Do any of you have already tried Jes2 dynamic exit reloader (CBTTape file
198) in zOS 1.8 ?
I`ve tried and it seems not to work properly. When issueing $REPEXIT
loadmod, we receive message
$HASP000 loadmod not located in LINKLIST library.
Same in z/OS 1.7. I managed to fix my EXIT52 during the
you didn't make any spelling errors doing it like I did! (Meant in humor)
Eric Bielefeld
Are you sure you don't mean humour
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:10:41 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, typo, make that R7 not R5
Thanks for your help, I caught the typo. In my cutting pasting, I missed
a couple lines from the IBM sample exit:
LRR8,R0 Copy XPL address
L
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:21:57 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed to use the $JCT address in the XPL, I don't know if this
will help you. I didn't look al that close at your code after I noticed
the unloaded USINGS.
OK, I'll give that a shot too. I didn't even notice that
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:00:14 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out SHARE Presentations from Skip Robinson and Tom Wasik
I've looked at everything findable via the web. I'll check out SHARE right
now, but it seems we do something very different than everyone else in
this
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:00:14 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out SHARE Presentations from Skip Robinson and Tom Wasik
I went through Skips SHARE presentation and made some changes to ignore
what comes in R1 and base all addresses off of XPL fields. Still S0C4's.
How does
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:29:06 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put $trace statements carefully in my ASM source. It took me about
4 days to do the 7 exits we use. It went much faster after I installed
the CBT exit loader (exit 5)
One of my colleagues is looking at installing the
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:50:11 -0500, Peter DeFabritus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, field X052JXWR is a pointer to the card you want to add. So you
need to do something like:
L R2,X052JXWR
MVC 0(80,R2),USRCARD
USRCARD DC CL80'// USER='
As you see, I would also
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:13:07 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just finished upgrading our exits. I stuck with IPL's for the first
day or two.
The good news is I made the changes and it's no longer giving me those
error messages.
The bad news is, now I'm getting S0C4's. I don't
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:30:05 -0700, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$TRACE can be very helpful :) Just remember that it uses R0,R1,R14,R15
:))
I tried that too, but I couldn't get it to work. The manuals say to turn
trace ID 13 on for EXIT52, so I did. I set TRACE=YES on EXIT52 and got
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:04:48 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sun DTrace
snip
Can you say z/OS System Trace and SLIP?
snip
And Voila! a patent for this will be granted
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:04:35 -0500, Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
We use the EMC Timefinder/SNAP and EMC/SRDF. I believe we have experienced
the 'issue' you have
described based on a couple of assumptions. I am assuming that when you
say: SRDF comes along
Yes, I believe that
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:45:00 +0200, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Are you using UNIX System Services heavily ??
Yes.
What for ??
Corporate email (Lotus Domino), some websphere - application server,
business integration message broker,...
Thanks Barbara,
I'm going to go with
John's point at the start of this thread is one that should be noted well.
These machines we administer have capability that is rarely fully realized.
So what is the answer to this dilemna ??? Do we wait to read about your
machine being retired in favor of one that has more blinking lights ??
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:59:32 -0700, Walter Marguccio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Forwarded Message
From: Mark Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am in the process of building a Production zOS 1.7 system.
I have converted my HFS File Systems to zFS's and all looks OK...
I'm installing
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:01:57 -0400, Robert Sample [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they should sell replicas etc. like ??course PA does
We were there earlier this month. My wife bought the T-shirt.
Darren must be on his way to Talledega. This one had to have tripped
a bounce back.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is the MIPS or MSUs of the particular models ???
MIPS are whatever you want them to be!
I wrote an article, admittedly for an IBM publication, and it was only 900
words, so I only scratched the surface.
But, MIPS are:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:57:49 +0200, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESEARCH.FREESERVE.CO.UK wrote:
You might want to revisit the site.
--
Which site ??? About the z900 withdrawal letter or something about the
z8 ???
--
For
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:00:12 -0500, Dave Kopischke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:57:49 +0200, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESEARCH.FREESERVE.CO.UK wrote:
You might want to revisit the site.
--
Which site ??? About the z900 withdrawal letter or something about the
z8
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:40:27 -0500, Curt Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a general question regarding the time synchronization across
heterogeneous servers that span thousands of miles apart from each other.
I have a large sysplex and distributed server environment, utilizing an IP
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:13:33 -0600, Alan C. Field
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
Almost I think.
The Sysplex Timer is a big clunky box. It connects to a PC as it's
console
We have a modem plugged into the PC that dials out to NIST.
I think the CLO (CLOck?) card is the card in the processor
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:18:03 -0400, Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the mainframe was running 2.10, I suspect that the
applications running on it were ones that were less than optimal and
this may have forced application consolidation and upgrade. Frankly I
would like to see
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:40:26 -0500, Robert Pelletier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The job just worked using work files. It failed all morning with work.
Any ideas? Does an LE program require a lot of storage? It looks like our
PUBLIC volumes have plenty of space. Thanks all.
Think Spring !!!
Bob
That's the basis for the question. Waaay back when IBM was talking about an
annual release schedule, they announced a four release support policy. I'm
not seeing that now. Maybe I'm not reading the dates right ??? I'd have to
do some searching just to come up with the doc I think I read that in.
Yes, we're at 1.4. I'm hesitant to go to anything too new for stability
reasons. I'll let you guys test it real good before I jump in with both
feet !
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/support/zos_eos_dates.html
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:20:29 -0500, Richards.Bob
[EMAIL
that is four releases old ??? Will
IBM support the coexistence ???
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:07:11 -0600, Dave Kopischke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the basis for the question. Waaay back when IBM was talking about an
annual release schedule, they announced a four release support policy. I'm
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:33:45 -0800, Youngren, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only that, Bruce, but on the same announcement page, they
*announced* the very same products.
According to a Mainstar source:
IBM wanted to have fewer PIDs for the Mainstar products and wanted to
group
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:03:52 -0600, McGee, Cletus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am running a ZOS 1.4 on a Z800 box. We are upgrading to a Z890. I am
going to have to apply the Z990 Exploitation Feature along the several
PTFS. I was wondering if anyone has an experience with this and if there
are any
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:02:40 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
Have you looked at the paging rate? Is DB2 invovled (ever heard
of Enclaves)? If Omegamon hasn't provided a clue, I'd start
by running RMF post processor reports and see if that gives you any
clues. Have a look at the workload reports in
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:11:22 -0700, Steve Bui wrote:
Which version of Java do you have?
We're still on release 1.3, and have not seen slow down, but our
transaction rate is low.
SteveBui
1.3 which came with z/OS 1.4. I'm not even sure it's a JAVA issue. I just
know the product
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:38:38 -0400, Patrick.Falcone wrote:
Can you share the product? Is it WAS? You say you've checked paging, how
about swapping? What is the capture ratio during the problem time frame?
Also, Mark makes a good point about enclave tracking, unfortunately it may
not be obvious
It depends on how far you want the hardware/software to get before if
fails.
For example:
- If you have access to the HMC, rename the IMAGE profile of the LPAR your
sandbox system runs in. Then De-activate that LPAR. If someone attempts
to IPL that LPAR, it will fail, LPAR not activated. If
I want to open a new VSAM KSDS and write a record to it then delete the
record so that the file is empty but had it's Initial Load. I thought
that fileaid could do this as it does it in the online version fine, but I
want to set up a batch job. The initial load is easy enough but how can I
delete
Steve, here's what I would do. Someone else may suggest something more
elegant.
I went to IBMLink and browsed the first PTF on your list - UQ91928. Down
at
the bottom, under PRE-REQS/CO-REQS it said:
AR038 FMIDHLE7703 PRE UQ89777 ++IFFMIDHLE7705
REQ UQ91929 ++IF
Hmmm. That seems like a lot of work, though, even for small amounts.
I have to download, upload, unterse, then recieve for all these
guys, only one of which I need. I'm not a sysprog, and never pretended
to be, and I have a much deeper appreciation for the weirdness of
your world now.
Order the
Great. where do I go to order a bunch?
Well, I used to go to IBMLink, then I think it was SRD, then it would
display a section where you enter PTF numbers delimited by a space or
comma. Now I go to IBMLink and it's a new page and it says I'm not
registered. I'm afraid I'm going to have to wait
I get NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CMD trying to purge my own output from the HOLD
queue. Another system programmer here gets NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CMD when
trying to add an initiator class from the INIT panel.
That sure sounds like an issue with ISFPRM. Maybe you can post the contents
of your segments in
301 - 337 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
