W dniu 2010-03-12 17:25, Ron Hawkins pisze:
I'd say it's more like 50% based on shops I've visited over the years.
It's exactly 0% of the shops I've visited over the years.
(honestly, in one case I'm not sure)
A conslusion is a proverb: Mine and my brother-in-law's opinion does
not
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] CA Easytrieve replacement
W dniu 2010-03-12 17:25, Ron Hawkins pisze:
I'd say it's more like 50% based on shops I've visited over the years.
It's exactly 0% of the shops I've visited over the years.
(honestly, in one case I'm not sure)
A conslusion is a proverb
On 11 Mar 2010 10:37:24 -0800, sredst...@googlemail.com (simone
redstock) wrote:
Most mainframe shops own File/AID. This has both an online and batch element
to it. File/AID batch is very powerful and we have replaced many of our
Easytrieve jobs with it. It performs better (less CPU) and is far
On 11 Mar 2010 14:44:31 -0800, wgshi...@benekeith.com (Greg Shirey)
wrote:
Most mainframe shops own File/AID??? I didn't know that, but I do know
mine does not.
Mine doesn't. Which could explain why I don't remember it having
Easytrieve type reporting capabilities, those could be new.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:11:11 -0600, Paul Peplinski
paul.peplin...@wpsic.com wrote:
There is one product (IBM Migration Utility) that claims to support EZT,
meaning it can convert EZT to COBOL on the fly and you can continue to
code
using EZT syntax if you wish.
IBM was reselling Foundation's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
On 11 Mar 2010 14:44:31 -0800, wgshi...@benekeith.com (Greg Shirey
I am not very familiar with EasyTrieve (we have it). ICETOOL has some
nice reporting tools in it also. What would be really nice would be a way
to process a COBOL copybook to create ICETOOL symbols.
John McKown
COBDFSYM, from the Tools Tricks page???
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:10:18 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
I am not very familiar with EasyTrieve (we have it). ICETOOL has some nice
reporting tools in it also. What would be really nice would be a way to process
a COBOL copybook to create ICETOOL symbols.
I'd say it's more like 50% based on shops I've visited over the years.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 6:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] CA Easytrieve
John McKown wrote on 03/12/2010 07:10:18 AM:
I am not very familiar with EasyTrieve (we have it). ICETOOL has
some nice reporting tools in it also. What would be really nice
would be a way to process a COBOL copybook to create ICETOOL symbols.
John,
See the Create DFSORT Symbols from COBOL
Most mainframe shops own File/AID. This has both an online and batch element
to it. File/AID batch is very powerful and we have replaced many of our
Easytrieve jobs with it. It performs better (less CPU) and is far easier to
maintain. even some of our junior team members are proficient in File/AID
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:26:44 +, simone redstock
sredst...@googlemail.com wrote:
Most mainframe shops own File/AID. This has both an online and batch element
to it. File/AID batch is very powerful and we have replaced many of our
Easytrieve jobs with it. It performs better (less CPU) and is
i guess it depends why you are wanting to replace CA-Easytrieve
money?
functionality?
ease of use?
support?
at many shops at which I have pretented to work, I have used a product
once called QUIKJOB - now called Advantageā¼§ VISION:Report
yes it is another CA product - but it is the most
Most mainframe shops own File/AID??? I didn't know that, but I do know
mine does not.
As much as our Compuware reps (who I like and respect) would like to
have us replace Easytrieve with File/Aid, the programmers here who have
worked with both report that it is *not* a no-brainer, for many of
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve at their shop and is willing to
share details about what product was chosen and how the replacement
performs in comparison to Easytrieve, I'd be very interested in hearing
about it.
Please contact me off-line.
TIA,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Greg Shirey
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA Easytrieve replacement
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve at their shop and is willing to share
details about what product was chosen and how
you recall the product ibm had??
From:
Edgington, Gerald gerald.edging...@libertymutual.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
02/16/2010 10:36 AM
Subject:
Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
There is/was an IBM tool, which was suppose
Subject:
Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
There is/was an IBM tool, which was suppose to replace Easytrieve. The
IBM product basically converts to the Easytrieve to Cobol, but without
regards to performance or maintainability. Our
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve at their shop and is willing to share
details about what product was chosen and how the replacement performs in
comparison to Easytrieve, I'd be very interested in hearing about it.
I did it once, many aeons ago.
CA didn't own EZTREV, then.
We replaced it
16, 2010 10:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
you recall the product ibm had??
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA Easytrieve replacement
If anyone has replaced CA-Easytrieve
I believe there should be careful consideration when replacing products. Basic
cost is one, but there are others.
Are you looking for something that can read Easytrieve and not require a
conversion?
Are you going to provide training to those that are currently using Easytrieve
but will need
From: Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 11:24:36 AM
Subject: Re: CA Easytrieve replacement
IBM resell (under OEM) PengiEzt the foundation Software. The product has two
modes of operation: One time conversion
Lizette,
I appreciate your response, but we do not have a specific requirement. We are
simply exploring options. I was not trying to suggest that we are dissatisfied
or are trying to lower costs, though I realize these are the obvious reasons
for someone asking a question such as mine.
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:08 -0500, Knutson, Sam wrote:
You might also join and post your question in the IBM ISVCOSTS forum. It
is a forum provided by IBM for candid discussion of vendor products and
excludes ISV representatives.
I'll add that ISVCOSTS isn't really a technical forum. (There
25 matches
Mail list logo
