Hi Jim,
Don't know about SAG, but PKS (http://www,pks.de) has a product that does
that that supports DB2 Oracle on many platforms, including Z/OS. I believe
that SAG prices are always charge more.
Itschak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Jim Marshall jim.marsh...@opm.gov wrote:
Today we run
Hi Jim,
As I wrote to you in other post SmartDCI from PKS replaces the ADABAS stub
module with one of its own and is able to direct adabas calls to DB2/Oracle
on almost any platform. It does involves any code change.
ITschak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
I am out of the office until 11/30/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 19
Nov 2009 to 20 Nov 2009 (#2009-324) sent on 11/21/09 0:00:04.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
I think the simplest answer to the question is that you can use the NIO
random access file methods to read or write any file using 64 bit XRBA
addressing with any length you want. Once you have read a block of data
from a file such as an SMF record you can wrap the block in a buffer and then
Bill,
Another way I could think of is to stop the MQ VIPA (Virtual IP address)
while CICS goes down and start it when CICS comes up and fully
functional. It can be done by automation package.
The following needs to be taken care
a) need to have VIPA for each CICS region in cases where one MQ
The replication code was changed. No resources shortage, no delay of the
real disk during the processing of the replication, and almost no overhead
using the replication. November 20, 2009.
Shai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Tony Harminc tz...@attglobal.net wrote:
The specialty engine part is just so much marketing hype. As has
been discussed endlessly here, the current specialty engines are the
very same engines as all the others, but with different legal Ts Cs
that make it
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:15:59 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net
wrote:
If they were running on 3081s, that would be a big innovation.
Last I heard they were still on 2050s (stripped down 360/50s).
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
The 9020 (not 2050) was made up of modified 360-65 and
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Jim Elliott, IBM jim_elli...@ca.ibm.comwrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:15:59 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil
gerh...@valley.net
wrote:
If they were running on 3081s, that would be a big innovation.
Last I heard they were still on 2050s (stripped down 360/50s).
P S wrote:
As for CBE, IBM was talking up Haplon and CBE on z a while ago, but that
seems to have died down. Interesting.
In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
described a hypothetical future machine in which non-z processor
blades, mounted within the System z
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:25:38 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
This is exactly what I've recently done and it works perfect on 1.09
How did you verify that the data set was not recalled before it
was deleted.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Donald Russell wrote:
//S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//FILE1 DD
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:47:40 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
described a hypothetical future machine in which non-z processor
blades, mounted within the System z frame, would be available as
accelerators to applications running on the
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:47:40 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
described a hypothetical future machine in which non-z processor
blades, mounted within the System z frame, would be available as
accelerators to
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:08, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:25:38 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
This is exactly what I've recently done and it works perfect on 1.09
How did you verify that the data set was not recalled before it
was deleted.
On Fri, Nov
Edward Jaffe pisze:
There are conceptually similarities. But, blades are usually
fully-functional, complex computers with their own operating systems. I
don't believe that's true of crypto cards.
I found excellent description of PCIXCC card part of some IBM Magazine
AFAIK). For my
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:54:32 -0800, Donald Russell wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:08, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I suspect this doesn't work as you wish for a couple reasons:
o Verifiably, on 1.10. I migrated a data set, then ran the job step:
//STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//D
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Edward Jaffe) writes:
In his System z keynote address at SHARE in Austin, Karl Freund
described a hypothetical future machine in
Donald Russell wrote:
//S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//FILE1 DD DSN=...,DISP=(OLD,DELETE),UNIT=(,,DEFER)
I believe this will delete a migrated dataset without recalling it, because
IIRC the DEFER option on UNIT says, don't allocate a device for this until
the dataset is opened... since IEFBR14 doesn't
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:24, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:54:32 -0800, Donald Russell wrote:
I have now done this. The data set was recalled, with SYSLOG messages
including:
11:13:07.26 STC05950 0090 *TMS009 IEC501A M
http://www.planetmvs.com/unxmit/index.html
http://www.planetmvs.com
Dave Alcock's excellent site includes a useful page of various
information about XMIT compiled in one place.
Thanks, Sam
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and
Is it possible to isolate one LPAR in a CEC and set the date/time to a
different value than the other LPARs in the same CEC?
Yes. This has been possible since the 9672 G5 (I think... could
have been prior). This was needed for Y2K testing. Of course
you have to have your CLOCKxx member set up
On 11/20/2009 10:28 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
This is exactly what I've recently done and it works perfect on 1.09
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Donald Russell russell@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:34, Tim Hare tim.h...@ssrc.myflorida.com
wrote:
In a 2008 thread on people
22 matches
Mail list logo
