Shane wrote on 07/09/2006 12:32:46 +1000
As a general statement, if the structure owner chooses to use async rather
than sync, why would you care ???.
If none are actually being converted, pat yourself on the back for a job
well done, and go find a real problem to worry about.
Don't be so quick
Your comments are exactly what I am searching for. Shane asked 'why
wwould I be concerned' and the answer is that the Async requests to the
DB2 lock structure seem to happen around the times of application timeouts.
I do hope that others, including IBM'ers, will join in with their comments
Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: DB2 CF Lock Structure DSNDP3G_LOCK1 Performance
Your comments are exactly what I am searching for. Shane asked 'why
wwould I be concerned' and the answer is that the Async requests to the
DB2 lock
Under what conditions might there be Async requests for this DB2 lock
structure?
The RMF 'Sync changed to Async' value is 0 during the intervals containing
Async requests 0.
The Async requests occur infrequently but I'm wondering if they might cause
sync requests to suffer, or might be the
Neil wrote on 07/09/2006 08:37:16 AM:
Under what conditions might there be Async requests for this DB2
lock structure?
The RMF 'Sync changed to Async' value is 0 during the intervals
containing Async requests 0.
The Async requests occur infrequently but I'm wondering if they
might cause
5 matches
Mail list logo
