Hi there,
We are currently in the process of looking for a replacemnt of CA-Sysview. At
the moment the suggestion is to replace it by TMON for zOS.
However, we are currently using the API interface of CA-Sysview. Does
anyone know if TMON has a comparable possibility?
Thanks in advance
On 2009-03-09 15:56, Duane Weaver weave.@os...edu wrote Sites
running CA-SYSVIEW release 12. to IBM-Main :
We are having a problem when in CA-SYSVIEW, then entering the ISPF
jump key character '=' (equal sign) in combination with the TSO/ISPF
command separator character ';' (semicolon
We are having a problem when in CA-SYSVIEW, then entering the ISPF
jump key character '=' (equal sign) in combination with the TSO/ISPF
command separator character ';' (semicolon)
example given =ze;2
which results in ISPF going to the primary options
:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Sites running CA-SYSVIEW release 12.
We are having a problem when in CA-SYSVIEW, then entering the ISPF
jump key character '=' (equal sign) in combination with the TSO/ISPF
command separator character ';' (semicolon
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Duane Weaver
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 SYSN 12:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Sites running CA-SYSVIEW release 12.
We are having a problem when in CA-SYSVIEW, then entering the ISPF
jump key character '=' (equal sign) in combination with the TSO/ISPF
- Original Message -
From: Duane Weaver weaver...@osu.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:56 PM
Subject: Sites running CA-SYSVIEW release 12.
We are having a problem when in CA-SYSVIEW, then entering the ISPF jump
key character '=' (equal sign
of the = sign or semicolon in this context).
Adam
We are having a problem when in CA-SYSVIEW, then entering the ISPF
jump key character '=' (equal sign) in combination with the TSO/ISPF
command separator character ';' (semicolon)
example given =ze;2
which
To replace base SYSVIEW I would think you would need at least a general
systems programmer tool kit product like MXI www.rs.com and a capable
spool browser and JES control like IOF, EJES, or SDSF.
Thanks, Sam
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
Yep, at least!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
To replace base SYSVIEW I would think you would
Shane wrote:
Mmmm - sign of the times I'm afraid. At least Norman now (sometimes)
includes his association with the vendor in question.
A question was asked, he responded.
When questions get raised here, sometimes products get dumped on, so
vendors defending/promoting their products also must
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A Refreshing Change (Was: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF)
At 4/24/2008 03:08 AM, Edward Jaffe
At 4/24/2008 09:15 AM, McKown, John wrote:
World Class? Is that __all__?? From the users, it sounds more like at
least Solar class! Maybe even Globular cluster or Galaxy class.
Hyper-instellar subspace class? Multiverse class? For the esoteric:
Brane-class.
It takes a real brain to understand
BAN!
;-)
David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/24/2008 8:56 AM
z/XDC is a SUPERIOR WORLD CLASS(!) Assembler Debugging Tool!
[sorry, i just couldn't resist]
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cole Software WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com
736 Fox Hollow RoadVOICE:
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
No, actually they do. You can get the JES2 features of Sysview that
allow you to manipulate the JES like SDSF. I prefer SDSF, but one of the
place I am now uses it extensively. Fortunately they also have SDSF so I
was not forced to use
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
Perhaps I mis-worded my reply.
While SYSVIEW can provide the informatiion one could derive from SDSF,
SYSVIEW is, in my mind, primalrily a system monitoring tool. If I want to
keep an eye on my system, I turn first
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:19:04 -0700, Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I look at SYSVIEW as a world class monitor, for diagnostics,
problem resolution, and a vehicle for driving automation.
A completely unbiased view no doubt. ;-)
BTW, I do run SYSVIEW here on a
Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz wrote:
SYSVIEW absolutely provides the exact same information and processes that
you use in SDSF today. In fact, SYSVIEW provides more information than
SDSF. You can use the same commands that you use in SDSF, today.
The SPOOL feature is included with the base
Tweeet. Foul.
This was not a simple advertisement.
Questions were raised about the product and its features compared to SDSF. He
is fully justified in responding.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:42:55 -0700 Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz wrote:
: SYSVIEW
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 09:42 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
How refreshing to see that IBM-MAIN has become the new forum for
advertising the merits of one's own world class products. And, why
not? Where else can you get better exposure for the price?
Mmmm - sign of the times I'm afraid. At least
How refreshing to see that IBM-MAIN has become the new forum for
advertising the merits of one's own world class products. And, why
not? Where else can you get better exposure for the price?
The guy was explaining/answering issues/questions about the product.
But, I think he went too far.
Has anyone ever switched their users from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF?
Duane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
] sent:
Has anyone ever switched their users from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF?
Duane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
snip
SYSVIEW provides internal, control-block structure information (at a
minimum) while SDSF (Spool Display and Search Facility) provides
information about Jobs in the JES queue.
snip
I'd look at EJES if I was going to switch over. From the above comment
SYSVIEW can be done by EJES and it is
Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/21/2008 03:09 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
Ah... These two products do not provide the same informaiton.
SYSVIEW provides internal
in the JES queue.
On Mon Apr 21 14:39 , Duane Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Has anyone ever switched their users from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF?
Duane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
No, actually they do. You can get the JES2 features of Sysview that
allow you to manipulate the JES like SDSF. I prefer SDSF, but one of the
place I am now uses it extensively. Fortunately they also have SDSF so I
was not forced to use Sysview, but I have learned a bit about it, and
can use it
Of Doug Fuerst
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 SYSN 03:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
No, actually they do. You can get the JES2 features of Sysview that
allow you to manipulate the JES like SDSF. I prefer SDSF, but one of the
place I am now uses
What was SYSVIEWs name before CA bought it?
George Fogg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
What was SYSVIEWs name before CA bought it?
George Fogg
SYSVIEW.
It was part of OPS/MVS. I can't remember the vendor.
The new name is CA-SYSVIEW.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
NO- it was never part of OPS/MVS. But we do have tight integration
with it. CA SYSVIEW has come a long way from its original incarnation
from Legent days.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted
MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, April 21
NO- it was never part of OPS/MVS. But we do have tight integration with it.
CA SYSVIEW has come a long way from its original incarnation from Legent days.
Ok.
I don't understand.
We had OPS/MVS and SYSVIEW at a site, long before CA bought it.
I was always able to get into it through the OPS
from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
NO- it was never part of OPS/MVS. But we do have tight integration with it.
CA SYSVIEW has come a long way from its original incarnation from Legent days.
Ok.
I don't understand.
We had OPS/MVS and SYSVIEW at a site, long before CA bought it.
I was always able to get
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Norman Hollander on h-WiZ.biz
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
You can absolutely get data from SYSVIEW from OPS/MVS
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: 22 April 2008 05:14
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: switch from CA-SYSVIEW to SDSF
Norman,
What I think Ted is referring to is that way back when OPS/MVS was still owned
by Goal Systems, before Goal merged with Legent, OPS had
Are you saying that CA-Sysview can replace MQ on z/OS?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
Thanks, Dave. There are many ood features slated for the next release.
Happy to share offline, with anyone who may have interest.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Barry
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA-SYSVIEW
I'm hearing good feedback at supported clients, where a CA SYSVIEW
component is involved in a competitive replacement opportunity
(overtaking
another
I am researching a product called CA-SYSVIEW. Can anyone offer any
opinions on this product? I did notice that Pat O'Keefe seems to like
it. Anyone else?
Thanks in advance,
Janet (Jill) Grine
--
For IBM-MAIN
I use it and it's not bad... Beyond that, we would need to get into
specifics.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Grine, Janet [GCG-PFS]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA-SYSVIEW
I am
Subject: CA-SYSVIEW
I am researching a product called CA-SYSVIEW. Can anyone offer any
opinions on this product? I did notice that Pat O'Keefe seems to like
it. Anyone else?
Thanks in advance,
Janet (Jill) Grine
I am the Product Manager for CA SYSVIEW, so I'd be happy to offer
any information you'd like- including what it can do now, and the
futures roadmap. You can contact me offlist at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are at SHARE next week, stop by
our booth for a personal demo
I thought that CA staff and management are no longer permitted to discuss
product futures. At last CA World, each CA-presented session had not one
but two DISCLAIMER foils
Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc.
--
For IBM-MAIN
in a next release. But I am happy to
discus the Roadmap for SYSVIEW, and where I see the product going.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Barry
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 SYSN 05:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA
I'm hearing good feedback at supported clients, where a CA SYSVIEW
component is involved in a competitive replacement opportunity (overtaking
another vendor's software product), most recently with MQ on z/OS.
Sincerely,
Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc
I would like to reach anyone who is running CA-SYSVIEW and also
running Chicagosoft's QUICKREF.
IF this applies to you, would you please contact me directly off the
list at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Duane
--
For IBM-MAIN
CA runs Quickref with Sysview on all of its systems.
Do you have a specific question? Or you can contact
Support for Questions/Errors/How-to help.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
46 matches
Mail list logo
