intended.
But what's about changing the service class manually (with a RESET
command) to BATCHRG, would WLM (or whoever) assign the jobs to the proper
report class?
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Frank,
did you verify your SMPNTS path? Is it really mounted and available?
The return and reason codes point to a file/dir not found.
Werner Kuehnel
Von:Sabo, Frank frank.s...@gianteagle.com
An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Datum: 31.10.2011 15:21
Betreff:SMPE order error
Gesendet
ECA1004E belongs to EMC product HSM Migrator:
ECA1004E Recall of dsn Failed. Return Code: return code.
Regards,
Werner Kuehnel
Von:Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se
An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Datum: 27.10.2011 10:43
Betreff:Which manual for ECA* messages ?
Gesendet von
There is another parm to keep in mind.
In the past we had massive problems with lost TELNET sessions (= hanging
TELNET session). Our hotline had a hard time to drop all the lost sessions
we had.
Then with a z/OS 1.8 enhancement we got relief:
?Telnet will be enhanced to allow a TN3270 server to
:08:19 +0200, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
There is another parm to keep in mind.
In the past we had massive problems with lost TELNET sessions (= hanging
TELNET session). Our hotline had a hard time to drop all the lost
sessions
we had.
Then with a z/OS 1.8 enhancement we
Sergio,
instead of SYSIN just add to your jcl:
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=,DISP=SHR,
//UNIT=3490,LABEL=(,BLP,EXPDT=98000),
//VOL=(,RETAIN,,SER=??)
DSN is unimportant, replace ?? with your VOLSER.
Werner Kuehnel
Von:Sergio Lima sergio...@hotmail.com
and
appreciate any help.
Werner Kuehnel
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Tel: +49.621.457-4885, Fax: -4046
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Tolga,
ISMF DELETE and delete with NSCR results in
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 90 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLFO-54
Thanks,
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist in der Abteilung Betrieb/Support
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Tel
Tolga,
we already tried to rename the dataset, that's how the other 2 datasets
(.IDC and .OLD) were created.
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist in der Abteilung Betrieb/Support
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Tel: +49.621.457-4885, Fax: -4046
David,
VVDSFIX made it. Thanks a lot.
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist in der Abteilung Betrieb/Support
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Tel: +49.621.457-4885, Fax: -4046
E-Mail: werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und
We're running 1.6.1 since a few months without any problems.
Werner Kuehnel
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Tel: +49.621.457-4885, Fax: -4046
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM
Marcel,
we have two separate LPARs and can logon to each SMCS console with the
same UID. There is no restriction.
However, the 2 LPARs have different system names (SYS1, SYS5) and we use
system symbols in SMCS definitions to differentiate between them.
Werner Kuehnel
IMD-Gesellschaft für
Def Act Def Num
IMDMVG 037 NO 2.0
IMDPRO 0 8 NO 2.0
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 03.02.2010
23:33:47:
Greetings again,
I have two LPARs that I'm trying to group softcap to 76 MSU's
Just the small ones of course. The other LPARs belong to other customers.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 04.02.2010
14:37:14:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:49:23 +0100, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
We also have very small LPARs
From my experience I'd avoid to define a uni-processor LPAR. Take at least
2 processors for a LPAR, even the ratio goes over 2.5.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 03.02.2010
18:59:00:
Yes, it is not a good idea to assign all of your CPs (physical
We also have very small LPARs with 42 and 11 MSUs running on a z10 with 16
procs and turned off HIPERDISPATCH, because it didn't us good. Mainly we
saw an increase in IMS resp times when it was turned on.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 03.02.2010
Dave,
I had a similar problem with appl environments which were not defined in
WLM. Since then I'm sensitive to this set of problems.
No, I'm not sure it's TCPIP alone. What I see is that PING times go up
when capping starts and RMF3 shows big (processor)delays for TCPIP.
Werner
Are you
% for TCPIP for processor even under SYSSTC.
Who is using the processor when TCPIP has delays?
Mainly the batch jobs (DISCRETIONARY).
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 02.02.2010
11:01:03:
Actually, at the time of capping (and tcpip NOT running), do you have
service
classes with a PI of less than 3? Less than 1?
There are some SCs with a PI 3. Very rare are PIs 1, and then just for
a minute.
observation. Many STCs are IRLMs for DB2 (probably have a stake in
bad response times) or monitors (which have an ISPF interface and bad
behaviour is covered by bad TSO response times). I'll watch RMF3 next
time.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am
Jim,
we don't have DB2 in SYSSTC, just the IRLMs. Application Server run in an
own SC with a high goal, but still lower than SYSSTC.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
16:18:18:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Werner Kuehnel
We running on z10 with 16 processors (1264 MSUs), however our LPAR just
has 2 logical processors with 40 MSUs.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
17:02:32:
Werner,
I'm curious, how many CPU's?
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, Werner Kuehnel
% for TCPIP for processor even under SYSSTC.
Thanks,
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
service class I can assign, it runs with dispatching
prio of FE. Nevertheless TCPIP is delayed at such a high degree.
Is there anything I can do to improve the performance of TCPIP?
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is not allowed. WLM can not
starve STCs defined in SYSSTC. Why does WLM not cut the processor for the
batch jobs which are defined DISCRETIONARY?
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
14:49:44
The normal delay is under 10%. I can't think of another address space
than TCPIP
to handle the PING. Probably OMPROUTE, but it's also defined as SYSSTC and
is
delayed for a much higher percentage than at normal times.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb
Thanks for your help, Allen, I'll check out the APARs. Turning on offload
I'm a bit hesitant..
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
15:13:33:
Check out the info apars and (very carefully!) check out segmentation
offload. You might want
Jim, while you can assign STCs to SC SYSSTC there is no definition
in WLM and no way to set the CPU critical flag.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
15:29:24:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de
Well, of course I can do that but they always warn to define unachievable
SCs.
Anyway, I'll give it a try.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu schrieb am 29.01.2010
15:51:43:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Werner Kuehnel
werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote
Issue the PTF command in each EJES to see if you're running the same
release / ptf level.
If not then you probably use different security definitions.
Werner
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 12.11.2009
10:45:55:
The only difference I can see between the two EJES
Ich werde ab 27.08.2009 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
15.09.2009.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
files going out directly
to cartridge, because migrating/recalling them would take too much time.
Using this TMM concept saved us to get extra software for tape stacking,
however HSM CPU usage is going up.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 16.06.2009
18:00
Lizette,
we even run DFHSM in STCLOW which is defined with Vel 10, Imp 5. It's far
below online workload and TSO, but above Batch, what is discretionary.
Even in capping periods no problems so far.
Werner
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 11.05.2009
19:00:16:
I
the granularity
is too fine.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 04.03.2009
20:33:50:
Any idea how quickly/frequently the reallocation occurs?
Say L1 and L2 are group capped at 100, and are weighted 90 10
respectively. We are capped and L1 and L2
any help.
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Al and Tom,
thanks for your explanations. That would confirm our observations. I've
collected RMF PM performance data the last weeks in a 2min interval, so
I'm going to verify this with some diagrams.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 26.02.2009
18
No, it doesn't require a logstream. I just use it (on very rare occasions)
with SYS1.LOGREC.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 12.11.2008
13:52:53:
It does require the use of a logstream for logrec recording. I have it
installed but don't use
,SIROTH)
//SMPCNTL DD *
SET BOUNDARY(GLOBAL).
RECEIVE SYSMODS
HOLDDATA
FROMNTS(U00395305)
.
/*
//
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 22.09.2008
14:42:00:
Lizette Koehler wrote:
I think you need to specify
).
Is there any command or way to get this information out of HSM? My search
through the manuals wasn't successful yet.
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
is not normal business, it's just in case of
failure.
Werner Kuehnel
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 06:39:18 -0400, Bobbie Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm confused, but why are you varying the units offline or online at all?
In a previous job, we used HSM with IBM 3494 and 3495 tape robots
volser 11
- recycle currently uses volsers 22, 33, 44
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 02.09.2008
12:56:31:
Werner,
It would help to know your issue.
Are you an HSMPLEX, a SYSPLEX a MONOPLEX?
What is your OS? z/OS V1.7
Sam,
thanks for replying. I misunderstood the ALL parameter, you're right that
it still shows the last 16 exceptions. I changed my parmlib member and
added the mentioned date/time to the check, restarted HC and the check
ended with RC0.
Thanks for your help,
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist in der
, that means
it's set to the starttime of HC.
Did I do anything wrong?
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 23.04.2008
14:54:45:
Hi Werner,
This may be dumb questions but if you did not IPL did you follow exactly
the steps outlined in the APAR to activate
Hi Sam,
thanks for pointing me to APAR OA22255. I've just installed it,
unfortunately there is no change in behaviour for this check.
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 22.04.2008
12:49:43:
Hi, Dave Danner has posted about this before... Search
yesterday,
Any idea how to get rid of this exception?
Werner Kuehnel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
and April, 21.
Werner Kuehnel
The message talks about the *staging* data sets, not about the offload
data sets. Are the former of reasonable size?
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
v=1234567/
var id=KNAME v=KNAME/
var id=KSTRASSE v=KSTRASSE/
var id=KSTRASSE2 v=KSTRASSE2/
var id=KORT v=KORT/
var id=KPLZ v=KPLZ/
/dataApp
Does anyone know the COBOL field structure to get the lines var
id=... v=.../ ?
Thanks,
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist
=... v=.../ ?
Thanks,
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist in der Abteilung Betrieb/Support
Werner,
You need to be at Enterprise COBOL V4R1; if you have
this version of the compiler, and compile with option
XMLPARSE(XMLSS), you can add the WITH ATTRIBUTES phrase
to your XML GENERATE
takes the SRM constant against the number of
logical processors?
Werner Kuehnel
Spezialist in der Abteilung Betrieb/Support
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Tel: +49.621.457-4885, Fax: -4046
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMD-Gesellschaft für
Jim,
many thanks for the comprehensive reply. Very helpful.
And thanks to all the others who replied.
Werner
IMD-Gesellschaft für Informatik und Datenverarbeitung mbH
Augustaanlage 66
68165 Mannheim
Germany
Tel: +49.621.457-4885, Fax: -4046
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Mainframe Discussion
Watch the wrap, don't forget 0621 at the end of the URL
Werner
Jorge Arueira Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
16.11.2007 12:22
Bitte antworten an
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
An
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Kopie
Thema
Michael,
do you have a dataset with SUBSYS=LAM (CA-LIBRARIAN masterfile) in your
JCL?
Werner Kuehnel
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 23.05.2007
21:03:00:
Good day!
One of our programs written in PL1 recently encountered a S0C7 abend.
In
the course of our
Peter,
great, exactly what I wanted to know ..
Thanks to all which have replied to my question.
Werner
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU schrieb am 31.10.2006
13:26:32:
What is the sense of giving a statement a name when there is a check
name
which is unique?
The
I want to modify attributes of IBM delivered checks during start of HC.
According to the manual I can do it by defining UPDATE statements in the
HZSPRM00 parmlib member:
UPDATE CHECK(IBMCNZ,CNZ_SYSCONS_MASTER)
WTOTYPE=INFORMATIONAL
However during startup of HC it says:
HZS0410I
__
Sam,
thanks for replying. I didn't use the ADDREPLACE because I didn't know
what to specify for STMT.
What is the sense of giving a statement a name when there is a check name
which is unique?
Werner
Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: IBM Mainframe
/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Werner Kuehnel
IMD GmbH (Mannheimer Versicherung)
Mannheim - Germany
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Werner Kuehnel
IMD GmbH (Mannheimer Versicherung)
Mannheim - Germany
/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Werner Kuehnel
IMD GmbH (Mannheimer Versicherung)
Mannheim - Germany
/ signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Werner Kuehnel
IMD GmbH (Mannheimer Versicherung)
Mannheim - Germany
and empty
them by copying the datasets to other ML1 volumes?
Or like DFSMS anything similar to DISABLE NEW?
Any idea how this can be done with least manual effort?
Werner Kuehnel
IMD GmbH (Mannheimer Versicherung)
Mannheim - Germany
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Werner Kuehnel
Sent: 10 June 2005 09:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Decrease ML1-Pool
We've the need to increase for a couple of months the DFHSM ML1 pool by
let's say 100 volumes
61 matches
Mail list logo
