Clark Morris asks:
Does EGL generate any better code than the awful spaghetti
GO TO laden COBOL code of CSP?
Do not look directly into the sun. :-)
Kind of missing the point. Generated code isn't supposed to be pretty,
maintained, or even looked at. If you want to write beautiful COBOL,
write
I am out of the office until 08/29/2011.
I will check mail periodically, but if you need answers immediately, you
can contact my manager, Jim Ground.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 23
Aug 2011 to 24 Aug 2011 (#2011-236) sent on 8/25/2011 0:00:05.
This is
Hi,
I am looking for a diagram or workflow which explains how tape allocationas are
performed.
i mean, when the job/program asks for a tape unit, which components have to
work to give the tape to the program (RMM, Operative System, HSM, Catalog,...).
Is there some IBM manual that explains it?
W dniu 2011-08-25 12:25, MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI pisze:
Hi,
I am looking for a diagram or workflow which explains how tape allocationas are
performed.
i mean, when the job/program asks for a tape unit, which components have to
work to give the tape to the program (RMM, Operative System,
By defining that resource (as discrete, not generic) you allow users to
change ownership of files that they own. Seems like a good fit for the
problem you're seeing.
Mark Jacobs
On 08/24/11 15:36, Bruce Wheatley wrote:
Mark,
No it's never been defined. Is it recommended for SFTP? Thanks.
You need to read the text of the article, not just the headline.
Their attack can recover an AES secret key from three to five times faster
than previously thought possible, reported the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,
a research university based in Belgium.
The researchers caution that the
hi ,
is somebody know were can i get the Beta 92 manuals (including the open
systems part) , i tried looking in Google but could only find the Beta 48
manuals .
thanks in advance .
--
best regards,
matan cohen
MF System Administrator.
Hi List,
Maybe someone here could have the same or similar case.
I run job:
//COPY1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER,REGION=0M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT1 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.COMPRESS.PAX
//SYSUT2 DD PATH='/TEST/COMPRESS9',
// PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT,OEXCL),
// PATHDISP=(KEEP,DELETE)
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
I
Angela,
No you don't need UID 0. This is the main misunderstood part of Unix
System Services, everybody thinks that you need UID 0 do do everything.
UID 0 will give Superuser to whoever has this, no matter what other
security is in place.
Unix System Services works everything off of a three
Samuel's post in a different thread (SYNCH[X] vs LINK[X]) was a gracious one.
Without necessarily agreeing with me, he nevertheless conceded my point, and he
did so ungrudgingly and unambiguously.
The Linkage Editor permitted--and where it is used still permits--reusability
attributes to be
W dniu 2011-08-25 14:02, Matan Cohen pisze:
hi ,
is somebody know were can i get the Beta 92 manuals (including the open
systems part) , i tried looking in Google but could only find the Beta 48
manuals .
You should get a CD from Betasystems. The CD contains all products
documentation. Ask
W dniu 2011-08-25 14:49, Angel Tamayo pisze:
Hi List,
Maybe someone here could have the same or similar case.
I run job:
//COPY1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER,REGION=0M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT1 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.COMPRESS.PAX
//SYSUT2 DD PATH='/TEST/COMPRESS9',
// PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT,OEXCL),
This is not really what you asked - but the pax command can read directly
from a z/OS dataset - you don't need to copy to a Unix file first.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Angel Tamayo a.tamay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Maybe someone
Do you see this when running the z/OS sftp client or the sftp-server (IOW,
the ssh client or sshd)?
If the client, add the option -vvv and post the log.
If the server, check syslogd for the sshd daemon for messages.
Although there isn't quite enough information to make a good guess, I
suspect
IMO, you need an OMVS segment and a unique, non-zero, UID. You also need Write
(Read eXecute would be nice too) access to the /TEST subdirectory. From the
message, your ID is running with a UID of 999 and a GID of 1. How to give
you access to /TEST as you are now defined?
1) setfacl -m
Hi,
Have your RACF person to provide : CHMOD 777 /TEST/COMPRESS9 to execute
this command in OMVS. Also ask them to change the owner by CHOWN command..
Simple.. then submitting the JCL again
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Angel Tamayo a.tamay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Maybe someone here
Oh, I forgot the ever popular command:
chmod 1777 /TEST
which allows all users access to /TEST, but only to files which they own.
This is how I have /tmp set up. That way, anybody can create any-named file in
/tmp that they want, assuming it doesn't already exist. But they can only
affect
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:18:16 +0530, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Have your RACF person to provide : CHMOD 777 /TEST/COMPRESS9 to execute
this command in OMVS. Also ask them to change the owner by CHOWN command..
Simple.. then submitting the JCL again
While you're at it, have him give all your
Years ago there was a Program Logic Manual (PLM) for SVS OPEN/CLOSE/EOV. If
you can find one of those it will give you a good idea of how it works today.
Details may change, but I don't think the basic flow has. In the last set of
microfiche they provided, the IBM code had not changed much
And make sure to turn off auditing so that it is impossible to determine who
did what to which resource. This eliminates a lot of wasted man hours
castigating others.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills *
The exact process varies depending on your specific environment. I seem to
recall years ago the StorageTek had a document that explained the process and
where they fit in. It was a pretty lengthy process as the allocation snaked its
way through each of the LPAR's first for the unit and later
The high level answer is that RMM and HSM are not involved in allocation,
and CATALOG is only involved if a cataloged dataset is referenced, and the
UNIT is not coded explicitly. SMS may be involved if SMS managed tape is in
place.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:25 AM, MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI
Be careful out there. There seems to be new sysprog types on the list now,
and they may take your words to heart and do exactly what you state. I
suspect the suggestions were intended to be tongue in cheek; however,
language and cultural differences may not reveal that. Unintended
consequences
Good point. In the future, when I'm being overly weird, I'll put in a
disclaimer to DON'T REALLY DO THIS!
So, instead, I'll say (DON'T DO THIS EITHER!):
Be sure to audit every resource and user. This way, you can spend inordinate
amounts of time writing reports for clueless managers so that
On 24 Aug 2011 23:19:14 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Clark Morris asks:
Does EGL generate any better code than the awful spaghetti
GO TO laden COBOL code of CSP?
Do not look directly into the sun. :-)
Kind of missing the point. Generated code isn't supposed to be pretty,
Hello
We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance
to move it to a z10 BC machine, but
during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064.
We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA, ECSA, SQA and ESQA values
and we continue to getting waits during
IPL. Since z/OS
On 8/25/2011 11:54 AM, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal wrote:
Hello
We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance
to move it to a z10 BC machine, but
during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064.
We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA, ECSA, SQA and ESQA values
and
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:53:00 -0300 Carlos Bodra - Pessoal
cbo...@terra.com.br wrote:
:We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance
:to move it to a z10 BC machine, but
:during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064.
:We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA,
Carlos,
This error is occurring early in the NIP process. Richard's suggestion is
certainly worth a shot.
What module name is specified in the message text? Are you using exactly the
same residence and IODF volumes as you were using in the z890?
If not (and Richard's suggestion doesn't
In snt113-w6ebabc9028d99c0f00cf9c6...@phx.gbl, on 08/25/2011
at 01:06 PM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com said:
Samuel's post
ITYM Shmuel.
The Linkage Editor permitted--and where it is used still
permits--reusability attributes to be assigned to a load module
independently of each other,
In
CACX+xPPcMG++TYRwHi58uSt-+JABp=xpbq62gdh5ja8otgs...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/25/2011
at 09:49 AM, Angel Tamayo a.tamay...@gmail.com said:
The RACF persons says that I need to have OMVS segment setup for my
userid with UID(0).
What's he drinking? You need a UID or GID with access to the
The wait state code indicates a program check.
Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? That is one possibility required HW/SW
not available. Has all applicable maintenance been applied?
Search IBM link for 2098DEVICE and research/install the indicated maintenance.
This might be due to missing
Are all the parameters in your SYS1.IPLPARM member alligned to the proper
column ?
We had CATALOG in column 63 instead of 64 once.
No longer sure if it was the same wait state.
Jay Campbell
IBM OS Support Section
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10?
Yes. 1.8 is also supported on a z196.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00afc0ed...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/25/2011
at 09:55 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Oh, I forgot the ever popular command:
chmod 1777 /TEST
Cruel, but all very well for a spree. (A Sea Dirge)
It's not my dog.
--
Shmuel
W dniu 2011-08-25 19:20, Staller, Allan pisze:
The wait state code indicates a program check.
Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10?
Yes, it was. As well as 1.7.
Of course some PTFs are required.
I also would start from checking service level and 2098DEVICE.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Be careful when RACF staff suggest such an extreme solution.
Their response The RACF persons says that I need to have OMVS segment setup
for my userid with UID(0).
..should be interpreted as:
That's the only way we know to solve OMVS related issues.
Oftentimes inexperienced RACF
On 8/25/2011 12:22 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
The wait state code indicates a program check.
Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? That is one possibility required HW/SW
not available. Has all applicable maintenance been applied?
Search IBM link for 2098DEVICE and research/install the
The manual previously cited does not state either case (pro or con)
clearly under the discussion of the INITSQA parameter.
My understanding was that this parameter was used to increase the
initial allocation until the SQA parameters of IEASYSxx were processed.
At that time the allocation would be
We are experiencing Mismatched CCSIDs in DB2. About a year ago we cleaned up
our CCSIDs in preparation for the migration from V7.1 to V8.1
Now are seeing a number of occasions where there are mismatches and we don't
know where they are coming from. We think this has been happening for some time
In
476996cbbe9af14285e09e63c370072a15063fc...@phxccrprd01.adprod.bmc.com,
on 08/25/2011
at 10:00 AM, Blaicher, Chris chris_blaic...@bmc.com said:
Years ago there was a Program Logic Manual (PLM) for SVS
OPEN/CLOSE/EOV.
Indeed, but it has nothing to do with tape allocations. He would need
Hello,
I have been dealing with some strange behaviour.
I am trying to run a job that calls BPXBATCH do execute a Unix script.
The Unix script tries to copy the file from the Unix environment to a MVS
dataset. I have tried these two approaches. The filename is variable.
1) cp -P
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: tape alloc workflow or diagram
In
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:45:12 -0500, Henrique Seganfredo
henrique.seganfr...@bcb.gov.br wrote:
Hello,
I have been dealing with some strange behaviour.
I am trying to run a job that calls BPXBATCH do execute a Unix script.
The Unix script tries to copy the file from the Unix environment to a
To list;
Not sure if this is the correct forum to post this. If not, can someone point
me in the right diection. I have a CICS COBOL program issuing the instruction
below. After it runs through the DFHECP1$ translator, I get the IGYPS2106-S
error. Below is a snippet of the code and the error
Hello Henrique,
There appear to be two threads, both describing a similar issue. BPXBATCH can
be a real can of worms. I believe that your problem stems from the fact that
executables may be invoked in multiple address spaces having different
jobnames, which screws up ENQueue something fierce.
Mark,
This is what I got. The other commands you suggested may show anything
different?
/D GRS,RES=(SYSDSN,PSTR.TEMP)
RESPONSE=HOMO
ISG343I 16.34.00 GRS STATUS 894
NO REQUESTORS FOR RESOURCE SYSDSN PSTR.TEMP
One
Please post your source, not just the output from the pre-processor.
I am not surprised by your error. I BETA tested CICS/OS2 and I found
numerous problems were with the pre-processor. It did not like any comments
within multi-line CICS commands and it did not like any CICS commands within
valid
I have a CEEDUMP with
CEE3250C The system or user abend U 802 R=NULL was issued.
ABEND code: 0322 Reason code:
CIB:
+00 000F37F8 C3C9C240 010C0004
00040CB2 61C3C5C5 |CIB /CEE|
+20
I've had good luck with COBOL problems by setting a NONPER SLIP trap with
no abend code specified. Just job name. SLIP is supposed to catch the
first abend--before any ESTAE gets control--and produce an SVC dump for
that abend.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
John,
I didn't have access to the command setfacl with my user then I used SU and
commands were accepted
1) setfacl -m user:999:rwx /TEST
2) setfacl -m group:1:rwx /TEST
I run the job but the same message.
Angel
2011/8/25 McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
IMO, you need an OMVS
The directory /TEST already is 777
Display File Attributes
Pathname : /TEST
File type . . . . . . : Directory
Permissions . . . . . : 777 rwxrwxrwx
and COMPRESS9 is created by the job.
Angel
2011/8/25 jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com
Hi,
Have your RACF person to provide
Had a power outage causing a delay in replying. I am an idiot (nothing
new about that). The owner access is --- which is none. And I noticed
you did not include the DD parameter
PATHMODE. Try:
//SYSUT2 DD PATH='/TEST/COMPRESS9',
// PATHOPTS=(OWRONLY,OCREAT,OEXCL),
//
_Hurricane Irene : Tracking Map : Weather Underground_
(http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at201109.html)
We'll be hoping for the best.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Hi
Can anyone confirm for me if ICEGENER when used to copy to a VSAM
cluster (SYSUT2) will preserve the CI/CA freespace parameters if they
are 0.
We use it successfully to copy QSAM to VSAM for CI/CA freespace=0 with
significant performance gains.
David Stewart
Mainframe
Clark Morris writes:
The CSP code was inefficient, caused excessive COBOL compile times and
required the compile option NOOPTIMIZE in general.
OK. Those might be some possible reasons for writing COBOL in the 1980s.
Obviously those reasons were considered and rejected. COBOL was not a
secret, and
I am out of the office until 08/29/2011.
Two short days to enjoy some hiking and photography. I'll be back at work
on Monday.
My backup is Mike Fay (km...@us.ibm.com) 1-704-843-8443
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 24
Aug 2011 to 25 Aug 2011 (#2011-237)
57 matches
Mail list logo
