Oracle on z/OS [was: Convert DB2 on z/OS to UDB on z/Linux]

2009-09-08 Thread Bill Manry
On 1 Sep 2009 22:51:02 -0700, ds...@hotmail.com (Dave Salt) wrote: A while ago I mentioned on this forum that a friend of mine works for a company that is considering a conversion from DB2 on z/OS to Oracle on z/Linux. I asked if anyone had any opinions on this, and Frank Swarbrick pointed out

Re: Oracle on z/OS [was: Convert DB2 on z/OS to UDB on z/Linux]

2009-09-08 Thread Bill Manry
On 8 Sep 2009 12:37:11 -0700, ds...@hotmail.com (Dave Salt) wrote: Hi Bill, Thanks for the info. I understand that OAM will continue to be supported, but not enhanced. If a new feature of the Oracle database requires an update to the OAM, it means applications running on z/OS would not be able

Re: Kicking off an oracle process

2009-06-04 Thread Bill Manry
On 4 Jun 2009 08:27:53 -0700, ptl...@midamerican.com (Patrick Lyon) wrote: A DBA wants to know if there is a way to request the execution of an oracle stored procedure on another server from the mainframe and have the result return to the mainframe. If you install the Oracle client libraries

Re: Oracle CICS Question

2006-09-26 Thread Bill Manry
On 26 Sep 2006 07:15:44 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CHUCK DARTER) wrote: We are going to Oracle to replace our database. Does any one have a sample of code that does a insert and delete from CICS to the Oracle database. When you install the Oracle software on MVS

Re: EXCP with a DEB

2006-08-21 Thread Bill Manry
On 21 Aug 2006 11:17:10 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gilbert Saint-Flour) wrote: Not necessarily. It could issue OPEN in KEY=ZERO,MODE=SUP which, if I'm not mistaken, bypasses SAF. Only with VSAM data sets. I don't think there's a SAF bypass for nonVSAM. I also don't think there is an easy

Re: LDAP and DBMS was Cheryl

2006-04-18 Thread Bill Manry
in this regard known to IBM. /b -- Bill Manry - Oracle Corp. Opinions expressed here are mine, not Oracle's. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN

Re: POSIX run-time option vs TSO and Batch

2006-02-01 Thread Bill Manry
On 31 Jan 2006 17:06:28 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't the POSIX setting affect the resolution of pathnames? where normally fopen(FRED) refers to a file relative to the current working directory, with POSIX(OFF) it refers instead to a DDNAME? Admittedly, this is CRTL behavior, not

Re: POSIX run-time option vs TSO and Batch

2006-01-31 Thread Bill Manry
On 19 Jan 2006 11:19:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wendell Simmons) wrote: I have a C application that uses Unix Services and therefore has to run with POSIX ON - logic has been added to the C program to display the setting of the POSIX option. I know this is resolved, but I'm curious about the

Re: IARVSERV

2005-10-18 Thread Bill Manry
IARVSERV? I doubt it, except indirectly by those porting or writing UNIX-type applications and using one of the BPX interfaces. We found a good use for it, but Oracle's situation is somewhat unusual. /Bill Manry - Oracle Corp