Lately we saw an increase in our ECSA storage consumption. As we recycle
CICS rarely (once a 30 days, or more), we need to expand edca size from
time to time. I looked into this storage (Omegamon, Storage, PAM EDCA)
and it look like it is occupied by RUWP RUWA.
Why CICS does not release this
Thanks Ted, clarification gratefully accepted!
Take care all,
Graeme.
At 09:37 PM 1/20/2007, you wrote:
As SLIKZIP's feature load has grown the release rate has dropped
from every six months to more like every 12, but that in no way
justifies the statements that Ted has made in this
Thanks anyway, Terry.
Can anyone else offer any practical guidance?
Jerry
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:18:32 -, Terry Sambrooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jerry,
With regard to:
I'm the dummy here. No real DB2 experience.
Running a Flex-Es system with z/OS 1.6 and DB2 8.1. We need to set
For those of you who read German there is a heavily illustrated piece on
this astonishing ancient Greek astronomical-navigation device in today's Die
Zeit, under the rubric Wissen at
http://www.zeit.de
The pictures will indeed be of interest even to those of you who have kein
Wort.
John
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/19/2007
at 01:24 PM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm wondering and the person doing the install is willing to consider
consolidating some or all of these functions.
I've run with[1] a single mastercat, single global zone and single
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/19/2007
at 07:57 AM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK I was off my 5 or so years.
Much more. Approximately another decade.
but the point is IBM has broken many promises
Not just with regard to OCO, either.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/19/2007
at 12:47 PM, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Decades before, people kept printed copies of programs they wrote.
The Devil is in the details. Were those programs proprietary? Did
those people also take copies of legally protected financial or
personnel
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/16/2007
at 10:36 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yet, unconditionally entering EODAD on any attempt to read beyond
DS1LSTAR _before_ formatting the CCW or issuing the EXCP would avoid
Charles's problem.
How? The problem is an incorrect value in the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/20/2007
at 11:36 AM, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Wrong.
The Devil is in the details. The issue for zLinux is license terms,
not the ability to submit kernel mods.
An oops will mark the (entire) kernel as tainted, and will not be
accepted by the kernel devs
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/17/2007
at 08:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd consider it a bug rather than request for new function: It works
for coax-attached terminals;
Coax is not TN3270 any more than DFT is CUT. If you create an ETR and
IBM agrees that it's a bug, fine,
On 20 Jan 2007 18:27:24 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/19/2007
at 11:03 AM, Eric Chevalier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Come on, folks; let's have a little perspective on this issue!
Perhaps you can't find laptops with ECC memory because the non-ECC
memory
Hi, All,
During acceptance testing of z/OS 1.7 one of our testers said the
following:
We used to be able to say RESTART=PSTEP025 or whatever
step. I had to change that to RESTART=STEP001.PSTEP025
This is consistent with the JCL Reference manual. The old release on
which the
Right. Actually, I think it is the zero BLOCK size not the zero RECORD
length that ends up in an invalid CCW, but pretty much equivalent
manifestations of the same root problem.
BTW, and FWIW, I have solved the problem by adding to the code a branch to
normal EOF if after opening the input DCB,
Hello.
I have been following the 'debate' about training, and it prompted me to
ask a question.
Does anybody know how I can get some training in IBM System Automation?
We are running V3R1 - and I think it is now officially known as Sa/zos
rather than Sa/390.
I am based in the UK and contacted
All of the recent posts regarding LPAR's and their CPU utilization prompts
a couple of questions on my part. 1)Does anyone know the mechanism used to
distribute CPU's to LPARS while they are running? Another way of stating this
question is what happens to the executing TCB or SRB on a
The console interface does not have any ability to execute anything
other than console commands. To execute REXX code you will somehow have
to get the command passed to another address space that has a REXX
execution environment.
If you have Netview, you can use the Netview console command
-snip
All of the recent posts regarding LPAR's and their CPU utilization
prompts a couple of questions on my part. 1)Does anyone know the
mechanism used to distribute CPU's to LPARS while they are running?
Another way of stating this question is what happens
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Clark Morris
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 10:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Non - ECC, non-parity memory was Re: Risks (Was Re: Decoding the
encryption puzzle)
snip
The non-ECC seems
ach! http://www.zeit.de/online/2006/48/bildergalerie-urwerk
Remarkable, a long article. And for those of us ohne das Wort
there's http://www.antikythera-mechanism.gr/
Graeme.
At 01:25 AM 1/22/2007, you wrote:
For those of you who read German there is a heavily illustrated
piece on this
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:14:28 -0800
BTW, and FWIW, I have solved the problem by adding to the code a branch to
normal EOF if after opening the input DCB, and before issuing the first GET,
the DCBBLKSI is zero. Given the full circumstances of
In a recent note, Joel C. Ewing said:
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:51:15 -0600
If you don't have Netview, you could try defining a started task PROC
in PROCLIB with JCL to run batch TSO and execute your EXEC. If
May not need batch TSO. Either IRXJCL or BPXBATCH may suffice,
On 21 Jan 2007 16:45:33 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
BTW, and FWIW, I have solved the problem by adding to the
code a branch to
normal EOF if after opening the input DCB, and before
issuing the first GET,
the
One more time:
1. It IS on SMS DASD. This is not a theoretical problem -- it happens in
real life. The problem is ***not*** with DS1LSTAR or EOF markers. The
problem is that the BLKSIZE in the DSCB is zero, QSAM picks that up, puts it
in a CCW, falls on its face, and diagnoses the situation with
All of the recent posts regarding LPAR's and their CPU utilization
prompts a couple of questions on my part. 1)Does anyone know the mechanism
used to distribute CPU's to LPARS while they are running? Another way of
stating this question is what happens to the executing TCB or SRB on a
In a message dated 1/21/2007 5:47:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remarkable, a long article. And for those of us ohne das Wort
there's http://www.antikythera-mechanism.gr/
I just used google pictures with antikythera for search
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:26:31 +0900, Timothy Sipples
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Most X86-based
Linux distributions include closed source device drivers.
Really? Sounds like FUD to me. My experience with Linux is
limited, but I've beeen running Fedora Core
Hi List,
We are a Bank still using SNA based ATM's and we want to start using
TCP/IP based ATM's. Our configuration consist from CICS TS 2.3 running on
Z/OS 1.7 and Z9 CPC.
We have an IP lpar and we thought about creating an IP CICS on that
lpar. This CICS will handle all connections against
When you set RUWAPOOL=YES CICS creates a pool of storage the first time a
program invoked by LE and maintain it. This is used to reduce
GETMAIN/FREEMAIN commands.
Since the applications are growing a new/bigger application program will
need to allocate more storage, and then from time to time
Edward Jaffe wrote:
This line of discussion is tangential at best. Open source is *not* a
requirement for conformance of any operating system or application
component to open standards. For example, the use of TCP/IP networking
is considered open. There is no requirement that the source code
29 matches
Mail list logo
