FWIW, I have been at many shops without the type of segregation Ted is
talking about and WLM does a fine job of managing the workloads.
I prefer to roll maintenance to a test system before a production
system. Once can only test a limited amount in a sysprog sandbox. I
agree that WLM can handle
test qer qer
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Tony Wiggett wrote:
Have toyed with the idea of changing from Basic Sysplex with GRS Ring
to a
Star configuration. Don't really want to do it using our General
CP's. We
have an IFL engine sitting there doing nothing. Has anyone ever got
IBM to
'convert' it
In a recent note, R.S. said:
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:24:56 +0200
I just encountered the following problem:
Restored production IODF from DSS dump and got two-extents file. For
obvious reason I didn't want more than 1 extent. g The primary reason
was near-full, fragmented volume,
Alan,
Thank you.
Crispin,
A search on HCD or PEER will get some good helpful papers.
An advanced search on Author John Huges will get a few more.
Best to have a fresh pot of coffee handy while reading John's papers (not
sure if white socks are required but might be helpful..)
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, R.S. said:
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:24:56 +0200
I just encountered the following problem:
Restored production IODF from DSS dump and got two-extents file. For
obvious reason I didn't want more than 1 extent. g The primary
reason
was
In a message dated 9/24/2006 11:33:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Best to have a fresh pot of coffee handy while reading John's papers (not
sure if white socks are required but might be helpful..)
Careful they might clash with the pocket protector%-)
Doug,
Once again, thanks for all the information.
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus
FYI,
Just placed my order for 1.8 today.. C'mon and get it!
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is
A good question. I think SMP apply checks the existence of directories but not
of external links. I even applied a recent PTF to upgrade the driver. The SMP
APPLY was successful. It didn't complain about the missing external links. The
links were created when I ran the REXX exec DSNMKDIR. I
Actually, allocation does the ENQ, not the initiator. And both names will
be ENQed, so the real point here is that your alias suggestion won't work.
Mark, I think you are wrong. The initiator ENQs on all dataset names
that appear in the JCL during job initiation, long before any allocation
of
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:27:09 -0400, Bob Shannon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I have been at many shops without the type of segregation Ted is
talking about and WLM does a fine job of managing the workloads.
I prefer to roll maintenance to a test system before a production
system. Once can
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:59:03 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And both names will
be ENQed, so the real point here is that your alias suggestion won't
work.
Mark, I think you are wrong.
Bruce,
Test it. Define an alias of A.B.C to data set A.B Run a job with
DISP=OLD for
The next meeting of the NY Metro Networking and Systems Professionals
Association (NaSPA) chapter is Tuesday, 3 October, 2006 in room 1219 at
the IBM Building at 590 Madison Avenue, in New York City. Our current
agenda (subject to change) is:
10:00-10:10 Welcome, Administrivia, etc.
True enough, but what does that have to do with the discussion at hand?
My comment was to posts subsequent to the original posting. The point is
that there are reasons beyond WLM for segregating work. From a WLM
perspective can you run everything on one LPAR? Yes. From a practical
standpoint
14 matches
Mail list logo
