In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:56:06 -0700
Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I like the approach of using
EDIT for basic editing in the environment you've described. EDIT is
simple, doesn't require a slew of pre-allocated data sets [whose
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:00:40 -0300
Kludgey, but how about:
Bletch! There are cleaner ways to handle it:
See above.
1. Use explicit partitions
Would this support concurrent sessions with different
active TIOTs?
2. Bring
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
2. Bring WSA back from the dead and fix it.
Is this the dreaded ISPGUI? I'd favor an approach which writes
classic 327x data streams to a socket, and instructions for
modifying an open-source x3270 client to
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Bring WSA back from the dead and fix it.
Is this the dreaded ISPGUI?
The ISPGUI window was just plain ugly.
Gil,
In my opinion, the ISPF WorkStation Agent (WSA) is brilliant, but I agree
with you that ISPGUI leaves much to be desired.
From: Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your idea of passing 327x streams to a socket is weak compared to what WSA
already does. You're making the classic mistake of confusing the WSA
(Workstation Agent) with the ISPF GUI.
The ISPF GUI is just one component of the WSA. Other capabilities of
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still wondering: is WSA the same as ISPGUI?
No, they're 2 completely different things. ISPGUI requires the WSA, just
like WordPad requires Windows. But that doesn't make them the same.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The easiest, most powerful way to surf a
Dave Salt wrote:
Ed,
I can't believe it. I wrote my response about the WSA (and even
renamed the subject to 'WSA versus ISPGUI') before reading your
response. Our comments about the WSA being confused with ISPGUI were
almost identical!
That's what generally happens when you state obvious
From: Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An alternative explanation, for those who believe in such things, is that
we have some sort of psychic connection. ;-)
Is that in any way similar to a workstation connection, or are they 2
different things?
:-)
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The
I don't quite understand You:
== Paul Gilmartin == wrote2005-10-22 17:28:
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:56:06 -0700
Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I like the approach of using
EDIT for basic editing in the environment
In a message dated 10/22/2005 1:17:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An alternative explanation, for those who believe in such things, is
that we have some sort of psychic connection. ;-)
Probably need a new number for psychic friends Help Desk. 'I've got a
Does anyone out there know about this? This announcement appears on the
IBMLink Main Menu when you press PF2 to display NEWS:
_
| NEWSScrolling is active. Press CANCEL to exit.
| ATTENTION: IBMLink Customers
|
What is maximum number of Coupling Facilities used by one sysplex ?
I know it's rather theoretical limit, but I'd like to know it.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Brian Peterson wrote:
Does anyone out there know about this? This announcement appears on the
IBMLink Main Menu when you press PF2 to display NEWS:
_
| NEWSScrolling is active. Press CANCEL to exit.
| ATTENTION: IBMLink Customers
|
Im also wondering how would I RSF if I need to with IBM?
Andy S White
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
10/22/2005 04:02 PM
Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To:
Another of gils lunatic flights of fancy.
Allow the ISVs to insist on dataset naming standards .
And SMPE zone structure next no doubt ???.
Like hell.
Pull your head in Paul - get the documentation generic enough to be useful.
Let us manange our sites so we can get real work done.
Programmers
On Oct 22, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 10/22/2005 1:17:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An alternative explanation, for those who believe in such things, is
that we have some sort of psychic connection. ;-)
Probably need a new
On Oct 22, 2005, at 4:32 PM, ibm-main wrote:
Another of gils lunatic flights of fancy.
Allow the ISVs to insist on dataset naming standards .
And SMPE zone structure next no doubt ???.
Like hell.
Shane,
Its being done already (and for quite a few years). An Hospital company
(that
Sort of. If you are using static VIPA and have SOURCEVIPA specified,
then the outbound source address will be the last VIPA address specified
before a real interface. Example:
OSA1 10.1.1.1
OSA2 10.1.2.1
VIPA1 10.100.1.1
OSA3 10.1.3.1
OSA4 10.1.4.1
VIAP2 10.200.1.1
OSA5 10.1.5.1
Has anyone encountered either of the following two situations recently (
say the last 6 months or so )?
IEC023I 237-08,IFG0553F
IEC140I ddname ,vv END OF DATA SET NOT ON VOLUME
IEFTMS50 1XX- 08 jobname,stepname ,ddname ,ccuu,vv
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=1EB
19 matches
Mail list logo
