Dears ,
as the subject ,would like to plan the MF unicode migrtion.
1) What are major considerations you will raise ?
- UTF 8 , UTF 16 , or UTF 32 support on MF ?
- COBOL pgm migration ? support UTF16 only ?
- PL/I PGM migration ?
- DB (IMS DB / VSAM DB /DB2 DB ) migration?
Hi
Try to install z/OS 1.12 via WEB download and got allocation
errors in GIMUNZIP for
SYSUT1 as:
GIM54701S ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SYSUT1 - IKJ56893I FILE SYSUT1 NOT
ALLOCATED+.
GIM54701S ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SYSUT1 - IGD17040I ERROR IN DADSM
PROCESSING ON VOLUME UNKNWN FOR
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Andrew Armstrong
androidarmstr...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim,
The EZY1300E message reports that errno 54 (Connection Reset by Peer) was
returned on a RECV socket call by the CICS listener (CSKL). I'd conclude
that the remote client has, for one reason or another,
It's a pity for the people who are in Europe :(
-Mensaje original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] En nombre de
Richards, Robert B.
Enviado el: martes, 22 de febrero de 2011 18:25
Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Asunto: Re: Writing a Systems Programmer
The below link would have more information:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IO12183
Thanks,
Prathap
Miklos Szigetvari miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/23/2011 02:12 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
Hi
Thank you the problem is with this
VOLUME UNKNWN
If we add volume parameter to archdef it works
On 2/23/2011 10:39 AM, Prathap Srinivasan wrote:
The below link would have more information:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IO12183
Thanks,
Prathap
Miklos
In ncbblknfeephcaamofkliehbmgaa.r.han...@rshconsulting.com, on
02/22/2011
at 05:56 AM, Robert S. Hansel (RSH) r.han...@rshconsulting.com
said:
If you do not activate either the TAPEVOL class or DEVSUPxx
TAPEAUTHDSN=YES, and if you do not also define profile ICHBLP to the
FACILITY class, then
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I believe that the point at issue is what happens if you define ICHBLP in the
FACILITY class but do not activate either the TAPEVOL class or DEVSUPxx
TAPEAUTHDSN=YES.
Robert S. Hansel (RSH) wrote:
If you do not activate either the TAPEVOL class or DEVSUPxx
In f5ff22ced304764eaac97a43706235b7174cb62...@corpexmbx.bekco.com,
on 02/22/2011
at 04:40 PM, Greg Shirey wgshi...@benekeith.com said:
Right...how many city airports are actually in that city? Is LAX in
LA?
I thought it was?
is Flushing (JFK) in NYC? (It is in a borough)
Do you mean NYC or
Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I believe that the point at issue is what happens if you define ICHBLP in the
FACILITY class but do not activate either the TAPEVOL class or DEVSUPxx
TAPEAUTHDSN=YES.
Robert S. Hansel (RSH) wrote:
If you do not activate either the
In 45e5f2f45d7878458ee5ca6796973355b85...@usdaexch01.kbm1.loc, on
02/22/2011
at 08:21 AM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com said:
I suggest the JCL include statement. Much easier to use and less to
change (After the initial pain).
Change the JCLLIB statement to point to the appropriate
Thanks for the explanations, and suggestions.
What I was observing, even if it was residual data, seemed different, either
for v1.11 itself, or some other component added last year to our systems in
support of v1.11.
I had not been successful with a SLIP, earlier, but I was able to observe
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca34308822...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware.com,
on 02/22/2011
at 04:06 PM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com said:
CONTIG and ROUND are/were independent, but they both addressed I/O
performance improvement. One purpose of ROUND was to reduce DASD
revolutions that
In 031b01cbd2c6$62366280$26a32780$@org, on 02/22/2011
at 11:26 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Do the same restrictions on static system symbols exist for dynamic
allocation as exist for JCL in the same environment
I've seen no documentation for such a restriction, and the excuses
Nobody knows, or is this too obvious a question to warrant an answer?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: System symbols in
Just went from TS22 to TS41 and have a surprise problem.
Our program writes a report to a TDQ, and when the report is
complete leaves the TDQ, which has a Trigger level of 1. At this point
TRANSID starts since the trigger level is reached and it process the
record in the TDQ.
Thanks. Your reply crossed in the mail with my follow-up.
FWIW in the case in question I am not using SVC 99 directly but rather using
C fopen();
Yeah, the fact that you can't code SYSNAME in JCL seems pretty lame.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
G'day,
When I generate a list of dsns - ISMF Option 1.2 for a HLQ I receive the
expected list. However, I notice that all of the DATA SET NAMEs are
truncated. Is there a way of having the dsns in their full name i.e. avoid
truncation?
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Andrew Armstrong
androidarmstr...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim,
The EZY1300E message reports that errno 54 (Connection Reset by Peer) was
returned on a RECV socket call by the CICS
This is what placing the cursor on the datasetname heading and pressing PF1
says. I think you want unfolded (however you accomplish that). An exercise left
to the reader :)
Alan
The value in this data column represents the data
set name of each data set in the list. The
DATA
G'day,
When I generate a list of dsns - ISMF Option 1.2 for a HLQ I receive the
expected list. However, I notice that all of the DATA SET NAMEs are
truncated. Is there a way of having the dsns in their full name i.e. avoid
truncation?
Thanks.
Could you cut and paste what you are
Looks like there are a few examples on the CBTTAPE.
File 573: IEFUJV exit for System Symbolic substitution in JCL
FILE 785: Substitute system symbols into JCL - K-H Doppelfeld
Rob
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Thanks. Your reply crossed in the mail
Alan,
Thanks. It works. I noticed also when I put the cursor under List the
option 3.
--- On Thu, 24/2/11, Field, Alan C. alan.c.fi...@supervalu.com wrote:
From: Field, Alan C. alan.c.fi...@supervalu.com
Subject: Re: ISMF QUESTION - DATA SET NAMES TRUNCATED
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Lizette,
This is exactly what I got. I tried the Fold option and it worked. The dsns
are no longer truncated.
Thanks and thank you to all who responded.
--- On Thu, 24/2/11, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: ISMF
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 2011.02.23
11:08:19:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Jim McAlpine
jim.mcalp...@gmail.comwrote:
This is doing my head in. I'm using the redbook to set up the
certificates
and keyring. I'm using section 3.4.2 Shared site
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.comwrote:
This is doing my head in. I'm using the redbook to set up the certificates
and keyring. I'm using section 3.4.2 Shared site certificate and shared
keyring so I've run the 6 jobs specified. So I've then ftp'd the
They also need the resource that allows for listing of keyrings.
Important: Any z/OS-based client or server that uses an RACF key ring
issues internal
RACDCERT LIST and RACDCERT LISTRING commands. The RACF user ID associated
with the server must therefore be granted READ access to the RACF
On 2/23/2011 1:36 AM, Tsai Laurence wrote:
Dears ,
as the subject ,would like to plan the MF unicode migrtion.
1) What are major considerations you will raise ?
- UTF 8 , UTF 16 , or UTF 32 support on MF ?
- COBOL pgm migration ? support UTF16 only ?
- PL/I PGM migration ?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Hayim Sokolsky hsokol...@dtcc.com wrote:
1. If the RDATALIB class is active, does the user have access to
Z30DUSR.SHAREDRING1.LST?
2. If RDATALIB is not active, or the above profile does not exist, does
the user have READ access to IRR.DIGTCERT.LISTRING?
On 22 February 2011 20:30, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Downsview and Buttonville are all in the GTA
Downsview hasn't existed for years.
Strange - it was there on Monday evening when I last visited. It was
dark, and the red obstruction lights stood out quite clearly. Google
Maps also
Thanks. I have no interest in improving JCL. I want to be able to use a
single common control file to specify the name of a file for an STC that
could be unique across systems:
MYFILE=MY.SYSNAME..DATA.FILE
MY.SYSNAME..DATA.FILE would ultimately end up in an fopen():
fopen(MY.SYSNAME..DATA.FILE,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Rob Schramm rob.schr...@gmail.com wrote:
They also need the resource that allows for listing of keyrings.
Important: Any z/OS-based client or server that uses an RACF key ring
issues internal
RACDCERT LIST and RACDCERT LISTRING commands. The RACF user ID
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 2011.02.23
11:51:23:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Rob Schramm rob.schr...@gmail.com
wrote:
They also need the resource that allows for listing of keyrings.
Important: Any z/OS-based client or server that uses an RACF key
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hayim Sokolsky
[ snip ]
1. If the RDATALIB class is active, does the user have access to
Z30DUSR.SHAREDRING1.LST?
2. If RDATALIB is not active, or the above profile does not exist,
does
the user have READ
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Hayim Sokolsky hsokol...@dtcc.com wrote:
It sounds like you've touched most if not all of the bases.
I would review the certificate, to check on the private key of the SITE
certificate, and see if ICSF is involved as well. (CSFKEYS, CSFSERV in
RACF.) Check
Downsview hasn't existed for years.
Strange - it was there on Monday evening when I last visited.
It was dark, and the red obstruction lights stood out quite clearly.
The airport was shut down before the turn of the millenium.
The base is mothballed.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
As I head to the bomb shelter in preparation of the replies.
Downsview is actually still open, sort of. It is being used by Canadair for
final assembly of the Q-400 DASH.
So while the 'base' is not open (well there are still military presence there)
a runway still exists, and planes fly in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto/Downsview_Airport
Current is a private airport for Bombadier manufacturing and testing.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 22 February 2011 20:30, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Downsview and Buttonville are all
Geez...we flew our covered wagon into Malton way back when...
John Donnelly
National Semiconductor Corporation
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
408-721-5640
408-470-8364 Cell
cjp...@nsc.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi All,
I am new to this list. I have a DS8100 that we are decommissioning and using
as a trade-in. We need to make sure that all the data on this system is erased
before we ship it off. Do any of you have any thoughts on how to accomplish
this at little or no expense? Has anyone already
I believe New Era has a product that you may use, lease for not too much
money that will do the trick.
We did three writes across everything with different patterns when we
collapsed one a couple of years ago, old DOD standards.
That is the basic deed, three write patterns to erase, cover the old
Delete the CKD/FB volumes, extentpools, ranks, arrays, and arraysites. The
logical pieces can't be put back together again.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Nancy R. Brizuela brizu...@uwyo.eduwrote:
Hi All,
I am new to this list. I have a DS8100 that we are decommissioning and
using as a
Nancy,
I believe the ICKDSF TRKFMT command will do what you need. It has an Erase
parameter.
David O'Brien
NIH Contractor
-Original Message-
From: Nancy R. Brizuela [mailto:brizu...@uwyo.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Question about
Probably just convert LCU to what it isn't; i.e., if it's MVS cnvt to
*Nix, if it's *Nix cnvt to MVS. CE has wiping tool but they charge depending
on contract fine print.
In a message dated 2/23/2011 12:06:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
pacemainl...@gmail.com writes:
Delete the
Ask your friendly CE. I am told that they have effective ways to sanitize the
unit.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Nancy R. Brizuela
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:00:50 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Thanks. Your reply crossed in the mail with my follow-up.
FWIW in the case in question I am not using SVC 99 directly but rather using
C fopen();
Yeah, the fact that you can't code SYSNAME in JCL seems pretty lame.
I
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:43:31 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Thanks. I have no interest in improving JCL. I want to be able to use a
single common control file to specify the name of a file for an STC that
could be unique across systems:
MYFILE=MY.SYSNAME..DATA.FILE
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:04 PM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
Nancy,
I believe the ICKDSF TRKFMT command will do what you need. It has an Erase
parameter.
David O'Brien
NIH Contractor
That is what we do. It writes 3 patterns, Repeating 00's, 11's, and
01's
Hello List,
This post is related to the existing discussion but does not address the C
fopen() issue.
I have, on occasion, needed a static system symbol in batch JCL that could not
be easily incorporated into a symbolicrelate alias. To that end, I wrote a
small NetView REXX that is executed
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:43:31 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I want to be able to use a
single common control file to specify the name of a file for an STC that
could be unique across systems:
You can use system symbols in started task JCL.
Yes, I could just write an STC to try it with but gee,
Charles,
Are you looking for something like...
S CICS,JOBNAME=CICSSYSNAME.
Or am I just completely not understanding what you are looking for...
There is a section in the JCL Reference on System Symbols which after
a few rules refers the reader to the JCL Symbols section and the Init
and
Thanks for such prompt responses, David, Claude, Mark, Ed, and Hal. I
neglected to mention that the DS8100 is no longer attached to a mainframe and
that we no longer have a CE. Alas, our mainframe was shipped off in a truck
four or five years ago and a couple years ago our managers
You may want to check with your 3rd party maintenance provider as well.
We are in a similar situation as yours, and our 3rd party provider
presented a few options.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Nancy R. Brizuela
Sent:
Downsview is actually still open, sort of. It is being used by Canadair for
final assembly of the Q-400 DASH.
So while the 'base' is not open (well there are still military presence there)
a runway still exists, and planes fly in and out regularly
My original post, as a response, listed the
Hi,
OK, *trying* to get this back on topic, which of the airports
mentioned - if any - run IBM Mainfames?
:-)
BobL
Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:26 PM
To:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:00:50 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
wrote:
Yeah, the fact that you can't code SYSNAME in JCL seems pretty lame.
Seems pretty lame, at least on the surface.
Since JOB C/I and execution are not guaranteed to happen on the same
system in a MAS, if the value for a
That is what I do not like about either JOBCLASS control or even ICHBLP within
RACF. The choice is either USER-A has BLP and USER-B does not. But that is not
limiting enough in my opinion. I want to allow a large group of users the
ability to use BLP to map foreign tapes (tapes with volsers
Arthur Gutowski wrote:
Yeah, the fact that you can't code SYSNAME in JCL seems pretty lame.
Seems pretty lame, at least on the surface.
Perhaps lame yes, but where do you want the symbols to be resolved?
This (resolving symbolics on correct system) has been discussed many times
here...
Groete
Ok, it has been suggested a couple times to kill this thread and no one
listened. So, I'm now going to say it, please kill this thread immediately
or I'm going to start setting people to NOPOST status. Thank you.
Darren
--
For
Russell,
In general good point: it's good idea to control BLP by volser, to
distinguish i.e. in-house and external tapes. Or even more categories.
Or just by volser.
Note, that (AFAIK) even for BLP processing RMM still checks the volser.
Note2 - in ATL, VTL it's not so easy to fake the volser
60 matches
Mail list logo
