Correct, although I'm not sure whether TSO/E supports setting REXX
variables from an authorized program.
You can set rexx variables from an authorized TSO command. For example, the
rmm tso commands all do that.
However, one of the difficulties we had was when those commands were issued
from a
I would divide the problem into two:
1. how to make the file be transactional. to do this, you can use MQ as the
mechanism to write into a file.
2. where to fire the transaction. You can write the message into a queue
managed by CICS and LINK to the application program (not START TRAN that
will
sysbinlog was an SQL table created by StuxNET worm/virus/malicious code.
Part of the virus code was stored in that table. There is an IBM document
from 2010 available: An inside look at Stuxnet.
Cheers
Michael
Von:Miklos Szigetvari miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
An:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:11:13 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Under Windows, a directory is closer functionally to the MVS/DOS concept
of a VTOC, as each volume has its own directory and you have to somehow
know which volume to consult -- although admittedly in a windows system
the number of volumes
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:25:32 -0600, Magen Margalit syste...@gmail.com wrote:
One idea that came up is to convert the process to a self developed STC
which will be triggered by a record on an MQ queue and will run as STC all the
batch process programs
I think MQ is indeed a very good way to
Hi
Thank you, Hope not so dangerous, they refer I think something like
JOBLOG or SYSLOG or JESMSGLG , but they are using this phrase.
We will ask
On 2/20/2012 10:08 AM, Michael Klaeschen wrote:
sysbinlog was an SQL table created by StuxNET worm/virus/malicious code.
Part of the virus code
Do you have a file called /Sys/Bin/Log by any chance ?
Jim McAlpine
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Miklos Szigetvari
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote:
Hi
Thank you, Hope not so dangerous, they refer I think something like JOBLOG
or SYSLOG or JESMSGLG , but they are using this
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 08:42 +0100, R.S. wrote:
snip
What is cool is that SMS storage group. Usually users do not see the
volumes, they see dasd space. In case of shortage you can simply add
some volumes to the group. You can even buy new box and simply add it to
the group. And that's really
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote in message
news:4f41f979.3010...@bremultibank.com.pl...
deleted
What is cool is that SMS storage group. Usually users do not see the
volumes, they see dasd space. In
Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:cajtoo5_brjh+-ojaqd9jq17cojfbbjuzddhi35yuk33zj_n...@mail.gmail.com
...
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.verno...@klm.com wrote:
R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote in message
glen herrmannsfeldt g...@ugcs.caltech.edu writes:
It would seem less likely that they would use the exact same
replacement algorithm, but could eventually lock, anyway.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012b.html#98 5 Byte Device Addresses?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012b.html#100 5 Byte
On 2/20/2012 5:34 AM, John McKown wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 08:42 +0100, R.S. wrote:
snip
What is cool is that SMS storage group. Usually users do not see the
volumes, they see dasd space. In case of shortage you can simply add
some volumes to the group. You can even buy new box and simply
IMHO, doing a STC wont make your processing Online. STC is just a STC -
making your process running under a STC wont turn it online.
If you plan to process the records one by one, I would advice to use a
transaction system, such as CICS or IMS. Using a STC like you described will
just turn your
I wish to continue this thread as it's related. I'm now running my program with
internal calls to DFSORT and it works fine except for one issue that I have,
namely that I get a lot of job log messages generated as a result of dynamic
allocation of VIO sortwork files. DFSORT is invoked 1000's of
On 2/20/2012 at 08:34 AM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
If the filesystem runs out of space,
and you used the proper type of filesystem (there are many), you simply
expand the size of the logical volume into unused space in the group.
You then resize the filesystem. If you used ext4
Nope. The DSNs on the volumes will stay on the volumes, and be fully
accessable. If they need to be extended onto a new volume, still no problem. If
they are every migrated recalled, they will go to other volumes in the old
storage group. Assuming nothing has been done to affect that. Unless,
There may well be a facility for suppressing unwanted DFSORT messages,
particularly informational ones. If there is, FY will provide you and
the rest of us with information about it here (unless perchance he is
in Timbuktu today).
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On 2/20/2012 12:32 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
There may well be a facility for suppressing unwanted DFSORT messages,
particularly informational ones. If there is, FY will provide you and
the rest of us with information about it here (unless perchance he is
in Timbuktu today).
I don't think this
I can't give specific recommendations without knowing more about these
sorts being executed and the environment. But perhaps I can offer a little
info that will be useful.
The reason the JCL SORTWKxx data sets get reallocated to SORTDKxx is
because VIO=NO is in effect. This is the installation
John,
You. Hit the nail on the head
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 19, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Fred Hoffman fhoff...@tad.org wrote:
Amen John!!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of John
Hey John,
That quite a new and surprising approach!
My point was to (indeed) empty several volumes, reformat/relabel them
(to predefined volumes in the new SG) and therewith add them to a new
SG, where I need the extra space.
With your way of handling, I can remove the volumes from the old SG,
I used to do that on rare occasion. I then got told off by management. They
associated the volser to the storage group and did their reporting based on it.
So my mixing things up messed up their reports. I'm not allowed to do that any
more. We have offline volumes with a specific starting
On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
The described record arrival rate averages at just under 58 records
per second. Somehow I don't think XBM was designed with that high
of transaction arrival rate in mind, processing each record as a
separate transaction. I would think
I am reading the FM and I am lost in a sea of environment variables and
POSIX and gosh knows what.
If I would like the strftime() format character %z to return -0500 or +
or whatever, what do I have to do?
I know the system knows what time zone it is in, because for a given
timeb,
Should have said that the environment is z/OS batch (started task,
actually).
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills [mailto:charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:01 PM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Do what to get C strftime %z to work?
I am reading
Both CICS and IMS have (rather different) facilities for
mini-batching, triggering FIFO processing of all of them after an
waiting-transactions queue reaches a specified length L 0.
This processing threshold L can be varied without making other
changes, and doing so provides a mechanism for
... DFSORT is invoked 1000's of times by the program ...
Once upon a time, at a previous job, I ran into a similar situation. The job
ran for hours and hours. Analysis showed that SORT was invoked to sort 1
record (yes, that's ONE record!) most of the time and between 2 and about
100 records the
In 4f418fa1.4040...@acm.org, on 02/19/2012
at 06:11 PM, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org said:
Under Windows, a directory is closer functionally to the MVS/DOS
concept of a VTOC, as each volume has its own directory
ITYM each volume has its own root directory; a typical DOS or 'doze
volume has
In af2ee1ca5139d947b1ccdbf226607e8e02b9d...@tad03.tad.org, on
02/19/2012
at 07:36 PM, Fred Hoffman fhoff...@tad.org said:
I thought os/vs1 was MFT with virtual storage.
That doesn't conflict with what anybody wrote in this thread, although
it is an oversimplification.
--
Shmuel
In m3obsuwa9v@garlic.com, on 02/19/2012
at 08:42 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com said:
folklore is that *IX (and numerous *IX work-alikes) came from
simplification of MULTICS.
That's why I spell it EUnix, but they're really fundamentally
different. Multics was built around the
In 1329705063.29591.54.ca...@mckown5.johnmckown.net, on 02/19/2012
at 08:31 PM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net said:
Just to play the Devil's advocate for a bit, it depends on how you
define dataset name. I agree, in Linux (and as a stretch, Windows),
if you specify the entire file path,
In 0fcef8d8-ed56-4e67-97b4-34a32d5b6...@yahoo.com, on 02/19/2012
at 11:05 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
Yep I agree with both of you, I learned assembler first
I learned assembler[1] first, but that didn't prevent me from picking
up new languages freely. I don't feel any
32 matches
Mail list logo
