There is also the Syzygy Automation Suite, it's a comprehensive, yet far less
expensive solution than most.
www.SyzygyInc.com
Brian Westerman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
It's embarrassing to admit, but I actually did this to myself in one of our
products (SyzMPF/z) which automates console messages. We also use a name table
to hold the address if the getmained area for later processing by multiple
address spaces. In my haste, I had created a situation whereby
Another program cannot acquire storage within your sp231 storage. At least, not
unless that program, or some other program, first released/freemained all or
part of your storage (yes, that could happen accidentally).
When you say the abend points to unknown=program, do you mean that you can't
Hi all,
I have the following piece of code running on many SRBs to give
serialisation.
SETLOCK OBTAIN,
TYPE=CML,ASCB=(11), PRIMARY ADDRESS SPACE
MODE=UNCOND,
Sorry should have added.
My situation, multiple SRBs in a single address space, some of which might be
non-dispatchable, doesn't appear to match any of the subcodes of the S073 abend.
I suspect this will be some variant of s073 but not 100% sure.
Ron.
Well for me it's easy.
I got a customer request that they want OpenSSL because they move from NFTP and
the ones that are to receive the file have a concept that is built on OpenSSL...
Hälsningar / Best regards,
Magnus Persson, Mainframe
Tieto
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Can I ask under what situations would that be appropriate?
Mark Jacobs
On 05/22/12 18:21, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Thanks Allan, but that is not what I was asking about.
In an HSMPlex you can setup what is called MASH (Multiple Address Space HSM).
This is where one LPAR can have upto 39 DFHSM
On 22 May 2012 20:04:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
In hj3lr7lassfuf88ovoeg000i1pp935e...@4ax.com, on 05/21/2012
at 03:51 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca said:
I'm the last to see my own errors. Hopefully it was obvious I
meant 24/7/365
That's no better. Either
Hello Ron,
Here is some information to assist you.
Create the procedure PROC020S.
This is how it is called from the Easytrieve program:
Run Statically with
PARM SQLSYNTAX NONE BIND (STATIC-ONLY)
DEFINE LNAMEIN S 8 A
DEFINE BRANCHO S 2 A
DEFINE EMPNOS 5 A
DEFINE LOC1
In actuality, isn't 24x7 comprehensive enough?
The 24 infers that the availability is round the clock, as opposed to most
operating schedules that embrace a single day shift of 8 hours (banker's
hours), or a day of 14 or 16 hours.
The 7 infers that availability is every day of the week, as
YES enough said!!!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Bill Ashton bill00ash...@gmail.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:30:11
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Reply-to: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Perhaps you could look at the common storage tracking information for
your SP 231 storage. With appropriate settings in your DIAGXX parmlib
member CSA/SQA storage tracking data should indicate the owner (address
space) of the storage. Perform this analysis before the problem occurs.
This
Interested/Qualified applicants please review/apply here:
https://cvg53.cvgs.net/Main/careerportal/Job_Profile.cfm?szOrderID=118864szReturnToSearch=1szWordsToHighlight=
Job location is the greater Cincinnati, OH area
Job Profile
Title: Lead Systems Programmer
I don't understand what I am seeing from Unicode Services translation.
I specify translation from 1047 (Encoding scheme 1100 - EBCDIC, SBCS; Name
LATIN 1 / OPEN SYSTEM) to 1252 (Encoding scheme 4105 - ASCII, SBCS; Name
MS-WIN LATIN-1).
As both CCSIDs are SBCS I would expect that any common
cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca (Clark Morris) writes:
On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut for
continuous availability become so pervasive that it is the shorthand
way for saying it and is it the way that the general public as opposed
to us professional nitpickers best
Mark,
From the IBM Presentations the biggest boost would be that one HSM address
space (HSMA) is the main that runs only RECALLS. Then an aux (HSMB) could
run PSM or SSM, then another aux could run DUMP/BACKUP.
Then each HSM could be in a different WLM class. This could offload the
work as
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is 900%
faster, and that 1 is 10 times smaller than 10. 2+2 no longer = 5; now it
equals chartreuse.
Fortunately architects and engineers know how to
bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com (Bill Fairchild) writes:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10
is 900% faster, and that 1 is 10 times smaller than 10. 2+2 no longer
= 5; now it equals
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Bill Fairchild
bfairch...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is
900% faster, and that 1 is 10 times smaller than 10. 2+2 no
On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:20:03 +, Bill Fairchild wrote:
And the general public, many Dilbertian managers, and even some of us
professional nitpickers, think that a job running 1 hour instead of 10 is 900%
faster,
I believe that's correct usage, even as an airplane that flies from
New York
Charles,
x'C2AC' is the logical not symbol in UTF-8. Are you sure that you are
translating to 1252?
When I display the translate table for 1047-1252 using Unicode Services,
it appears to be single bye - single byte:
Here is a dump using the showtrtab command (part of the free Co:Z
Toolkit) -
IMHO everyone here perfectly understand common (and intended) meaning of
24/7/365. While is formally inaccurate, it's still clear.
The rest is as worth to discuss as USS=Unix System Services.
Maybe there is official IBM meaning* of 24/7/365 or the only proper
description of continuous
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:43:53 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
I don't understand what I am seeing from Unicode Services translation.
I specify translation from 1047 (Encoding scheme 1100 - EBCDIC, SBCS; Name
LATIN 1 / OPEN SYSTEM) to 1252 (Encoding scheme 4105 - ASCII, SBCS; Name
MS-WIN LATIN-1).
As
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Unicode Services translation question
snip
(John M. was lately ranting on another forum
Are you sure that you are translating to 1252?
Mighty sure. Could I be confused? Of course. But it looks rock solid to me.
I have a lot of display facilities in the code and everything looks right
(except the output).
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
The SHARE in Anaheim schedule is now available online here:
https://share.confex.com/share/119/webprogram/start.html
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
All:
Thank you so much for the help. We are digging through the problem.
I hadnt seen this one before, so I was looking for pointers to point me the
right direction to find the cause.
All your help was very much appreciated.
Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
Does it work as you expected for other characters in 1047 whose equivalent in
1252 have values above x7F? Or is the not sign the only one that's
mis-behaving?
--
Walt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Does it work as you expected for other characters in 1047 whose equivalent
in 1252 have values above x7F?
I just put in a broken vertical bar (EBCDIC 6A) and it translated (allegedly
into 1252) as C2A6 rather than the expected A6.
Where are you going with this? You obviously have something in
Brain drain: Where Cobol systems go from here
-When the last Cobol programmers walk out the door, so may 50 years
of business processes within the software they created. Will you be
ready?
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9227263/The_Cobol_Brain_Drain?
taxonomyId=154
Charles,
I'm not sure what the problem is, but 1252 is a single byte charset, so it
seems wrong that you are getting multi-byte results.
I don't see any difference in how you are calling CUNLCNV I tried our
code with your technique string (we default to LMREC) :
*showtrtab -s 1047 -t 1252
Thanks.
Could there be something wrong with how your Unicode Services tables are
configured?
Sure, but I try to avoid blame the compiler and blame the operating
system for as long as possible!
I want to see where Walt was going with the 7F question.
Charles
-Original Message-
From:
I have the following piece of code running on many SRBs to
give serialisation.
SETLOCK OBTAIN,
TYPE=CML,ASCB=(11), PRIMARY ADDRESS SPACE
MODE=UNCOND,
REGS=USE,
RELATED=(*(SERSTLRL))
The fine manual
Here is what showtrtab shows (pretty much as expected: 6A-A6 and B0 - AC).
$ ./showtrtab -s 1047 -t 1252
00: 00 01 02 03 9C 09 86 7F 97 8D 8E 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F
10: 10 11 12 13 9D 0A 08 87 18 19 92 8F 1C 1D 1E 1F
20: 80 81 82 83 84 85 17 1B 88 89 8A
I *think* I understand the problem. I am going to have to revisit the
documentation and then the code.
When I *re*-parametize the service with a different CCSID it is not
taking. I have a handle or something that is not getting re-initialized.
I just started the program over with 01047/01252 and
When the last Cobol programmers walk out the door, so may 50 years
of business processes within the software they created. Will you be
ready?
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9227263/The_Cobol_Brain_Drain?
taxonomyId=154
Ed, Interesting article and fairly accurate IMO.
This is what
On 5/23/2012 3:39 PM, Roberts, John J wrote:
When the last Cobol programmers walk out the door, so may 50 years
of business processes within the software they created. Will you be
ready?
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9227263/The_Cobol_Brain_Drain?
taxonomyId=154
Ed, Interesting
On 21 May 2012 16:57, Longnecker, Dennis
dennis.longnec...@courts.wa.gov wrote:
Curious as to what people might be using, if anything, on the JAVA side for
screen scraping TN3270 applications. Last year, because of performance
problems, we switched from IBM Hats to a different JAVA based
Update to this CALL PLIMOVE generates loop of MVCs topic:
we did some further research and found out, that for CALL PLIMOVE with
known length at compile time, even with EP PL/1 V3.9, there is a code
sequence generated which uses MVCL, if the length is greater or equal
16384. For lengths below
Only if you are an incompetent company...
From: Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:31 PM
Subject: Brain drain: Where Cobol systems go from here
Brain drain: Where Cobol systems go from here
-When
I'm almost old enough to admit I'm old.
I remember a time when businesses would take the brightest young
business minds they had, turn them over to folks like Steve (good
teachers) for 90 days, and get back ... COBOL programmers who understood
the business. Oddly enough, it was those 90-day
Indeed, this is exactly what our company does. Our newest COBOL
victim/developer (g) was working in a non-IT part of the company. I myself
came from such a place. As have a not insignificant number of our other COBOL
programmers.
From: Thomas H
42 matches
Mail list logo
