Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-26 Thread Dave Quinton
, Dave Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 1:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Dataclas won't directly affect volume choice. What do your STORCLAS and STORGRP routines do with such allocations? Dave Gibney Information Technology Services Washington State University

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-26 Thread Lester, Bob
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 9:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) I just read that in detail again. The automount lead me

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-26 Thread Neil Duffee
On 2009-05-22 at 16:15, concerning Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC), Bob Lester bles...@oppcom wrote to IBM-Main: We have an ftp batch job that reaches down to a squatty box and pulls some data. The LOCSITE parms are: LOCSITE LRECL=8996 BLKSIZE=9000 RECFM=VBA + unit=sysda

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-23 Thread Lester, Bob
= in the FTP client as well. Thanks! BobL -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Greg Shirey Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 3:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) I believe this is one the situations

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-23 Thread Ted MacNEIL
No joy, I'm afraid. Set it up as documented, but get the same error. I think I'm getting bit by this statement in the doc. I haven't really been following this thread, so please forgive me as I ask for clarification. Are you saying that if an FTP outfile is allocated, under z/OS, that DFSMS

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-23 Thread Lester, Bob
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) No joy, I'm afraid. Set it up as documented, but get the same error

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-23 Thread Gibney, Dave
-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lester, Bob Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 7:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Saturday, May 23

FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Lester, Bob
Hi Folks, I'm in the middle of an SMS conversion at z/OS 1.9. We have an ftp batch job that reaches down to a squatty box and pulls some data. The LOCSITE parms are: LOCSITE LRECL=8996 BLKSIZE=9000 RECFM=VBA + unit=sysda volume=SYST01 cyl pri=20 sec=30

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Roach, Dennis (N-GHG)
and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Hi Folks, I'm in the middle of an SMS conversion at z/OS 1.9. We have an ftp batch job that reaches down to a squatty box and pulls some data. The LOCSITE parms are: LOCSITE LRECL=8996 BLKSIZE=9000 RECFM=VBA + unit=sysda

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Lester, Bob
List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 1:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Does a catalog entry for PFDT.TSREL.OPPLZDCK.PULLOUT.SUN already exist for SYST01? Dennis Roach GHG Corporation

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Roach, Dennis (N-GHG)
: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Hi Dennis, Nope, I checked that. It appears that the volume specified on the LOCSITE VOL= parameter must exist? It can't be redirected? Can you confirm? (Or am I doing something stupid?). Thanks for the reply. Thanks! BobL -Original

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Gibney, Dave
Of Lester, Bob Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Hi Dennis, Nope, I checked that. It appears that the volume specified on the LOCSITE VOL= parameter must exist? It can't be redirected? Can you confirm? (Or am I doing

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Dave Quinton
Of Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 1:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Does a catalog entry for PFDT.TSREL.OPPLZDCK.PULLOUT.SUN already exist for SYST01? Dennis Roach GHG Corporation

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Lester, Bob
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Since you are relying on SMS to select the volume, take it out of the locsite statement. -- This e-mail transmission may contain information

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Lester, Bob
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 1:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Dataclas won't directly affect volume choice. What do

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Gibney, Dave
, Bob Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 2:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) Hi Dave, Data is pulled via ftp in batch to new DSN: PFDT.TSREL.OPPLZDCK.PULLOUT.SUN, which matches this DC FILTLIST pattern: SYST_NEWINCLUDE ( PFDT

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Lester, Bob
Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) My best guess is that there is a condition earlier in one or more of the routines that is satisfied first. I decided I wanted to know what my routines were doing. On entry, I write out a routine identifier and the more important read only

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Greg Shirey
storage groups allow existing JCL to function without having to be changed. HTH, Greg -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lester, Bob Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS

Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)

2009-05-22 Thread Lester, Bob
@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC) I believe this is one the situations where a dummy storage group would be useful. I couldn't find an example in the Implementing System-Managed Storage manual, but found the definition: A type of storage group that contains the serial numbers