John,
If the job has a constant name, just insert a TN rule for that job
preceding the TNG for the rest.
HTH,
Steve Samson (Yes, I'm still around and lurking)
John Mattson wrote:
Been trying to figure this one out in the manuals and searching the net,
but no luck.
I have a few transaction
If you can't beat 'em, eat 'em?
Dave Jones wrote:
This might be of some interest to the folks here
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/24560.wss
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Tom,
I just got the same e-mail and thought the same thoughts. With friends
like these
Kelman, Tom wrote:
I just got an email titled “Legacy Modernization Spotlight”. When I clicked on the links in it they took me to articles that look like they’re in the online version of z/Journal but
On the one hand, the ripples in the Hudson seem to be sharper than the
cars in the parking lot. On the other, I think I can see Gordon
MacKenzie playing his bagpipes at the edge of the parking lot...
Flashback over
Steve Samson
Roger Bowler wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:05:56 -0400, Tony
Miklos,
If it is a trusted server, the natural choice is SYSSTC.
Steve Samson
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
I'm asking for the best practices for a long running server address space.
It is an authorization server , pooling a number of sockets.
Is it possible , that in an empty , idle
the HO bit is treated as any other. TSS did not use the sign
bit as a signal, just as an address bit.
HTH,
Steve Samson
Mohammad Khan wrote:
Mr. Samson,
Would you please clarify another point in this regard for me. Is it the
hardware that ignores the high order bit or the OS that plays some
It's the peril of upward compatibility. If no one took a 24-bit or
31-bit program and bound it in AMODE 64, there would be no problem.
Who's willing to take that bet?
Steve
R.S. wrote:
Correct. For an amode24 program, the entire universe ends at address
x'00FF'; the next step wraps
Radoslaw,
A 24-bit program using fullword (24-bit) addresses in a variable length
parameter list will have the high-order bit on in the last such address.
This bit is ignored in addressing modes less than 64-bit. It is
significant in 64-bit mode, placing the address in the dead zone.
A
zone is necessary in z/VSE for the same reason.
Other operating systems did not use the high order bit in the same way,
so there is no need for the dead zone in virtual addresses.
Has this helped to achieve clarity?
Steve Samson
, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:
In a message dated 11/3
Max,
I thought a lot about this one. My belief is that WLM does almost
nothing on a lightly loaded machine. Unless you performed this
experiment many times under rigidly controlled conditions, I would
hesitate to draw any conclusions. You did not state whether the elapsed
run time changed. I
Max,
I realize that I did not fully answer your second question: since
passage through periods is based on service accumulation, a unit of work
(batch job) accumulating only initiator delay (no service) will stay in
first period until it is fully in the system and receiving CPU and I/O
what you asked for.
Hope this helps and keep asking.
Best regards,
Steve Samson
Max Scarpa wrote:
Resent as there was an error in the previous mail
---
Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most
Phil,
How does one find the material alluded to in the last paragraph?
Phil Payne wrote:
And I'm off to see Carnival at the Broadfield in the excellent company of
not-mad-Alison.
http://www.isham-research.co.uk/fb/index.html
Been a fun couple of weeks. For students of the IBM vs PSI
Gotcha beat. I'm 70.
Steve Samson
Steve Comstock wrote:
Stephen Wolf wrote:
I turned 61 this year (same as Gorge W. and William J.). DO I hear 62?
Jeez! I turned 63 in March. I _can't_ be the oldest guy on
the list, can I
Firefox has an add-in called IE Tab which will open a URL with IE as
the rendering engine. It works with Windows Update and other IE-oriented
pages flawlessly.
Cheers,
Steve Samson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jul 2007 17:05:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---BeginMessage---
Well,
and at least one Redbook on the
subject. If you need something else, let me know and I can send you some
of my presentations. You might also want to get my softcopy book, MVS
Performance Management. Let me know and I'll give you a link to purchase it.
Good luck!
Steve Samson
Tommy Tsui wrote:
Hi
you called to
order manuals, as all of them with half a brain were pulled into the
S/360 development effort.
Just my opinion and recollections...
Steve Samson
Bruce McKnight wrote:
Greetings all,
What is the difference between a systems engineer and a systems
programmer? I'm referring
... not to mention that F.X. Cringely is a notoriously inaccurate and
fanciful rumor monger. This time, we SHOULD consider the source. I buy
Phil's analysis.
Cheers,
Steve Samson
Phil Payne wrote:
I don't believe a word of it. I _might_ if persuaded believe a couple of the
full stops
My recollection is different. SVC 99 (Dynamic Allocation) was a
necessary element of the TSO infrastructure. When TSO went GA, SVC 99
had to be there. TSO was available when I moved from New York to
Poughkeepsie in 1972.
Steve Samson
Staller, Allan wrote:
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clem
Jim,
There's not enough information yet. Are you running CICS with response
time goals? Are they being met? If you are using velocity goals only,
are those goals being met both before and after the queue buildup?
Input! Input!
Steve Samson
Jim Marshall wrote:
We run CICS TS ADABAS
If the current contribution supersedes or outweighs what came before,
top posting is clearly superior. This assertion of course illustrates
the foolishness of such rules.
Charles Richmond wrote:
Howard Brazee wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:54:23 -0500, CBFalconer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tom,
I don't know when RENT changed, but here's how it was born. This passage
was OCR'd from GC28-6535-0 (OS/360 Concepts and Facilities, copyright
1964) Note that the idea of REFR wasn't around at that time. (I think
that REFR was added when some boy genius proved that a self-modifying
Markus,
Sorry, WLM can't do it. If you have OMEGAMON, you can use a command to
make any address space nonswappable. Similar products may offer the same
capability.
Steve Samson
damonty wrote:
Hi
I'm running a tomcat webcontainer in JZOSVM (java for zos) environment
as started task. I
Dunno if it was C++ for sure, but there was a lot of borrowing from some
object-oriented programming language.
Andy Wood wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 10:39:48 -0700, Steve Samson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Complexity? Blue sky? FS was the champion. From where I sat in FS
Architecture in the 1973
in VS2 marketing support.
Your recollection may differ. That's OK.
Steve Samson
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
While FS was incompatible ... there were lots of other issues. It was
extremely ambitious with seemingly every blue-sky concept that ever
existed being thrown into the pot. At the time, I
Bob,
Did you really do that and remain conscious through the whole book?
Cheers,
Steve
Richards.Bob wrote:
Howard,
When I was a newbie, I read the MVS Init and Tuning manual cover to
cover. That held me in good stead for many, many years. Try it and see!
Bob Richards
Jerry,
Now would be a good time to move to response time goals for CICS (before
the upgrade). In the mixed environment, the achieved velocities may vary
widely, but the RT goals should be met on either platform.
Good luck!
Steve Samson
J Ellis wrote:
We are going to have a 2094-604- 4
Chris,
I am enjoying retirement greatly--keeping busy playing bridge a lot more
than any time since college. I still get my daily fix of IBM-MAIN and am
happy to contribute when I can.
What's new with you? (answer off-list if you want)
Cheers,
Steve
Craddock, Chris wrote:
---
I
Must be the umlaut.
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
small town in Austria named F**king
Pronounced ficking!
-
-teD
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
transactions are more important or much more numerous than the
others, put the MANTIS rule as the first level 2, to save some minuscule
increment of processing time.
The asterisk catcher is unnecessary here. It was a leftover from the
days of implicit classification of STCs.
Cheers,
Steve Samson
on this problem.
Good luck!
Steve Samson
Mark Steely wrote:
Several day ago we received the following messages:
IRA400E 04,PAGEABLE STORAGE SHORTAGE
IRA403E PXXX SWAPPED TO RECLAIM PROCESSOR STORAGE; 001759 PAGES
000117 FIXED
etc...
Then we received:
IRA401E 04,CRITICAL PAGEABLE
Sorry folks. I must have just gotten up from a nap when I read the
original message.
Shane, no trout fishing here, just bridge and taxes.
Cheers,
Steve
Knutson, Sam wrote:
We are talking about a shortage of PAGEABLE storage not paged storage.
Nothing Mark can do with his PAGE data sets is
and worms.
Thanks,
Steve Samson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Kinda hard to create with hex digits...
Ed Gould wrote:
On Aug 22, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Paul Hanrahan wrote:
FREEBEEF sounds good to me. Dead or alive doesn't matter to me. Dave
Potter's dad owned balogna factory. Dave new all about dead beef.
Anyway
thanks for being patient with my off topic
No sign of PDF availability yet.
Steve Samson
McKown, John wrote:
I don't remember anybody mentioning this, but the z/OS 1.7 manuals are
available at
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information
and the messages manual
explanation were not so obtuse. (The sizing recommendations in the
Initialization and Tuning Guide should be revisited as well.)
Maybe a doc change would make the issue go away for good.
FWIW,
Steve Samson
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
..
Your disk technology makes the single pack
PLPA
Original Message
Subject: Re: Newsgroups (Was Another OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 migration
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:43:44 GMT
From: Steve Samson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
References: [EMAIL
...
Cheers,
Steve Samson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all who responded, especially to those who offered to look at my
WLM specifications.
Here's what happened: I had specified a couple of System Name Groups
(SYG's), something I had not done in this policy before. It turns out that
if a task
to fix it?
Cheers,
Steve Samson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fellow listers.
We currently have 2 WLM service classes defined for CICS and managed to
transaction-based goals. One is for transactions entered via TOR regions,
classified by SI (Subsystem Instance), i.e. by CICS region. The other
40 matches
Mail list logo
