Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Matan Cohen
thanks for the help . Linda - you are right , I do have the control area set. I checked out the CONTROL command in the manuals and couldn't found how can i control this display in meaning of scrolling \ deletion of this mesages . I'll probably will set the AREA(10) to AREA(NONE) in my CONSOLxx .

Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Matan Cohen
P.S there is the 'K E,D which delete all of the status display . On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.comwrote: thanks for the help . Linda - you are right , I do have the control area set. I checked out the CONTROL command in the manuals and couldn't found how

Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Matan Cohen
Just found the 'K D,F' which scroll the status display to the next frame. On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.comwrote: P.S there is the 'K E,D which delete all of the status display . On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Robin Atwood
Now if you set PF8 to K D,F and PF12 to K E,D, it all becomes very familiar! HTH -Robin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matan Cohen Sent: 06 June 2012 16:18 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Consoles New options Just

Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Matan Cohen
yes it does. I think I'll keep this functionality. On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robin Atwood robin.atw...@microfocus.comwrote: Now if you set PF8 to K D,F and PF12 to K E,D, it all becomes very familiar! HTH -Robin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: JCL PROBLEM

2012-06-06 Thread McKown, John
Just a point which may not be obvious (at least it wasn't to me). The default of 5 tape volumes is hard coded only for non-SMS managed tapes. Truly! If you are using SMS managed tapes (in an automated or even manual library), then you can assign a default DATACLAS. In this DATACLAS, you can set

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread Scott Ford
I should have added under z/os1.11 works fine Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jun 5, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote: All, We migrated to z/os 1.12 , LE COBOL. I have noticed on a COBOL program running as a STC, No yucks please, a Display or Write to

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread McKown, John
Did somebody change the LE options? That's all that I can think of. No, I don't know what the option(s) might be that could cause this difference. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817)

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread Scott Ford
John, No, we don't change LE options, I will look at them.. Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jun 6, 2012, at 9:16 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: Did somebody change the LE options? That's all that I can think of. No, I don't know what the option(s) might be that

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread Scott Ford
John, I fixed it, but the fix was odd, I added a //sysout dd sysout=* It now works Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jun 6, 2012, at 9:16 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote: Did somebody change the LE options? That's all that I can think of. No, I don't know what the

Question on TCP window size for FTP

2012-06-06 Thread Mauri Kanter
Good morning list: I'm FTPing files from one z/OS mainframe at my site to another mainframe. On a packet trace I can clearly see that the FTP window is small (about 20K) while if I FTP from my PC to my mainframe I see that the window is scaled and it is 256K. My side uses TCPSENDBFRSIZE

Re: JCL PROBLEM

2012-06-06 Thread Mitch
John, May I ask where you work? My friends in Australia may know some of the management folks at your site. Is there anything I can send to you to help your cause? What types of JCL issues do you typically have? May I ask what batch scheduler you use? Change management tool? .anything

Re: Consoles New options

2012-06-06 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In CALuePdiAsQ8JSQXspkGn=eDioy1wgRn_eD=wn9uq+_nwu-z...@mail.gmail.com, on 06/06/2012 at 11:09 AM, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com said: I checked out the CONTROL command in the manuals and couldn't found how can i control this display in meaning of scrolling \ deletion of this mesages

Re: JES/2 Proc SYSIN Concat Error??

2012-06-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:59:25 -0700, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: IEF694I DDNAME REFERENCE TO DD CONCATENATION REFERS ONLY TO FIRST DD Explanation: THE JCL DDNAME keyword has been used to refer to a DD concatenation. When the object of a DDNAME reference is a concatenation of

IBM Ported Tools OpenSSH - Key Authentication webinars

2012-06-06 Thread Kirk Wolf
Join us for a free two-part webinar on IBM Ported Tools OpenSSH key authentication: IBM Ported Tools for z/OS: OpenSSH - Key Authentication Reserve your Webinar seat for part 1 now at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/956665254 IBM Ported Tools for z/OS: OpenSSH is IBM's port of the

Re: Question on TCP window size for FTP

2012-06-06 Thread Hal Merritt
I believe that these sizes are actually negotiated with each appliance in the path. All it would take is one device configured such and all along that path would follow suit. I'd try a trace route on each path and compare the results. Then have the network folks check the routers/firewalls in

Need a PC tape drive to read 3490, 3490E

2012-06-06 Thread Sam Golob
Hi Folks, Does anybody have a suggestion how I can get a tape drive to attach to a PC so that I can read 3490, 3490E tapes, without my having to spend a couple of thousand dollars? I need this to support the CBT Tape effort and to try and resurrect old archives for the public's benefit.

Re: JCL PROBLEM

2012-06-06 Thread McKown, John
Where I work is in all my sig lines. Doesn't matter, if you're thinking of anything that costs money. We aren't spending any more than we currently do. And we may actually get more budget cuts in 2013. Our main OEM vendor is CA. We don't normally have JCL problems, the one I mentioned was

Re: Question on TCP window size for FTP

2012-06-06 Thread Steven St.Jean
Hal, I believe that these sizes are actually negotiated with each appliance in the path. You're confusing path MTU size with TCP window size. The receiver's window size is a reflection of his available buffer space. Mauri, what is the value of TCPMAXRCVBUFRSIZE on the receiving stack? This

Re: Need a PC tape drive to read 3490, 3490E

2012-06-06 Thread Mike Schwab
There are some people on the Hercules group that will read the tapes and post the AWSTAPE files. You just have to get the tape to them. On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Sam Golob sbgo...@cbttape.org wrote: Hi Folks,     Does anybody have a suggestion how I can get a tape drive to attach to a

Re: JES/2 Proc SYSIN Concat Error??

2012-06-06 Thread Charles Mills
Does this imply that I can't code two separate DD statements, each containing the DDNAME=... option in the same PROC, where they refer to separate concatenations, respectively? Not sure that I read that into it, although it certainly is possible User Response: If the DDNAME reference was

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread Charles Mills
I don't know what the cause is but I know that sometimes I see output when I do an S on a running job or STC and sometimes I do not (even though the output has in fact been written). Not sometimes as in today versus yesterday but sometimes as in one system or situation versus another over some

Re: JES/2 Proc SYSIN Concat Error??

2012-06-06 Thread Charles Mills
If I change the proc so that SYSUT1 is last statement, everything works fine I think it's a coincidence (more or less) that it works. The orphan DD's get concatenated to the previous DD, which just happens to be SYSUT1 in this case. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Group, We are running z/OS V1R13 and a product called VPS. I wrote some code to ADD, UPDATE and DELETE members of a PDS. It worked fine until VPS came up. I see that the VPS started task OWNS SHR the dataset. I need to allocate a dataset exclusively (EXCL/DISP=MOD) to do a delete from

Article on use of LLVM and compilers

2012-06-06 Thread McKown, John
I don't know if anybody else would be interested. Makes me wish that somebody would port LLVM to z/OS. I have it on Linux. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/os-createcompilerllvm1/index.html?ca=drs- Hum, the dash needs to be on the end of that URL, but OutLook doesn't highlight

Dumps to vendors with sensitive data

2012-06-06 Thread Andy White
We recently have a DOD (Department of Defense) account on our systems. Question if you are sending a dump to a vendor e.g. IBM and there might be a slight change it has user data stored in common storage. Do you have a DOD approved person within IBM you send the dump to? Or an assigned group

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 11:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task? Group, We are running

Re: Question on TCP window size for FTP

2012-06-06 Thread Mauri Kanter
I'm unaware of the max value they specified on their stack ... But I understood their TCP stack is configured with send/receive buffers also of 256K. On my stack the max value was not specified and I can see that the FTP from my PC do use a 256K window ... BTW both sides are z/OS 1.11 Mauri.

Re: Dumps to vendors with sensitive data

2012-06-06 Thread Scott Ford
Andy,   We work with the DOJ(FBI) and they remove IP addresses etc..since we are a IP server/client dealing with security subsystems. Scott J Ford Software Engineer http://www.identityforge.com   From: Andy White awh...@metlife.com To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Sri h Kolusu
Q). What is the best way to delete a PDS member while the started task has it allocated DISP=SHR? You can try using IDCAMS delete function with FILE Parameter //DELPMEM EXEC PGM=IDCAMS //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //DDN DD DSN=YOUR PDS, //DISP=SHR //SYSIN DELETE

Re: Question on TCP window size for FTP

2012-06-06 Thread Itschak Mugzach
Have you looked into MTU on the link definition? ITschak On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Mauri Kanter itzuv...@013.net.il wrote: I'm unaware of the max value they specified on their stack ... But I understood their TCP stack is configured with send/receive buffers also of 256K. On my stack

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
Dave, At R1.13 z/OS you can use the DEL 'MYDSN(member)' in rexx. Also note, the member can contain a mask so if you wanted to delete all members that being with A you can issue DEL 'MYDSN(A*)' and it should remove all the members that being with A. If you allocate MYDSN with SHR REUSE in

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:33:55 -0500, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote: I need to allocate a dataset exclusively (EXCL/DISP=MOD) to do a delete from REXX (or batch). By delete from Rexx do you mean TSO? If not, what? I can go out by hand using 3.4 and delete all I want from the dataset

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Mingee, David
Hi, If the Lib is a pdse you can verify that sys1.parmlib(igdsms00) is set to PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) this should allow deleting in this case. This permits member level access. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:33:55 -0500 Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov wrote: :Group, : : We are running z/OS V1R13 and a product called VPS. I wrote some code to ADD, UPDATE and DELETE members of a PDS. It worked fine until VPS came up. : I see that the VPS started task OWNS

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Linda Mooney
Hi Dave, Which VPS dataset? Thanks, Linda - Original Message - From: Dave L - Eagan Hansen, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 9:33:55 AM Subject: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task? Group,   We are

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread Clark Morris
On 6 Jun 2012 07:04:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: John, I fixed it, but the fix was odd, I added a //sysout dd sysout=* It now works If the statement //SYSOUT DD some parameters is missing and you have a DISPLAY something in your program and the LE runtime option CBLQDA is

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Linda, My parmlibs have the printer members in them. I was just trying to get a REXX job to delete a printer member. Address ISPEXEC LMINIT DATAID(INDD) DATASET('VPS.PARMLIB3') ENQ(SHRW) LMOPEN DATAID(INDD) OPTION(OUTPUT) LMMDEL DATAID(INDD) MEMBER(DAVE) LMCLOSE DATAID(INDD) LMFREE

FYI LinKEdln passwords hacked

2012-06-06 Thread Ed Gould
LinkedIn Users: Change Password Now Attackers appear to have obtained--and may have already decrypted--at least 6.5 million LinkedIn passwords. http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/attacks/240001623? cid=nl_IW_daily_2012-06-06_htmlelq=a86e12d6260b46e991eaf6fac15b1ab7

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Linda Mooney
Hi Dave, The VPS printer member dataset has an as-shipped  lower level of CNTL - unless you are using a local name?   Linda - Original Message - From: Dave L - Eagan Hansen, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 1:38:54 PM Subject:

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Ed Gould
This is age old issue. I think the summary is that in order to to maintain data integrity of the PDS don't try updating any PDS that is allocated by someone else. If it works great otherwise don't come crying to IBM (or anyone else). Dataset integrity is only as good as you treat the dataset

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Mark Douglas (CITEC)
Right, the Enq is there for a reason. My VPS delete Rexx only removes the VPSMLIST entry, not the printer member. This update works fine with an Alloc SHR REU. Cheers, MARK DOUGLAS Senior IT Consultant | Mainframe | CITEC | www.citec.com.au Department of Science, Information Technology,

Re: LE COBOL odd behavior

2012-06-06 Thread Scott Ford
Thanks Clark, I had to look it up, didn't know it existed, much appreciated Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote: On 6 Jun 2012 07:04:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: John, I fixed it, but the fix was odd,

Re: Exclusive ENQ on dataset owned (SHR) by Started Task?

2012-06-06 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hi Dave, You do not NEED to access a PDS as exclusive to be able to manipulate members. Mostly, DISP=SHR is all that is needed.in the unlikely occurrence that 2 tasks attempt to update the same member at the same time, they may get an error. Regards Bruce Hewson