Thanks Ron.
Do you perhaps have a link to updated documentation for this seems
difficult to find any.
Kind Regards,
Sarel Swanepoel
Infrastructure Hosting Services: Capacity Management
South African Revenue Services
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
DB2 is a heavy Unicode Services (UCS) user. For example, beginning with DB2
8, the parser operates in Unicode. DB2 certainly isn't the only UCS user,
by any means.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
STG Value Creation Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based in
Sarel,
I believe this is the latest version.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea5j700/CONTENTS
?SHELF=EZ2ZBK0KDT=19990208095033#FRONT_2
It's still in the MVS bookshelf, third from the top after Batch LSR.
Document title is MVS Hiperbatch Guide.
Ron
-Original
In listserv%201008201054137834.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 08/20/2010
at 10:54 AM, Joe D'Alessandro joseph.d'alessan...@fiserv.com
said:
I recall MVSCP coming into usage with MVS/SP 2.2.0 .
That sound about right. Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
I just went through the archives looking for generic information on 3270
emulators. There is a lot but no specific to my requirements.
So here goes.
What are - say - the top 5 emulators everyone uses out there.
I have in my list so far
Hummingbird
Bluezone
HOD (Host on Demand -
In listserv%201008191847300157.1...@bama.ua.edu, on 08/19/2010
at 06:47 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
This works if the CGI program if written in any language other than
Rexx;
No; it only works in two situations
* The source code starts with a shebang
* The path designates
In 002d01cb42cf$384d88e0$a8e89a...@org, on 08/23/2010
at 10:26 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Not sure that I understand the question but perhaps the answer is
that unlike machines you may have used in the past, standard OS
architecture and linkage does not use a stack,
It's
In blu0-smtp1480c2e4f6169b7c0c0cebaa0...@phx.gbl, on 08/24/2010
at 07:47 PM, Ram Study rambal...@chennairocks.in said:
Can anyone explain me why we are using Entry and Exit conventions in
Mainframe assembler.
Because the vendor documented them. Because it helps to promote
interoperability.
I just went through the archives looking for generic information on 3270
emulators. There is a lot but no specific to my requirements.
So here goes.
What are say - the top 5 emulators everyone uses out there.
I have in my list so far
Hummingbird
Bluezone
HOD (Host on Demand IBM) an I am
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:29:48 -0400, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there is any place where z10 CEC temperatures are
logged? The data is now available on the SAD in real time, but is it logged
anywhere?
IBM Systems Director Active Energy Manager for Linux on System z
In 00d101cb42b2$08a0d100$19e273...@org, on 08/23/2010
at 06:57 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
most favorably disposed to a product that
Uses standard system services instead of rolling its own.
- used z/OS Unicode Services and gave you the ability in the vendor
products parameter
W dniu 2010-08-23 23:04, Rick Fochtman pisze:
---snip-
Obviously this is my humble opinion, but even IBMers used to admit
that there are very few customers who need more than two (TWO!) CPCs
- of
course having in mind
W dniu 2010-08-24 12:42, Lizette Koehler pisze:
I just went through the archives looking for generic information on 3270
emulators. There is a lot but no specific to my requirements.
So here goes.
What are - say - the top 5 emulators everyone uses out there.
I have in my list so far
We use two: PowerTerm by Ericom Software and QWS (QuickWorkStation Secure) by
Jolly Giant Software
Frank J. Martinez
Technical Support Supervisor
IT System z
Tel.: 305-284-3919
Cell: 305-987-8281
Fax : 305-284-3872
e-Mail: fjm...@miami.edu
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Um, don't the descendants of the 8086 -- you know, those pesky PCs -- have a
stack implemented in hardware?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:00 AM
To:
Hi,
Just for clarafication in EXEC PGM=MICHEAL. TCBJSTCB. is not the
initiator but MICHEAL
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
On 08/24/2010 01:23 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Um, don't the descendants of the 8086 -- you know, those pesky PCs -- have a
stack implemented in hardware?
And there also you have entry/exit conventions. At least two,
see cdecl ou stdcall. Who does the push/pop, caller or subroutine.
Any
HI Lizette,
You might want to check if any of your apps are using EHLLAPI (Screen
scraping) or HLLAPI , so you can make sure the new emulator software
supports that (I suspect most do, but you never know ).
Extra is in use here, deployed over citrix
Kind regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Assembler Entry and Exit module
Um, don't the descendants of the 8086 -- you know, those
Over the years and doing consulting work for several different companies
my favorite is TN3270 Plus by http://www.sdisw.com/. It is cheap works
great and with Citrix I have never seen it deployed with Citrix. I
connect using Citrix to 2 different clients then use TN3270 for my
emulation.
I have z/Scope installed on my laptop. Be aware of the supported certificate
types. Not all of the emulators supports all types of certificates,
especially ARMs.
ITschak
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Michael Saraco
michael.sar...@baer-consulting.com wrote:
Over the years and doing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 3270 Emulator Software
SNIPPAGE
However, I was wondering if there were others.
My requirements are
True stack based machines don't have general purpose registers
Fair enough. Remember Forth?
it is superior to the PC's because you can't overflow the stack. On a
PC, this overwrites memory
Of course we all know the Z is superior to all other types of hardware, real
or even conceived. :-) But
Strange, no one seems to have mentioned what I believe is one of the BEST and
I've heard others state such too.
Hmmm.
Tom Brennan's Vista!
http://www.tombrennansoftware.com/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette
Um, don't the descendants of the 8086 -- you know, those pesky PCs -- have a
stack implemented in hardware?
Don't DEC machines have them also?
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation!
Kimota!
--
For IBM-MAIN
I believe IBM has PCOMM, and there is another vendor called ERICOM they
have a pretty good tn3270 client. We use OpenText Host Explorer. It used
to be HummingBird.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent:
Lizette,
We just went through a TN3270 RFP and chose Bluezone as a replacement for
Attachmate. We deploy via traditional thick client, thin client, served
desktop and Citrix. If you want more information on our selection criteria,
contact me offline and I'll send you the technical
1. Tom Brennan's Vista!
http://www.tombrennansoftware.com/
Very small footprint, fast, supports SSL, has reasonable font selection, FTP,
Macros (record/playback) The best $30 I've spent in a long time. And you have
your choice of colors (really) even pink. And fantastic support, I've never had
In 007001cb437e$bb883fc0$3298bf...@org, on 08/24/2010
at 07:23 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Um, don't the descendants of the 8086 -- you know, those pesky PCs --
have a stack implemented in hardware?
Well, they have something called SP, but the Devil is in the details.
You're
In 4c73b326.3030...@edelweb.fr, on 08/24/2010
at 01:55 PM, Peter Sylvester peter.sylves...@edelweb.fr said:
And there also you have entry/exit conventions. At least two, see
cdecl ou stdcall. Who does the push/pop, caller or subroutine.
If you're lucky, the push and pop might be for the same
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e05...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/24/2010
at 07:40 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
There are not truly stack based as Shmuel was talking about. True
stack based machines don't have general purpose registers.
It's possible to have a
In 013e01cb4379$111dcaa0$33595f...@com, on 08/24/2010
at 06:42 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com said:
There is a lot but no specific to my requirements.
Are you looking for a 3270 simulator or for a TN3270 client? If the
latter, have you looked at x3270.
What features do you need,
I have 4 lpars in a group. SCRT reports the group value in the E5
section (PRODUCT SUMMARY INFORMATION) which is what appears when I
upload the report to LMS.
The N5 section (DETAIL LPAR DATA SECTION) does show a total for the CPC
as group+1.
Silvio Camplani
zSeries Sr. Analyst, Systems Support
Hi all,
Does any of you know if there is a tool named BLSR Aid ? If it exists
where can i find it ?
TIA
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
BANCO BRADESCO S.A.
4254 / DPCD Engenharia de Software
Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: +55 11 4197-2021 R: 22021
Folks, read her post -- she mentioned Vista in her query. But consider
this another vote for a good, solid piece of software.
I've seen and used dozens of tn3270 clients. Most are pretty well the
same, though you'll learn to hate specific features in some of them. I
would thus STRONGLY recommend
Try this Cisco website:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/ps2006/products_command_reference_chapter09186a0080950dbf.html
-Original Message-
From: ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO 4254.itur...@bradesco.com.br
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, Aug 24, 2010 4:06 pm
Why?
Aled Hughes aledlhug...@aol.com 8/24/2010 11:16 AM
Try this Cisco website:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/ps2006/products_command_reference_chapter09186a0080950dbf.html
-Original Message-
From: ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO 4254.itur...@bradesco.com.br
To:
IBM Redbooks SG246105
VSAM Demystified
2010/8/24 Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
Why?
Aled Hughes aledlhug...@aol.com 8/24/2010 11:16 AM
Try this Cisco website:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/ps2006/products_command_reference_chapter09186a0080950dbf.html
Has the recommended ratio for Logical to Physical processor changed in the last
10 years or so?
There was a time where a ratio above 2:1 led to something called Short Engine
Syndrome or generally sluggish CPU performance.
A colleague in the office now maintains the WSC has changed the
Scott
Because it refers to 'BLSR Aid'. If it does not refer to the particular BLSR
Aid requested, I apologize, I was merely trying to be helpful.
Cheers
ALH
-Original Message-
From: Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, Aug 24, 2010 4:18 pm
Subject: Re:
For which TCB?
IEAVAR00 is JSTCB for IEAVAR00 region control.
IEAVTSDT is JSTCB for IEAVTSDT DUMP task.
IEESB605 is JSTCB for IEESB605/IEFSD060.
MICHAEL is JSTCB for MICHAEL and (usually) children.
Stephen R. Donaldson, Code Magus Limited (England reg. no. 4024745)
Number 6, 69
issues with customers that don't have it running/configured properly
Anyone?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: EBCDIC-ASCII
In 008101cb4392$d0c24570$7246d0...@org, on 08/24/2010
at 09:46 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
But I do recall that the 8086+ family has an SS
register that normally points to the end (lower memory extremity) of
the stack. The SP grows toward 0 has I recall and causes a program
In listserv%201008191837506477.1...@bama.ua.edu, on 08/19/2010
at 06:37 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
You generally laud JCL for embracing Assembler's syntactic
conventions. Another it spurned was order-independence of keyword
arguments.
WTF? Keyword arguments in JCL are
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:21:46 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
Has the recommended ratio for Logical to Physical processor changed in the
last 10 years or so?
There was a time where a ratio above 2:1 led to something called Short
Engine Syndrome or generally
In
245452399-1282658035-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-16452400...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 08/24/2010
at 01:54 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
Don't DEC machines have them also?
Which DEC machines?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
On 24 August 2010 08:40, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
There are not truly stack based as Shmuel was talking about. True stack
based machines don't have general purpose registers. Instructions, such as
ADD, take their operands from a stack and leave their results on the
I've presented on this fact at Share conferences, z/OS Expo and CMG. The 4
hour rolling average (4HRA) often (but not always) stabilizes at a number
higher than an LPAR's Defined Capacity or an LPAR Group's Capacity Limit.
This has to do with the algorithms WLM uses to control the capping.
When
David,
I believe that the 2:1 ratio can be pretty well dead and buried, especially
with enhancements like Hyperdispatch.
There were two affects as I recall. One was that the excess number of LP
increased CPU time through increased HSB miss, and that low weight LPARs
with way too many engines
Here's my two cents.
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0708L=ibm-mainP=R22070
I wrote the above post in August 2007, and it is still true today.
Every z/OS shop should do this - Unicode On Demand works great!
Brian
--
We've run into a problem with our IEFUTL exit allowing a batch job to be
terminated for wait time exceeded even though it has executing OMVS
spawned address spaces.
A fast look through the exits manual didn't spot anything in the exits
parameter list where I can test for this condition. I
When EXEC PGM=MICHEAL the initator does an ATTACH JSTCB=YES. For
MICHEAL is represented by what data name of the TCB control block
TCBJSTCB.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Stephen Donaldson
step...@codemagus.com wrote:
For which TCB?
IEAVAR00 is JSTCB for IEAVAR00
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
Perhaps you are
thinking of references to specific steps, but there's no analog to
that in assembler.
Sure there is -- the order of the instructions! (Although with OoO
Execution, even THAT changes...)
what about a time parm in the job card(time=1440)?
mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:05:20 -0400, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.com
wrote:
We've run into a problem with our IEFUTL exit allowing a batch job to be
terminated for wait time exceeded even though it has executing OMVS
spawned address spaces.
A fast look through the exits manual didn't spot
From: zedgarhoo...@gmail.com
One anti-recommendation: Extra! has sucked pretty badly IMHO for a
very long time. Buggy and flaky.
I have to agree. Last year I worked at a customer's site for 2 months, and was
forced to use Extra! The first thing I did after installing SimpList was to try
to
On 08/24/10 13:17, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:05:20 -0400, Mark Jacobsmark.jac...@custserv.com
wrote:
We've run into a problem with our IEFUTL exit allowing a batch job to be
terminated for wait time exceeded even though it has executing OMVS
spawned address spaces.
A fast
I can't directly help you. But what I'd do is run one of these jobs. When the
step is waiting for a UNIX process to finish, I'd do a console DUMP command of
that address space. I'd then look at the TCB and RB to see if there is
something that I could test in my IEFUTL exit. I would guess that
Did a quick look. If you use SDSF and the PS command to look at UNIX processes,
you will see that SDSF has a message on the job which says:
TSH0099 STC47962 SWAPPED,WAITING FOR CHILDTSH009 1WI 0.06
83887051 8388704779 004F -sh
So SDSF knows that it is
In
200800533-1279300268-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-16566119...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 07/16/2010
at 05:11 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
To cic...@listserv.uga.edu
Also, you can send it to almost any list server -- if it doesn't
recognise it as one of its
I opened a PMR with IBM to inquire about this. I learned two things:
1) The PTFs UK59131 and UK59134 are now available as of today.
2) It might be a good idea to wait for new PTFs UK59501 and UK59510 which
are coming real soon and will replace UK59131 and UK59134 respectively.
I've asked IBM to
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:38:09 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
You generally laud JCL for embracing Assembler's syntactic
conventions. Another it spurned was order-independence of keyword
arguments.
WTF? Keyword arguments in JCL are order-independent. Perhaps you are
thinking of references
You really should look at VISTA, from TomBrennanSoftware.com
It's quite good and, in my experience, very reliable.
Rick
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I just went through the archives looking for generic information on
Dave
We have EXTRA! and I too am not as pleased with it as a few others.
However, at least with Extra! Xtreme 9 you can change the mouse's left
double click to select and ENTER. HOWEVER, it is NOT in the mouse map
settings but in the Global Preferences. Go figure.
-Original Message-
Hi,
We use NEXUS currently, and used Reflections in the past.
Thanks...Guy M. Gates Jr.
TTI Z/OS Systems Programmer II
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with
Hello all, I'm asking for a little help. I would like to keep TSO users
from submitting jobs using class P. I am looking through the Jes2 exits,
but I'm not sure which one to choose. If someone could point me in the
right direction I would appreciate it. Also if anyone has a sample or
knows where
Gil,
The problem with your example is that even though it looks like it is,
PGM=xxx is not a keyword argument. According to the JCL reference manual,
the first parameter after the EXEC statement is a positional parm and the rest
of them are keyword. The While I'm not saying I agree with
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:38:09 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
You generally laud JCL for embracing Assembler's syntactic
conventions. Another it spurned was order-independence of keyword
arguments.
WTF? Keyword arguments in JCL are order-independent. Perhaps you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ward, Mike S
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Job Submission exit
Hello all, I'm asking for a little help. I would like to keep TSO users
from
I don't know about favourites, but Dave Alcock has a pretty extensive list at
http://planetmvs.com/tn3270/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 05:56
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
That is a very intriguing question and there were some responses that further
piqued my curiosity, so I did some digging.
I believe that the SDSF PS command may be using the MVS BPXEKDA service to
display the waiting for child status.
I took a dump of one of these waiting for child address
Rick Fochtman schrieb:
You really should look at VISTA, from TomBrennanSoftware.com
It's quite good and, in my experience, very reliable.
Yeah, it is! And the Font that comes with Vista is just GREAT! It is so
great that I use it with SPF/SE (a SPF-like Editor for Windows) and not
just for
James,
You can used JES2 exit 2 (I use JES3 but I suspect you'll find an example in
HASPSAMP or HASPSRC).
You can also use SMF exit IEFUJV (examples in SAMPLIB members IEEUJV and
SMFEXITS).
Cheers,
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Sorry Mike. The exit that James mentioned will work fine too, as long as you're
only concerned with jobs entering via the TSO SUBmit CP. There are other ways
to submit jobs into the system from TSO (e.g. executing a foreground IEBGENER
to INTRDR or FTPing to JES).
Cheers...
-Original
We use JES2 exit 6 to restrict job classes to selected RACF groups,
but is should be pretty easy to just check the origin for TSUn
instead.
The problem with using the TSO submit exit is that it is easy to
bypass by just using any old program to send card images to the
INTRDR.
/jack
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:22:20 -0500, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Hello all, I'm asking for a little help. I would like to keep TSO users
from submitting jobs using class P. I am looking through the Jes2 exits,
but I'm not sure which one to choose. If someone could point me in the
right
I've sent you, via private E-Mail, a copy of the IKJEFF10 exit we used
at Board of Trade Clearing Corp. It does job-class enforcement based on
userid. Enjoy. :-)
Rick
---
Ward, Mike S wrote:
Hello all, I'm asking for a little help. I would like to
Got it. Right now I'm only interested in the TSO users. All of you
thanks for all the feedback and help.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Starr, Alan
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 13:24 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote:
The problem seems to be that the submitted batch job is waiting for the
spawned OMVS address spaces to complete. When the wait time limit for
the batch job is exceeded IEFUTL gets control and the parameter list
indicates that it's a
Hi Lizette,
I have used Tom Brennan's Vista TN3270 and I like it very much.
Some of our customer base uses Mocha TN3270 from MochaSoft, I have not used
it, but they seem to like it pretty well.
HTH,
Linda Mooney
- Original Message -
From: Lizette Koehler
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:36:22 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:39:17 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Here's a weird one for you:
We recently upgraded two LPARs from z/OS 1.9 to z/OS 1.11. One of those
LPARs is our sandbox, which is pretty well crippled (one CPU, 3GiB
central
On 8/24/2010 12:56 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
What are – say - the top 5 emulators everyone uses out there.
I have in my list so far
- A real 3279 Mod 3 (If I had one) - Not really an emulator is it ?
But the best experience ever !
- SDI's TN3270 Plus
- x3270
- c3270
..
In a message dated 8/24/2010 5:43:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
i...@vmfacility.fr writes:
A real 3279 Mod 3 (If I had one) - Not really an emulator is it ?
But the best experience ever !
The 3192's with the VGA ports were outstanding.
Then GRAFTEK with PCI card was great, but pricey.
- A real 3279 Mod 3 (If I had one) - Not really an emulator is it ?
But the best experience ever !
[Ron Hawkins]
I often miss my 3472G. A Mainframe terminal with a mouse and supported five
sessions!
--
For
We use Tom Brennan's Vista at ASE: http://www.tombrennansoftware.com
take care all,
Graeme
At 08:42 PM 24/08/2010, you wrote:
I just went through the archives looking for generic information on 3270
emulators. There is a lot but no specific to my requirements.
So here goes.
What are -
--- On Tue, 8/24/10, Brian Peterson brian.peterson.ibm.m...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Brian Peterson brian.peterson.ibm.m...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER: JAVA 5.0 PTFs not found by server??
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 2:18 PM
I opened a PMR with IBM
86 matches
Mail list logo
