Hello,
I am setting up environment for RLS. I started SMSVSAM (with
V SMS,SMSVSAM,ACTIVE), but now I have to restart it (had some security
problems), and I don't know how. I issued V SMS,SMSVSAM,ACTIVE again, since
the explanation of the command states that 'it restarts SMSVSAM address
space', so
-- snip --
Hello,
I am setting up environment for RLS. I started SMSVSAM (with
V SMS,SMSVSAM,ACTIVE), but now I have to restart it (had some security
problems), and I don't know how. I issued V SMS,SMSVSAM,ACTIVE again, since
the explanation of the command states that 'it restarts SMSVSAM address
Good Day
I have an opportunity to join our Storage group. I have several years of
experience (15) as a Storage Administrator, however, coming from the old manual
school, I do not have much experience in the SMS / DFHSM area. I know the
basic commands but I would like to know more about
Willie,
Have you looked at the SMS Manuals - all the things you are after are
described very well there.
You can start with the Introduction to SMS book and then go onto the
Storage Administration Reference manuals for dfp and hsm.
There is even an ISMF User Guide.
If you have no manuals at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Klein
First, I agree with you that a 140,000 line program is NOT a
good thing - but it certainly does occur in the real world.
If this is a CICS (or possibly DB2) program, make certain
that you are NOT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott
[ snip ]
If you have no manuals at your site - you can go onto the IBM website
and browse them online.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv
-jc-
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not
Thanks for all the responses.
We tried 0M, we tried 64M, never considered 128M but we'll try.
As Roland suggested its looking for X'FA0' 4000dec below the line.
Available region below is about 10.5Mb
Here are the compiler options:
PP 5655-G53 IBM ENTERPRISE COBOL FOR Z/OS 3.3.1
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:29:27 -0600, Doug Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:41:50 -0600, Pommier, Rex R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only have 1 IKJTSOxx member, last modified July 2005. It does not have
PING defined to AUTHCMD.
From z/OS Comm Svr: IP Sys Admin Commands
I really think that in this type of question, someone should basically
ask for clarification, and then everyone should wait until the person
furthur states his question. If not, why waste all of the bandwidth
answering maybe this is what he wanted.
Agreed. It would have been nice if Jerry
This jcl and cblopt works with DB2 V7 and enteprise cobol 3.3 and it works
with either region = 0M or region = 8M
I tried the same options and JCL with DB2 V8 and got an abend - didn't
examine it closely (u3002).
The quickest way out is what was already suggested - change to the stand
alone
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/02/2006
at 03:36 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok. So Chris maybe shouldn't have said requires. Yes, there is
full-screen automation. Every screen-scraper is doing full-screen
automation. Even NetView has full-screen automation. But automating
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/03/2006
at 02:44 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Even so I vaguely remember integrated communications
adapters which supported SDLC circuits.
My recollection is that those were supported only in VSE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/03/2006
at 03:40 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At the time I tried to implement
automation for the purposes of teaching it, basically the 80s, the
idea of implementing automation by programmed analysis of 3270 data
streams in order to extract key character
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/02/2006
at 07:12 AM, Jerry Ragland [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When I submit this JCL and I found in the logs
Logs? What about the console?
*IEF233A M 0590,RIMS01,,COPYINST,COPYSTEP,IBM.HCI64.F2
Did you put the cartridge in the drive when you got this message? Did
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/02/2006
at 03:06 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the 1401 was used for unit record-tape frontend for 709;
709? You didn't trade it in on a 7090?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/02/2006
at 08:13 AM, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not for PDSE.
Why would AMASPZAP processing be any different for PDSE?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't
I agree too. That was why I threw out some questions to try to clarify
his situation. Jerry did reply and clarify eventually, except that he
used two other threads ('Mount a tape in flexes', 'IBMLINK vs
techsupport.service.ibm.com') instead of this one.
Howi Kok
-Original Message-
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/03/2006
at 05:05 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not clear what is supposed to be wrong here.
And yet you describe something that you consider wrong.
Thus it is indeed wrong that RFC 2355 requires
this passthrough mode of behaviour rather than saying
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/02/2006
at 01:30 PM, Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You know, my first thought was to simply delete your ranting
Feel free.
because it seems there are a few people on this board
who seem to think their sole purpose is to blast others rather than
to try to
Louis Krupp wrote:
Don't forget the write ring. Leave it off when you intended to write to
the tape, and you had to unload and reload the tape all over again.
Leave it on when you didn't mean to, and the tape might get purged by
mistake.
i had some stuff from the late 60s and early 70s
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:11:12AM -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/03/2006
at 02:44 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Even so I vaguely remember integrated communications
adapters which supported SDLC circuits.
My recollection is that those were
Paul,
I'm coming back to this post because I've realised that your desire to have
all the TELNET services available on *one port* - see below - was mentioned
in the post you referenced but your snip ignored it.
I had a nagging doubt over just exactly how this worked so I've done the
research and
Reading through IPCS customization, it is not clear to me how to go about
accessing data in the dataspace through a verbexit.
I would typically use the Storage Access Service (Chap 10.2.18) to acess
data in a dump, but it says right up front to use the Storage Access
function of the Symbol
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:59:37 -0600, Alan C. Field wrote:
We tried 0M, we tried 64M, never considered 128M but we'll try.
As Roland suggested its looking for X'FA0' 4000dec below the line.
Available region below is about 10.5Mb
What does the IEF374I message look like for the compile step? (It
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
On 2/1/2006 4:39 PM, Chase, John wrote:
Is there a reliable way, from within (specifically) the RACF
IRREVX01 command exit, to determine whether a particular command of
interest was entered by a
Have you tried with NOSSR as someone has already suggested. I have
experience of trying to compile similar sized programs and the SSR option
often causes problems.
Jim McAlpine
On 2/3/06, Alan C. Field [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses.
Jay,
Shmuel is right - he often is - well, half-right, but I'm not deducting any
points for not mentioning VM. In other words the ICA is supported only under
VM and VSE VTAM .
From your post I used AWSICA as a Google search word and confirmed the
above in one or two hits. I vaguely remembered
Jerry did reply and clarify eventually, except that he
used two other threads ('Mount a tape in flexes', 'IBMLINK vs
techsupport.service.ibm.com') instead of this one.
Ah so. I didn't notice those were from him (especially the second
one). Even the first subject made me wonder whats a flex?)
On 1 Feb 2006 05:32:58 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kittendorf, Craig) wrote:
The only COBOL compiler we have is: PP 5655-G53 IBM Enterprise COBOL for
z/OS 3.4.0.
Be aware that if the last time the program(s) in question were
compiled the OS/VS compiler was used, the
Hi
I have a PDSE and when try to edit receive the msg IEC036I 002-A4,IGC0005E.
I need recover. Anybody can help me ???
Thanks for all
Jorge Arueira Campos
Support Team Z/os
CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL- OSASCO - SP - BRAZIL
55-11-3685-6991
I have a PDSE and when try to edit receive the msg IEC036I 002-A4,IGC0005E.
I need recover. Anybody can help me ???
A4Unable to complete the READ against the PDSE directory due to
an
error return code from an SMS service used to obtain
directory
information.
Obviously the error message is not much help
A4Unable to complete the READ against the PDSE directory due to an
error return code from an SMS service used to obtain directory
information.
I do have access to OS/VS Cobol (circa 1984-1985) , Cobol II and Enterprise
Cobol Compilers. If it helps, I'm happy to compile the source for you.
Just let me know
what options you want and where to send the output.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Thank you. We are aware of the differences.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: (fwd) RE: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
On 1 Feb 2006 05:32:58
Thanks for the offer but we wouldn't be allowed to for privacy/security
reasons. But if we need to and can, I let you know.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Norman Hollander
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: (fwd) RE: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
Thanks for the offer but we wouldn't be allowed to for
Ed said:
Not for PDSE.
Shmuel said;
Why would AMASPZAP processing be any different for PDSE?
It used to be (until I opened a PMR on it 3 or 4 years ago) that you
could not zap program objects. AMASPZAP just curled up its toes and
barfed if you presented it with a program object. It is
PDSEs are (were?) funny about having multiple DCB's opened against them, and
being opened UPDAT, OUTIN or INOUT. I remember that in an earlier life, we
had to disable update in place if the target was a PDSE.
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
In a recent note, Craddock, Chris said:
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:22:56 -0600
Why would AMASPZAP processing be any different for PDSE?
Can PDSE members be updated in place?
It used to be (until I opened a PMR on it 3 or 4 years ago) that you
could not zap program objects.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:54:40 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Yes, I believe that we are in violent agreement that the RFC should be
changed to allow more reasonable behavior.
...
Well, the status of RFC2355 is Draft Standard (having obsoleted
proposed
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/02/2006
at 08:13 AM, Edward E. Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not for PDSE.
Why would AMASPZAP processing be any different for PDSE?
Because the IEWBIND interface doesn't provide support to allow ZAP in place.
--
It's amazing what you manage to see in a listing when you know what you are
looking for. Thanks Bob. I'm fully operational at this point.
Todd
Bob Helps:
The BLSRESSY (symbol service) and BLSRSASY structures both use three
elements to talk about the dump data of interest:
1. A
I would try the doing ALL of the following (at the same time)
- do the SQL preprocessor in a separate step (if the program actually HAS
EXEC SQL statements in it - otherwise use NOSQL)
- Change to SIZE(MAX)
- Change to NOSSRANGE
If - with those 3 changes - the compile still fails, I would
I just thought of something else (see below)
Alan C. Field [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:OF798E9B96.C165DDCC-ON8625710A.004C9571-8625710A.004CDEF
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thanks for all the responses.
snip
* STATISTICS FOR COBOL PROGRAM xx:
*SOURCE RECORDS = 376159
*
Well I compiled one of my complex Cobol programs. Actually it's just a
benchmark for different versions of Cobol. It was OS/VS Cobol 5740-CB1
R2.4 from July 1, 1982.
Funny, the compiler thought it was 1906. But then we knew it wasn't Y2K
compliant.
ILBOSPI0 (zero at the end) was in the load
http://ibm.p.delivery.net/m/p/ibm/mto/reg.cgi?
pcode=ZOSPE1JAN06Itcode=106AA09Emid=1094633140
Unfortunately you must register:(
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
47 matches
Mail list logo
