Re: IEFU29 and Automation

2009-08-02 Thread Shimeon Ginsburg
Hi, I have seen this sample and tried to implement it, but when I started the procedure with ALL=TRUE the following messages were issued: IFA010I SMF DUMP PARAMETERS IFA010I END(2400) -- DEFAULT IFA010I START() -- DEFAULT

Re: IEFU29 and Automation

2009-08-02 Thread Shimeon Ginsburg
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:07:14 -0500, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:14:15 -0400, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: I am having a discussion with a coworker about whether or not we need to run IEFU29. We have OPS/MVS in house. I say that we do

Re: IEFU29 and Automation

2009-08-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
When you used Mark's solution, how did you code //SMFDUMP PROC MAN='X',ALL=FALSE The X= part? This process requires the fully qualified MAN file to be dumped. You should have started the ALL process something like S SMFDUMP,MAN='SYS1.MANx',ALL=TRUE Where MAN is your fully qualified man file.

Re: IEFU29 and Automation

2009-08-02 Thread Shimeon Ginsburg
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:18:23 -0400, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: When you used Mark's solution, how did you code //SMFDUMP PROC MAN='X',ALL=FALSE The X= part? This process requires the fully qualified MAN file to be dumped. You should have started the ALL process something

Re: IEFU29 and Automation

2009-08-02 Thread Lizette Koehler
Please post your JCL for this process. The ALL step uses SMFDUMP and the FALSE step uses IFASMFDP. Lizette Lizette, The problem occured when ALL=TRUE was specified. In this case the DUMPONE step is not executed . The step that is executed is DUMPALL. In this step there is no reference to

Re: Any gotchas going from 1.4 to 1.9?

2009-08-02 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In listserv%200907220033570348.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 07/22/2009 at 12:33 AM, Brian Westerman brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com said: As for falling back, there is no such kind of maintenance or support. Of course there is, although it's pretty much the same maintenance as for coexistence. When a

Re: USS misuse

2009-08-02 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 01:26:11 EDT, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote: ... Not much litany, but IBM has put out Dictionary of Computing for years. ... Online found this but it's poorly indexed. _http://www-01.ibm.com/software/globalization/terminology/index.jsp_

Re: USS misuse

2009-08-02 Thread P S
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Patrick O'Keefepatrick.oke...@wamu.net wrote: No z/... abbreviation or phrase for anything Unixy except for zFS . Even z/Linux is omited. Official IBM policy is that it does not use terms that include others' trademarks. Thus the official name is Linux for System

Re: IEFU29 and Automation

2009-08-02 Thread Mark Zelden
Lizette is correct. The example I posted requires the use of the CBIPO SMFDUMP program for the ALL step. Search the archives if you want to know more about the SMFDUMP program. Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers

Re: Hercules; more information requested.

2009-08-02 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4a74725a.3010...@valley.net, on 08/01/2009 at 12:50 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said: Not being a *nix user, I don't consider it modern software. If you define modernity in terms of the prototype release, then *ix is more modern than z/OS. If you define it by the current

Re: Hercules; more information requested.

2009-08-02 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In m3ocqzqm2u@garlic.com, on 08/01/2009 at 05:08 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com said: 1) initial transition from mvt to svs wasn't bad because basically it attempted to simulate a 16mbyte real machine (with single 16mbyte virtual address sapce. Except for TSO. Also, SVS dropped

Call for Sessions Chairs for EWCP at SHARE in Denver, CO

2009-08-02 Thread Norman Hollander on DesertWiz
Good Evening SHARE Participants - The SHARE conference in Denver, CO is approaching fast. And there is a lot of good information waiting to be shared. It will be held at the Denver Convention Center, August 23rd through August 29th, 2009. The Enterprise Wide Capacity and Performance (EWCP)

Re: Enforcing CPU Time

2009-08-02 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hi Mark, I thought it would be simple when I agreed to add RACF checking for the TIME parameter, but during my research I found that there was always a TIME value encoded on the STEP card when it was being processed by JES2 EXIT6. So I then had to work out what the jobclass default was to