Re: CSA page tables

2006-01-03 Thread David Cole
Thanks, Jim. That answers my question rather completely. [:)] Dave (I know what I need to do to fix this. I'm just curious about what good reason IBM might or might not have for doing this.) (1) Pageable common storage (pageable CSA and DREF SQA) can exist in the same segment as fixed

CSA page tables

2006-01-02 Thread David Cole
Hi All, I have just discovered that for extended CSA, page tables exist for all storage within the CSA, even for whole segments (mega-byte chunks) that are in unallocated storage. In other words, for CSA storage, even when every page within a segment's page table is flagged as being invalid

Re: CSA page tables

2006-01-02 Thread Bruno Sugliani
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:37:09 -0500, David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I know what I need to do to fix this. I'm just curious about what good reason IBM might or might not have for doing this.) RSU ? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: CSA page tables

2006-01-02 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 01/02/2006 03:37:09 PM: I have just discovered that for extended CSA, page tables exist for all storage within the CSA, even for whole segments (mega-byte chunks) that are in unallocated storage. In other words, for CSA storage