On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:00:11 -0600 McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Note that not every product which has a command characters uses the
:z/OS API to register it. D OPDATA only gives those products which use
:the API. Some actually trap the console SSI and do their thing.
I have not tried
Hi
I would like to get an independent LE enclave for all of my subtasks in
a multitask application.
(Subtasks A starts an LE application, and subatsks B also starts another
LE application.
I got some U4093 X'AC' abend , as I can specify POSIX(ON) once in
nested enclaves )
--
Miklos
Hi
I'm using the DFHLS2WS utility, but don't have very long path names.
Anyhow you can define in the USS a symbolic link to your long path name
and access over the symbolic link
גדי בן אבי wrote:
Hi,
We are exploring the new Web Services features in CICS TS v3.1.
One of the steps in
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:01:40 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can find all of 'em via the CMD 'D OPDATA'
IEFSSNxx?
Well Ted, that's what I was thinking. It's defined there for DB2 on my
test system LPAR, but does NOT show up via 'D OPDATA'.so go figure?!
Someone else
If you are going over to z/OS V1R8 and run MVS Solutions Thruput Manager I
would wait until the smoke clears on recent JES2 abends which IBM seems to
think are caused by the Thruput Manager product. I will keep you posted.
If you are running it and are not having problems, I would appreciate a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/20/2007
at 03:08 PM, Charles Mills said:
I think there may have been some other subsetting also. For example,
I suspect there was no problem program disk support either. (No
QSAM.)
I don't know about BPS and BOS, but DOS and TOS had access methods.
The source code,
On 2/20/2007 9:54 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
I haven't seen whether COBOL development is supported with a
full blown IDE based on Eclipse, either stand alone or in the one also
used for C/C++ and Java.
If you haven't seen that then perhaps you should look around a little
more. Websphere
D OPDATA only shows those command prefixes from software that
participate by using the CPF services - in essence it is a gentleman's
agreement as any software that has a active subsystem that has a
function that responds to SSI broadcast 10 (System command) can
implement its own command
I'm fairly new to this
does anyone know a way of obtaining a future date using the SETVAR
command?
I want to obtain the date 9 in MMDD format of the next calendar Sunday
I have tried something like this...
//*%OPC SCAN
//*%OPC SETVAR TEMP=(7 - CDAY)
//*%OPC SETVAR TSUN=(CYMD + TEMP)
what's with the (spam) in the title?
Perry O'Connell Perry.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
21/04/2007 13:56
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
[SPAM] Tivoli workload
Walt Farrell wrote:
On 2/20/2007 9:54 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
I haven't seen whether COBOL development is supported with a
full blown IDE based on Eclipse, either stand alone or in the one also
used for C/C++ and Java.
If you haven't seen that then perhaps you should look around a little
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:22:44 -0600, Mark H. Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:01:40 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can find all of 'em via the CMD 'D OPDATA'
IEFSSNxx?
Well Ted, that's what I was thinking. It's defined there for DB2 on my
test system
thanks Steve, our mailserver date should now be correct
apologies
Steve Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
21/02/2007 14:22
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [SPAM]
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
I would like to get an independent LE enclave for all of my subtasks in
a multitask application.
(Subtasks A starts an LE application, and subatsks B also starts another
LE application.
I got some U4093 X'AC' abend , as I can specify POSIX(ON) once in
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:28:56 -0600, Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are going over to z/OS V1R8 and run MVS Solutions Thruput Manager I
would wait until the smoke clears on recent JES2 abends which IBM seems to
think are caused by the Thruput Manager product. I will keep you posted.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:24:09 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unless there's some sort of DB2 database voodoo incantation that needs to
be performed?!
There is. Check out the INITPARM options for the DB2 subsystem. Same
is true with RACF - it will only register with the correct
Mark,
Do you have a REXX Exec in your bag of tricks that lists out the other
CMD characters in use on a system, like in 'D OPDATA'?? Or does such code
exist on the CBT tape somewhere?
THANX,
Mark
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the heads up. We are running fine on z/OS R7. We are just
ordering z/OS R8 next week and upgrading Thruput Manager from V6R1.1 AT
PTF TMT6110 to V6R1.2 at the most current PTF level we understand to be
TMT6115 but will be at least TMT6114. It will be a few weeks before we
The CPF services are a fairly recent (ahem) addition and some legacy
software may not have been updated to use CPF to register the prefixes.
Brand new. Can't be more than 15 years old. ;-)
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
- Original Message -
From: Mark H. Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: z/OS System Cmd Characters
Mark,
Do you have a REXX Exec in your bag of tricks that lists out the other
CMD characters in use on a
We have successfully run the sample from the COBOL manual and are now trying
our own COBOL to Java application but are getting an abend as follows -
JVMDG217: Dump Handler is Processing Signal 11 - Please Wait.
JVMHP002: JVM requesting System Transaction Dump
JVMHP012: System Transaction Dump
From IBM eNews
_http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/20980.wss_
(http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/20980.wss)
BRBRBR**BR Check out free AOL at
http://free.aol.com/thenewaol/index.adp. Most comprehensive set of free
safety and
(After ATTACH), in the subtask's initialization, you can use CEEPIPI to
establish
the LE enclave for that task. In that call, you can pass an environment
variable
list to 'PIPI to specify your POSIX(ON), or otherwise customize the
environment
for that subtask. I believe there are also other
I could separately post this to DB2 and CICS lists but I suspect I will
get as good (or better) response here.
Does anyone have advice on migrating to CICS and DB2 COBOL coprocessors
opposed to separate translate and precompile steps? I tried it before for
CICS (2002?) but encountered
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:38:59 -0600, Mark H. Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:24:09 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unless there's some sort of DB2 database voodoo incantation that needs to
be performed?!
There is. Check out the INITPARM options for the DB2
--snip--
On 20 Feb 2007 13:44:04 -0800, Bo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Today we shut down and boxed up the z/OS system. It's rolling out the
door.
Most of the operation got switched to either an AS/400 or VM/VSE
platform.
It was nice being here.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:45:04 -0600, Mark H. Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Do you have a REXX Exec in your bag of tricks that lists out the other
CMD characters in use on a system, like in 'D OPDATA'?? Or does such code
exist on the CBT tape somewhere?
No can do. If it was that easy,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/21/2007
at 06:21 PM, Ken Brick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IBM called it a System 360. It had many things in common with other
S/360's and many peculiarities of it's own. It wasn't the only S/360
that had differences from the norm.
It was the only one that was grossly
- Original Message -
From: Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
Do you have a REXX Exec in your bag of tricks that lists out the other
CMD characters in use on a system, like in 'D OPDATA'?? Or does such code
exist on the CBT tape somewhere?
No can do. If it was that easy, don't you
At the risk of starting a whole new discussion, let me propose a
possible mechanism that MIGHT be acceptable to most, if not all, vendors.
1. IBM provides a mechanism to fetch a single entry from IFAPRDxx, based
on a product identifier, E.G. SYNCSORT VxRx.x. The entry would include
a USERDATA
Hi All,
Could someone please enlighten me on the below query ? :
Q. I have renamed a LNKLSTed load library ( say , ABC.LOAD on VOLSER =
XX ) to ABC.LOAD.OLD . I have then named a new version of the same
product load library to the same name ( ABC.LOAD.NEW on VOLSER=XX
to ABC.LOAD
z/OS sysprog with 20 years - I am out of work also - downsized and
outsourced (corporate officers caught in fraud), no reason to wonder why the
new generation is avoiding IT.
On 2/21/07, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--snip--
On 20 Feb 2007
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajesh Dharia
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: UPDATING VLF data objects without an IPL --a query
for the list, please
Hi All,
Could
I think I have this figured out but I would like a second opinion from
someone who unlike myself paid attention in math class. (I was talking to
Maureen Valente.)
I'm trying to port an S/390 assembler routine to Visual Basic. VB has no
shift operators. I'm trying to simulate SRL R6,8
No
Would be interested in knowing if anyone has gone all z/OS V1R8 on all
LPARS in a SYSPLEX. Just went to it on Sunday and encountering $BR JES2
abends in the JES2 code which manages the XEQCOUNT timers in the
checkpoint. MVS Solutions believes it is not their problem although they
have no
Dennis, I just sent you the time zone routine you asked for. I sent it
direct;y to your Netscape e-mail address from my gmail account
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), as I am having some trouble with my main one.
DJ
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:29:49 -0500, Denis Gäbler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
Have you contacted IBM support? This certainly sounds like the way to go.
Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
We have successfully run the sample from the COBOL manual and are now
trying
our own COBOL to Java application but are getting an abend as follows
Since many of us were quick to complain
From: CICS List
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:53 PM
Since there was a lot of complaining about the IBMLink changes
that forced us to search in two different places, I thought
Apparently Internet delivery has just been fixed (server issue, I was
told). So, anyone who's been having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER, try it
again now.
For future reference, here's some of the error messages I've seen over the
past three days, each from a separate SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER job:
In a message dated 2/21/2007 2:28:58 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
nice to say THANKS to IBM for fixing the SIS service in IBMLink. It's
back to the way it used to work - we can search several libraries with
one search submission.
Be nice to get a 10% rebate
There were bunches of problems with the COBOL2 translator option
interacting with the DBCS compiler option. I can't (quickly) find a summary
of what APARs fixed which problems. You might want to check out
PKPK26401
and
PK26933:
If you are a SHARE member, you may want to check out
- Original Message -
From: Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: FW: IBMLink SIS Fixed!
Since many of us were quick to complain
From: CICS List
Sent: Wednesday,
If this feature is important to your site, then you should contact your
marketing branch and ask that a REQUEST be submitted - referencing
existing SHARE requirement:
SSLNGC0313587 - LE Callable Service to get (various) Program Names
(current IBM response RECOGNIZED)
Oscar Flores [EMAIL
Thanks for your response , John :-) .
You are right . I know, the proper way would have been to update the
LNKLST with a new loadlib name or a different VOLSER ,at least .
Considering the situation that a dynamic LNKLST change is not to be made
, do you think IPLing the system will be
Don't be too quick to congratulate IBM.
I just got this feedback from them after failing to lonon to
Resourcelink.
Did you change your password recently?
The IBM registration authentication system is having problems and they
estimate it will take hours to process/replicate all password change
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:35:11 +0530, Rajesh Dharia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your response , John :-) .
You are right . I know, the proper way would have been to update the
LNKLST with a new loadlib name or a different VOLSER ,at least .
Considering the situation that a dynamic
Hi Mark,
Not local rules, really. I could update the LNKLST dynamically.However,
that won't be useful unless it is backed by the same changes done
statically (which will be taking effect during the next IPL ). The problem
is ... the change management procedures come into the scene here and I
There are numerous threads in the archives of IBM-Main which discuss
manipulation of linklist. The basic procedure is:
Define a new linklist set, copying the current one
Add the new data set to the new linklist set
Delete the old data set from the new linklist set
Activate the new linklist set
As was pointed out by Mark, the LNKLST is accessed through LLA. VLF only
does the memory storage based on LLA requests.
So even though you restarted VLF, you must also restart LLA. This might
make your changes available to the system.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:01:13 -0500, Imbriale, Donald
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:48:10 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I'm trying to port an S/390 assembler routine to Visual Basic. VB has no
shift operators. I'm trying to simulate SRL R6,8
No need to know Visual Basic, just pretend the following is pseudo-code.
R6
is defined as a signed, 32-bit (31-bit
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/09/2007
at 11:04 AM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Are you just adding another reason for not using a TFS for /tmp or
are you making a different point?
No, a reason for not using TFS for /var. I quoted the wrong text in
front of my response. Sorry.
It
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/15/2007
at 01:46 PM, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We ran into an interesting situation with z/OS V1.8. One of our folks
uses a PDS for his listing dataset in ISPF 3.12 and 3.14. This
stopped working when we upgraded to z/OS V1.8. After hitting enter we
Thanks. Without the R6 = R6 - 1 it's definitely wrong most of the time.
That's the difference between 1's complement and 2's complement arithmetic.
(I think your -512 is a particularly favorable boundary case with no
remainder.)
-1 \ 256 = 0 (with a remainder of -1).
That would give you
What are the naming rules for logical partitions? (I'll go RTFM if I have it
-- is it on the DVD?)
8 characters, upper case alphanumeric, first character alpha? Are $, @, and
# legal? (Hate those non-invariant EBCDIC characters.)
Thanks,
Charles Mills
I see it's not as simple as I thought. Maybe if it's negative, zero the
sign bit with an And, divide by 256, then Or the quotient with hex
0080 to recover the dropped bit.
Bill
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:43:51 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
Thanks. Without the R6 = R6 - 1 it's definitely wrong
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:13:59 -0600, Matthew Stitt wrote:
As was pointed out by Mark, the LNKLST is accessed through LLA. VLF only
does the memory storage based on LLA requests.
So even though you restarted VLF, you must also restart LLA. This might
make your changes available to the system.
Bill -
Good thought. Let's see
(-1) anded becomes
7FFF (2147483647) divided by 256 becomes
007F (8388607) and oring the bit back gives
00FF QED
FE00 (-512) anded becomes
7E00 (2147483136) divided by 256 becomes
007E (8388606) and oring the bit back gives
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:52:53 -0800
Good thought. Let's see
(-1) anded becomes
7FFF (2147483647) divided by 256 becomes
007F (8388607) and oring the bit back gives
00FF QED
FE00 (-512) anded becomes
7E00
Just thought I would update folks on the present problem IBM has accepted
as a JES2 problem. MVS Solutions' Thruput Manager is not the guilty party.
This was introduced into JES2 with new function when all systems are
running JES2 V1R8 in a sysplex. JES2 takes multiple $BR4 abends where
Ah! I knew someone out there was paying attention in math class. Thanks.
OT The VB issue is complex. VB.Net breaks a whole lot of VB6. It will
probably break this program somewhere, but the program is for internal use
only in a software company, so we're used to broken software g, and
there's no
I have a question about DAF. Have you ever made DAF so it uses less CPU
time? I really like DAF, and found it a great help under certain
circumstances. It just seemed that whenever I ran a DAF job, it buried
the CPU while the job ran. This was at my last job, where we had an
MP3000-H50,
61 matches
Mail list logo
