Russel,
I try to have the newest version active, but the newest sample on the IBM
download site I've found has date 05/07/2010.
Markus
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hello,
IPL isn't necessary, just do a Hotstart on the globel and a Local start
on the local.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of sunil mirchandani
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 7:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
Hi,
Recently we have upgraded our z/os to V1R12 but still we are not able to
access the SDSF options and below error message is thrown.
ISF024I USER A255209 NOT AUTHORIZED TO SDSF, NO GROUP ASSIGNMENT
***
From the racf point of view i have checked the profiles permission but still
we are not
Hi,
Did you check the message in the IBM Look At site?
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/index.html
*** NO GROUP ASSIGNMENT. The user does not fall into any group of users
defined by ISFPARMS. For more information, see Group authorization parameters
(ISFGRP or GROUP) in
I checked at the LOOTAT site and gave all the necessay access but still the
user id is not able to access SDSF.
Regards,
Jags
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:20 PM, MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI
enriqueeloi.mont...@servifactory.com wrote:
Hi,
Did you check the message in the IBM Look At site?
I checked at the LOOTAT site and gave all the necessay access but still the
user id is not able to access SDSF.
1) How did you give the necessary authorizations ?
2) Do you run the SDSF Server address space ?
Walter Marguccio
z/OS Systems Programmer
BELENUS LOB Informatic GmbH
Munich -
Hi,
SDSF runs as server address space. I have given the ISF.** access to the
user.
Regards,
Jags
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Walter Marguccio
walter_marguc...@yahoo.com wrote:
I checked at the LOOTAT site and gave all the necessay access but still
the
user id is not able to access
Well CEE.SCEERUN and RUN2 are in the linklist while CEE.SCEELPA is in
the lpalist. I'm still confused about this statement in the FM.
Mark Jacobs
On 05/16/11 19:46, John McKown wrote:
Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries.
Most UNIX commands are written in C.
If you do, then you need to defin
SDSF runs as server address space.
If you do, then you need to define the needed authorizations in ISFPRMxx
in your PARMLIB concatenation.
I have given the ISF.** access to the user.
AFAIK, either you protect SDSF functions using the SDSF Server and its
Thanks a lot ,I permitted the user to group.ISFSPROG.sdsf and the user was
able to access the SDSF.
Regards,
Jags
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Walter Marguccio
walter_marguc...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you do, then you need to defin
SDSF runs as server address space.
If you do, then you
jagadishan perumal wrote:
Recently we have upgraded our z/os to V1R12 but still we are not able to
access the SDSF options and below error message is thrown.
ISF024I USER A255209 NOT AUTHORIZED TO SDSF, NO GROUP ASSIGNMENT
***
Have the id do comman WHO and compare the output with ISFPRMxx
Thanks a lot ,I permitted the user to group.ISFSPROG.sdsf and the user was
able to access the SDSF.
Regards,
Jags
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Walter Marguccio
walter_marguc...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you do, then you need to defin
SDSF runs as server address space.
If you do, then you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Schwab
http://www.p390.com/pdf/zPDTPricingSheet120209.pdf
is the prices for the hardware, dongle, and software discs.
Compared to the 1996 pricing on a P/390, even the L3 offering here is
CHEAP. Still beyond
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
More like $US2330. The AUD is worth more than the USD now
(www.xe.com).
Yep, and The FED (Federal Reserve Bank), the world's only approved
counterfeiter of US currency, is trying hard to make the USD
Don't know for certain, but I'd lay odds that it is the LE libraries.
Most UNIX commands are written in C. Which requires LE to run.
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:33 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote:
In the documentation for the FORKCOPY option in BPXPRMxx it says;
If the runtime library is in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 7:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Running z/OS On Your Laptop
Snipped
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.ADCD.GLOBAL.HTML(READM11S)'
On Tue, 17 May 2011 07:57:38 +0200, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote:
The Unix syntax is the same whether the commands come from a Telnet
session or from the TSO OMVS command.
Syntax: Yes
Terminal (not command) behaviour: No
Surely you're not thinking of the dreadful RUNNING/INPUT toggle
(I try
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
Snipped
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.ADCD.GLOBAL.HTML(READM11S)'
AC/DC annual updates.
This URI doesn't work.
Add the trailing quote and it
On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:56:19 +0530, sunil mirchandani
sunilmirchandani1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Team,
I have added a new Proclib concatenation in JES3 Proc on two systems
Lpara(Global) and Lparb (local), both are test systems with minimal usage
Any one help me to identify which option shall
Jags
As I have just pointed out in the RACF-L list, when you post in more than one
list you should say so in order that people can respond appropriately.
... apology for posting this question in this forum, ...
Unless there is a list specifically for matters concerning SDSF, this list will
Enrique
Did you check the message in the IBM Look At site?
Indeed, when you discover a message that you need quickly explained, the
LookAt! technique can be very helpful as a starting point.
However in this case, we are dealing with a product which is completely
described in one manual:
Jags
... gave all the necessary access but still the user id is not able to access
SDSF.
Clearly you did not!
But happily I see that now, prompted by Walter Marguccio, you have.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:26:16 +0530, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked at
Thanks ...
It will be helpfull !
Cordialement,
___
YANN CUNY
AXA TECH
IDST OUTILS
( + 33 1 55 67 22 49
___
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] De la part
Thanks all.
I have used HR option and it worked fine..
Thanks Regards:
Sunil Mirchandani
9243116830
Yesterday I dared to struggle. Today I dare to win
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Art Gutowski arthur.gutow...@compuware.com
wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:56:19 +0530, sunil mirchandani
did you check the ISFPRMxx?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:58 AM, jagadishan perumal
jagadish...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Recently we have upgraded our z/os to V1R12 but still we are not able to
access the SDSF options and below error message is thrown.
ISF024I USER A255209 NOT AUTHORIZED TO SDSF,
Chris,
Funny that the US Thesaurus built into Windows lists problem as an
alternative for issue. Why don't you take this up with Microsoft?
I have no problem understanding what Jags is saying, and don't give a toss
where he posts his questions.
Ron
Incidentally, if we are dealing with
... and don't give a toss where he posts his questions.
Well, in total contrast, I do, assuming I spot them - in order that he may this
time and next time and the time after that more accurately target his
burgeoning queries.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:45:17 -0700, Ron Hawkins
There's always one!
the US Thesaurus built into Windows lists problem as an alternative
for issue.
Gates? You trust Gates to define your language for you? You must be joking
or, if you are not, a sadder character than I thought.
Incidentally, if anyone is of a mind to challenge whether or
But you did not allow for 'issue' and 'problem' in the pluperfect progressive
grammatical tense.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
In listserv%201105161217371283.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/16/2011
at 12:17 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Because you trimmed the essence of my remark,
I quoted the part that I was challenging.
then disputed what remained out of context.
Context is not always relevant. I was
But you did not allow for 'issue' and 'problem' in the pluperfect progressive
grammatical tense.
Thank you for clouding the topic,b
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I know - we get to keep it simple
Theresa Hellner
Application Architect -- Mainframe Security Engineering
(602) 284-2732 Cell Phone
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] on behalf of
Donnelly, John P [john.p.donne...@nsc.com]
Sent:
In a general thesaurus, issue is a synonym of problem...and surprisingly,
problem is a synonym of issue...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 1:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
On 17 May 2011 16:32, Donnelly, John P john.p.donne...@nsc.com wrote:
But you did not allow for 'issue' and 'problem' in the pluperfect
progressive grammatical tense.
I had been thinking that someone would raise this issue.
Tony H.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
snip
Now I'm an incredibly understanding character myself and so I am going to
exercise extreme kindness and bow to the litigious folk between the shining
seas by quoting from a dictionary which I believe is held in
The OP's father might worry that his issue has issued an issue re 'issue'...
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 5/17/2011 3:32 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 17 May 2011 16:32, Donnelly, John Pjohn.p.donne...@nsc.com wrote:
But you did not allow for 'issue' and 'problem' in the pluperfect progressive
grammatical tense.
I had been thinking that someone would raise this issue.
Tony H.
Classy
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.comwrote:
On 5/17/2011 3:32 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 17 May 2011 16:32, Donnelly, John Pjohn.p.donne...@nsc.com wrote:
But you did not allow for 'issue' and 'problem' in the pluperfect
progressive grammatical tense.
Webster's on a dictionary has no significance - it's just an attempt to cadge
some legitimacy by invoking Noah Webster's name). Try AHD or OED (both of
which do support the usage).
Dictionaries do NOT support usage!
They report it!
Any usage is subject to consensus.
We, when I was a kid, used
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Webster's on a dictionary has no significance - it's just an attempt to
cadge some legitimacy by invoking Noah Webster's name). Try AHD or OED (both
of which do support the usage).
Dictionaries do NOT support usage!
They
Sometime soon, this issue (def n 6) may become a problem (of
additional IBM-MAIN noise).
I hope we can cease the issues (def vt 1a) on the list soon before
Darren rightly points out that dictionaries and proper word usage have
little relationship to mainframe topics of discussion.
Dave Gibney
Where is it documented on how to read sysudumps with secondardy
address spaces. I need to see the information in the secondary address
space.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Time to reel in the kids. Kill this thread.
Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote in message news:
1305551674-1305673483-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1802551282-@b2.c1.bise6.blackberry...
Webster's on a dictionary has no significance - it's just an attempt to
cadge some
Does anybody know which is more CPU efficient? Functionally equivalent
SDSF API code in REXX or in Java? Assume there is no zAAP or zIIP to
offload the Java workload. Assume fairly equal programming ability in
the person doing the coding (equally medium). Compiling of Java would
occur on my
Fred Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:21:15 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
---snip---
Does the name TAPE appear in your device name table? You also need a
DD statement that refers to each tape volume;
Do you honestly think that Gates is the author of the Thesaurus shipped with
Office? And as for defining my language, the English I speak and spell is
much closer to the real thing then the one you use. So what?
And so we get to your newest subject de jour; I am a sad character. Well
what did I
Well bully for you...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Chris Mason
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] What to do with misdirected questions (Was: SDSF
issue)
... and
Does this Mason have a job?
- Original Message -
From: Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: What does issue mean? (Was: SDSF issue)
Do you honestly think that Gates is the
On 18/05/2011 9:12 AM, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Well everyone, this LISTSERV has been hijacked by one contributor and is now
bordering on the ridiculous. Good day and good luck to all those I have
debated, agreed with, and most importantly learnt from for the last 14
years, but It's farewell from me.
I am out of the office until 06/08/2011.
I am on vacation. Limited access to mailbox (but will try to look at).
Mobile: + 48 601606821.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: What does issue
mean? (Was: SDSF issue) sent on 18/5/11 0:02:51.
This is the only notification you
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Ron Hawkins
ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Do you honestly think that Gates is the author of the Thesaurus shipped with
Office?
deleted
The last software Bill Gates wrote was the TRS-80 Model 100
http://www.club100.org/press/04/feature.html
--
Mike A
On Tue, 17 May 2011 19:26:20 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
---snip
Try this:
COPY
DSNAME=a.b.c,FROM=TQAPE=(101178,file#),TO=TAPE=(200198,file#), x
FROMDD=INDD1,TODD=OUTDD1
Yes, but if I have to
On May 17, 11:13pm, Eric Jackson wrote...
IEHMOVE has been functionally stable for a generation. A human
generation. As described in Utilities, it doesn't copy from tape to
tape, and it doesn't handle blocks greater than 32,760.
That just about kills the IEHMOVE maggot option, then. I did see
Just FYI for those following this thread, I have been talking off-list with
Sams Golob and Bass, who are kindly looking at adapting their various tape
copying utilities to handle 256K blocksizes.
Fred.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Where is it documented on how to read sysudumps with secondardy
address spaces. I need to see the information in the secondary address
space.
I believe you're out of luck on that one. I am not aware of any place
describing *how* to read sysudumps. Contents are described where the dump
otions are
Rick:
You have proven that IEHMOVE should be nuked and or zapped out of existance.
There is also a cavet if you go into multi volume to make sure you put the
sequence numer in parenthess eg
vol=tape=(123456,1,23456,1, etc etc
Heaven help you if you have multiple iehmove datasets on a volume.
Shmuel:
A couple of things.
1. Yes I used to wade though some of the posts and decided they weren't worth
the time next time I saw one to do so.
2. You first statement comes under opinion. I will leave it as that. I was
expressing an opinion as did you.
3. As to the manual I referenced I spent a
my two cents:
(a) is the SDSF API available in Java or is it just JNI around some C or
even REXX functions?
- no words, eh -
(b) what has to be done?
# computing like numerical maths (in addition one could differ, e.g.
between integer and floating point)
-- Java has neat facilities dealing
58 matches
Mail list logo
