Lizette, we even run DFHSM in STCLOW which is defined with Vel 10, Imp 5. It's far below online workload and TSO, but above Batch, what is discretionary. Even in capping periods no problems so far.
Werner IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> schrieb am 11.05.2009 19:00:16: > I ran into a small issue where when using Interval Migration DFHSM > took all the resources on my small LPAR. Even on my largest LPAR it > still consumes a lot of resources. > > IBM Suggested I set DFHSM to STCMED. My concern is that since we > have a lot of tasks in WLM at SYSSTC (not my choice) that if a > recall or migrate was requested, that DFHSM might be impacted by the > other high runnings tasks. > > Has anyone delt with Interval Migration and controlling it via WLM? > > Does anyone else have DFHSM in STCMED and if so, how is that workingfor DFHSM. > > Lizette > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
