricacies, which
can be many more than devs care to admit... I agree.. this is not a
usable product unless it alll works... saying oh welll speak
doesnt work because of x
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:14, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
ok? I guess this will be contreversial but it must be said and acted
upon (much more importantly)
Im gonna try and make this easy:
SoaS - the latest fedora core based
I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister...
Hi,
I see frustration but I'm having trouble knowing who should have done
something and failed to do it.
Can we get a list of issues, each of them with a list of people that
may be able to do something about them?
Thanks,
Tomeu
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:16, David Van Assche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:22AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
you know what the irony is with all this... all we need to do to get
those packs working is type ./configure --with-libabiword
I know because I took the painful step of doing it in
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:22, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:22AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote:
you know what the irony is with all this... all we need to do to get
those packs working is type ./configure
On 11.02.2009, at 10:59, Morgan Collett wrote:
etoys
This is packaged, but I think we're still missing a bit - the actual
sugar activity for etoys. I don't personally have the time to work on
it because I'm working on the above (and the actual glucose packages).
What needs to be done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 11.02.2009, at 10:59, Morgan Collett wrote:
etoys
This is packaged, but I think we're still missing a bit - the actual
sugar activity for etoys. I don't personally have the
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging sugar-etoys-activity.
Drop an email to debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org .
Ubuntu POV: Someone needs to volunteer hacking[1] together a sugar
activity package
On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging
On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:26:28PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
1) You consider packaging Pippy and sugar-base my way
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
No need to get into details of what exactly is flawed with my packaging
style, or how you would do things differently:
I'm just trying to see if I'm missing something as far as the workflow.
Simply put, the commands given
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:38:04PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
No need to get into details of what exactly is flawed with my
packaging style, or how you would do things
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.comwrote:
Caroline, I really don't think the problem is lack of testing in the case
of Ubuntu. It is that so little works that activity testing is basically a
smoke test (turn it on and see if it even comes up). And because the
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, IMO the *only* stable Sugar OS is OLPC XO Software 8.2.0
running on XO or emulator. As far as I know, none of the other
distributions has caught up in terms of activity support.
FWIW, I am keeping an eye on
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote:
ok? I guess this will be contreversial but it must be said and acted
upon (much more importantly)
Im gonna try and make this easy:
SoaS - the latest fedora core based
I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister...
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, IMO the *only* stable Sugar OS is OLPC XO Software 8.2.0
running on XO or emulator. As far as I know, none of the other
God I a m happy u stated the needed. We hqd a presentation in Grqz,
Austria, where basically we walked out like idiots. We got loqds of
feedback, which is what my message as about... but fact remains SoaS,
be if fedora (a slight bit better) or ubuntu.. we as educators,
marketers can only shake our
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Caroline Meeks solutiongr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am dogfooding a bit with the Fedora SoaS. My Thinkpad X40 ...
Excellent news. Here's to more SL'ers doing the same :-)
Wearing my XSA hat, I want to get my hands on that second Sugar
platform and test interop
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com
wrote:
Im gonna try and make this easy:
SoaS - the latest fedora core based
I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister... (related one)
Speak - it
well this entire conversation was really brought about because I
couldnt practice speech with my 2 nephews... Im sorry if I crossed the
line a bit, but I think what I said needed to be said... SoaS is
indeed the best plqtform right now and the kids not only loved it
(one 9 the other 3) they
29 matches
Mail list logo
