I am not close to a manual ATM, but is there an exit that gets control for each
record written?
It is possible the original asker would want to utilize one if one were
available.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
If you do CEMT I FILE(DFHCSD), do you have update access? In my CICS
region, I do a CEMT I FILE(DFH*) and then make sure the CSD has
update/add/delete privileges the same as other files.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I'm guessing it will be the routing codes assigned to the console. Use
display console and the manuals to find out what routing codes are
sent to the console in question and what routing codes are being used to
send the RACF message.
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Logan, David wrote:
: Even with my AXSET, I still get a S052/319 ABEND at the ETCRE
macro. I : have no idea why. My code looks right based on what I think
I know. What : am I doing wrong?
: MODESET MODE=SUP,KEY=ZERO
: GETAXDS0H
: LA6,1
Apologies, you are right...I was writing from memory, and
mis-remembered. The client needs an AXSET and an ETCON. The only way to
issues AXSET and ETCON seems to be in supervisor state. The only way for
a problem program to gain access to supervisor state code seems to be
via an SVC.
I tried
, December 17, 2007 6:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:51:56 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Apologies, you are right...I was writing from memory, and
:mis-remembered. The client needs an AXSET and an ETCON. The only way
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 6:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:19:07 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Logan, David
Sent: 17 December 2007 13:19
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
I believe I understand the ETDEF options
:39:11 -0500, Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, if I don't need an ATSET for a non-system LX, why did my PC crash
with a S0C2? Do I not want to AXRES/AXSET in my server if I use a
system
LX?
Here is my XMS setup from the service:
...snipped...
To run my system LX test, I added SYSTEM=YES
: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:17:40 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Actually, my server and client code all work fine with a non-system
LX,
:so I had not felt the need to post my client code. Not only that, but
my
:client code is virtually non-existent. All I did
...snip...
If the service provider knows who the clients will be, it can SRB over to
them.
But why do you object to using a system LX?
P.S. SVC's are so passé.
...snip...
I object to a system LX partially because it's philosophical, and partly
because there are a limited number of system
and use it right from the get-go?
David Logan
-Original Message-
From: Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: 12/16/07 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Basic Cross Memory questions
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:50:34 -0500 Logan, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Logan, David
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 5:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Basic Cross Memory questions
I see one of my questions answered, and even with that, not entirely. So
with that, let's jump in. I have three:
(1
13 matches
Mail list logo
