On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:16:09 -0500, Richard Peurifoy r-Rather than using
a RACF or TSS control block, try using the JSAB.
L R2,PARMEPRM Common exit parm area
USING JMR,R2
IAZXJSAB READ,USERID=JMRUSEID Copy USERID to JMR
Richard
Hello Richard;
I installed
Richard;
Thanks for the smaple, I'll check it out.
Kind regards,
Giovanni
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Rather than using a RACF or TSS control block, try using the JSAB.
L R2,PARMEPRM Common exit parm area
USING JMR,R2
IAZXJSAB READ,USERID=JMRUSEID Copy USERID to JMR
Richard
--
For
The issue is that DAF is processing some SMF records that the system does
not automatically populate with the userid.
The DAF source provides sample code for IEFUJI to get the userid from the
RACF control blocks and copy it to the User Identification field of the
SMF Common Exit Parameter Area.
Dear folks;
I'm playing with DAF and I realized that the Userid field on the SMF
records is blank. This means that I need to code an IEFUJI exit to update
that field. Is there any sample IEFUJI with this executable code that
someone can kindly share with me?.
TIA,
Giovanni
Mark;
Another debate is what's small and what's large. I'm a 303304 complex and
I do not condider myself large. I have one (1) man dataset per 3390-9
volume and each is dumped four times a day and I don't have VSAM nor CICS
activity logged.
I prefer to have all the possible records rather
Thanks so much to all responders and Mark, as always, very proficiency.
Giovanni
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Dear folks;
As a possibly a neverending debate, I wanto to know, besides storage and
CPU usage implications, what are the benefits of not having all the smf
records ON with the exception of 4,5 and 99.
I don't have neither the VSAM SMF records ON nor the CICS record ON. I run
about 10k+ Jobs
Hello;
I know that HCM 1.7 comes with some new features, including a preview
capability but I would like to know if there is a way to generate or
create the HCM reports in PDF format. In this way I can make it available
to people that need to take a lot on it.
TIA,
G.
Dear folks;
I'm using HCM via TCP/IP and I have no problems when the connection is
successful but, if there is a security error accessing the CBDQDISP (by
instance, the OMVS segment was not assigned in RACF to the user trying to
connect to HCM), the user get a invalid logon. No problem here.
Dear folks;
We have a necessity to synchronize our IBM Parallel Sysplex with other
platforms, i.e. HP Non Stop, Sun, PSeries, etc. I'm aware that PS does not
support NTP.
I was thinking if with STP we can achieve this but with the information I
have, I think the answer seems to be a big NO.
Any
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:56:15 +0100, John Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From the horses mouth:
Mid to end of Jan.
John
From: Edward E. Jaffe
Based on the amount of information available from IBM's web site, I
suspect STP is not yet ready for prime time.
Well they'd better get their
We have an implementation assistance program (a kind of ESP) for STP.
For
z9-109 processors, it is planned to start 1Q06. For z890 and z990
processors, the program was kicked off a month or two ago. If you are
interested in participating, please contact Angelo Corridori
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or
Hello folks;
Now that z/OS 1.7 is available, I would like more info about STP. I found
and read the following documment:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/events/2005-Z31.PDF
(Z31 Server Time Protocol)
But I still have some doubts.
Any other more detailed doc, describing feature code, price (if any), CFCC
Dear folks;
I just activated the VSAMRLS(ADD(...)) option in RMF for RLS monitoring
and all I can get is zeroes in all metrics thar RMF is suppose to display.
I mean, I get the storage class names, if I select a storage class, I get
the dataset names and if I select one datasets I get other
I post some details to Scott Fagen and not to Greg Dick, so, sorry about
the mistake.
As Ed suggested, Share would be a good forum. True is that real world is
far from ideal world. Trying to reconcilate best practices all around IT
and at the same time keep in pace with federal regulations is not
Dear Folks;
Do you know if there are plans for future enhancements to GRS?.
TIA,
Giovanni
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Scott;
I've been thinking in the possibility of a Sysplex of Sysplexes, so I can
connect two sysplexes with full integrity at dataset level. In my case, is
just because we are thinking into separate from our Prod PS the Test
LPARs. Because we have a Change Control mechanism between Test and Prod
Hello Mark;
Certainly it's kind of weird but in a sense it's more a long term
statement for GRS. I already post more details to Greg Dick but, in other
words, it's like if there are plans to have GRS more versatile, like
having GRS Star and the GRS Ring features in one GRS service for which can
Hello posters,
I think this debate has been discussed before but...
My Parallel Sysplex includes productions lpars and test lpars. The primary
reason for this is to allow an effective Change Control at application
program level. Also, the operlog implementation allows us to have a single
view of
I've heard 2nd-hand that DFHSM restrictions may influence your decision
regarding use of striping and multi-volume data sets for your inventory,
but that's not my area of expertise. Hopefully, some others who follow
IBM-MAIN can supply some information on that front.
Bob Wright - z/OS MVS
Rob;
DFHSM allows you to migrate the dumps datasets very agrresively if you
code MC and SG properly.
Also, don't try to save dasd space for dumps bacause there are cases when
an error is not easily recreable. I have 10 3390-9 for production dumps,
even the SG was defined with 20. Wasting space?,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:25:35 -0700, George Kozakos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are looking at merging 2 SYSPLEXes which are 20 KMs apart. Our first
step is to create a Bronze-PLEX as described in SG26-6818 Merging
Systems into a SYSPLEX. The driver is to achieve single SYSPLEX
pricing.
We are
One enhancement with which a lot of people should be quite pleased is
the preview of Server Time Protocol, mentioned in the z/OS V1.7
announcement. Finally, IBM mainframes will automatically synchronize
with one another and with dial-up/Internet time reference sites (e.g.,
NIST), adjust for
Hello folks;
1. Do you know if there are any plans to provide full support in HSM for
3592J cartirdges, in the sense to filling up the cartridge to the maximum
possible?. I do understand that the stack use only provides up to for 99
which means up to 99 files in a 3592J cartridge. For most of our
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:43:48 -0400, Cheryl Watson Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is from our March 1991 TUNING Letter and our April 2004 CPU Charts,
and
should provide everything you need:
1 base CPU service unit = 1 TCB second * CPU-factor
1 base SRB service unit = 1 SRB second *
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:43:48 -0400, Cheryl Watson Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is from our March 1991 TUNING Letter and our April 2004 CPU Charts,
and
should provide everything you need:
1 base CPU service unit = 1 TCB second * CPU-factor
1 base SRB service unit = 1 SRB second *
27 matches
Mail list logo
