A nonvolatile CF will be given preference over a volatile CF by more than
just the DB2 structures. It dates back to when you had stand alone CFs
with built-in battery backups. Because most people do use UPS and the fact
that the built in battery would not last nearly as long as your UPS power
Your bible for CF's and Sysplexes always was, is and will be: SA22-7625,
Setting up a Sysplex.
Ch 4.2.2.6 Determining the Amount of Coupling Facility Dump Space, says:
IBM recommends that you specify 5% of the available storage in a
coupling facility for dump space.
Kees.
munif sadek [EMAIL
. - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DUMPSPACE in Coupling Facility
Your bible for CF's and Sysplexes always was, is and will be: SA22-7625,
Setting up a Sysplex.
Ch 4.2.2.6 Determining the Amount of Coupling Facility Dump Space, says:
IBM
In addition to Sam's question regarding DUMPSPACE, I have a question as
well. What about VOLATILE? Years ago, ours were set to NO. Is this wrong?
Brian
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:29:46 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will make a true confession... I bet that gets caught by net
The use of Volatile really (in my opinion) deals more with DB2 Data Sharing
than anything else. If you set the CF to Volatile YES - the DB2 Data Sharing
Regions put out a message
DSN7507I :DSNQ DSN7LSTK 737
SCA STRUCTURE DSNSB0Q_SCA IS ALLOCATED IN A
I have been asked to increase DUMPSAPCE in our coupling facility (% Storage
allocation vise - existing dumpspace is 1% of coupling facility total
space), although we have not seen any problems. Is there any IBM
recommedation / ROTs.
regards, munif..
6 matches
Mail list logo
